©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2006; 12(45): 7341-7345
Published online Dec 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i45.7341
Published online Dec 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i45.7341
Table 2 Bacterial isolates in patients with splenic abscess
| Microorganism | n | Isolated from | ||
| Pus | Blood | Pus andblood | ||
| Aerobes | ||||
| Gram positive | ||||
| Staphyloccocus aureus (SA) | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| Streptoccocus viridans (SV) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Enterococcus species | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Gram negative | ||||
| Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
| Pseudomonas species | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Escherichia coli (EC) | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Gram positive + Gram negative SA + ECSV + KP | 3 2 | 2 2 | 1 0 | 0 0 |
| Anaerobes Bacteroides fragilis | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Sterile culture | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 19 | 5 | 6 |
- Citation: Zerem E, Bergsland J. Ultrasound guided percutaneous treatment for splenic abscesses: The significance in treatment of critically ill patients. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(45): 7341-7345
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i45/7341.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i45.7341