We aimed to categorize the severity of eosinophilic esophagitis using the recently developed Index of Severity of Eosinophilic Esophagitis (I-SEE), to assess the longitudinal response to treatment, and to correlate baseline severity with outcome variables. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively enrolled cohort of children at two centers was performed. I-SEE was calculated at diagnosis, at the second endoscopy after initial treatment, and at the last endoscopy over a mean of 35 months. We analyzed clinical, endoscopic, and histologic characteristics at baseline by disease severity, examined the change in severity at the second and last endoscopy, and evaluated the association of baseline disease severity with treatment variables. Of 95 children meeting inclusion criteria, 35%, 63%, and 2% had mild, moderate, and severe I-SEE scores, respectively, at baseline. Between baseline and the second endoscopy, the median I-SEE decreased from 7 (7-8) to 2 (0-5) (p < 0.001), and to 0 (0-3) at last endoscopy, with 53% of patients having inactive and 47% having mild scores (p < 0.001). Patients with histologic response at the second and final endoscopy had lower I-SEE scores than non-responders (p < 0.001). A higher baseline I-SEE score was associated with increased odds of receiving 2 or more treatments or combined therapy (OR 95% CI 1.28 (1.03-1.59) and (1.18 (1.04-1.39), respectively).

 The I-SEE score reflects longitudinal treatment response in children with EoE. Patients with higher baseline I-SEE may be at higher risk of requiring more than one treatment, sequentially or in combination.

• Eosinophilic esophagitis is a heterogenous disease with different degrees of severity. • The recently developed index of severity of eosinophilic esophagitis (I-SEE) incorporates frequency of symptoms, complications, and inflammatory and fibrostenotic findings and has shown to be a sensitive tool to change with treatment in a pediatric cohort.

• We confirmed the sensitivity of the index, with a significant decrease in the score with treatment, with the decrease being more pronounced in children with histologic response. • A higher initial severity score was associated with the need for more treatments, sequentially or in combination.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) was first described in the early 1990s. Initially a rarity, it is now the most common cause of dysphagia for solid foods in young adults. Its prevalence is estimated to be 1:2000. Mechanistically, EoE is characterized by a chronic type‑2 T‑helper cell (Th2) inflammation of the esophagus which is triggered by food allergens. It often occurs in association with other Th2-mediated diseases, such as asthma, atopic dermatitis, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. EoE is diagnosed based on an esophagogastroduodenoscopy with biopsies of the esophageal epithelium. The diagnosis can be established when both symptoms of esophageal dysfunction (usually dysphagia) and an eosinophilic infiltration of at least 15 eosinophils per high-power field (HPF) are present. EoE can be treated with drugs, diet, and endoscopic dilatation. In terms of diet, milk elimination appears most reasonable, particularly as first choice. Drug treatment includes proton pump inhibitors (PPI), topical steroids, and the biologic agent dupilumab. Endoscopic dilatation is effective but does not treat the underlying inflammation. Therefore, it should never be used alone, but rather as an add-on therapy. In cases where clinical suspicion of EoE is strong but no or only few eosinophils are detected in esophageal biopsies, the diagnosis of an EoE variant should be considered. This review article provides a detailed discussion of the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and variants of EoE.

Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, approved for the treatment of multiple T2 diseases and more recently for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE). EoE is a chronic T2 inflammatory disease, believed to be a member of the "atopic march", due to multiple similarities with other atopic diseases, ranging from epidemiology to genetics and pathophysiology. Although often co-existing in the same patient, these diseases are still treated as separated entities by different specialists, resulting in polypharmacy and chronic use of steroids. Thus, a shared-decision approach by a multidisciplinary team composed of different specialists might improve clinical management and outcomes. Yet, prospective data on the effectiveness of dupilumab as a single agent for multiple T2 inflammatory diseases are lacking, since only few case reports and small studies have been published so far reporting outcomes in patients affected by multiple T2 diseases. The purpose of this review is to illustrate the rationale and clinical evidence supporting the possibility of using dupilumab as a single therapeutic agent in those patients affected by multiple T2 diseases in addition to EoE.

Standard treatments for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) may present adherence, tolerance, and efficacy challenges. Dupilumab 300 mg weekly is approved for the treatment of EoE in patients ≥ 1 year old, weighing ≥ 15 kg. This analysis aimed to evaluate dupilumab efficacy in patients from the LIBERTY EoE TREET trial (NCT03633617), with prior history of different EoE interventions.

This analysis included patients from Parts B/B - C of LIBERTY EoE TREET. Dupilumab efficacy was analyzed according to prior swallowed budesonide or fluticasone use and in those patients with previously trialed food elimination diet, esophageal dilation, or baseline proton pump inhibitor use, as stratified by prior swallowed topical corticosteroid (STC) use or STC inadequate response/intolerance/contraindication.

Dupilumab improved the proportion of patients achieving peak intraepithelial eosinophil count ≤ 6 eosinophils/high-power field, absolute change in Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire score, and other histologic, symptomatic, and endoscopic endpoints vs. placebo at Week (W) 24, irrespective of prior swallowed budesonide/fluticasone use. Improvements were maintained at W52. Similar results were observed across the other subgroups.

Dupilumab was efficacious in patients with EoE irrespective of prior treatments/interventions.

www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT03633617.

Since the first description of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) as clinicopathologic syndrome three decades ago, considerable progress has been made to standardize and validate instruments to assess symptom severity, quality of life, endoscopic, and histologic activity for the purpose of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Standardized assessment of EoE activity is crucial to be able to compare the results of therapeutic interventions and bring much needed therapies to patients. This review focuses on outcome assessment of disease activity in adults with EoE.

