To evaluate the effectiveness of the new-generation snapshot freeze (SSF2) algorithm combined with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) in improving the image quality of coronary artery calcifications (CAC) and their quantification.

Coronary artery calcification score (CACS) scans were performed on 69 patients using ECG-triggered noncontrast CT. Four groups of images were reconstructed with SSF2 or without (STD), combined with ASIR-V (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V) and DLIR: STDASIR-V, STDDLIR, SSF2ASIR-V, and SSF2DLIR. CAC image quality was compared, and inter-observer consistency was evaluated among reconstruction groups. CACS, including the Agatston score (AS), volume score (VS), mass score (MS), and the risk stratification based on AS among groups, were compared.

The consistencies of the inter-observer image quality scores were excellent or good (kappa=0.705 to 0.837). SSF2ASIR-V and SSF2DLIR had significantly higher scores than STDASIR-V and STDDLIR in reducing motion artifacts of calcified plaques (P<0.05), while no significant differences between SSF2ASIR-V and SSF2DLIR, or between STDASIR-V and STDDLIR (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in CT values of vessels, subcutaneous fat, and muscle in CAC images, but the noises of SSF2ASIR-V and STDASIR-V images were significantly higher than those of SSF2DLIR and STDDLIR images (P>0.05). STDASIR-V had the highest CACS values, while SSF2DLIR had the lowest. Using AS in STDASIR-V as the reference, 9 patients (13.04%) in SSF2DLIR and 7 patients (10.14%) in SSF2ASIR-V had a risk stratification reduced, while no change in STDDLIR.

SSF2 and DLIR significantly reduce motion artifacts and image noise in non-contrast CACS CT, respectively. SSF2 reduces CACS values and risk stratification.

To evaluate the performance of the Aquilion Exceed LB computed tomography (CT) scanner for radiotherapy treatment planning, this study examined the effect of different combinations of the image reconstruction function (IRF) (AiCE and AIDR) and scan parameters on the CT-to-physical density (CT-PD) table and radiation dose in the phantom, and the effect of different object positions on CT values.

To investigate IRF's influence on each material, we calculated CT values by varying tube current, pitch, field of view (FOV), and phantom position for each IRF, comparing them with reference values using filtered back projection (FBP). Furthermore, we evaluated changes in depth dose values due to IRF differences using a solid phantom.

In the combinations of changes in IRF and scan parameters the change in CT value (ΔHU) of each material was within ±10 HU, except for most conditions. The change in physical density (ΔPD) was within ±0.02 g/cm3 for all combinations. For changes in phantom position, ΔHU was within ±25 HU for changes within the scan FOV, except for Bone 200 mg/cc and 1250 mg/cc. In areas outside the scan FOV with an expanded FOV, ΔHU was significantly larger than within the scan FOV. Variations in depth dose for different IRFs using solid phantoms were within ±0.5 %, except at material boundaries.

Our evaluations of the CT values and dose calculations suggested no need to change the CT-PD table, even with multiple IRFs.

This study aimed to evaluate the image quality and visualization of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on arterial phase computed tomography (CT) using the contrast enhancement (CE)-boost technique.

This retrospective study included 527 consecutive patients who underwent dynamic liver CT between June 2021 and February 2022. Quantitative and qualitative image analyses were performed on 486 patients after excluding 41 patients. HCC conspicuity was evaluated in 40 of the 486 patients with at least one HCC in the liver. Iodinated images obtained by subtracting nonenhanced images from arterial phase images were combined to generate CE-boost images. For quantitative image analysis, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured for the liver, pancreas, muscles, and aorta. For qualitative analysis, the overall image quality and noise were graded using a 3-point scale. Artifact, sharpness, and HCC lesion conspicuity were assessed using a 5-point scale. The paired-sample t test was used to compare quantitative measures, whereas the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare qualitative measures.

The mean SNR and CNR of the aorta, liver, pancreas, and muscle were significantly higher, and the image noise was significantly lower in the CE-boost images than in the conventional images ( P  < 0.001). The mean CNR of HCC was also significantly higher in the CE-boost images than in the conventional images ( P  < 0.001). In the qualitative analysis, CE-boost images showed higher scores for HCC lesion conspicuity than conventional images ( P  < 0.001).

The overall image quality and visibility of HCC were improved using the CE-boost technique.

To evaluate and compare image quality of different energy levels of virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) using standard versus strong deep learning spectral reconstruction (DLSR) on dual-energy CT pulmonary angiogram (DECT-PA).

