©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2015; 21(2): 423-431
Published online Jan 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.423
Published online Jan 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.423
Table 2 Middle rectal cancer data
| Age (yr) | Sex | CCRT | CM | R | L | Pre OP TS | TNM | O/L/R | OP | Post OP TS | TNM |
| 64 | F | N | 7.0 | Rb | 2 | II | T3N0 | O | LAR | II | PT3N0 |
| 68 | F | N | 7.0 | Rb | 2 | III | T3N+ | O | LAR | II | PT3N0 |
| 50 | M | Y | 7.2 | Rb | 2 | III | T3N+ | L | LAR | III | YPT3N2 |
| 85 | M | Y | 7.8 | Rb | 2 | III | T3N+ | R | LAR | III | YPT3N1 |
| 66 | M | N | 8.0 | Rb | 2 | III | T3N+ | O | LAR | III | PT3N1 |
| 73 | M | N | 8.0 | Rb | 2 | III | T3N+ | L | LAR | III | PT3N1 |
| 49 | M | Y | 8.5 | Rb | 2 | III | T3N+ | R | LAR | 0 | YPT0N0 |
| 58 | M | Y | 8.8 | Rb | 2 | III | T3N0 | L | LAR | II | YPT3N0 |
| 78 | M | N | 9.0 | Rb | 2 | II | T3N0 | L | LAR | III | PT4N1 |
| 52 | F | N | 9.3 | Rb | 2 | III | T3N+ | R | LAR | III | PT3N2 |
| 61 | F | Y | 9.5 | Rb | 2 | II | T3N0 | L | LAR | III | YPT3N1 |
| 73 | F | Y | 9.5 | Rb | 2 | III | T3N+ | R | LAR | II | YPT3N0 |
| 48 | M | Y | 10.0 | Rb | 2 | I | T2N0 | R | LAR | I | YPT2N0 |
| 74 | F | Y | 10.0 | Rb | 2 | III | T2N+ | R | LAR | II | YPT3N0 |
| 47 | F | N | 10.0 | Rb | 2 | III | T3N+ | O | LAR | III | PT3N2 |
| 82 | M | N | 10.0 | Rb | 2 | II | T3N0 | L | LAR | II | PT3N0 |
- Citation: Alasari S, Lim D, Kim NK. Magnetic resonance imaging based rectal cancer classification: Landmarks and technical standardization. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(2): 423-431
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i2/423.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.423