The choice of endpoints/instruments to be used depends on the setting, which might be either an RCT, an observational study, or clinical practice. In RCTs, the choice of endpoints further depends on requirements from regional regulatory authorities. Primary endpoints chosen in RCTs typically focused on symptoms and esophageal peak eosinophil counts, although that likely will change, as therapies with new mechanism of action are explored. Validated symptom-based PRO instruments used in RCTs include the Daily Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ), the EoE activity index (EEsAI) PRO instrument, and numeric rating scales for dysphagia and pain. Histologic activity in RCT is assessed using the EoE histologic scoring system (EoEHSS) that takes into account the severity and extent of eight distinct histologic features. Endoscopic activity is assessed using the EREFS (Exudates, Rings, Edema, Furrows, Stricture) grading system. For observational studies, activity assessment is based on EEsAI PRO, epithelial peak eosinophil counts, and EREFS. In daily clinical practice, EoE activity is based on assessment of symptoms using a visual analog scale (VAS, from 0-10), peak eosinophil count, and EREFS. Several other instruments including the I-SEE, dysphagia-free days over a defined period, the dysphagia stress test, and impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP), to assess EoE severity in clinical practice are currently under evaluation.

EoE activity assessment based on symptom-based PRO, histology, and endoscopy has become increasingly complex and varies depending on the setting. While more stringent endpoints and daily recall PRO instruments are being used in RCTs, new instruments aimed at broader disease activity assessment and weekly recall PRO instruments are being used in observational studies and daily clinical practice.

Intraepithelial mast cells (MCs) are increased in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and reduced with elimination of dietary antigens. Single food reintroduction can identify triggers of eosinophilia; however, the extent to which specific foods trigger intraepithelial mastocytosis remains unknown. We hypothesized that specific foods drive different degrees of MC inflammation. We previously reported a prospective pediatric EoE cohort treated with a 4-food elimination diet (4FED) with removal of soy, egg, wheat, and milk. We retrieved unstained slides in which baseline, 4FED, and post-4FED diet reintroduction time points were available. Slides were stained with tryptase, and intraepithelial MCs were counted. Comparisons were made by stratifying patients by eosinophilia, basal cell hyperplasia (BCH), endoscopic abnormalities, and symptoms. Pearson correlation was assessed for MCs with eosinophilic, endoscopic, and BCH severity; symptoms; and a novel mucosal activity score combining endoscopic and histologic structural severity. Slides were available from 37 patients with at least 1 food reintroduced. MCs were significantly reduced with 4FED. Wheat led to increased intraepithelial MCs in the upper esophagus and with food-induced eosinophilia, while milk led to significantly increased MCs in the upper and lower esophagus and was significantly associated with patients with food-triggered eosinophilia, endoscopic abnormalities, BCH, and symptoms. MCs best correlated with the mucosal activity score during milk reintroduction. In children with EoE, MCs are reduced with 4FED. During milk reintroduction, significant increases in MCs were observed with all metrics of inflammation along with moderate correlation with structural mucosal activity that was not seen with other foods. This suggests that milk exerts unique effects either directly or indirectly on MCs in the esophagus in EoE patients.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic T helper 2-mediated inflammatory disorder of the esophagus defined clinically by the presence of symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and histologically by an eosinophil-predominant infiltration. Correspondingly, treatment has aimed at controlling both symptom severity and histologic activity. However, with emerging clinical and pathophysiologic understanding of the disease, it has become increasingly apparent that other disease aspects need to be targeted as well, such as endoscopic severity and quality of life. Moreover, with the role of eosinophils having been questioned lately, histologic changes beyond eosinophil infiltration have come to attention and are captured by newly validated scores. In addition, EoE is being increasingly considered a transmural disease that cannot be assessed by simple endoscopy but needs measurement of esophageal distensibility, a surrogate marker for fibrosis. Finally, novel tools such as measurement of esophageal impedance could make it possible to assess for complete restoration of the esophageal epithelium, potentially corresponding to disease clearance. This article reviews the various outcome parameters in adult EoE management and proposes an algorithm for a treat-to-target concept, in analogy to what has been practiced in inflammatory bowel disease treatment for the last 10 years.

Dysphagia is the hallmark symptom in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, data are limited regarding the overall prevalence and potential implications of atypical symptoms like odynophagia and retrosternal pain.

Patients enrolled into the Swiss EoE cohort study (SEECS) were analyzed regarding the presence of odynophagia and retrosternal pain. Demographics, other EoE-related symptoms, histologic and endoscopic activity were compared between EoE-patients with vs. without odynophagia and/or retrosternal pain.

474 patients (75.2% male) were analyzed. In their individual course of disease 110 (23.2%) patients stated to have ever experienced odynophagia and 64 (13.5%) retrosternal pain independent of food intake, 24 (5%) patients complained about both symptoms. Patients with odynophagia consistently scored higher in symptom severity (p < 0.001), EREFS score (median 3.0 vs. 2.0, p = 0.006), histologic activity and a lower quality of life (p = 0.001) compared to patients without odynophagia. Sex, age at diagnosis, EoE-specific treatment, complications such as candida or viral esophagitis and disease duration were similar in patients with vs. without odynophagia. Also patients with retrosternal pain scored higher in symptom severity (2.0 vs. 1.0, p = 0.001 and 2.0 vs. 1.0, p < 0.001 in physician and patient questionnaire assessment, respectively). However, there was neither a difference in endoscopic/histologic disease activity nor in quality of life according to presence or absence of retrosternal pain. Due to logistic reasons, a stratification regarding the presence of concomitant dysphagia was not possible.

Odynophagia and swallowing-independent retrosternal pain are common symptoms in patients with EoE, associate with an overall higher EoE-related symptom severity and for the case of odynophagia lower quality of life. However, the influence of concomitant dysphagia and its severity remains unclear and needs to be included in future analyses.

