Editorial Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Artif Intell Med Imaging. Jun 28, 2020; 1(1): 1-5
Published online Jun 28, 2020. doi: 10.35711/aimi.v1.i1.1
Rising role of artificial intelligence in image reconstruction for biomedical imaging
Xue-Li Chen, Tian-Yu Yan, Nan Wang, Karen M von Deneen, Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi’an 710126, Shaanxi Province, China
ORCID number: Xue-Li Chen (0000-0002-3898-9892); Tian-Yu Yan (0000-0002-2245-1537); Nan Wang (0000-0002-6780-3401); Karen M von Deneen (0000-0002-5310-1003).
Author contributions: Chen XL designed the overall outline of the manuscript; Yan TY and Wang N performed the literature review and summary; Chen XL contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript; von Deneen KM polished the language of the paper.
Supported by The National Key R& D Program of China, No. 2018YFC0910600; the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 81627807 and 11727813; Shaanxi Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholars, No. 2020JC-27; the Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation, No. 161104; and Program for the Young Top-notch Talent of Shaanxi Province.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Xue-Li Chen, PhD, Professor, Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, No. 266, Xinglong Section of Xifeng Road, Xi’an 710126, Shaanxi Province, China. xlchen@xidian.edu.cn
Received: May 7, 2020
Peer-review started: May 7, 2020
First decision: May 15, 2020
Revised: June 9, 2020
Accepted: June 17, 2020
Article in press: June 17, 2020
Published online: June 28, 2020

Abstract

In this editorial, we review recent progress on the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in image reconstruction for biomedical imaging. Because it abandons prior information of traditional artificial design and adopts a completely data-driven mode to obtain deeper prior information via learning, AI technology plays an increasingly important role in biomedical image reconstruction. The combination of AI technology and the biomedical image reconstruction method has become a hotspot in the field. Favoring AI, the performance of biomedical image reconstruction has been improved in terms of accuracy, resolution, imaging speed, etc. We specifically focus on how to use AI technology to improve the performance of biomedical image reconstruction, and propose possible future directions in this field.

Key Words: Biomedical imaging, Image reconstruction, Artificial intelligence, Machine learning, Deep learning, Tomography

Core tip: Three-dimensional biomedical imaging plays an important role in biology and medicine. We review recent progress on the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in image reconstruction for biomedical imaging. We specifically focus on how to use AI technology to improve the performance of biomedical image reconstruction and propose possible future directions in this field. We believe that, with further development, AI technology will play an increasingly important role in biomedical image reconstruction.



BACKGROUND

Biomedical imaging plays an important role in biology and medicine. In particular, three-dimensional (3D) imaging mode based on an image reconstruction technique, such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), photoacoustic tomography (PAT), and 3D optical imaging, allow biologists and physicians to visualize the structural, cellular, and functional information stereoscopically. Image reconstruction in 3D biomedical imaging is a type of inverse problem, which is used to reconstruct the distribution of this information in the living body by using the physical signals acquired from outside of the body. Research on the image reconstruction algorithm has always been an important issue to promote the development and innovation of biomedical imaging equipment. However, due to several reasons, such as the limitation of imaging time and dose (contrast medium or radiation dose), insufficiency of the measurements, inherent noise and other interference doping in the original signals, the traditional image reconstruction techniques cannot achieve good performance. For example, there are trade-offs in optimal imaging accuracy, spatial resolution and imaging speed, which have been challenges in the field of biomedical image reconstruction. The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology brings new opportunities for biomedical image reconstruction. AI abandons prior information of traditional artificial design, and adopts a completely data-driven mode to obtain deeper prior information via learning. Currently, the combination of AI and the biomedical image reconstruction method has become a hotspot in the field.