A retrospective study was performed on 70 patients who underwent DECT-PA (15 PE present; 55 PE absent) scans. VMIs were reconstructed at different energy levels ranging from 35 to 200 keV using standard and strong levels with deep learning spectral reconstruction. Quantitative assessment was performed using region of interest (ROI) analysis of eleven different anatomical areas, measuring absolute attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). In addition, CNR of clot compared to normally opacified lumen was calculated in cases that were positive for PE. For qualitative analysis, four different keV levels (40-60-80-100) were evaluated.

The image noise was significantly lower, and the cardiovascular SNR (24.9 ± 5.85 vs. 21.98 ± 5.49) and CNR (23.72 ± 8.00 vs. 20.31 ± 6.44) were significantly higher, on strong Deep Learning Spectral reconstruction (DLSR) than standard DLSR (p < 0.0001). PE-specific CNR (8.58 ± 4.47 vs. 6.25 ± 3.19) was significantly higher on strong DLSR than standard (p < 0.0001). The subjective image quality scores were diagnostically acceptable at four different keV levels (40-60-80-100 keV) evaluated using both standard and strong DLSR, with no qualitative differences observed at those energies.

Strong DLSR improves image quality with an increase of the SNR and CNR in DECT-PA compared to standard DLSR.

To evaluate the accuracy of ultra-low dose (ULD) chest computed tomography (CT), with a radiation exposure equivalent to a 2-view chest x-ray, for pulmonary nodule detection using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR).

This prospective cross-sectional study included 60 patients referred to our institution for assessment or follow-up of solid pulmonary nodules. All patients underwent low-dose (LD) and ULD chest CT within the same examination session. LD CT data were reconstructed using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V (ASIR-V), whereas ULD CT data were reconstructed using DLIR and ASIR-V. ULD CT images were reviewed by 2 readers and LD CT images were reviewed by an experienced thoracic radiologist as the reference standard. Quantitative image quality analysis was performed, and the detectability of pulmonary nodules was assessed according to their size and location.

The effective radiation dose for ULD CT and LD CT were 0.13±0.01 and 1.16±0.6 mSv, respectively. Over the whole population, LD CT revealed 733 nodules. At ULD, DLIR images significantly exhibited better image quality than ASIR-V images. The overall sensitivity of DLIR reconstruction for the detection of solid pulmonary nodules from the ULD CT series was 93% and 82% for the 2 readers, with a good to excellent agreement with LD CT (ICC=0.82 and 0.66, respectively). The best sensitivities were observed in the middle lobe (97% and 85%, respectively).

At ULD, DLIR reconstructions, with minimal radiation exposure that could facilitate large-scale screening, allow the detection of pulmonary nodules with high sensitivity in an unrestricted BMI population.

This study aimed to evaluate the image quality of virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) reconstructed with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) using dual-energy CT (DECT) to diagnose pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Fifty patients with histologically confirmed PDAC who underwent multiphasic contrast-enhanced DECT between 2019 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. VMIs at 40-100 keV were reconstructed using hybrid iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V 30% and ASiR-V 50%) and DLIR (TFI-M) algorithms. Quantitative analyses included contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) of the major abdominal vessels, liver, pancreas, and the PDAC. Qualitative image quality assessments included image noise, soft-tissue sharpness, vessel contrast, and PDAC conspicuity. Noise power spectrum (NPS) analysis was performed to examine the variance and spatial frequency characteristics of image noise using a phantom. TFI-M significantly improved image quality compared to ASiR-V 30% and ASiR-V 50%, especially at lower keV levels. VMIs with TFI-M showed reduced image noise and higher pancreas-to-tumor CNR at 40 keV. Qualitative evaluations confirmed DLIR's superiority in noise reduction, tissue sharpness, and vessel conspicuity, with substantial interobserver agreement (κ = 0.61-0.78). NPS analysis demonstrated effective noise reduction across spatial frequencies. DLIR significantly improved the image quality of VMIs on DECT by reducing image noise and increasing CNR, particularly at lower keV levels. These improvements may improve PDAC detection and assessment, making it a valuable tool for pancreatic cancer imaging.

