BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2014; 20(18): 5527-5532
Published online May 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5527
Table 2 Endoscopy-related outcomes among the groups n (%)
No sedationMidazolamPropofolP value
(n = 35)(n = 35)(n = 33)
Indications0.084
Screening28 (80.0)25 (71.4)17 (51.5)
Epigastric discomfort/pain5 (14.3)6 (17.2)14 (42.6)
Peptic ulcer disease follow-up1 (2.9)1 (2.9)2 (6.0)
Others1 (2.9)3 (8.6)0 (0.0)
Endoscopic findings
Reflux esophagitis4 (11.4)2 (5.7)2 (6.1)0.726
Hiatal hernia0 (0.0)3 (8.6)0 (0.0)0.105
Peptic ulcer disease3 (8.6)2 (5.7)2 (6.1)1.000
Gastric polyp2 (5.7)2 (5.7)1 (3.0)1.000
Neoplasm0 (0.0)2 (5.7)0 (0.0)0.327
Adverse event
Hiccoughing0 (0.0)9 (25.7)3 (90.0)0.002
Hypoxia0 (0.0)0 (0.0)2 (6.1)0.101


Write to the Help Desk