©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2014; 20(37): 13325-13342
Published online Oct 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i37.13325
Published online Oct 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i37.13325
Table 1 Statistical methods adopted in the identification of biomarkers for pancreatic cancer
| Type of statistical method | Method adopted |
| Classical mono- and multi-variate methods | Student t-test (parametric) |
| Mann-Whitney U-test (non-parametric) | |
| T2 Hotelling | |
| ANOVA and MANOVA | |
| Bayes factors | |
| Unsupervised pattern recognition methods | Principal Component Analysis |
| Cluster Analysis | |
| Multidimensional Scaling | |
| Supervised classification methods | SIMCA |
| Ranking-PCA | |
| O-PLS | |
| CART | |
| Random Forests | |
| Methods for determining survival outcomes | Kaplan Meyer functions |
| Cox Regression | |
| Other methods | PAM |
| Metropolis algorithm and Monte Carlo simulation |
- Citation: Marengo E, Robotti E. Biomarkers for pancreatic cancer: Recent achievements in proteomics and genomics through classical and multivariate statistical methods. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(37): 13325-13342
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i37/13325.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i37.13325