To evaluate the usefulness of low-keV multiphasic computed tomography (CT) with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in improving the delineation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) compared to conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR). Thirty-five patients with PDAC who underwent multiphasic CT were retrospectively evaluated. Raw data were reconstructed with two energy levels (40 keV and 70 keV) of virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) using HIR (ASiR-V50%) and DLIR (TrueFidelity-H). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNRtumor) was calculated from the CT values within regions of interest in tumor and normal pancreas in the pancreatic parenchymal phase images. Lesion conspicuity of PDAC in pancreatic parenchymal phase on 40-keV HIR, 40-keV DLIR, and 70-keV DLIR images was qualitatively rated on a 5-point scale, using 70-keV HIR images as reference (score 1 = poor; score 3 = equivalent to reference; score 5 = excellent) by two radiologists. CNRtumor of 40-keV DLIR images (median 10.4, interquartile range (IQR) 7.8-14.9) was significantly higher than that of the other VMIs (40 keV HIR, median 6.2, IQR 4.4-8.5, P < 0.0001; 70-keV DLIR, median 6.3, IQR 5.1-9.9, P = 0.0002; 70-keV HIR, median 4.2, IQR 3.1-6.1, P < 0.0001). CNRtumor of 40-keV DLIR images were significantly better than those of the 40-keV HIR and 70-keV HIR images by 72 ± 22% and 211 ± 340%, respectively. Lesion conspicuity scores on 40-keV DLIR images (observer 1, 4.5 ± 0.7; observer 2, 3.4 ± 0.5) were significantly higher than on 40-keV HIR (observer 1, 3.3 ± 0.9, P < 0.0001; observer 2, 3.1 ± 0.4, P = 0.013). DLIR is a promising reconstruction method to improve PDAC delineation in 40-keV VMI at the pancreatic parenchymal phase compared to conventional HIR.

This study investigated the effectiveness of augmenting datasets for super-resolution processing of brain Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) T1-weighted images (T1WIs) using deep learning. By incorporating images with different contrasts from the same subject, this study sought to improve network performance and assess its impact on image quality metrics, such as peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM). This retrospective study included 240 patients who underwent brain MRI. Two types of datasets were created: the Pure-Dataset group comprising T1WIs and the Mixed-Dataset group comprising T1WIs, T2-weighted images, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images. A U-Net-based network and an Enhanced Deep Super-Resolution network (EDSR) were trained on these datasets. Objective image quality analysis was performed using PSNR and SSIM. Statistical analyses, including paired t test and Pearson's correlation coefficient, were conducted to evaluate the results. Augmenting datasets with images of different contrasts significantly improved training accuracy as the dataset size increased. PSNR values ranged 29.84-30.26 dB for U-Net trained on mixed datasets, and SSIM values ranged 0.9858-0.9868. Similarly, PSNR values ranged 32.34-32.64 dB for EDSR trained on mixed datasets, and SSIM values ranged 0.9941-0.9945. Significant differences in PSNR and SSIM were observed between models trained on pure and mixed datasets. Pearson's correlation coefficient indicated a strong positive correlation between dataset size and image quality metrics. Using diverse image data obtained from the same subject can improve the performance of deep-learning models in medical image super-resolution tasks.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Early detection via surveillance plays a crucial role in enabling curative treatment and improving survival rates. Since the initial randomized controlled trial, biannual ultrasound (US) has been established as the standard surveillance method because of its accessibility, safety, and low cost. However, US has some limitations, including operator dependency, suboptimal sensitivity for early-stage HCC, and challenges such as a limited sonic window that may result in inadequate examination. Alternative imaging modalities, including contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have demonstrated higher sensitivity for detecting very early-stage HCC. Recent advancements, such as low-dose CT with deep learning-based reconstruction, have enhanced the safety and feasibility of CT-based surveillance by reducing radiation exposure and amount of contrast media. MRI, particularly with gadoxetic acid or abbreviated protocols, offers superior tissue contrast and sensitivity, although its accessibility and cost remain challenges. Tailored surveillance strategies based on individual risk profiles and integration of advanced imaging technologies have the potential to enhance the detection performance and cost-effectiveness. This review highlights the recent developments in imaging technologies for HCC surveillance, focusing on their respective strengths and limitations.

To evaluate the efficiency of super-resolution deep-learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) optimized for helical body imaging in assessing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) using normal-resolution (NR) CT scanner.

