Clinical Research Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2004. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 1, 2004; 10(3): 410-414
Published online Feb 1, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i3.410
Comparative observation on different intervention procedures in benign stricture of gastrointestinal tract
Ying-Sheng Cheng, Ming-Hua Li, Qi-Xin Zhuang, Ke-Zhong Shang, Department of Radiology, Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200233, China
Wei-Xiong Chen, Ni-Wei Chen, Department of Gastroenterology, Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200233, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by the National Key Medical Research and Development Program of China during the 9th Five-year Plan Period, No.96-907-03-04; Shanghai Nature Science Funds, No.02Z1314073; Shanghai Medical Development Funds, No.00419
Correspondence to: Dr. Ying-Sheng Cheng, Department of Radiology, Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200233, China. chengys@sh163.net
Telephone: +86-21-64368920 Fax: +86-21-64701361
Received: May 15, 2003
Revised: May 25, 2003
Accepted: June 2, 2003
Published online: February 1, 2004

Abstract

AIM: To determine the most effective intervention procedure by evaluation of mid and long-term therapeutic efficacy in patients of stricture of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT).

METHODS: Different intervention procedures were used to treat benign stricture of GIT in 180 patients including pneumatic dilation (group A, n = 80), permanent (group B, n = 25) and temporary (group C, n = 75) placement of expandable metallic stents.

RESULTS: The diameters of the strictured GIT were significantly greater after the treatment of all procedures employed (P < 0.01). For the 80 patients in group A, 160 dilations were performed (mean, 2.0 times per patient). Complications in group A included chest pain (n = 20), reflux (n = 16), and bleeding (n = 6). Dysphagia relapse occurred in 24 (30%) and 48 (60%) patients respectively during 6-and-12 momth follow-up periods in group A. In group B, 25 uncovered or partially covered or antireflux covered expandable metallic stents were placed permantly, complications included chest pain (n = 10), reflux (n = 15), bleeding (n = 3), and stent migration (n = 4), and dysphagia relapse occurred in 5 (20%) and 3 patients (25%) during the 6- and -12 month follow-up periods, respectively. In group C, the partially covered expandable metallic stents were temporarily placed in 75 patients and removed after 3 to 7 days via gastroscope, complications including chest pain (n = 30), reflux (n = 9), and bleeding (n = 12), and dysphagia relapse occurred in 9 (12%) and 8 patients (16%) during the 6-and-12 month follow-up periods, respectively. The placement and withdrawal of stents were all successfully performed. The follow-up of all patients lasted for 6 to 96 months (mean 45.3 ± 18.6 months).

CONCLUSION: The effective procedures for benign GIT stricture are pneumatic dilation and temporary placement of partially-covered expandable metallic stents. Temporary placement of partially-covered expandable metallic stents is one of the best methods for benign GIT strictures in mid and long-term therapeutic efficacy.




INTRODUCTION

Benign stricture of gastrointestinal tract (GIT) is caused by postsurgical anastomoses, ingestion of corrosive agents, simple sclerosis after radiation therapy for tumors, digestive ulcer and functional disturbances, which involve different sites including esophagus, stomach, duodenum, colon and rectum. From July 1994, 180 patients with benign GIT stricture were treated with intervention procedures. Our experiences and follow-up data are reported herein.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials

Our cohort comprised 180 patients with benign GIT stricture (101 males, 79 females; age, 12 to 78 years, mean 48.7 years). The subjects were divided into three groups according to the intervention procedures used: 80 patients with pneumatic dilation (group A), 25 with permanent uncovered or partially covered or antireflux covered metallic stent dilation (group B), and 75 with temporary partially covered metallic stent dilation (group C). Among the 180 patients, 8 had simple sclerosis stricture after radiation therapy for esophageal carcinoma, 132 had achalasia, 32 had esophageal and esophagogastric anastomosis stricture (complicated with anastomosis fistula in two patients), 4 had gastroduodenal anastomosis stricture, and 4 had esophageal chemical corrosive stricture. All patients were examined by barium radiography of GIT and gastroscopy before the intervention procedures.

