Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2014; 20(20): 6092-6101
Published online May 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6092
Table 3 Comparison of treatment efficacy in combination with oxaliplatin
Clinical trialTypeTreatmentORRPFS (mo)OS (mo)
Díaz-Rubio et al[20] (2007)Phase IIIXELOX vs FUOX37% vs 46% (P = 0.154)8.9 vs 9.5 (HR = 1.18, P = 0.153)18.1 vs 20.8 (HR 1.22, P = 0.145)
Cassidy et al[45] (2008)Phase IIIXELOX vs FOLFOX-4+/- Bev47% vs 48% (OR 0.94)8 vs 8.5 (HR = 1.04)119.8 vs 19.6 (HR = 0.99)
Ducreux et al[42] (2011)Phase IIIXELOX vs FOLFOX-642% vs 46%8.8 vs 9.3 (HR = 1)19.9 vs 20.5 (HR = 1.02)
Porschen et al[22] (2007)Phase IIICAPOX vs FUFOX48% vs 54% (P = 0.7)7.1 vs 8.0 (HR = 1.17, P = 0.117)16.8 vs 18.8 (HR = 1.12, P = 0.26)
Comella et al[23] (2009)Phase IIIOXXEL vs OXAFAFU34% vs 33% (P = 0.999)6.6 vs 6.5 (HR = 1.12, P = 0.354)16.0 vs 17.1 (HR = 1.01, P = 0.883)
Hochster et al[25] (2008)Phase IIXELOX vs FOLFOX-6 vs bFOL+ Bev27% vs 41% vs 20%; 46% vs 52% vs 39%5.9 vs 8.7 vs 6.9; 10.3 vs 9.9 vs 8.317.2 vs 19.2 vs 17.9; 24.6 vs 26.1 vs 20.4