©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2010; 16(28): 3510-3520
Published online Jul 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i28.3510
Published online Jul 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i28.3510
Table 3 Inter-rater reliability for quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies items
| QUADAS item | Agreement (%) | κ |
| Representative spectrum? | 90 | 0.4621 |
| Selection criteria clear? | 81 | 0.6321 |
| Appropriate reference standard? | 100 | 1.0001 |
| Appropriate delay between tests? | 100 | 1.0001 |
| Partial verification avoided? | 95 | -2 |
| Differential verification avoided? | 95 | -2 |
| Incorporation avoided? | 100 | 1.0001 |
| Adequate index test description? | 86 | 0.4681 |
| Adequate reference test description? | 76 | -2 |
| Index test blinded? | 86 | 0.7041 |
| Reference test blinded? | 95 | 0.9011 |
| Relevant clinical information available? | 86 | 0.7121 |
| Uninterpretable results reported? | 29 | 0.022 |
| Withdrawals explained? | 33 | 0.033 |
- Citation: Allan R, Thoirs K, Phillips M. Accuracy of ultrasound to identify chronic liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(28): 3510-3520
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i28/3510.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i28.3510