Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2008; 14(8): 1231-1236
Published online Feb 28, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.1231
Table 2 Comparison of serological tests with H pylori infection (n = 82)
TestH pylori infection1
Infected (n = 61)Non-infected (n = 21)
n (%)2n (%)2
ELISA
Positive (n = 71)59 (83.0)12 (17.0)
Negative (n = 11)2 (18.2)9 (81.8)
ICT
Positive (n = 59)55 (93.2)4 (6.8)
Negative (n = 23)6 (26.1)17 (73.9)
ICT with CIM
Positive (n = 56)54 (96.4)2 (3.6)
Negative (n = 26)7 (26.9)19 (73.1)
Immunoblot
Positive (n = 64)60 (93.8)4 (6.2)
Negative (n = 18)1 (5.6)17 (94.4)
Immunoblot with CIM
Positive (n = 62)60 (96.8)2 (3.2)
Negative (n = 20)1 (5.0)19 (95.0)