Methods

The GIT was emptied for at least 4 h before intervention procedures. Bleeding and clotting times were examined. The devices used were as follows. The catheter was an SY dumbbell-like catheter (Sanyuan Medical Instrument Research Institute, Jinan, Shandong, China) with a length of 75 cm. The diameters upon saccule dilation were 28 mm, 30 mm, and 32 mm, and length of the saccule was 8 cm. There were two types of metallic stents, one was an imported covered Z-stent made from stainless steel wire (Wilson-Cook Medical Inc, NC, USA), the other made domestically from nitinol and uncovered or partially covered or antireflux covered (Zhiye Medical Instrument Research Institute, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China; Youyi Yijin Advanced Materials Co. Ltd, Beijin, China). The body of the partially covered metallic stents was coated with intracavity silica gel. The areas within 2 cm of both ends of the stent were not membrane covered. The stents were 4 to 14 cm in length and 16 to 30 mm in diameter, with one or two horns (diameter, 20 to 35 mm).

Patients for pneumatic dilation were placed in a supine or sitting position. Surface anesthesia was first applied to the pharynx. The guidewire was inserted through the mouth and passed through the stricture section as demonstrated by X-ray examination. The catheter with a diameter of 28 mm was introduced through the region of benign esophageal stricture via the guidewire, with the center of saccule at the most-strictured section. The saccule was injected using an injector with the dilated contrast medium or gas. Under fluoroscopy and according to the pain reaction of the patient, pressurization was applied to gradually dilate the saccule. The central portion of the saccule was dumbbell-shaped. When further pressurization flattened the surface of the saccule or when the pressure did not further change, the piston was turned off. The pressure of the saccule was maintained for 5 to 30 min. After the saccule pressure had reduced for 5 min, pressurization was again applied. Typically each treatment involved 3 to 5 dilations, and then the catheter was withdrawn. The second and third treatments with graded pneumatic dilation were carried out using dilators with diameters of 30 mm and 32 mm, respectively. In some patients, the treatment was conducted every 2 weeks until clinical symptoms disappeared.

The placement of metallic stents was performed as follows. In upper GIT, lidocaine (1%) was first sprayed (as a mist) for anaesthesia on the pharynx. Patients were placed in a sitting position or lying on the side. Applicable false tooth were removed and a tooth bracket was mounted. A 260 cm long exchange guidewire was inserted into the stomach. The stent was mounted on the propeller whose front end was coated with sterilized liquid paraffin. Guided by the wire, the propeller on which the stent was mounted was moved through the section of pathological change. Under fluoroscopic control, the outer sheath was slowly withdrawn and the stent was expanded under its own tension. After placing a stent, GIT radiography was performed to observe the patency of the GIT. In group C, 500 to 1000 ml ice-cold water was injected via a bioptic hole under gastroscope for 3 to 7 days after stent placement, which resulted in retraction of the stent and reduced its diameter. Bioptic pliers were then used to withdraw the stent using a gastroscope. Gastroscopy was performed again to detect complications, such as bleeding, mucosa tearing, or perforation. Patients returned to the ward and consumed cold drinks and liquid food for 2 days before resuming a normal diet. It was preferable for patients to eat solid food since the natural expansion of the food reduced the retraction of the GIT. The criterion for therapeutic efficacy was the diameter of the most-strictured gastrointestinal segment before and after dilation.

For postoperative treatment of pneumatic dilation, barium radiography of the GIT was performed immediately after intervention procedure to observe the patency of the GIT and check the presence of perforations and submucous hematoma. Patients drank fluids 2 h after intervention procedure and were treated with antibiotics, antacids, antireflux drugs, and analgesics. For postoperative treatment of stent placement, barium radiography was used to observe the patency of the GIT. Patients ate semisolid food on the day following intervention procedure. Within one week after stent removal, barium radiography of the GIT was again used to observe the patency of the GIT. Patients were followed-up by telephone and out-patients after 1 month, 6 months, 1 year.

