Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2013; 19(48): 9472-9480
Published online Dec 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9472
Table 2 Summary odds ratios of polymorphisms with irritable bowel syndrome risk
P valueOR (95%CI)I2P heterogeneityBegg’ testEgger test
rs1800870
GG vs AA0.3381.11 (0.89-1.39)0.0%0.9501.0000.694
Caucasian[13,18,20,21]0.2281.19 (0.90-1.58)0.0%0.776
Asian[22-24]0.9631.01 (0.71-1.42)0.0%0.999
GG+GA vs AA0.0180.80 (0.66-0.96)79.4%0.0001.0000.200
Caucasian0.0030.70 (0.55-0.89)88.5%0.000
Asian0.8601.03 (0.74-1.43)0.0%0.990
AA+GA vs GG0.0070.68 (0.52-0.90)0.0%0.5421.0000.899
Caucasian0.0080.69 (0.52-0.91)0.0%0.415
Asian0.4780.31 (0.01-7.76)--
G vs A0.8151.01 (0.90-1.14)0.0%0.7200.7640.773
Caucasian0.7991.02 (0.89-1.16)17.1%0.306
Asian0.9761.00 (0.80-1.2600.0%0.974
rs1800871
AA vs GG0.6980.90 (0.53-1.54)0.0%0.4400.3080.326
Caucasian[18,20]0.2050.56 (0.23-1.37)22.6%0.255
Asian[23,24]0.5301.25 (0.62-2.54)0.0%0.969
AA+GA vs GG0.9690.99 (0.61-1.60)32.4%0.2180.3080.146
Caucasian0.1820.58 (0.26-1.29)0.0%0.365
Asian0.2521.45 (0.77-2.76)0.0%0.364
GG+GA vs AA0.6510.92 (0.64-1.33)0.0%0.7200.7340.080
Caucasian0.9851.00 (0.68-1.49)0.0%0.906
Asian0.2190.54 (0.20-1.45)0.0%0.967
A vs G0.4961.09 (0.85-1.38)0.0%0.8091.0000.924
Caucasian0.9391.01 (0.75-1.37)0.0%0.631
Asian0.3141.23 (0.83-1.82)0.0%0.671
rs1800872
CC vs AA0.9891.00 (0.77-1.19)0.0%0.4560.8060.506
Caucasian[18,20]0.3790.73 (0.37-1.47)41.6%0.191
Asian[23,24,32]0.7301.05 (0.80-1.38)0.0%0.466
CC+CA vs AA0.0281.29 (1.03-1.62)0.0%0.7170.2210.196
Caucasian0.4171.27 (0.71-2.26)0.0%0.573
Asian0.0421.29 (1.01-1.66)0.0%0.410
AA+CA vs CC0.8330.97 (0.72-1.31)60.2%0.0400.8060.384
Caucasian0.5781.13 (0.72-1.71)3.2%0.310
Asian0.3820.82 (0.53-1.27)76.0%0.016
C vs A0.1121.12 (0.97-1.28)0.0%0.8630.0860.266
Caucasian0.6141.12 (0.97-1.28)0.0%0.669
Asian0.1141.14 (0.97-1.33)0.0%0.618