Fifty patients with PDAC who underwent multiphase pancreas CT on a 320-row NR scanner were retrospectively analyzed. Images were reconstructed using hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR), normal-resolution deep-learning reconstruction (NR-DLR), and SR-DLR at a 0.5-mm slice thickness. The matrix size was 512 × 512 for HIR and NR-DLR, and 1024 × 1024 for SR-DLR. Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of pancreas, superior mesenteric artery, portal vein, and PDAC were quantified. Noise power spectrum (NPS) in the liver and edge rise slope (ERS) at the pancreas, artery, and vein were used to quantify noise properties and edge sharpness. Subjective evaluations included rankings of image sharpness, noise magnitude, texture fineness, and delineation of PDAC, pancreas margin, pancreatic duct, peripancreatic vessels, and hepatic lesions (1 = worst; 3 = best among three image series). Overall diagnostic quality was rated on a 5-point scale (1 = undiagnostic, 5 = excellent).

SR-DLR showed significantly lower image noise and higher CNR than HIR and NR-DLR (all, p < 0.001). NPS analysis revealed no significant difference in average spatial frequency between SR-DLR and NR-DLR (p = 0.770), both being higher than HIR (both, p < 0.001). ERS values of all structures were highest with SR-DLR (p < 0.001). SR-DLR received the highest subjective scores for all criteria, with significant differences from HIR and NR-DLR (all, p < 0.001).

SR-DLR improved both subjective and objective image quality, enhancing the delineation of all structures relevant to PDAC assessment using NR CT scanner.

In recent years, computed tomography (CT) has undergone a number of developments to improve radiological care. The most recent major innovation has been the development of photon-counting detectors. By comparison with the energy-integrating detectors traditionally used in CT, these detectors offer better dose efficiency, eliminate electronic noise, improve spatial resolution and have intrinsic spectral sensitivity. These detectors also allow the energy of each photon to be counted, thus improving the sampling of the X-ray spectrum in multiple energy bins, to better distinguish between photoelectric and Compton attenuation coefficients, resulting in better spectral images and specific color K-edge images. The purpose of this article was to make the reader more familiar with the basic principles and techniques of new photon-counting CT systems equipped with photon-counting detectors and also to describe the currently available devices that could be used in clinical practice.

Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and dynamic stress CT myocardial perfusion (CT-MPI) are established modalities in the analysis of patients with chronic coronary syndromes. Their role in patients with suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is unknown. CCTA with CT-MPI might assist in the triage of NSTEMI patients to the Cath lab. We investigated the correlation of significant epicardial lesions by CT-MPI in addition to CCTA compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with NSTEMI. Twenty NSTEMI patients scheduled for ICA were enrolled in this study with planned ICA. CCTA and CT-MPI was performed pre-ICA. For each coronary artery, the presence or absence of significant lesions was interpreted by CCTA with CT-MPI, using an FFR of ≤ 0.8 or angiographic culprit (stenosis > 90%, suspected plaque rupture) as reference. The main outcome was the per-vessel correlation. Sixteen out of 20 patients had a culprit lesion that required immediate revascularization. CCTA with ≥ 50% stenosis demonstrated a per vessel sensitivity and specificity for the detection of significant stenosis of respectively 100% (95% CI: 86-100%) and 75% (95% CI: 58-88%). CCTA with CT-MPI showed a lower sensitivity 90% (95% CI: 70-99%) but higher specificity of 100% (95% CI: 90-100%). CCTA with CT-MPI exhibits a strong correlation for identifying significant CAD in patients with NSTEMI. Thereby, it might assist in the triage of ICA in NSTEMI patients.

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) provides significant information on image quality in vascular imaging, thus offering high-resolution images despite having the disadvantages of increased radiation doses and contrast agent-related side effects. The deep-learning image reconstruction strategies were used to quantitatively evaluate the enhanced contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and the dose reduction effect of subtracted images.

This study aimed to elucidate a comprehensive understanding of the quantitative image quality features of the conventional filtered back projection (FBP) and the advanced intelligent clear-IQ engine (AiCE), a deep learning reconstruction technique. The comparison was made in subtracted images with variable concentrations of contrast agents at variable tube currents and voltages, enhancing our knowledge of these two techniques.

Data were obtained using a state-of-the-art 320-detector CT scanner. Image reconstruction was performed using FBP and AiCE with various intensities. The image quality evaluation was based on eight iodine concentrations in the phantom setup. The efficiency of AiCE relative to FBP was assessed by computing parameters including the root mean square error (RMSE), dose-dependent CNR, and potential dose reduction.