This position paper deals with an expert consensus on diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis and esophageal food impaction issued by the Austrian Eosinophilic Esophagitis Network, a working group under the patronage of the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (ÖGGH). In need of a standardized approach on the management of EoE, recommendations were made based on international guidelines and landmark studies.

: Asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE), characterized by eosinophil infiltration in the esophagus without clinical symptoms, has been reported as a precursor of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Nevertheless, no report exists on the long-term clinical course of the disease. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical course of aEE over 5 years, including the symptomatic conversion rate and the effect of treatments.

: We reviewed 28 patients with aEE who had been followed up for over 5 years with endoscopic monitoring. The basal characteristics of patients were compared with those of 58 patients diagnosed with EoE during the same period. Patients' clinicopathological findings were collected and examined.

: No significant differences in basal characteristics and histopathological findings were observed between the patients with aEE and those with EoE. The median follow-up duration was 64 months. Among the 28 patients with aEE, seven were treated with proton pump inhibitor or potassium-competitive acid blocker and the remaining 21 opted for follow-up with no medication. Among the treated patients, six (85.7%) exhibited endoscopic and pathologic improvements. Among the cases followed up without medication, the findings worsened in two (9.5%), improved spontaneously in seven (33.3%), and were unchanged in 12 (57.1%), and three (14.3%) developed symptoms at a mean time of 40 months. Symptoms developed in cases where endoscopic and pathologic findings remained unchanged or worsened during follow-up.

: Some patients with aEE had improved findings without treatment, whereas others developed symptoms, emphasizing the importance of long-term monitoring and individualized treatment decisions.

Eosinophilic esophagitis is an antigen-mediated chronic inflammatory disorder that has risen in incidence and prevalence over the past 2 decades. The clinical presentation is variable and consists of mainly esophageal symptoms such as dysphagia, heartburn, food impaction, and vomiting. Current management relies on dietary elimination, proton-pump inhibitors, and topical corticosteroids with different response rates and relapses after treatment discontinuation. With a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, many molecules emerged recently as targeted treatment including dupilumab (IL4/IL13 blocker), as the first FDA-approved biological treatment, which has changed the management paradigm.

Transnasal endoscopy (TNE) does not require general anesthesia, an attractive characteristic for monitoring eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We evaluated the adequacy of TNE-obtained esophageal biopsies using the EoE Histology Scoring System (EoEHSS).

The Cincinnati Center for Eosinophilic Disorders database was searched for esophageal biopsies obtained by the same endoscopist, using either TNE or conventional endoscopy (CE). Whole-slide biopsy images were evaluated. The Mann-Whitney test was used for median (interquartile range) values and Fisher exact test for categorical variables. P ≤ .05 was considered significant.

Median age (P = .82) or height (P = .83) did not differ between TNE (n = 17) and CE (n = 17) groups. Although median largest piece size (mm2) differed between the groups (TNE: 0.59 (0.45, 0.86), CE: 2.24 (1.09, 2.82), P < .001), all 8 EoEHSS features were evaluated in each group; only 1 feature (lamina propria fibrosis) was missing in both groups (TNE: 19/34, CE: 11/34, P = .09). The median peak eosinophil count/high-power field differed (TNE: 3 (0, 29), CE: 16 (1, 66), P = .03), but overall grade (TNE: 0.17 (0.10, 0.29), CE: 0.22 (0.14, 0.46), P = .12), stage (TNE: 0.14 (0.10, 0.24), CE: 0.20 (0.10, 0.43), P = .15), and non-eosinophil-related individual EoEHSS scores did not differ.

TNE- and CE-obtained esophageal biopsies are similarly sufficient for evaluation of key pathological features in EoE.

Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have clinical benefits for treating several atopic diseases. However, consensus on its use for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is lacking. The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of MAbs versus placebo for treating EoE.

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcomes were changes in peak esophageal eosinophils count/high power field (HPF) and mean esophageal eosinophils count/HPF. The secondary outcomes were changes in the EoE-Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS), Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS), dysphagia score, and adverse events (AEs). We compared binary outcomes using risk ratio (RR) and continuous outcomes using mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD), with 95% confidence interval (CI). Considering the diversity of mechanistic properties of MAbs, a pre-specified subgroup analysis by MAb mechanism of action was performed for all outcomes, provided that at least two studies were in each subgroup. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics.

6 RCTs were included (533 patients). Compared to placebo, MAbs led to a significant reduction in peak esophageal eosinophils count/HPF (MD -0.78; CI 95% -0.87, -0.6801) and mean esophageal eosinophils count/HPF (SMD -0.79; CI 95% -1.5, -0.08). Moreover, MAbs significantly reduced EoE-HSS scores (grade score: SMD -9.31; 95% CI -13.95, -4.6701; stage score: SMD -10.18; 95% CI -15.06, -5.31), EREFS (SMD -5.95; CI 95% -9.19, -2.71) and dysphagia score (SMD -1.79; CI 95% -3.36, -0.23) without increasing AEs compared to placebo. Among those MAbs whose mechanism of action includes the blockage of the receptor for IL-13 (Dupilumab, QAX576, and RPC4046), the scores of EoE-HSS grade, EoE-HSS stage, EREFS, and dysphagia were significantly reduced, and they presented a similar risk of overall and serious AEs compared to placebo.

MAbs seem effective and safe in reducing esophageal eosinophil infiltrate, EoE-HSS score, EREFS score, and dysphagia symptoms in patients with EoE. However, further evidence is needed to establish its place in EoE management.

Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders (EGIDs) are a group of conditions characterized by abnormal eosinophil accumulation in the gastrointestinal tract. Among these EGIDs, Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) is the most well documented, while less is known about Eosinophilic Gastritis (EoG), Eosinophilic Enteritis (EoN), and Eosinophilic Colitis (EoC). The role of endoscopy in EGIDs is pivotal, with applications in diagnosis, disease monitoring, and therapeutic intervention. In EoE, the endoscopic reference score (EREFS) has been shown to be accurate in raising diagnostic suspicion and effective in monitoring therapeutic responses. Additionally, endoscopic dilation is the first-line treatment for esophageal strictures. For EoG and EoN, while the literature is more limited, common endoscopic findings include erythema, nodules, and ulcerations. Histology remains the gold standard for diagnosing EGIDs, as it quantifies eosinophilic infiltration. In recent years, there have been significant advancements in the histological understanding of EoE, leading to the development of diagnostic scores and the identification of specific microscopic features associated with the disease. However, for EoG, EoN, and EoC, precise eosinophil count thresholds for diagnosis have not yet been established. This review aims to elucidate the role of endoscopy and histology in the diagnosis and management of the three main EGIDs and to analyze their strengths and limitations, their interconnection, and future research directions.

It is an honor and a privilege to have helped bring this Special Issue titled "Multidisciplinarity and Trandisciplinarity in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pediatric Gastrointestinal Diseases" to you [...].

The aim of the study was to characterize the circulating immunome of patients with EoE before and after proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment in order to identify potential non-invasive biomarkers of treatment response.

PBMCs from 19 healthy controls and 24 EoE patients were studied using a 39-plex spectral cytometry panel. The plasmacytoid dendritic cell (pDC) population was differentially characterized by spectral cytometry analysis and immunofluorescence assays in esophageal biopsies from 7 healthy controls and 13 EoE patients.

Interestingly, EoE patients at baseline had lower levels of circulating pDC compared with controls. Before treatment, patients with EoE who responded to PPI therapy had higher levels of circulating pDC and classical monocytes, compared with non-responders. Moreover, following PPI therapy pDC levels were increased in all EoE patients, while normal levels were only restored in PPI-responding patients. Finally, circulating pDC levels inversely correlated with peak eosinophil count and pDC count in esophageal biopsies. The number of tissue pDCs significantly increased during active EoE, being even higher in non-responder patients when compared to responder patients pre-PPI. pDC levels decreased after PPI intake, being further restored almost to control levels in responder patients post-PPI.

We hereby describe a unique immune fingerprint of EoE patients at diagnosis. Moreover, circulating pDC may be also used as a novel non-invasive biomarker to predict subsequent response to PPI treatment.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by an intense infiltration of eosinophils into the esophageal epithelium. When not adequately controlled, eosinophilic inflammation can lead to changes in components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) of the lamina propria. Particularly, alterations to the collagen fiber matrix can lead to lamina propria fibrosis (LPF), which plays an important role in the fibrostenotic complications of EoE. Current approaches to assess LPF in EoE are prone to inter-observer inconsistencies and provide limited insight into the structural remodeling of the ECM. An objective approach to quantify LPF can eliminate inter-observer inconsistencies and provide novel insights into the fibrotic transformation of the lamina propria in EoE. Second harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy is a powerful modality for objectively quantifying disease associated alterations in ECM collagen structure that is finding increasing use for clinical research. We used SHG with morphometric analysis (SHG-MA) to characterize lamina propria collagen fibers and ECM porosity in esophageal biopsies collected from children with active EoE (n = 11), inactive EoE (n = 11), and non-EoE (n = 11). The collagen fiber width quantified by SHG-MA correlated positively with peak eosinophil count (r = 0.65, p < 0.005) and histopathologist scoring of LPF (r = 0.52, p < 0.005) in the esophageal biopsies. Patients with active EoE had a significant enlargement of ECM pores compared to inactive EoE and non-EoE (p < 0.005), with the mean pore area correlating positively with EoE activity (r = 0.76, p < 0.005) and LPF severity (r = 0.65, p < 0.005). These results indicate that SHG-MA can be utilized to objectively characterize and provide novel insights into lamina propria ECM structural remodeling in children with EoE, which could aid in monitoring disease progression.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, progressive, type 2 inflammatory esophageal disease presenting as dysphagia to solid food and non-obstructive food impaction. Knowledge gaps exist in its diagnosis and management. These expert recommendations focused on the diagnosis of EoE in the United Arab Emirates. An electronic search of PubMed and Embase databases was used to gather evidence from systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, consensus papers, and expert opinions from the last five years on the diagnosis of EoE. The evidence was graded using the Oxford system. Literature search findings were shared with the expert panel. A 5-point scale (strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, and strongly disagree) was used, and a concordance rate of >75% among experts indicated agreement. Using a modified Delphi technique, 18 qualified experts provided 17 recommendations. Eleven statements achieved high agreement, four got moderate agreement, and two got low agreement. Challenges exist in diagnosing EoE, particularly in children. Esophageal biopsies were crucial in diagnosis, irrespective of visible mucosal changes. Further research on diagnostic tools like endoscopic mucosal impedance and biomarkers is needed. Diagnosis relies on esophageal biopsies and symptom-histology correlation; however, tools like EoE assessment questionnaires and endoscopic mucosal impedance could enhance the accuracy and efficiency of EoE diagnosis. The diagnosis of EoE is challenging since the symptoms seldom correlate with the histological findings. Currently, diagnosis is based on patient symptoms and endoscopic and histological findings. Further research into mucosal impedance tests and the role of biomarkers is needed to facilitate diagnosis.

Biochemical alterations in the esophagus of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are poorly understood. We used Raman spectroscopy through a pediatric endoscope to identify key Raman features reflective of the esophageal biochemical composition to differentiate between children with EoE from non-EoE controls and between children with active (aEoE) and inactive EoE (iEoE).