RESULTS

The diameters of the strictured GIT were significantly greater after the treatment of all procedures employed (P < 0.01). The 80 patients in group A involved 160 dilations (mean 2.0 times per patient). Among them, five graded dilations of increasing diameters were performed in 1 patient, three in 29 patients, two in 18 patients and a single dilation in 32 patients. In the 25 patients of group B, uncovered or partially covered or antireflux covered stents were placed. Stent placement was successful in 100% of the patients. In the 75 patients of group C, 75 partially covered stents were placed and removed under gastroscope guidance 3 to 7 days after intervention procedure. The success rate of stent placement and extraction was 100%. The complications of the treatment are listed in Table 1, and the relapse rates of dysphagia are listed in Table 2.

Table 1 Incidence of complications following treatment with different intervention procedures (%).
GroupsPatientNumber (%)Number (%)Number (%)Number (%) with
numbers (n)with pain (n)with reflux (n)with bleeding (n)stent migration (n)
A8020 (25.0%)16(20.0%)6(7.5%)-
B2510 (40.0%)15(60.0%)3(12.0%)4 (16.0%)
C7530 (40.0%)9(12.0%)12(16.0%)-
Table 2 Dysphagia relapse rate during follow-up.
Groups6 months follow-up
12 months follow-up
Number tested (n)Number (%) with DR (n)Number tested (n)Number (%) with DR(n)
A8024(30%)8048(60%)
B255(20%)123(25%)
C759(12%)508(16%)
DISCUSSION

Benign stricture of the GIT is a common complication of gastrointestinal diseases. Its causes are diverse, its treatment is usually difficult. The procedures used included surgery, bougienage, pneumatic dilation, permanent metallic and temporary metallic stent dilation, each having their own advantages and drawbacks[1-7]. Bougienage is now uncommon since it has a poor therapeutic efficacy and many complications. The use of surgery is declining due to the associated large lesion, high risk, and high relapse rate, but it is still one of the most common method of treatment. Pneumatic dilation was primarily used in the plasty of angiostenosis, and then applied gradually to other organs for its reliable therapeutic efficacy. It exhibits a remarkable therapeutic efficacy when used in benign esophageal stricture. Currently, it has been widely used in the nonsurgical treatment of benign GIT stricture. According to most authors[8-31] , the graded dilation is more effective than single dilation.

Permanent metallic stent dilation was primarily used in the treatment of malignant obstruction of the GIT, and exhibited a remarkable palliative therapeutic efficacy[32-40]. Cwikiel et al[2] reported an experimental and clinical study of the treatment of benign esophageal stricture with expandable metallic stents. We used uncovered or partially covered or antireflux covered stents in 25 patients of benign GIT stricture in order to reduce the possibility of stent migration. After placement of the uncovered stent, dilation of the stricture was excellent and dysphagia disappeared. Thus we achieved the treatment goal. However, the patients were accompanied by new problems including gastroesophageal reflux or biliary regurgitation, followed by occurrence of restenosis (hyperplasia of granulation tissue). Reflux could be treated with drugs, but this took a long time. Restenosis was reduced after cauterization using hot-point therapy under gastroscope guidance, but it was easy to relapse. Even though an antireflux stent was used, many unexpected results appeared. These difficulties led to dilation using temporary partially covered metallic stents. After their clinical trials, they not only produced fewer complications, but also exhibited excellent therapeutic efficacy. Now their use has been gradually accepted by clinicians.

