Copyright
©The Author(s) 1996.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 25, 1996; 2(2): 86-88
Published online Jun 25, 1996. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v2.i2.86
Published online Jun 25, 1996. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v2.i2.86
Table 1 Correlation between clinicopathologic factors and microvessel count
| Variables | n | MVC | P value |
| Histologic type | |||
| Differentiated | 50 | 15.7 ± 7.7 | > 0.05 |
| Undifferentiated | 78 | 17.1 ± 9.1 | |
| Serosal inversion | |||
| Negative | 60 | 15.7 ± 7.6 | > 0.05 |
| Positive | 68 | 16.9 ± 9.1 | |
| Growth pattern | |||
| Expanding | 50 | 15.9 ± 7.6 | > 0.05 |
| Infiltrative | 78 | 17.0 ± 9.0 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | |||
| Negative | 50 | 13.8 ± 7.4 | > 0.01 |
| Positive | 78 | 18.3 ± 8.7 |
- Citation: Tao HQ, Qing LF, Lin YZ, Wang RN. Significance of microvessel count in gastric carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 1996; 2(2): 86-88
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v2/i2/86.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v2.i2.86