Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography: A useful tool in the hands of the hepatobiliary surgeon

doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.609

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 21, Issue 2

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (5308)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-2) series.

Item

Count

PDF

388

WORD

228

HTML

3029

Figures (1-3)

140

Tables (1-2)

117

Sum=3902

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

786

Download

620

Sum=1406

Jan 14, 2015 (publication date) through Apr 25, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (7)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Clinical Trials Study

World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2015; 21(2): 609-615
Published online Jan 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.609

Table 1 Demographic data

Variables	Data
Age (yr)	32 (18-59)
Sex
Male	20 (25)
Female	60 (75)
Bilirubin (mg)	3.8 (0.4-10)
AST (IU)	99 (21-468)
ALT (IU)	93 (24-1000)
CBD diameter (mm)	11 (6-15)
Size of stones in CBD
Mean size (mm)	8 (5-17)

Data are expressed as absolute numbers (percentage) or median (range). CBD: Common bile duct stone.

Citation: El Nakeeb A, Sultan AM, Hamdy E, El Hanafy E, Atef E, Salah T, El Geidie AA, Kandil T, El Shobari M, El Ebidy G. Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography: A useful tool in the hands of the hepatobiliary surgeon. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(2): 609-615
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i2/609.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.609