Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2021; 27(25): 3925-3939
Published online Jul 7, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i25.3925
Published online Jul 7, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i25.3925
Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram of included articles.
ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection.
Figure 2 Forest plot for risk of perforation.
RR: Relative risk; CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 3 Forest plot for risk of bleeding.
RR: Relative risk; CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 4 Forest plot for recurrence rate.
RR: Relative risk; CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 5 Meta regression of perforation and proportion of right colon polyps.
CI: Confidence interval.
- Citation: Lim XC, Nistala KRY, Ng CH, Lin SY, Tan DJH, Ho KY, Chong CS, Muthiah M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps: A meta-analysis and meta-regression with single arm analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27(25): 3925-3939
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v27/i25/3925.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i25.3925