Topic Highlight
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2016; 22(26): 5950-5957
Published online Jul 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i26.5950
Table 2 Characteristics of observational studies evaluating selective intestinal decontamination in liver transplant
Ref.Type of studySID regimenOther antibioticsPatients (n)
Patients with infection, n (%)
Period of observation posttransplantation (d)
SIDControlSIDControl
Gorensek et al[47], 1993Prospective nonrandomized study with historical controlNorfloxacin and nistatin. Oropharyngeal paste (polymyxin, gentamicin, nystatin)Metronidazole and Third-generation cephalosporins for 5 d17341 (5.9)118 (52.9)130
San-Juan et al[54], 2011Prospective cohort studyFluoroquinolones (norfloxacin or ciprofloxacin) 7 dFirst- or second- or third generation cephalosporins, or antipseudomonal beta-lactams or glycopeptides415595110 (26.5)156 (26.21)30
Sun et al[49], 2012Retrospective uncontrolled studyRifaximinCefotaxime and ampicillin for 24 h30807 (23.3)23 (28.7)90
Katchman et al[55], 2014Retrospective cohort studyColitin, gentamicin and nystatinCefazolin and metronidazole for 4 d1113747 (42.7)18 (46.8)30