For the temporary metallic stents, optimal placement time remains to be determined. If the therapeutic efficacy is poor, stents cannot be easily removed after a long-time placement. Usually, the stents are placed within 1 week. Cwikiel et al[2] placed a covered metallic stent in the esophagus of the pigs in an experimental study. One week later, granulation tissue grew and merged with the noncovered area of the stent, resulting in difficulties for removing the stent. The stent could not be removed following the placement for 10 to 14 days or longer. By our experience, stent migration occurred mostly within 1 week. Therefore, after the placement of a partially covered metallic stent, it should be extracted within 1 week. In our series, the stent was easily removed on the third to forth day, but this became quite difficult on the fifth day, and extremely difficult after 6 to 7 days. Song et al[3] reported the removal of a stent 2 months after its placement. In such patients the stent should be completely coated (including its outer layer) so that granulation tissue cannot grow into the lumen. However, the use of this type of stent should be limited to patients with tumor, since in patients of benign GIT stricture, it migrates easily. In terms of the degree of acceptance of patients, therapeutic efficacy, extent of tissue lesion, and incidence of complications, the best method for malignant stricture or obstruction of the GIT is the partially covered metallic stent, and for benign stricture of the GIT, graded pneumatic dilation or temporary partially covered metallic stent dilation should be recommeded[41-45].

Sixty percent of patients with the follow-up of 1 year or longer had dysphagia relapse, demonstrating that pneumatic dilation of benign stricture of the GIT had an excellently immediate therapeutic efficacy but a poor mid and long-term therapeutic efficacy. First, this was associated with the diameter of saccule. Kadakia et al[4] suggested that the diameter of the saccule in pneumatic dilation should be 35 to 45 mm, but the incidence of complications was very high (e.g., 15% presented esophageal perforation). We used saccules with a diameter of 28 to 32 mm in order to reduce the incidence of serious complications, but the mid and long-term therapeutic efficacy was not satisfactory. Second, the therapeutic efficacy was associated with the frequency of dilation. One dilation did not produce excellent therapeutic efficacy, since it was affected by various factors such as the correct location of the saccule pressure applied to the saccule, and variations in the anatomy of GIT. The graded dilation was suggested by most authors. Third, the therapeutic efficacy was associated to the course of the disease. When the course was long, the GIT muscularis would become fleshy and lose elasticity.

Permanent uncovered or partially covered metallic stents were used in the treatment of malignant stricture or obstruction of the GIT with excellently immediate therapeutic efficacy and poor mid and long-term therapeutic efficacy. This was mainly due to tumor growth. Since uncovered or partially covered metallic stents could only provide palliative treatment for the obstruction, only by adopting a combined therapy for the tumor, can mid and long-term therapeutic efficacy be achieved. In our series, permanent uncovered or partially covered or antireflux covered metallic stent dilations were used in 25 patients of benign GIT stricture, their immediate therapeutic efficacy was excellent and the mid and long-term efficacies were unsatisfactory. The poor mid and long-term outcome for permanent uncovered metallic stent dilation was mainly due to frequent gastroesophageal reflux or biliary regurgitation and restenosis. Three uncovered stents could not be extracted after a 12-month follow-up period, and hence the cardia had to be excised with the stent and surgically reconstructed. Therefore, permanent uncovered metallic stent dilation was not suitable for patients with functional GIT stricture[46-49]. Permanent partially covered metallic stent dilation had poor mid and long-term therapeutic effects. This was mainly due to reflux and stent migration. Temporary partially covered metallic stent dilation used for benign GIT stricture resulted in excellent immediate effect, thus becoming the best method for mid and long-term therapeutic efficiencies. First, design of the stent coincided with the physiological structure of the gastrointestinal tract and the specific pathological manifestations of the benign stricture. The upper outlet of the stent was a large horn without cover, increasing stability of the stent. However, this made removal of the stent more difficult. Second, the diameter of the stents used in this group was 16 to 30 mm. Upon stent dilation, the stricture returned almost to the maximum normal diameter of gastrointestinal dilation. Third, the duration of dilation was very long, with a typical period of stent placement for 3 to 7 days. Why was the therapeutic efficacy of temporary partially covered metallic stent dilation better than that of pneumatic dilation We thought that this was mainly due to the stent expanding the strictured gastrointestinal region, causing chronic tearing of the strictured wall muscularis. As a stent gradually expanded with the body temperature of the patient, it took 12 to 24 h for a stent to reach 36 °C. The stent thus expanded completely to reach the expected diameter . In our consideration, the wall muscularis was torn regularly by the metallic stent, and scars were relatively few when repaired. This resulted in a markably lower incidence of restenosis compared to that for pneumatic dilation.