The results showed that elevated concentrations of iodine and increased tube currents improved AiCE performance regarding CNR enhancement compared to FBP. AiCE also demonstrated a potential dose reduction ranging from 13.7 to 81.9% compared to FBP, suggesting a significant reduction in radiation exposure while maintaining image quality.

The employment of deep learning image reconstruction with AiCE presented a significant improvement in CNR and potential dose reduction in CT angiography. This study highlights the potential of AiCE to improve vascular image quality and decrease radiation exposure risk, thereby improving diagnostic precision and patient care in vascular imaging practices.

The purpose of this study was to compare radiation dose reduction capability for accurate liver tumor measurements of a computer-aided volumetry (CAD v ) software for filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid-type iterative reconstruction (IR), mode-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), and deep learning reconstruction (DLR) at a phantom study.

A commercially available anthropomorphic abdominal phantom was scanned five times with a 320-detector row CT at 600 mA, 400 mA, 200 mA, and 100 mA and reconstructed by four methods. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of all lesions within the arterial and portal-venous phase inserts were calculated, and SNR of the lesion phantom was compared with that of all reconstruction methods by means of Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test. Then, tumor volume ( V ) of each nodule was automatically measured using commercially available CAD v software. To compare dose reduction capability for each reconstruction method at both phases, mean differences between measured V and standard references were compared by Tukey's honestly significant difference test among the four different reconstruction methods on CT obtained at each of the four tube currents.

With each of the tube currents, SNRs for MBIR and DLR were significantly higher than those for FBP and hybrid-type IR ( p < 0.05). At the arterial phase, the mean difference in V for the CT protocol obtained at 600 or 100 mA and reconstructed with DLR was significantly smaller than that for others ( p < 0.05). At the portal-venous phase, the mean differences in V for the CT protocol obtained at 100 mA and reconstructed with hybrid-type IR, MBIR, and DLR were significantly smaller than that for FBP ( p < 0.05).

Findings of our phantom study show that reconstruction method had influence on CAD v merits for abdominal CT with not only standard but also reduced dose examinations and that DLR can potentially yield better image quality and CAD v measurements than FBP, hybrid-type IR, or MBIR in this setting.

We investigated the feasibility of deep learning-based ultra-low dose kV-fan-beam computed tomography (kV-FBCT) image enhancement algorithm for clinical application in abdominal and pelvic tumor radiotherapy.

A total of 76 patients of abdominal and pelvic tumors were prospectively selected. The Catphan504 was acquired with the same conditions as the standard phantom test set. We used a CycleGAN-based model for image enhancement. Normal dose CT (NDCT), ultra-low dose CT (LDCT) and deep learning enhanced CT (DLR) were evaluated by subjective and objective analyses in terms of imaging quality, HU accuracy, and image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

The image noise of DLR was significantly reduced, and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was significantly improved compared to the LDCT. The most significant improvement was the acrylic which represented soft tissue in CNR from 1.89 to 3.37, improving by 76%, nearly approaching the NDCT, and in low-density resolution from 7.64 to 12.6, improving by 64%. The spatial frequencies of MTF10 and MTF50 in DLR were 4.28 and 2.35 cycles/mm in DLR, respectively, which are higher than LDCT 3.87 and 2.12 cycles/mm, and even slightly higher than NDCT 4.15 and 2.28 cycles/mm. The accuracy and stability of HU values of DLR were similar to NDCT. The image quality evaluation of the two doctors agreed well with DLR and NDCT. A two-by-two comparison between groups showed that the differences in image scores of LDCT compared with NDCT and DLR were all statistically significant (p < 0.05), and the subjective scores of DLR were close to NDCT.

The image quality of DLR was close to NDCT with reduced radiation dose, which can fully meet the needs of conventional image-guided adaptive radiotherapy (ART) and achieve the quality requirements of clinical radiotherapy. The proposed method provided a technical basis for LDCT-guided ART.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly being integrated into medical imaging practice, prompting calls to enhance AI education in undergraduate radiography programs. Combining evidence from literature, practitioner insights, and industry perspectives, this paper provides recommendations for medical imaging undergraduate education, including curriculum revision and re-alignment.

A proposed modular framework is outlined to assist course providers in integrating AI into university programs. An example course design includes modules on data science fundamentals, machine learning, AI ethics and patient safety, governance and regulation, AI tool evaluation, and clinical applications. A proposal to embed these longitudinally in the curriculum combined with hands-on experience and work-integrated learning will help develop the necessary knowledge of AI and its real-world impacts. Authentic assessment examples reinforce learning, such as critically appraising published research and reflecting on current technologies. Maintenance of an up-to-date curriculum will require a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach involving educators, clinicians, and industry professionals.

