BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Original Article
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2010; 16(20): 2496-2503
Published online May 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i20.2496
Table 2 Comparison of histopathologic parameters between ITB and CD n (%)
Histologic parametersCases
P value
ITB (n = 52)CD (n = 26)
Size of granuloma0.000
Small (< 200 μm)6 (11.5)13 (50.0)
Medium (200-400 μm)7 (13.5)7 (26.9)
Large (> 400 μm)39 (75.0)5 (19.2)
Granuloma/piece > 1124 (46.2)9 (34.6)0.331
Giant cells25 (45.5)5 (19.2)0.015
Caseation necrosis14 (26.9)0 (0.0)0.003
Confluent granuloma24 (46.2)2 (7.8)0.001
Discrete granuloma30 (57.7)3 (11.5)0.000
Lymphoid cuff31 (59.6)9 (34.6)0.037
Ulcer with histiocytes217 (30.9)3 (11.5)0.056


Write to the Help Desk