Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2015; 21(20): 6252-6260
Published online May 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6252
Published online May 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6252
Figure 3 Comparison of measurement error values.
The measurement error values for CE-EUS were significantly lower than those for CT or EUS. |HCT-HPath|, measurement error value for CT; |HEUS-HPath|, measurement error value for EUS; |HCE-EUS-HPath|, measurement error value for CE-EUS. Statistically significant, aP < 0.05, |HCT-HPath| vs |HCE-EUS-HPath|, statistically significant, bP < 0.01, |HEUS-HPath| vs |HCE-EUS-HPath|. CT: Computed tomography; EUS: Endoscopic ultrasonography; CE-EUS: Contrast-enhanced EUS.
- Citation: Harima H, Kaino S, Shinoda S, Kawano M, Suenaga S, Sakaida I. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm using contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(20): 6252-6260
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i20/6252.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6252