Clinical comparison of antrum-preserving double tract reconstruction vs roux-en-Y reconstruction after gastrectomy for Siewert types II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

Table 1 Pathological characteristics of the antrum-preserving double-tract reconstruction group and the Roux-en-Y reconstruction group

Pathologic characteristic	ADTR (n = 18)	RY (n = 37)	P value
Sex ratio (Male:Female)	17:1	31:6	0.406
Age (yr)	61.94 ± 6.41	62.08 ± 7.98	0.950
BMI (kg/m2)	21.50 ± 2.61	20.98 ± 2.66	0.683
Siewert type			0.497
II	7	11
III	11	26
pT status			0.744
T1a	0	0
T1b	3	3
T2	1	4
T3	2	5
T4a	12	25
Lymph node metastasis			0.709
pN0	6	8
pN1	4	9
pN2	7	15
pN3a	1	5
pN3b	0	0
Tumor TNM stage			0.002
Ia	3	0
Ib	2	0
IIa	1	4
IIb	1	6
IIIa	3	3
IIIb	7	7
IIIc	1	17
Histological type			0.002
Well differentiated	3	16
Moderately differentiated	11	13
Poorly differentiated	4	8

ADTR: Antrum-preserving double-tract reconstruction; RY: Antrum-preserving double-tract reconstruction; TNM: Tumor-node-metastasis.