Spectral measurements were obtained using a customized pediatric endoscope-compatible fiber-optic Raman probe in real time during an esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Chemometric analysis was performed to identify key Raman features associated with EoE. Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess relationship between the key Raman features and EoE activity indices. Their diagnostic utility was ascertained using the receiver operator characteristic curve analysis.

Forty-three children were included in the study (EoE = 32 [74%] and non-EoE control = 11 [26%]; aEoE = 20 [63%] and iEoE = 12 [37%]). Raman intensities assigned to lipids, proteins, and glycogen:protein ratio accurately distinguished children with EoE from those without EoE and aEoE from iEoE. They significantly correlated with EoE activity indices. The Raman peak ratio for lipids had 90.6% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.95 to differentiate children with EoE from non-EoE controls. The glycogen:protein ratio had 70% sensitivity, 91.7% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.75 to distinguish children with aEoE from iEoE.

Real-time intraendoscopy Raman spectroscopy is an effective method for identifying spectral markers reflective of the esophageal biochemical composition in children with EoE. This technique may aid in the diagnosis and monitoring of EoE and help to elucidate EoE pathogenesis.

Asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE) is considered to be a potential precursor of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, there are few clinical parameters that can be used to evaluate the disease. Therefore, we aimed to clarify the factors involved in the symptoms of EoE by examining the clinicopathological differences between aEE and EoE.

We reviewed 41 patients with esophageal eosinophilia who underwent endoscopic ultrasonography and high-resolution manometry. They were divided into the aEE group (n=16) and the EoE group (n=25) using the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease score. The patients' clinicopathological findings were collected and examined.

The median Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease score was 3.0 in the aEE group and 10.0 in the EoE group. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics, endoscopic findings and pathological findings. The cutoff value for wall thickening was 3.13 mm for the total esophageal wall thickness and 2.30 mm for the thickness from the surface to the muscular layer (total esophageal wall thickness: 84.0% sensitivity, 75.0% specificity; thickness from the surface to the muscular layer: 84.0% sensitivity, 68.7% specificity). The high-resolution manometry study was abnormal in seven patients (43.8%) in the aEE group and in 12 (48.0%) in the EoE group. The contractile front velocity was slower in the EoE group (p=0.026).

The esophageal wall thickening in the lower portion of the esophagus is an important clinical factors related to the symptoms in patients with EoE.

The Swiss Eosinophilic Esophagitis Cohort Study (SEECS) is a national cohort that was established in 2015 with the aim of improving quality of care of affected adults with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Between 2020 and 2022, paper questionnaires were gradually replaced by fully electronic data capture using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap®) software. We aim to provide an update of the SEECS 8 years after its launch.

The SEECS prospectively includes adults (≥18 years of age) with EoE as well as patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy control subjects (HC). Upon inclusion and follow-up (typically once every 12-18 months), patients and physicians complete REDCap® questionnaires, which are available in German, French, and English. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and biologic findings are assessed on the same day using validated instruments (EEsAI PRO for symptoms; EoE-QoL-A for QoL; EREFS for endoscopic activity; modified EoE-HSS for histologic activity). The SEECS biobank includes biosamples from patients with EoE, GERD, and HC.

As of July 2023, the SEECS included 778 patients (716 [92%] with EoE, 29 [3.8%] with GERD, and 33 [4.2%] HC; 559/778 [71.9%] were male). Mean age ± SD (years) at enrollment according to diagnosis was as follows: EoE 41.9 ± 12.9, GERD 53.6 ± 16.4, HC 51.7 ± 17.2. Concomitant GERD was found in 200 patients (27.9%) of the EoE cohort. Concomitant allergic disorders (asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, eczema) were present in 500 EoE patients (74.4%). At inclusion, 686 (95.8%) of EoE patients were on ongoing treatment (orodispersible budesonide tablet [Jorveza®] in 281 patients [41%]; budesonide or fluticasone syrup or swallowed powder in 290 patients [42.3%]; proton-pump inhibitors in 162 patients [23.6%]; elimination diets in 103 patients [15%]; and esophageal dilation at last visit in 166 patients [24.2%]). A total of 8,698 biosamples were collected, of which 1,395 (16%) were used in the framework of translational research projects.

SEECS continuously grows and is operational using fully electronic data capture. SEECS offers up-to-date epidemiologic and real-world clinical efficacy data on EoE and promotes clinical and translational research.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated disease, manifested by dysphagia and characterized by intraepithelial infiltration: more than 15 eosinophils per field of view at x400 magnification, and requiring differential diagnosis with reflux esophagitis (RE).

To access the implication of EoE histologic scoring system (EoEHSS) for differential diagnosis of EoE and RE and to characterize features of immune response in these diseases.

38 patients with EoE and 38 patients with RE were enrolled in the study. All the patients had esophagogastroduodenoscopy with biopsy. Biopsy specimens were stained with H&E and combined PAS/Alcian blue staining. Immunohistochemical evaluation was conducted with antibodies to CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD56 and CD68.

Grade score of EoEHSS in EoE was 2.4 times more than in RE (p<0.05). Stage score in EoE was 2.75 more than in RE (p<0.05). Intraepithelial count of CD3+ T-lymphocytes comprised 87 (76-95.5) in high-power view in EoE and 45 (38.5-48.5) in high-power view in RE. Intraepithelial count of CD4+ T-lymphocytes was 35 (28-41.5) in high-power view in EoE and 19 (16.5- 22.5) in high-power view in RE. Intraepithelial count of CD8+ T-lymphocytes comprised 59 (50.5-67.5) in high-power field in EoE and 27 (24-28.5) in high-power field in RE.

