Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2011; 17(28): 3335-3341
Published online Jul 28, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i28.3335
Published online Jul 28, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i28.3335
Table 5 mean values of total fat, visceral fat, and subcutaneous fat among three different groups of hepatic fat infiltration
n | mean ± SD | Minimum | Maximum | |
TF (cm2) | ||||
Normal | 249 | 299.8 ± 133.3 | 68.8 | 869.6 |
Fatty liver | 57 | 409.8 ± 159.3 | 126.6 | 838.0 |
VF (cm2) | ||||
Normal | 249 | 110.1 ± 59.7 | 15.7 | 316.6 |
Fatty liver | 57 | 171.4 ± 79.8 | 46.5 | 377.2 |
SF (cm2) | ||||
Normal | 249 | 189.7 ± 92.8 | 12.9 | 571.3 |
Fatty liver | 57 | 238.4 ± 108.0 | 72.4 | 628.6 |
- Citation: Jang S, Lee CH, Choi KM, Lee J, Choi JW, Kim KA, Park CM. Correlation of fatty liver and abdominal fat distribution using a simple fat computed tomography protocol. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(28): 3335-3341
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i28/3335.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i28.3335