©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2016; 22(23): 5415-5421
Published online Jun 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i23.5415
Published online Jun 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i23.5415
Table 3 Changes of the flora after treatment with E. coli Nissle n (%)
| Experimental | Control | |||
| arm (n = 37) | arm (n = 20) | |||
| Microflora | Before | After | Before | After |
| characteristics | treatment | treatment | treatment | treatment |
| Bifidobacteria | ||||
| > 107 CFU/g | 5 (14) | 29 (79)b | 3 (15) | 3 (15) |
| Normal | ||||
| < 107 CFU/g | 26 (70) | 7 (19)b | 15 (75) | 14 (70) |
| Below normal | ||||
| absent | 6 (16) | 1 (2)b | 2 (10) | 3 (15) |
| Lactobacteria | ||||
| > 107 CFU/g | 3 (8) | 23 (63)b | 3 (15) | 2 (10) |
| Normal | ||||
| < 107 CFU/g | 27 (73) | 13 (35)b | 15 (75) | 15 (75) |
| Below normal | ||||
| absent | 7 (19) | 1 ( 2)b | 2 (10) | 3 (15) |
| Pathogenic | ||||
| microflora | 27 (73) | 5 (14)b | 16 (80) | 14 (70) |
- Citation: Manzhalii E, Hornuss D, Stremmel W. Intestinal-borne dermatoses significantly improved by oral application of Escherichia coli Nissle 1917. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(23): 5415-5421
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i23/5415.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i23.5415