The use of the EoEHSS histological rating scale for eosinophilic esophagitis is effective in the differential diagnosis of EoE and EC. Predominant cells in intraepithelial infiltrate are CD3+ T-lymphocytes both in EoE and RE, CD8+ cells prevail over CD4+ cells. In EoE intraepithelial count of CD3+ T-lymphocytes is 1.93 times more, count of intraepithelial CD4+ lymphocytes is 1.84 times more and count of CD8+ lymphocytes is 2.19 times more than in RE.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of budesonide oral suspension (BOS) in adolescents with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

This post hoc analysis pooled data from two 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of BOS 2.0 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) (phase 2, NCT01642212; phase 3, NCT02605837) in patients aged 11-17 years with EoE and dysphagia. Efficacy endpoints included histologic (≤6, ≤1, and <15 eosinophils per high-power field [eos/hpf]), dysphagia symptom (≥30% reduction in Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire [DSQ] scores from baseline), and clinicopathologic (≤6 eos/hpf and ≥30% reduction in DSQ scores from baseline) responses at week 12. Change from baseline to week 12 in peak eosinophil counts, DSQ scores, EoE Histology Scoring System (EoEHSS) grade (severity) and stage (extent) total score ratios (TSRs), and total EoE Endoscopic Reference Scores (EREFS) were assessed. Safety outcomes were also examined.

Overall, 76 adolescents were included (BOS, n = 45; placebo, n = 31). Significantly more patients who received BOS than placebo achieved histologic responses (≤6 eos/hpf: 46.7% vs 6.5%; ≤1 eos/hpf: 42.2% vs 0.0%; <15 eos/hpf: 53.3% vs 9.7%; P < 0.001) and a clinicopathologic response (31.1% vs 3.2%; P = 0.003) at week 12. More BOS-treated than placebo-treated patients achieved a dysphagia symptom response at week 12 (68.9% vs 58.1%; not statistically significant P = 0.314). BOS-treated patients had significantly greater reductions in EoEHSS grade and stage TSRs ( P < 0.001) and total EREFS ( P = 0.021) from baseline to week 12 than placebo-treated patients. BOS was well tolerated, with no clinically meaningful differences in adverse events versus placebo.

BOS 2.0 mg b.i.d. significantly improved most efficacy outcomes in adolescents with EoE versus placebo.

This review presents and summarizes the existing studies on the treatment goals and options for pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis utilizing rigorous peer-reviewed literature.

In addition to traditional treatments, emerging biologic therapies continue to evolve the approach to treating pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. Well defined treatment goals will aid the continued development of new therapies. Further, innovative assessment tools have changed how the clinician is able to assess the effectiveness of therapies with a trend toward less invasive options. The management of pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis continues to evolve with the advent of both novel treatment options and assessment tools. Treatment choices, with benefits and risks involved, should be presented to families upon diagnosis and tailored towards the individual patient and likelihood of adherence and success. Biologic therapy for EoE presents an exciting option for both first line therapy and escalation for those with severe or unresponsive disease.

The eosinophilic esophagitis histologic scoring system (EoEHSS) was developed to enhance the diagnostic standard of peak eosinophil count (PEC) in evaluating disease activity in EoE.

(1) Correlate the EoEHSS and PEC to measures of symptomatic and endoscopic disease activity, (2) Correlate EoEHSS grade and stage subcomponents to clinical, radiology, and endoscopic markers of fibrotic disease, (3) Evaluate EoEHSS remission in asymptomatic patients with PEC < 15 eosinophils per high powered field (eos/hpf).

Secondary analysis of prospective cohort data of 22 patients with EoE that underwent dietary therapy and endoscopy at 3 time points. Active disease was defined by EoEHSS grade or stage > 0.125, symptomatic disease by EoE symptom activity index > 20, endoscopic disease by endoscopic reference score > 2, and histologic disease by PEC ≥ 15 eos/hpf. EoEHSS remission was defined by esophageal inflammation (EI) grade of 0-1, EI stage of 0, total grade ≤ 3, and total stage ≤ 3.

EoEHSS grade and stage did not correlate with symptomatic disease but did with endoscopic and histologic disease. PEC showed similar correlation pattern. Abnormal grade and stage had strong sensitivity (87-100%) but poor specificity (11-36%) to detect symptomatic, endoscopic, and histologic disease activity. Lamina propria fibrosis was evaluated in 36% of biopsies and did not correlate with minimum esophageal diameter. Out of 14 patients who were in complete symptomatic, endoscopic, and histologic remission, 8 met criteria for EoEHSS remission.

The positive and negative correlations of EoEHSS to specific measures of symptomatic, histologic, and endoscopic activity suggest that it provides complementary information in EoE.

Having long been considered the mainstay in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) diagnosis and pathogenesis, the role of eosinophils has been questioned and might be less important than previously thought. It is well known now that EoE is a Th2-mediated disease with many more disease features than eosinophilic infiltration. With more knowledge on EoE, less pronounced phenotypes or nuances of the disease have become apparent. In fact, EoE might be only the tip of the iceberg (and the most extreme phenotype) with several variant forms, at least three, lying on a disease spectrum. Although a common (food induced) pathogenesis has yet to be confirmed, gastroenterologists and allergologists should be aware of these new phenomena in order to further characterize these patients. In the following review, we discuss the pathogenesis of EoE, particularly those mechanisms beyond eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal mucosa, non-eosinophilic inflammatory cell populations, the new disease entity EoE-like disease, variant forms of EoE, and the recently coined term mast cell esophagitis.

Since the first description of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) less than three decades ago, we have observed a striking increase in the number of patients diagnosed with EoE and the understanding of its clinical and immunopathogenic background. Nonetheless, a plethora of open questions await elucidation. In this Review, we discuss the current state of knowledge regarding the underlying mechanisms, particularly environmental factors and their interaction with genetic susceptibility. Subsequently, we discuss how to translate these factors into the diagnostic and therapeutic management of this chronic, immune-mediated disorder. Finally, we dissect the still long list of unmet needs, such as reasons for and handling refractory EoE and atypical clinical presentations. These open questions can guide us through future research steps and potentially foster reconsideration of the diagnostic guidelines of EoE.

