Basic Research
Copyright ©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2005; 11(22): 3431-3440
Published online Jun 14, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i22.3431
Figure 3
Figure 3 Analysis of liver histopathology and immunohistochemistry in rats induced with CCl4. A: Paraffin/saline; B: CCl4×6 wk; C: CCl4/MSCs; D: CCl4/saline; 1: HE staining, original magnification ×100; 2: MT staining, original magnification ×40; 3: immunohistochemistry for α-SMA, DAB staining, original magnification ×400; E: MT and α-SMA staining was quantified using IBAS 2.5 software. Data represent the fold-increase in positive staining vs paraffin/saline. Values are presented as mean±SD. bP<0.01 vs CCl4/saline. Not significantly different between values of CCl4/saline and CCl4×6 wk.