Integrating AI education into undergraduate medical imaging programs equips future radiographers in an evolving technological landscape. A strategic approach to embedding AI modules throughout degree programs assures students a comprehensive understanding of AI principles, skills in utilising AI tools effectively, and the ability to critically evaluate their implications.

The practical implementation of undergraduate AI education will prepare radiographers to incorporate these technologies while assuring patient care.

To evaluate the effect of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) on vascular depiction, tumor enhancement, and image quality of computed tomography hepatic arteriography (CTHA) images acquired during transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE).

Institutional review board approval was obtained. Twenty-seven patients (18 men and 9 women, mean age, 75.7 years) who underwent CTHA immediately before TACE were enrolled. All images were reconstructed using three reconstruction algorithms: hybrid-iterative reconstruction (hybrid-IR), DLR with mild strength (DLR-M), and DLR with strong strength (DLR-S). Vascular depiction, tumor enhancement, feeder visualization, and image quality of CTHA were quantitatively and qualitatively assessed by two radiologists and compared between the three reconstruction algorithms.

The mean signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) of sub-segmental arteries and sub-sub-segmental arteries, and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of tumors, were significantly higher on DLR-S than on DLR-M and hybrid-IR (P < 0.001). The mean qualitative score for sharpness of sub-segmental and sub-sub-segmental arteries was significantly better on DLR-S than on DLR-M and hybrid-IR (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the feeder artery detection rate of automated feeder artery detection software among three reconstruction algorithms (P = 0.102). The contrast, continuity, and confidence level of feeder artery detection was significantly better on DLR-S than on DLR-M (P = 0.013, 0.005, and 0.001) and hybrid-IR (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, and P < 0.001). The weighted kappa values between two readers for qualitative scores of feeder artery visualization were 0.807-0.874. The mean qualitative scores for sharpness, granulation, and diagnostic acceptability of CTHA were better on DLR-S than on DLR-M and hybrid-IR (P < 0.001).

DLR significantly improved the SNR of small hepatic arteries, the CNR of tumor, and feeder artery visualization on CTHA images. DLR-S seems to be better suited to routine CTHA in TACE than does hybrid-IR.

The dynamic regional accuracy of electrical impedance tomography has not yet been validated. We aimed to compare the regional accuracy of electrical impedance tomography with that of four-dimensional computed tomography during dynamic ventilation.

This single-center, prospective, observational study conducted in a general intensive care unit included adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation from July 2021 to February 2024. The patients were mechanically ventilated passively and underwent electrical impedance tomography and four-dimensional computed tomography on the same day.

Overall, 45 patients were analyzed. The correlation coefficients in regional dynamic ventilation between four-dimensional computed tomography and electrical impedance tomography in each region were 0.963, 0.963, 0.835 (ventral, central, and dorsal, respectively) in the right lung and 0.947, 0.927, 0.823 (ventral, central, and dorsal, respectively) in the left lung. The correlation coefficient was low when the regional ventilation distribution detected by the electrical impedance tomography was < 2%. After excluding nine patients with a regional ventilation distribution of < 2%, the ventral, central, and dorsal correlation coefficients were 0.963, 0.963, and 0.946 in the right lung and 0.942, 0.924, and 0.951, respectively, in the left lung.

Regional ventilation using electrical impedance tomography during dynamic ventilation was highly accurate and consistent with the time phase compared to four-dimensional computed tomography. Given the high correlation between these modalities, they can contribute significantly to further studies on regional ventilation dynamics. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov (No. UMIN00044386).

The purpose of this study was to assess image-quality and dose reduction potential using a photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) system by comparison with two different dual-source CT (DSCT) systems using two phantoms.

Acquisitions on phantoms were performed using two DSCT systems (DSCT1 [Somatom Force] and DSCT2 [Somatom Pro.Pulse]) and one PCCT system (Naeotom Alpha) at four dose levels (13/6/3.4/1.8 mGy). Noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were computed to assess noise magnitude and noise texture and spatial resolution (f50), respectively. Detectability indexes (d') were computed to model the detection of abdominal lesions: one unenhanced high-contrast task, one contrast-enhanced high-contrast task and one unenhanced low-contrast task. Image quality was subjectively assessed on an anthropomorphic phantom by two radiologists.