ADVANCES

Recently, AI plays an increasingly important role in image reconstruction of 3D biomedical imaging, including both clinical and preclinical biomedical imaging technologies such as CT, MRI, PET, PAT, and 3D optical imaging. In CT reconstruction, AI technology mainly focuses on solving two problems: CT reconstruction with low radiation dose and CT reconstruction with a small amount of view measurements[1-6]. For example, Chen et al[1] integrated the autoencoder, deconvolution network, and shortcut connections into the residual encoder-decoder convolutional natural network for low-dose CT imaging, which demonstrated great potential for high-speed imaging with good noise reduction, structural preservation, and lesion detection. For CT reconstruction with a small amount of view measurements, it mainly involves a small amount of view reconstruction based on limited angles[2-4] and sparse view reconstruction based on full angles[5-7]. With the help of the deep learning framework, researchers can obtain a much clearer edge and fine structural information through a small amount of measured data, to achieve the best imaging quality with faster imaging speed[5-7]. The use of AI technology in MRI image reconstruction has attracted an increasing amount of attention, and much progress has been made in recent years. In these works, by means of machine learning or deep learning framework, MRI image reconstruction can be much improved by reducing noise or artifacts[8], enhancing spatial resolution or details[9-12], accelerating imaging speed[13-16], and improving image accuracy and quality[17-21]. AI-based image reconstruction techniques have also been applied to clinical studies, for example the TrueFidelity[22], a deep learning-based image processing platform developed by General Electric Healthcare and the Advanced intelligent clear-IQ Engine[23], developed by Canon Medical Systems Corporation.

In functional or molecular imaging, AI technology is mainly used to improve the quality of reconstructed images[24-38]. For example, by using AI technology, high-quality PET images can be reconstructed from low-dose and ultra-low-dose radionuclides[24,25]. The whole neural network can solve the storage space challenge in PET and realize the direct reconstruction of large-scale data[28]. With the help of machine learning and deep learning frameworks, the problems existing in PAT image reconstruction caused by limited views or sparse view measurements, including resolution and image quality degradation, can be solved[29-33]. In diffuse light-based 3D optical imaging, it is necessary to establish a mathematical model to describe diffused light propagation in the living body, and then to calculate the target distribution by solving the model in reverse[39,40]. However, this mathematical model is usually a simplified linear model that has serious ill-posedness, which results in poor quality of reconstructed images. With the help of the deep learning framework by directly learning the complicated relationship between surface measurements and target distribution inside the body, the quality of the reconstructed image can be greatly improved and the reconstruction time can be reduced[34-38].

OUTLOOK

We present recent progresses on AI-based image reconstruction for 3D biomedical imaging. The rising role of AI in image reconstruction includes improving the quality, accuracy, and resolution of the reconstructed image as well as the imaging speed. Furthermore, with the rapid development of AI technology, such a rising role will become increasingly significant. However, there remain several central challenges facing the field. The first one is the generality of machine learning or the deep learning framework. In existing studies, the frameworks are all aimed at specific problems, such as image objects with specific features. Thus, generalization performance and the migration ability of the framework are poor. If a network framework can be developed, which can provide good image reconstruction performance for the imaging objects with various structures and properties, even for all of the biomedical imaging technologies, it will be great progress on AI-based image reconstruction for biomedical imaging. Second, current research needs to use AI technology to reconstruct the measured data into images, and then analyze these images to obtain relevant physiological or pathological information. With the help of AI, it will be significant to obtain physiological and pathological information directly from the measured data, which is also the future direction of the application of AI technology in the field of biomedical imaging. Lastly, the development of machine learning or the deep learning algorithm itself is also an important direction in the field. These efforts are expected to promote the wide applications of AI-based biomedical imaging in biology and medicine.

Footnotes

Manuscript source: Invited manuscript

Specialty type: Radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging

Country/Territory of origin: China

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): B

Grade C (Good): 0

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Tomizawa N S-Editor: Wang JL L-Editor: Filipodia E-Editor: Ma YJ