With different intervention procedures compared in consideration of the extents of lesion, incidences of complication, therapeutic efficacies, and degrees of acceptance of patients, we found that partially covered metallic stents could provide excellent therapeutic effect. However, different strategies should be adopted to different types of lesion (Table 3). Development of biologically removable stents, which can be catabolized in 2 months after their placement, may provide a much longer retention time with no necessity for extraction[50-56] .

Table 3 Strategies of intervention procedure for different benign strictures in upper gastrointestinal tract.
Types of GIT strictureStrategies
ASTCSD > PD > PCSD > PUCSD
AS with fistulaPCSD > TCSD
New scar strictureTCSD >PD > PCSD
Scar stricturePCSD > TCSD > PD
Functional stricture (achalasia)TCSD > PD > PCSD with antireflux
Footnotes

Edited by Su Q and Wang XL

References
1.  Cheng YS, Shang KZ, Zhuang QX, Li MH, Xu JR, Yang SX. Interventional therapy and cause of restenosis of esophageal benign stricture. Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 1998;6:791-794.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Cwikiel W, Willén R, Stridbeck H, Lillo-Gil R, von Holstein CS. Self-expanding stent in the treatment of benign esophageal strictures: experimental study in pigs and presentation of clinical cases. Radiology. 1993;187:667-671.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Song HY, Park SI, Do YS, Yoon HK, Sung KB, Sohn KH, Min YI. Expandable metallic stent placement in patients with benign esophageal strictures: results of long-term follow-up. Radiology. 1997;203:131-136.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Kadakia SC, Wong RK. Graded pneumatic dilation using Rigiflex achalasia dilators in patients with primary esophageal achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:34-38.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Cheng YS, Yang RJ, Mao AW, Zhuang QX, Shang KZ. Common complications of stent insertion in patients with GI tract stricture or obstruction. Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 1998;6:856-858.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Huang QH, Jin ZD, Xu GM. Ultrasonographic endoscopy and microultrasound probe in the diagnosis and treatment of car-diac achalasia. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 1999;7:787-788.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Shang KZ, Cheng YS, Wu CG, Zhuang QX. Pharyngoesophageal dynamic imaging in diagnosis of patients with deglutition disorders. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 1999;7:52-54.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Lisý J, Hetková M, Snajdauf J, Vyhnánek M, Tůma S. Long-term outcomes of balloon dilation of esophageal strictures in children. Acad Radiol. 1998;5:832-835.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Chawda SJ, Watura R, Adams H, Smith PM. A comparison of barium swallow and erect esophageal transit scintigraphy following balloon dilatation for achalasia. Dis Esophagus. 1998;11:181-187; discussion 187-188.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Yoneyama F, Miyachi M, Nimura Y. Manometric findings of the upper esophageal sphincter in esophageal achalasia. World J Surg. 1998;22:1043-106; discussion 1043-106;.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Katz PO, Gilbert J, Castell DO. Pneumatic dilatation is effective long-term treatment for achalasia. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43:1973-1977.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Vaezi MF, Richter JE. Current therapies for achalasia: comparison and efficacy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998;27:21-35.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Khan AA, Shah SW, Alam A, Butt AK, Shafqat F, Castell DO. Pneumatic balloon dilation in achalasia: a prospective comparison of balloon distention time. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:1064-1067.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Muehldorfer SM, Schneider TH, Hochberger J, Martus P, Hahn EG, Ell C. Esophageal achalasia: intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin A versus balloon dilation. Endoscopy. 1999;31:517-521.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Beckingham IJ, Callanan M, Louw JA, Bornman PC. Laparoscopic cardiomyotomy for achalasia after failed balloon dilatation. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:493-496.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Seelig MH, DeVault KR, Seelig SK, Klingler PJ, Branton SA, Floch NR, Bammer T, Hinder RA. Treatment of achalasia: recent advances in surgery. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1999;28:202-207.