Eosinophils in the esophageal epithelium are unevenly distributed in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Esophageal eosinophilia (EE) may be observable by endocytoscopy (EC). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of EC for the diagnosis of EE.

A total of 33 EoE patients underwent EC with methylene blue staining from March 2020 to April 2021. A total of 194 EC images with corresponding biopsies were obtained. Three findings of EC, increased squamous cells (item I), increased inflammatory cells (item II), and cells with bilobed nuclei (item III), were established. These findings were reviewed by two endoscopists to diagnose EE. Another four endoscopists reviewed the images for interobserver agreement.

When all three items were met by EC, the sensitivity and the accuracy for the diagnosis of EE were 88% and 76%, respectively. The integrated diagnostic odds ratios (ORs) for the diagnosis of EE of the four endoscopists were significant (OR: 3.98, 95% CI: 2.94-5.40, p < 0.001). The results were similar when only item III was met. Interobserver agreement was good for item III to diagnose EE (kappa value = 0.653).

The diagnostic performance of EC for EE is acceptable and has good interobserver agreement. It may be useful for targeted biopsy in EoE patients.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory disease, characterized by esophageal dysfunction and intense eosinophil infiltration localized in the esophagus. In recent decades, EoE has become a growing concern as a major cause of dysphagia and food impaction in adolescents and adults. EoE is a clinicopathological disease for which the histological demonstration of esophageal eosinophilia is essential for diagnosis. Therefore, the recognition of the characteristic endoscopic features with subsequent biopsy are critical for early definitive diagnosis and treatment, in order to prevent complications. Accumulating reports have revealed that EoE has several non-specific characteristic endoscopic findings, such as rings, furrows, white exudates, stricture/narrowing, edema, and crepe-paper esophagus. These findings were recently unified under the EoE endoscopic reference score (EREFS), which has been widely used as an objective, standard measurement for endoscopic EoE assessment. However, the diagnostic consistency of those findings among endoscopists is still inadequate, leading to underdiagnosis or misdiagnosis. Some endoscopic findings suggestive of EoE, such as multiple polypoid lesions, caterpillar sign, ankylosaurus back sign, and tug sign/pull sign, will aid the diagnosis. In addition, image-enhanced endoscopy represented by narrow band imaging, endocytoscopy, and artificial intelligence are expected to render endoscopic diagnosis more efficient and less invasive. This review focuses on suggestions for endoscopic assessment and biopsy, including recent advances in optical technology which may improve the diagnosis of EoE.

When eosinophilia was first associated with esophagitis, it was thought to reflect gastroesophageal reflux disease, especially given the efficacy of reflux medications to abate esophageal eosinophilia in many individuals. Subsequent studies demonstrated disease remittance with amino acid-based formulas and conversely induction of esophageal eosinophilia in mice following allergen challenge. These results, along with the finding that proton pump inhibitors alleviated esophageal eosinophilia by an anti-inflammatory mechanism, turned attention away from an acid-induced pathogenesis and established eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) as a separate disease entity driven by allergic inflammation. The disease underpinnings were elucidated by analysis of esophageal transcriptomic profiling, revealing gene signatures orchestrated by type 2 cytokine signaling, mainly IL-13. Preclinical studies showed that IL-13 overproduction was sufficient to induce EoE-like changes in mice and human ex vivo systems and conversely that inhibiting IL-13 signaling attenuated these processes. An early proof-of-principle study with a humanized anti-IL-13 mAb in patients with EoE revealed correction of the EoE transcriptome and attenuation of esophageal eosinophilia, providing a rationale for advancing anti-type 2 cytokine therapy for EoE. Dupilumab, a precision therapeutic mAb that blocks the shared IL-13 and IL-4 receptor, is the first drug to advance through clinical trials and receive US Food and Drug Administration approval for EoE. The ability of dupilumab to improve clinical, histologic, endoscopic, and molecular features of EoE and garner US Food and Drug Administration approval is a victory for science, rare diseases, patients, and advocacy and provides a framework for developing additional EoE treatments and approved treatments for eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease beyond the esophagus.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) has received increasing attention as a disease entity, and it is now recognized as an important disorder of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract. Topical corticosteroids (tCS) are effective in clinical-pathological remission induction (RI) and remission maintenance (RM) of active EoE. With scoring systems, such as clinical (SDI), endoscopic (EREFS), and histological (EoEHSS) systems, EoE can be graded, and its disease activity can be assessed.

To discover how closely results within each of the three scoring systems SDI, EREFS, and EoEHSS are correlated between initial diagnosis (ID), RI, and RM, and to determine how well scores from the three systems are intercorrelated at each time point.

Retrospective cohort analysis of patients with active EoE was performed between 2006 and 2020, with follow-up for up to 6 years. SDI, EREFS and EoEHSS scores were recorded at ID, at RI, and in RM. Evaluation employed descriptive statistics, the Friedman test, and Bonferroni-corrected post hoc pairwise comparisons.

At RI 29 and at RM 19 EoE patients provided data. Significant correlations were found between EREFS and EoEHSS at RI and in RM. Pairwise comparisons showed significant differences between ID and RI for SDI, for EREFS, and for EoEHSS.

The scoring systems tested did not show intercorrelation at ID. Comparison revealed significant differences for SDI, EREFS, and EoEHSS between the systems at ID und RI, but not in RM, during tCS treatment. These results underline the efficacy of tCS (at RI and RM) in the treatment of active EoE.

