Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatments: Are we getting evidence based - a systematic review

Table 7 Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of non-peripancreatic and pelvic collections

Ref.	Design	Cases	Technical success	Clinical success	Complications1
Attwell et al[135]	CR	1	100%	100%	None
Giovannini et al[136]	PS	12	100%	75%	25%
Seewald et al[137]	CR	2	100%	100%	None
Seewald et al[138]	CR	1	100%	100%	None
Kahaleh et al[139]	CR	2	100%	100%	None
Lee et al[140]	CR	1	100%	100%	None
Jah et al[141]	CR	1	100%	100%	None
Shami et al[142]	RS	5	100%	100%	None
Ang et al[143]	CR	1	100%	100%	None
Piraka et al[144]	PS	7	100%	100%	28%
Noh et al[145]	PS	3	100%	100%	None
Puri et al[146]	RS	14	100%	93%	None
Itoi et al[147]	CR	1	100%	100%	None
Decker et al[148]	CR	1	100%	100%	None
Gupta et al[149]	RS	20	90%	90%	35%
Ulla-Rocha et al[150]	RS	6	100%	100%	None
Varadarajulu et al[151]	CR	1	100%	100%	None
Knuth et al[152]	CR	1	100%	100%	None
Ramesh et al[153]	RS	38	100%	87%	None
Luigiano et al[154]	CR	2	100%	100%	None
Total	20 studies	120	100% (90%-100%)	100% (75%-100%)	0% (0%-35%)

¹Complications include: early and late, procedural and stent related. PS: Prospective study; RS: Retrospective study; CR: Case report.