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Khan AA, Shah SW, Alam A, Butt AK, Shafqat F, Castell DO. Massively dilated esophagus in achalasia: response to pneumatic balloon dilation. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:2363-2366.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Panaccione R, Gregor JC, Reynolds RP, Preiksaitis HG. Intrasphincteric botulinum toxin versus pneumatic dilatation for achalasia: a cost minimization analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:492-498.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Gideon RM, Castell DO, Yarze J. Prospective randomized comparison of pneumatic dilatation technique in patients with idiopathic achalasia. Dig Dis Sci. 1999;44:1853-1857.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Singh V, Duseja A, Kumar A, Kumar P, Rai HS, Singh K. Balloon dilatation in achalasia cardia. Trop Gastroenterol. 1999;20:68-69.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Vaezi MF. Achalasia: diagnosis and management. Semin Gastrointest Dis. 1999;10:103-112.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Gaudric M, Sabate JM, Artru P, Chaussade S, Couturier D. Results of pneumatic dilatation in patients with dysphagia after antireflux surgery. Br J Surg. 1999;86:1088-1091.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Vaezi MF, Baker ME, Richter JE. Assessment of esophageal emptying post-pneumatic dilation: use of the timed barium esophagram. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:1802-1807.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Torbey CF, Achkar E, Rice TW, Baker M, Richter JE. Long-term outcome of achalasia treatment: the need for closer follow-up. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1999;28:125-130.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Metman EH, Lagasse JP, d'Alteroche L, Picon L, Scotto B, Barbieux JP. Risk factors for immediate complications after progressive pneumatic dilation for achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:1179-1185.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
26.  Vaezi MF, Richter JE, Wilcox CM, Schroeder PL, Birgisson S, Slaughter RL, Koehler RE, Baker ME. Botulinum toxin versus pneumatic dilatation in the treatment of achalasia: a randomised trial. Gut. 1999;44:231-239.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.  Smout AJ. Back to the whale bone. Gut. 1999;44:149-150.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Alonso P, González-Conde B, Macenlle R, Pita S, Vázquez-Iglesias JL. Achalasia: the usefulness of manometry for evaluation of treatment. Dig Dis Sci. 1999;44:536-541.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Prakash C, Freedland KE, Chan MF, Clouse RE. Botulinum toxin injections for achalasia symptoms can approximate the short term efficacy of a single pneumatic dilation: a survival analysis approach. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:328-333.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Horgan S, Pellegrini CA. Botulinum toxin injections for achalasia symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:300-301.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Hamza AF, Awad HA, Hussein O. Cardiac achalasia in children. Dilatation or surgery. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1999;9:299-302.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
32.  De Palma GD, Catanzano C. Removable self-expanding metal stents: a pilot study for treatment of achalasia of the esophagus. Endoscopy. 1998;30:S95-S96.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Kozarek RA. Esophageal stenting--when should metal replace plastic. Endoscopy. 1998;30:575-577.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
34.  Ell C, May A. Self-expanding metal stents for palliation of stenosing tumors of the esophagus and cardia: a critical review. Endoscopy. 1997;29:392-398.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
35.  Ell C, May A, Hahn EG. [Self-expanding metal endoprosthesis in palliation of stenosing tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Comparison of experience with three stent types in 82 implantations]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1995;120:1343-1348.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
36.  Yates MR, Morgan DE, Baron TH. Palliation of malignant gastric and small intestinal strictures with self-expandable metal stents. Endoscopy. 1998;30:266-272.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
37.  De Gregorio BT, Kinsman K, Katon RM, Morrison K, Saxon RR, Barton RE, Keller FS, Rösch J. Treatment of esophageal obstruction from mediastinal compressive tumor with covered, self-expanding metallic Z-stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;43:483-489.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
