Successful outcomes of EMR-L with 3D-EUS for rectal carcinoids compared with historical controls

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 14, Issue 25

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

333

HTML

2819

Figures (1-3)

242

Tables (1-2)

136

Sum=3530

Jul 7, 2008 (publication date) through Jun 17, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Rapid Communication

World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2008; 14(25): 4054-4058
Published online Jul 7, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4054

Table 2 Comparative evaluation and complete resection rate of both groups

	Group A (n = 20)	Group B (n = 14)	P value
Gender (M/F)	11/9	6/8	NS
Age (mean ± SD)	58.7 ± 8.7	57.3 ± 11.3	NS
Location (Rb/Ra)	14/6	11/3	NS
Tumor diameter, mm (mean ± SD)	6.1 ± 2.3	5.9 ± 2.3	NS
Complete resection rate, % (cut edge positive)	100 (0)	71.4 (4)	< 0.05

NS: No statistical significance demonstrated.

Citation: Abe T, Kakemura T, Fujinuma S, Maetani I. Successful outcomes of EMR-L with 3D-EUS for rectal carcinoids compared with historical controls. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(25): 4054-4058
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v14/i25/4054.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.4054