©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2014; 20(46): 17507-17515
Published online Dec 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17507
Published online Dec 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17507
Table 3 Participants (n = 23) patient safety attitudes pre and post training on a 5-point Likert scale (1: strongly disagree, 5: strongly agree)
| Patient safety attitude | Pre-course mean ± SD | Post-course mean ± SD | P value |
| A. Perceived patient safety knowledge | |||
| Different types of medical error | 3.3 ± 1.2 | 4.2 ± 0.6 | < 0.001 |
| Factors contributing to error | 3.5 ± 1.0 | 4.5 ± 0.5 | < 0.001 |
| Factors influencing patient safety | 4.0 ± 1.0 | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 0.04 |
| Ways of speaking up about error | 3.5 ± 1.1 | 4.3 ± 0.6 | 0.009 |
| What should happen if an error occurs | 3.6 ± 1.2 | 4.3 ± 0.7 | 0.01 |
| How to report an error1 | 3.8 ± 1.3 | 4.3 ± 0.7 | 0.11 |
| B. Perceived patient safety awareness | |||
| Able to identify situations leading to error | 3.9 ± 0.6 | 4.3 ± 0.5 | 0.03 |
| Able to take steps to ensure patient safety1 | 4.0 ± 0.5 | 4.1 ± 0.5 | 0.45 |
| Able to investigate errors to prevent re-occurrence | 3.5 ± 0.8 | 4.1 ± 0.6 | 0.006 |
| Understand the role of human factors in error prevention | 4.0 ± 0.8 | 4.5 ± 0.6 | 0.01 |
| Able to see potential for error and rectify it1 | 3.8 ± 0.6 | 4.0 ± 0.6 | 0.09 |
| Understand factors resulting in wrong site procedure | 3.8 ± 0.8 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | < 0.001 |
| Able to prevent wrong site procedures | 4.0 ± 0.7 | 4.5 ± 0.6 | 0.004 |
| Understand factors behind drug errors | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 4.4 ± 0.6 | 0.004 |
| Able to prevent drug errors | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 4.4 ± 0.6 | 0.002 |
| C. Perceived influence on patient safety | |||
| Easier to find someone to blame following an error | 2.5 ± 1.2 | 2.4 ± 1.0 | 0.79 |
| Confident addressing a colleague disregarding patient safety | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 4.3 ± 0.6 | 0.07 |
| Able to talk to a colleague who has made an error1 | 3.7 ± 0.7 | 4.0 ± 0.7 | 0.06 |
| Able to ensure safety is not compromised | 3.5 ± 0.8 | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 0.10 |
| Incident forms improve patient safety | 4.0 ± 1.0 | 4.0 ± 0.8 | 0.59 |
| Able to talk about my own errors | 4.1 ± 0.5 | 4.3 ± 0.5 | 0.16 |
| D. Attitudes towards error management | |||
| Identifying incident causation contributes to patient safety | 4.3 ± 0.6 | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 0.13 |
| Learning from my mistakes will prevent medical error | 4.2 ± 0.8 | 4.4 ± 0.6 | 0.45 |
| Dealing with errors is an important part of my job | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 1.00 |
| Able to challenge practices that compromise patient safety | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 4.6 ± 0.6 | 0.65 |
| It is acceptable to be honest about mistakes in my work-place | 4.5 ± 0.6 | 4.4 ± 0.6 | 0.48 |
| Admitting error would lead to fair treatment by management | 4.0 ± 0.7 | 4.1 ± 0.6 | 0.32 |
| E. Error management actions | |||
| I report errors in my workplace | 4.4 ± 0.7 | 4.5 ± 0.6 | 0.76 |
| I challenge patient safety complacency | 4.2 ± 0.7 | 4.4 ± 0.5 | 0.24 |
| I communicate safety expectations to my team | 4.3 ± 0.6 | 4.4 ± 0.5 | 0.39 |
| I support team members involved in an incident | 4.5 ± 0.6 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 0.10 |
| I inform colleagues about errors they make | 4.2 ± 0.6 | 4.1 ± 0.6 | 0.71 |
| I intervene if a patient is exposed to harm | 4.4 ± 0.7 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 0.23 |
| I actively learn from others’ mistakes | 4.4 ± 0.6 | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 0.41 |
| F. Personal views following an error | |||
| Following an error I would feel afraid | 3.1 ± 0.9 | 3.1 ± 0.8 | 1.00 |
| Following an error I would feel ashamed | 3.6 ± 0.9 | 3.6 ± 1.0 | 1.00 |
| Following an error I would feel guilty | 4.1 ± 0.7 | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 0.15 |
| Following an error I would feel upset | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 4.3 ± 0.6 | 0.24 |
| I know whom to inform following an error | 4.4 ± 0.7 | 4.5 ± 0.6 | 0.24 |
| I know whom to escalate a problem to arising during a list | 4.5 ± 0.7 | 4.4 ± 0.7 | 0.56 |
| Able to request a debrief +/- support following a mistake I have made | 4.1 ± 1.1 | 4.2 ± 0.9 | 0.94 |
- Citation: Matharoo M, Haycock A, Sevdalis N, Thomas-Gibson S. Endoscopic non-technical skills team training: The next step in quality assurance of endoscopy training. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(46): 17507-17515
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i46/17507.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17507