Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2008; 14(36): 5595-5600
Published online Sep 28, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.5595
Table 2 Risk factors of post-ERCP pancreatitis (univariate analysis) n (%)
Risk factorsPancreatitis (+)Pancreatitis (-)POR (95% CI)
(n = 14)(n = 99)
Age (< 50 yr)2 (14)3 (3)0.225.3 (0.81-35)
Female gender8 (57)42 (42)0.451.8 (0.58-5.6)
History of pancreatitis08 (8)0.58-
Normal bilirubin level12 (86)55 (56)0.0634.8 (1.0-23)
Duodenal diverticulum3 (21)29 (29)0.770.66 (0.17-2.5)
Pancreatic duct stenosis07 (7)0.66-
Procedure time > 45 min5 (36)47 (47)0.590.61 (0.19-2.0)
Therapeutic ERCP7 (50)68 (69)0.280.46 (0.15-1.4)
PD opacification14 (100)99 (100)--
No PD stenting11 (79)38 (38)0.0115.9 (1.5-22)
Failure in PD stenting2 (14)3 (3)0.225.3 (0.81-35)
Unsuccessful BD cannulation4 (29)27 (27)0.831.1 (0.31-3.7)
Biliary sphincterotomy3 (21)36 (36)0.420.48 (0.12-1.8)
Precut2 (14)6 (6)0.572.6 (0.47-14)
Intraductal ultrasonography3 (21)22 (22)0.780.95 (0.24-3.7)
Biliary stent placement2 (14)22 (22)0.740.58 (0.12-2.8)
Papillary balloon dilatation1 (7)1 (1)0.587.5 (0.44-128)
Cytology of bile/pancreatic juice1 (7)10 (10)0.890.68 (0.081-5.8)
Biopsy of the BD/PD1 (7)9 (9)0.790.77 (0.090-6.6)
Choledocholithiasis5 (36)37 (37)0.860.93 (0.29-3.0)
Cholecystolithiasis5 (36)21 (21)0.392.1 (0.62-6.8)
Cholangiocarcinoma1 (7)8 (8)0.680.88 (0.10-7.6)
Pancreatic cancer08 (8)0.58-
Chronic pancreatitis05 (5)0.87-
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm1 (7)3 (3)0.992.5 (0.24-25)
Ampullary cancer/adenoma04 (4)0.99-