Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2008; 14(26): 4216-4221
Published online Jul 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4216
Table 2 Multiple stepwise regression analysis with the Cox proportional hazards model (n = 236)
CharacteristicsβWaldPRR95% CI
Result 1
Tumor size8.400.015
3-6 cm vs < 3 cm0.3033.770.0521.3540.997-1.840
> 6 cm vs < 3 cm0.5307.880.0051.6991.174-2.460
pT category37.340.000
T3 vs T20.89913.510.0002.4571.522-3.969
T4 vs T21.49833.550.0004.4712.693-7.420
Number of total LNs-0.04218.560.0000.9590.941-0.977
Number of positive LNs0.09453.050.0001.0981.071-1.126
Result 21
Tumor size8.830.012
3-6 cm vs < 3 cm0.2993.670.0551.3490.993-1.833
> 6 cm vs < 3 cm0.5478.410.0041.7271.194-2.499
pT category37.970.000
T3 vs T20.89913.500.0002.4561.521-3.967
T4 vs T21.50733.960.0004.5112.718-7.488
Number of positive LNs0.05220.200.0001.0531.030-1.077
Number of negative LNs-0.04519.690.0000.9560.938-0.975