Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2014; 20(32): 11033-11053
Published online Aug 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11033
Table 2 Comparison of the main characteristics of liver biopsy, serum biomarkers and transient elastography
Liver biopsySerum biomarkersTransient elastography
AdvantagesDirect assessment of liver fibrosisImmediate resultImmediate result
Stage by stage fibrosis classificationFast (one time blood sample)Duration of examination 5 min
Evaluation of coexisting disorders (inflammation, steatosis, iron overload)Patient friendlyOperator and patient friendly
LimitationsComplications (pain, bleeding)Cost (unitary cost per patient for patented tests)Cost (one time per machine)
Sampling error, intra-observer and inter-observer variabilityHigh rates of unclassified patients (APRI, Fib-4, Forns’ index, Lok index)Failure in 5% of cases (25% in obese patients)
Hospitalization (day hospital) often requiredUnreliable results in 15% of cases (obesity, ascites, limited operator experience)
CostLower performance for diagnosis of significant fibrosisLower performance for diagnosis of significant fibrosis
Delayed result (2-4 wk)Unable to discriminate between intermediate stages of fibrosisUnable to discriminate between intermediate stages of fibrosis
ContraindicationsAbsolute: uncooperative patient, severe coagulopathy, extrahepatic biliary obstructionNonePacemaker, pregnancy
Relative: ascites, morbid obesity, possible vascular lesions, amyloidosis
Risk factors for errorBiopsy sample < 2 cm in length, containing < 10 complete portal tracts; inexperienced pathologistAutoimmune thrombocytopenia (APRI); Gilbert’s sydrome, extrahepatic cholestasis, hemolytic anemia (Fibrotest)Transaminases flares; acute viral hepatitis; non-fasting patient; vascular hepatic congestion; extrahepatic cholestasis; IQR ≥ 30%