Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2014; 20(44): 16480-16488
Published online Nov 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16480
Table 3 Technical and therapeutic differences in continuous high intensity focused ultrasound and pulsed focused ultrasound therapy
US waveUS intensityTreatment sessionChange in US image during procedureTreatment mechanismTreatment useRequired anesthesiaAppearances in follow-up images
Continuous HIFU therapyContinuous5-20kW/cm2One sessionReal-time hyperechoic change in the focus during each shotThermal ablation for coagulation necrosisMonotherapy, used aloneSedation or general anesthesiaNo contrast enhancement in tumor on MRI/CT; negative uptake on PET/CT
Pulsed focused ultrasound therapyPulsed< 3 kW/cm2Multiple sessionsNo real-time US image change during each shotHyperthermia for enhancing sensitive to chemotherapeutic agentsNeed to be combined with chemotherapySedation or noneTumor shrinkage on MRI/CT; negative uptake on PET/CT