Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2015; 21(25): 7795-7804
Published online Jul 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i25.7795
Table 4 Stratified multivariate analysis
Adjusted variablesAdjusted OR (95%CI)
All cohort (n = 351)Female (n = 185)Male (n = 166)
Age at Thiopurine prescription > 40 (sex-by-age interaction, P = 0.04)2.4 (1.4-4.2)2.8 (1.4-5.6)0.9 (0.4-2.1)
Female vs male (referent)1.2 (0.7-2.0)NANA
Smoking history (current/past)1.5 (0.9-2.5)1.5 (0.8-3.1)1.6 (0.8-3.6)
Pre-thiopurine intestinal resection vs no resection (referent)0.86 (0.43-1.71)0.7 (0.3-1.8)1.0 (0.4-2.8)
L1 vs L2 (referent)1.4 (0.6-3.2)1.2 (0.4-3.6)3.1 (0.9-10.4)
L3 vs L2 (referent)1.5 (0.7-3.0)1.1 (0.4-2.7)2.1 (0.7-6.3)
B2 vs B1 (referent)1 (0.5-2.2)1.0 (0.3-2.8)0.7 (0.2-2.4)
B3 vs B1 (referent)1.1 (0.5-2.5)1.0 (0.3-2.8)0.8 (0.3-2.5)
Pre-thiopurine perianal disease vs no perianal disease (referent)0.7 (0.4-1.3)1.1 (0.5-2.7)0.7 (0.3-1.8)
5-ASA at time of thiopurine vs past or never (referent)0.8 (0.4-1.5)0.7 (0.3-1.8)1.0 (0.4-2.4)
Corticosteroid at diagnosis vs no exposure at diagnosis (referent)0.9 (0.5-1.6)0.7 (0.3-1.5)0.9 (0.4-2.2)
L4 vs L2 (referent)1.8 (0.7-4.3)3.4 (0.9-12.2)0.9 (0.3-3.1)