38.  Spinelli P, Cerrai FG, Dal Fante M, Mancini A, Meroni E, Pizzetti P. Endoscopic treatment of upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies. Endoscopy. 1993;25:675-678.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
39.  Pinto IT. Malignant gastric and duodenal stenosis: palliation by peroral implantation of a self-expanding metallic stent. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1997;20:431-434.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
40.  Strecker EP, Boos I, Husfeldt KJ. Malignant duodenal stenosis: palliation with peroral implantation of a self-expanding nitinol stent. Radiology. 1995;196:349-351.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
41.  Acunaş B, Poyanlí A, Rozanes I. Intervention in gastrointestinal tract: the treatment of esophageal, gastroduodenal and colorectal obstructions with metallic stents. Eur J Radiol. 2002;42:240-248.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
42.  Wan XJ, Li ZS, Xu GM, Wang W, Zhang W, Wu RP. Pathologic study on esophagus after “Z” and reticular stenting. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 2000;8:5-9.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
43.  Wan XJ, Li ZS, Xu GM, Wang W, Zhan XB, Liu J. Study on changes of mucosal blood flow and permeability after esophageal “Z” stenting. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 2000;8:10-14.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
44.  Mao AW, Gao ZD, Yang RJ, Jiang WJ, Cheng YS, Fan H, Jiang TH. Malignant obstruction of digestology tract of 198 cases with stent. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 2000;8:369-370.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
45.  Mauro MA, Koehler RE, Baron TH. Advances in gastrointestinal intervention: the treatment of gastroduodenal and colorectal obstructions with metallic stents. Radiology. 2000;215:659-669.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
46.  Chen WX, Cheng YS, Yang RJ, Li MH, Zhuang QX, Chen NW, Xu JR, Shang KZ. Interventional therapy of achalasia with temporary metal internal stent dilatation and its intermedi-ate and long term follow-up. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 2000;8:896-899.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
47.  Cheng YS, Shang KZ. Gastrointestinal imageology in China: a 50 year evolution. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 2000;8:1225-1232.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
48.  Cheng YS, Yang RJ, Li MH, Shang KZ, Chen WX, Chen NW, Chu YD, Zhuang QX. Interventional procedure for benign or malignant stricture or obstruction of upper gastrointestinal tract. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 2000;8:1354-1360.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
49.  Chen WX, Cheng YS, Yang RJ, Li MH, Shang KZ, Zhuang QX, Chen NW. Metal stent dilation in the treatment of benign esoph-ageal stricture by interventional procedure: a follow-up study. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 2002;10:333-336.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
50.  Shang KZ, Cheng YS. Making more attention to issure of swalling disorders. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 2002;10:1241-1242.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
51.  Cheng YS, Shang KZ. Interventional therapy in dysphagia. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 2002;10:1312-1314.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
52.  Therasse E, Oliva VL, Lafontaine E, Perreault P, Giroux MF, Soulez G. Balloon dilation and stent placement for esophageal lesions: indications, methods, and results. Radiographics. 2003;23:89-105.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
53.  Zhong J, Wu Y, Xu Z, Liu X, Xu B, Zhai Z. Treatment of medium and late stage esophageal carcinoma with combined endoscopic metal stenting and radiotherapy. Chin Med J (Engl). 2003;116:24-28.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
54.  Sakakura C, Hagiwara A, Kato D, Deguchi K, Hamada T, Itoi Y, Mitsufuji S, Kashima K, Yamagishi H. Successful treatment of intractable esophagothoracic fistula using covered self-expandable stent. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;50:77-79.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
55.  Dormann AJ, Eisendrath P, Wigginghaus B, Huchzermeyer H, Devière J. Palliation of esophageal carcinoma with a new self-expanding plastic stent. Endoscopy. 2003;35:207-211.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
56.  Keymling M. Colorectal stenting. Endoscopy. 2003;35:234-238.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]