References
1.  Chen H, Zhang Y, Kalra MK, Lin F, Chen Y, Liao P, Zhou J, Wang G. Low-Dose CT With a Residual Encoder-Decoder Convolutional Neural Network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017;36:2524-2535.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1046]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 556]  [Article Influence: 79.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Jiang Z, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Ge Y, Yin FF, Ren L. Augmentation of CBCT Reconstructed From Under-Sampled Projections Using Deep Learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019;38:2705-2715.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 46]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 8.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Bubba TA, Kutyniok G, Lasses M, Marz M, Samek W, Siltanen S, Srinivasan V. Learning the invisible: a hybrid deep learning-shearlet framework for limited angle computed tomography. Inverse Probl. 2019;35:064002.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Fu J, Dong J, Zhao F. A Deep Learning Reconstruction Framework for Differential Phase-Contrast Computed Tomography With Incomplete Data. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2020;29:2190-2202.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Kyong Hwan Jin, McCann MT, Froustey E, Unser M. Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imaging. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2017;26:4509-4522.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1201]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 611]  [Article Influence: 87.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Han Y, Ye JC. Framing U-Net via Deep Convolutional Framelets: Application to Sparse-View CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018;37:1418-1429.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 317]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 184]  [Article Influence: 30.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Nakai H, Nishio M, Yamashita R, Ono A, Nakao KK, Fujimoto K, Togashi K. Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Convolutional Neural Networks with a Deeper U-Net for Sparse-View Computed Tomography Reconstruction. Acad Radiol. 2020;27:563-574.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Zhu B, Liu JZ, Cauley SF, Rosen BR, Rosen MS. Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning. Nature. 2018;555:487-492.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 748]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 669]  [Article Influence: 111.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Chaudhari AS, Fang Z, Kogan F, Wood J, Stevens KJ, Gibbons EK, Lee JH, Gold GE, Hargreaves BA. Super-resolution musculoskeletal MRI using deep learning. Magn Reson Med. 2018;80:2139-2154.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 220]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 171]  [Article Influence: 28.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Sun L, Fan Z, Fu X, Huang Y, Ding X, Paisley J. A Deep Information Sharing Network for Multi-Contrast Compressed Sensing MRI Reconstruction. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2019;28:6141-6153.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 57]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 6.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Shi J, Li Z, Ying S, Wang C, Liu Q, Zhang Q, Yan P. MR Image Super-Resolution via Wide Residual Networks With Fixed Skip Connection. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2019;23:1129-1140.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 55]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 9.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Zhang J, Gu Y, Tang H, Wang X, Kong Y, Chen Y, Shu H, Coatrieux J. Compressed sensing MR image reconstruction via a deep frequency-division network. Neurocomputing. 2020;384:346-355.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Yang G, Yu S, Dong H, Slabaugh G, Dragotti PL, Ye X, Liu F, Arridge S, Keegan J, Guo Y, Firmin D, Keegan J, Slabaugh G, Arridge S, Ye X, Guo Y, Yu S, Liu F, Firmin D, Dragotti PL, Yang G, Dong H. DAGAN: Deep De-Aliasing Generative Adversarial Networks for Fast Compressed Sensing MRI Reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018;37:1310-1321.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 553]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 385]  [Article Influence: 64.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Lee D, Yoo J, Tak S, Ye JC. Deep Residual Learning for Accelerated MRI Using Magnitude and Phase Networks. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018;65:1985-1995.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 142]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 146]  [Article Influence: 24.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Xiang L, Chen Y, Chang W, Zhan Y, Lin W, Wang Q, Shen D. Deep Leaning Based Multi-Modal Fusion for Fast MR Reconstruction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019;66:2105-2114.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 68]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 7.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Zhang J, Wu J, Chen S, Zhang Z, Cai S, Cai C, Chen Z. Robust Single-Shot T2 Mapping via Multiple Overlapping-Echo Acquisition and Deep Neural Network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019;38:1801-1811.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Schlemper J, Caballero J, Hajnal JV, Price AN, Rueckert D. A Deep Cascade of Convolutional Neural Networks for Dynamic MR Image Reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018;37:491-503.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 641]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 493]  [Article Influence: 82.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Quan TM, Nguyen-Duc T, Jeong WK. Compressed Sensing MRI Reconstruction Using a Generative Adversarial Network With a Cyclic Loss. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018;37:1488-1497.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 339]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 229]  [Article Influence: 38.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Mardani M, Gong E, Cheng JY, Vasanawala SS, Zaharchuk G, Xing L, Pauly JM. Deep Generative Adversarial Neural Networks for Compressive Sensing MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019;38:167-179.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 331]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 205]  [Article Influence: 41.