Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2014; 20(16): 4702-4711
Published online Apr 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i16.4702
Published online Apr 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i16.4702
Table 3 Diagnostic accuracy of controlled attenuation parameter and its suggested optimal cut-off values
| Steatosis | AUC (95%CI) | P value | Cut-off (dB/m) | Sensitivity (95%CI), % | Specificity (95%CI), % | PPV (95%CI), % | NPV (95%CI), % |
| S0 vs S1-S3 (≥ 5%) | 0.92 (0.88-0.97) | < 0.001 | 253 | 88.8 (79.9-94.2) | 82.5 (70.5-90.6) | 87.8 (78.8-93.4) | 83.9 (71.9-91.6) |
| S0-S1 vs S2-S3 (≥ 34%) | 0.92 (0.87-0.97) | < 0.000 | 285 | 93.3 (80.7-98.3) | 83.2 (74.4-89.5) | 70.0 (56.6-80.8) | 96.7 (90.1-99.2) |
| S0-S2 vs S3 (≥ 67%) | 0.88 (0.82-0.94) | < 0.001 | 310 | 92.3 (62.1-99.6) | 79.1 (71.3-85.4) | 29.3 (16.6-45.7) | 99.1 (94.4-99.9) |
- Citation: Shen F, Zheng RD, Mi YQ, Wang XY, Pan Q, Chen GY, Cao HX, Chen ML, Xu L, Chen JN, Cao Y, Zhang RN, Xu LM, Fan JG. Controlled attenuation parameter for non-invasive assessment of hepatic steatosis in Chinese patients. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(16): 4702-4711
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i16/4702.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i16.4702