Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2015; 21(30): 9189-9208
Published online Aug 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9189
Table 3 Controlled clinical trials for antioxidant management to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis
Ref.Drug/supplementsStudy designJadad scorenTreatment (intervention)
Outcome (results)
Adverse effects/eventsOther comments
CaseControlPrimaryOther
Abbasinazari et al[40], 2011AllopurinolRandomized double blind clinical trial37429 patients;45 patients; no medicationRate of PEP1(11.5% vs 12.5%)Serum amylase activity1--
Martinez-Torres et al[41], 2009AllopurinolRandomized; double-blind; placebo-controlled517085 patients; 300 mg oral allopurinol 15 h and 3 h before ERCP85 patients; placeboRate of PEP ↓ (2.3% vs 9.4%)Serum amylase activity ↓-21.7% absolute benefit in patients with high-risk procedures favoring allopurinol, no difference in low-risk procedures
Kapetanos et al[42], 2009PentoxifyllineRandomized;2590205 patients; 400 mg oral Pentoxifylline, 40 h, 32 h, 24 h, 16 h and 8 h before ERCP (total dose 2 g)205 patients; no medicationRate of PEP1(7.3% vs 2.9%)TNF-α1IL-61--
Octreotide180 patients; 0.5 mg subcutaneous octreotide, 64 h, 56 h, 48 h, 40 h, 32 h, 24 h, 16 h and 8 h before ERCP (total dose 4 mg)205 patients; no medicationRate of PEP1(5% vs 2.9%)TNF-α↓IL-61
Romagnuolo et al[43], 2008AllopurinolRandomized; double blind; placebo- controlled4586293 patients; 300 mg oral allopurinol 60 min before ERCP293 patients; placeboRate of PEP1(5.5% vs 4.1%)Disease-related adverse events1Procedure-related complications1Hospitalization1-In the non–high-risk group (n = 520), the crude PEP rates were 5.4% for allopurinol and 1.5% for placebo (P = 0.017), favoring placebo, indicating harm associated with allopurinol, whereas in the high-risk group (n = 66), the PEP rates were 6.3% for allopurinol and 23.5% for placebo (P = 0.050), favoring allopurinol
Kapetanos et al[44], 2007PentoxifyllineRandomized;2320158 patients; 400 mg oral pentoxifylline, 40 h, 32 h, 24 h, 16 h and 8 h before ERCP (total dose 2 g)162 patients; no medicationRate of PEP1(5.6% vs 3%)Hemorrhage1Serum amylase activity1Nausea and vomiting in 10% of the patients who received the drug-
Milewski et al[45], 2006N-acetylcysteineRandomized; placebo-controlled210655 patients; 600 mg oral N-acetylcysteine 24 h and 12 h before ERCP and 1200 mg IV for 2 d after the ERCP51 patients; isotonic IV saline b.d for 2 d after the ERCPRate of PEP1(7.3% vs 11.8%)Urine amylase activity1Serum amylase activity1--
Katsinelos et al[46], 2005AllopurinolRandomized; double blind; placebo-controlled4250125 patients; 600 mg oral allopurinol 15 and 3 h before ERCP118 patients; placeboRate of PEP ↓(3.2% vs 17.8%)Hospitalization ↓Severity of Pancreatitis ↓--
Katsinelos et al[47], 2005N-acetylcysteineRandomized; double-blind; placebo-controlled3256124 patients; 70 mg/kg 2 h before and 35 mg/kg at 4 h intervals for a total of 24 h after the procedure125 patients; placebo (normal saline solution)Rate of PEP1Hospitalization1-Nausea Skin rash Diarrhea Vomiting2 patients with suspected SOD
Mosler et al[48], 2005AllopurinolRandomized; double blind; placebo- controlled4701355 patients; 600 mg 4 h and 300 mg 1 h oral allopurinol before ERCP346 patients; placeboRate of PEP1(13.0% vs 12.1%)Severity of pancreatitis1-4% absolute benefit in high-risk patients; 4% absolute harm in average risk
Lavy et al[49], 2004Natural β-caroteneRandomized; double-blind; placebo-controlled5321141 patients; 2 g oral β-carotene 12 h before ERCP180 patients; placeboRate of PEP1(10% vs 9.4%)Severe pancreatitis ↓--
Budzyńska et al[50], 2001AllopurinolRandomized; placebo-controlled330099 patients; 200 mg oral Allopurinol 15 h and 3 h before ERCP101 patients; placeboRate of PEP1(12.1% vs 7.9%)Severity of pancreatitis1-3-arm study, with third arm (n = 100) given prednisone