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Qin C, Schlemper J, Caballero J, Price AN, Hajnal JV, Rueckert D. Convolutional Recurrent Neural Networks for Dynamic MR Image Reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019;38:280-290.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 275]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 198]  [Article Influence: 39.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Kofler A, Dewey M, Schaeffter T, Wald C, Kolbitsch C. Spatio-Temporal Deep Learning-Based Undersampling Artefact Reduction for 2D Radial Cine MRI With Limited Training Data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020;39:703-717.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 10.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Hsieh J, Liu E, Nett B, Tang J, Thibault JB, Sahney S.   A new era of image reconstruction: TrueFidelityTM - Technical white paper on deep learning imaging reconstruction. New York: General Electric Company, 2019: 1-14.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Boedeker K  AiCE deep learning reconstruction: bringing the power of ultra-high resolution CT to routine imaging. Tochigi: Canon Medical Systems Corporation, 2019.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Kim K, Wu D, Gong K, Dutta J, Kim JH, Son YD, Kim HK, El Fakhri G, Li Q. Penalized PET Reconstruction Using Deep Learning Prior and Local Linear Fitting. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018;37:1478-1487.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 119]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 102]  [Article Influence: 17.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Ouyang J, Chen KT, Gong E, Pauly J, Zaharchuk G. Ultra-low-dose PET reconstruction using generative adversarial network with feature matching and task-specific perceptual loss. Med Phys. 2019;46:3555-3564.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 95]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 94]  [Article Influence: 18.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Xu J, Liu H. Three-dimensional convolutional neural networks for simultaneous dual-tracer PET imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64:185016.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Gong K, Catana C, Qi J, Li Q. PET Image Reconstruction Using Deep Image Prior. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019;38:1655-1665.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 139]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 97]  [Article Influence: 19.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Whiteley W, Luk WK, Gregor J. DirectPET: full-size neural network PET reconstruction from sinogram data. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2020;7:032503.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 5.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Antholzer S, Haltmeier M, Schwab J. Deep learning for photoacoustic tomography from sparse data. Inverse Probl Sci Eng. 2019;27:987-1005.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 154]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 111]  [Article Influence: 18.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Waibel D, Grohl J, Isensee F, Kirchner T, Maier-Hein K, Maier-Hein L. Reconstruction of initial pressure from limited view photoacoustic images using deep learning. Oraevsky A, Wang L, editors. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing. SPIE 2018; 104942S.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Hauptmann A, Lucka F, Betcke M, Huynh N, Adler J, Cox B, Beard P, Ourselin S, Arridge S. Model-Based Learning for Accelerated, Limited-View 3-D Photoacoustic Tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018;37:1382-1393.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 166]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 123]  [Article Influence: 20.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Deng H, Wang X, Cai C, Luo J, Ma C. Machine-learning enhanced photoacoustic computed tomography in a limited view configuration. In: Yuan XC, Carney PS, Shi K, Somekh MG, editors. Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies II. SPIE 2019; 111860J.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Vu T, Li M, Humayun H, Zhou Y, Yao J. A generative adversarial network for artifact removal in photoacoustic computed tomography with a linear-array transducer. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2020;245:597-605.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 52]  [Article Influence: 13.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Gao Y, Wang K, An Y, Jiang SX, Meng H, Tian J. Non model-based bioluminescence tomography using a machine-learning reconstruction strategy. Optica. 2018;5:1451-1454.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
35.  Guo L, Liu F, Cai C, Liu J, Zhang G. 3D deep encoder-decoder network for fluorescence molecular tomography. Opt Lett. 2019;44:1892-1895.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 38]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 35]  [Article Influence: 7.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Zhang Z, Cai M, Gao Y, Shi X, Zhang X, Hu Z, Tian J. A novel Cerenkov luminescence tomography approach using multilayer fully connected neural network. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64:245010.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Li DS, Chen CX, Li JF, Yan Q. Reconstruction of fluorescence molecular tomography based on graph convolution networks. J Opt. 2020;22:045602.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
38.  Yoo J, Sabir S, Heo D, Kim KH, Wahab A, Choi Y, Lee SI, Chae EY, Kim HH, Bae YM, Choi YW, Cho S, Ye JC. Deep Learning Diffuse Optical Tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020;39:877-887.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41]  [Article Influence: 10.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Cong W, Wang G, Kumar D, Liu Y, Jiang M, Wang L, Hoffman E, McLennan G, McCray P, Zabner J, Cong A. Practical reconstruction method for bioluminescence tomography. Opt Express. 2005;13:6756-6771.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 238]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 71]  [Article Influence: 3.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Darne C, Lu Y, Sevick-Muraca EM. Small animal fluorescence and bioluminescence tomography: a review of approaches, algorithms and technology update. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:R1-64.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 139]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 108]  [Article Influence: 9.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]