Introduction: Benign esophageal tumors are uncommon; most are detected by chance upon endoscopy. Lymphoid polyps, like those of the small and large intestine, have not been reported to occur in the esophagus. We describe an esophageal benign lymphoid polyp. Case Report: A 7.5-year-old girl was referred with dysphagia. Upper endoscopy demonstrated and removed a single small pedunculated polyp in the upper third of the esophagus. The polyp consisted of two hyperplastic lymphoid aggregates in the lamina propria covered by stratified non-keratinizing squamous epithelium. Discussion: Esophageal polyps may be produced by hyperplastic lymphoid tissue and may be a cause of dysphagia.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a patchy disease of the esophagus with significant variability in intraepithelial eosinophilia. Three biopsies each from distal and proximal esophagus are recommended for identification of active EoE. Recent work suggests 3 biopsy sites are more optimal. We sought to evaluate 2-site vs 3-site esophageal biopsy combinations for utility to identify active EoE.

We prospectively obtained 3-site esophageal biopsies based on rigorous endoscopic measurements of the proximal, mid, and distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Biopsies were reviewed by a pathologist, and those with at least 15 eosinophils per high-power field were considered active EoE. The sensitivity of one or more sites to identify active EoE was determined, and endoscopic measurements were correlated to height and age.

Five hundred ninety-six endoscopies were performed in 217 patients; of these, 304 endoscopies in 167 patients had active EoE. Among the initial esophagogastroduodenoscopies with active EoE, distal biopsies had greater than 80% sensitivity, whereas mid and proximal biopsies had sensitivity of 65% and 62%, respectively, and distal + proximal biopsies had the highest diagnostic sensitivity for a 2-site combination. Among the 304 endoscopies with active EoE, 9 had focal eosinophilia restricted to the mid esophagus, and 8 were restricted to the proximal esophagus. For patients with multiple endoscopies with active EoE, nearly one fourth had reduced sites with eosinophilia at the second time point. Endoscopic measurements strongly correlated with height and age.

This study supports endoscopic measurement-guided 3-site biopsies for optimal disease assessment of active EoE in children.

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is an increasingly common cause of dysphagia in both children and adults, as well as one of the most prevalent oesophageal diseases with a significant impact on physical health and quality of life. We have provided a single comprehensive guideline for both paediatric and adult gastroenterologists on current best practice for the evaluation and management of EoE.

The Oesophageal Section of the British Society of Gastroenterology was commissioned by the Clinical Standards Service Committee to develop these guidelines. The Guideline Development Group included adult and paediatric gastroenterologists, surgeons, dietitians, allergists, pathologists and patient representatives. The Population, Intervention, Comparator and Outcomes process was used to generate questions for a systematic review of the evidence. Published evidence was reviewed and updated to June 2021. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to assess the evidence and make recommendations. Two rounds of voting were held to assess the level of agreement and the strength of recommendations, with 80% consensus required for acceptance.

Fifty-seven statements on EoE presentation, diagnosis, investigation, management and complications were produced with further statements created on areas for future research.

These comprehensive adult and paediatric guidelines of the British Society of Gastroenterology and British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition are based on evidence and expert consensus from a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals, including patient advocates and patient support groups, to help clinicians with the management patients with EoE and its complications.

Data on the role of the microbiome in adult patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) are limited.

To prospectively collect and characterise the salivary, oesophageal and gastric microbiome in patients with EoE, further correlating the findings with disease activity.

Adult patients with symptoms of oesophageal dysfunction undergoing upper endoscopy were consecutively enrolled. Patients were classified as EoE patients, in case of more than 15 eosinophils per high-power field, or non-EoE controls, in case of lack of eosinophilic infiltration. Before and during endoscopy, saliva, oesophageal and gastric fundus biopsies were collected. Microbiota assessment was performed by 16 s rRNA analysis. A Sparse Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (sPLS-DA) was implemented to identify biomarkers.

Saliva samples were collected from 29 EoE patients and 20 non-EoE controls;, biopsies from 25 EoE and 5 non-EoE controls. In saliva samples, 23 Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) were positively associated with EoE and 27 ASVs with controls, making it possible to discriminate between EoE and non-EoE patients with a classification error (CE) of 24%. In a validation cohort, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of this model were 78.6%, 80%, 75%, 80% and 60%, respectively. Moreover, the analysis of oesophageal microbiota samples observed a clear microbial pattern able to discriminate between active and inactive EoE (CE = 8%).

Our preliminary data suggest that salivary metabarcoding analysis in combination with machine learning approaches could become a valid, cheap, non-invasive test to segregate between EoE and non-EoE patients.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the esophagus characterized by increased number of eosinophils. Currently, EoE diagnosis is based on endoscopic procedures for histopathological examination, eosinophils' counting and, often, in clinical practice, the challenge is the differentiation between EoE and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Our aim was to develop novel peptide ligand to Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) present in EoE biopsies of patients with potential to be used for detection. We performed a comparative proteomic analysis using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) of esophageal biopsies from pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease and control individuals. Then, phage display technology was used to select peptides against specific up-regulated protein from EoE patients. Twelve phage clones were selected after three biopanning rounds, and the best phage clone reactivity was evaluated by phage-ELISA assay using esophageal mucus samples from 94 pediatric patients. Mass spectrometry showed that eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) was one of the most up-regulated proteins in EoE patients, which is an eosinophil granule protein usually deposited on tissues to mediate remodeling, but in excess may cause fibrosis and hypertrophy, especially in allergic responses. A highly reactive ECP-ligand peptide (E5) was able to distinguish reactive mucus of EoE patients from GERD and the control individuals by Phage-ELISA, achieving a sensitivity of 84.62%, and a specificity of 82.72%. This is the first study that successfully demonstrated an antibody-like peptide targeting ECP at the esophagus mucus as a useful auxilliary tool for EoE diagnosis with a significant association with atopic disorders and dysphagia.ClinicalTrials.gov no.: NCT03069573.