Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2015; 21(20): 6252-6260
Published online May 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6252
Table 1 Clinical features of the 35 patients who were monitored
Follow-up cases (n = 35)
Sex, M/F18/17
Mean age ± SD, yr67.9 ± 10.2
Mean follow-up period ± SD, mo27.4 ± 16.7
Cyst size
Initial examination ± SD, mm27.0 ± 11.8
Last examination ± SD, mm30.1 ± 13.1
Changes of the cyst size
No change29
Enlarged (≥ 10 mm)5
Reduced (≥ 10 mm)1
MPD diameter
Initial examination ± SD, mm3.2 ± 1.8
Last examination ± SD, mm3.5 ± 2.2
Changes in MPD diameter
No change26
Enlarged (≥ 1 mm)7
Reduced (≥ 1 mm)2
Appearance of MNs during follow-up period0
Followed up > 12 mo33
Resected after follow-up2
Pathological diagnosis
Low-grade dysplasia0
Intermediate-grade dysplasia0
High-grade dysplasia2
Invasive adenocarcinoma0