Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2013; 19(10): 1645-1651
Published online Mar 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i10.1645
Figure 1
Figure 1 Flowchart of study selection. IFN-γ: Interferon-gamma.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Forest plot showing the sensitivity and specificity of interferon-gamma in the diagnosis of tuberculous peritonitis. Forest plot shows the sensitivity and specificity of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) for tuberculous peritonitis diagnosis. The point estimates of sensitivity and specificity from each study are shown as solid circles. Error bars indicated 95%CI. Numbers indicate the studies included in the meta-analysis, as cited in the reference list. Pooled estimates for IFN-γ assay were as follows: sensitivity, 0.93 (95%CI, 0.87 to 0.97), specificity, 0.99 (95%CI, 0.97 to 1.00).
Figure 3
Figure 3 Summary receiver operating characteristic curves for interferon-gamma assays. Solid circles represent each study included in the meta-analysis. The size of each study is indicated by the size of the solid circle. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves summarize the overall diagnostic accuracy.