For all dose levels, noise magnitude values were lower with PCCT than with DSCTs. For all CT systems, similar noise texture values were found at 13 and 6 mGy, but the greatest noise texture values were found for DSCT2 and the lowest for PCCT at 3.4 and 1.8 mGy. For high-contrast inserts, similar or lower f50 values were found with PCCT than with DSCT1 and the opposite pattern was found for the low-contrast insert. For the three simulated lesions, d' values were greater with PCCT than with DSCTs. Abdominal images were rated satisfactory for clinical use by the radiologists for all dose levels with PCCT and for 13 and 6 mGy with DSCTs.

By comparison with DSCTs, PCCT reduces image-noise and improves detectability of simulated abdominal lesions without altering the spatial resolution and image texture. Image-quality obtained with PCCT seem to indicate greater potential for dose optimization than those obtained with DSCTs.

This study aimed to investigate the utility of low-energy virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) combined with deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in improving the delineation of endoleaks (ELs) after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT (DECT).

A total of 61 consecutive patients (mean age, 77 years; 46 men) after EVAR who underwent contrast-enhanced DECT were enrolled. Virtual monochromatic 40- and 70-keV images were reconstructed using DLIR (TrueFidelity-H) and conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the EL on the venous-phase CT was calculated. Four different reconstructed image series (hybrid IR and DLIR at two energy levels, 40- and 70-keV) were displayed side-by-side and visually assessed for EL conspicuity on a 5-point comparative scale from 0 (best) to -4 (significantly inferior). Two experienced radiologists independently conducted a qualitative evaluation of the CT images.

A total of 30 out of 61 patients presented with an EL. On both 40- and 70-keV images, the CNR of the EL was significantly higher in DLIR than in hybrid IR (40-keV, 14.5 ± 7.3 vs 8.6 ± 4.2, P<0.001; 70-keV, 8.7 ± 4.5 vs 5.5 ± 2.6, P<0.001). The comparative scale of EL conspicuity in the 40-keV DLIR images (Observer1, -0.2 ± 0.4; Observer2, 0.0 ± 0.0) was significantly higher than 40-keV hybrid IR (Observer1, -0.5 ± 0.5; Observer2, -1.0 ± 0.0; P<0.05), 70-keV DLIR (Observer1, -1.8 ± 0.4; Observer2, -2.0 ± 0.0; P<0.001) and 70-keV hybrid IR images (Observer1, -1.8 ± 0.4; Observer2, -2.4 ± 0.5; P<0.001), respectively.

Using 40-keV VMI in combination with DLIR improves EL delineation after EVAR compared with the 70-keV VMI with hybrid IR or DLIR.

Lifelong re-examination of CT enterography (CTE) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be necessary, and reducing radiation exposure during CT examinations is crucial. We investigated the potential application of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) in CTE to reduce radiation dose and improve image quality in IBD.

Thirty-six patients with known or suspected IBD were prospectively recruited to the low-dose CTE (LDCTE) group, while forty patients were retrospectively selected from previous clinical standard-dose CTE (STDCTE) scans as controls. STDCTE images were reconstructed with hybrid-IR (adaptive iterative dose reduction 3-dimensional [AIDR3D], standard setting); LDCTE images were reconstructed with AIDR3D and DLR (Advanced Intelligence ClearIQ Engine [AiCE], Body mild/standard/strong, Sharp Body mild/standard/strong setting). The effective radiation dose (ED), image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), overall image quality, subjective image noise, and diagnostic effectiveness were compared between the LDCTE and STDCTE groups.

Compared with STDCTE, the ED of LDCTE was lower by 54.1% (p<0.001). Compared with STDCTE-AIDR3D, LDCTE-AIDR3D reconstruction objective image noise and SNR were greater (p<0.05), the subjective overall image quality was lower (p<0.05), and the diagnostic efficiency was lower (AUC=0.52, p<0.05). The SNRs of reconstructedimages of LDCTE-AiCE Body Strong and LDCTE-AiCE Body Sharp standard/strong groups were greater than that of STDCTE-AIDR3D group (all p<0.05), and the diagnostic performance was better than or comparable to that of STDCTE; the AUCs were 0.83, 0.76 and 0.76, respectively CONCLUSION: Compared with STDCTE with AIDR3D, LDCTE with DLR effectively reduced the radiation dose and improve image quality in IBD patients.

To demonstrate the value of using 50 keV virtual monochromatic images with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in low-dose dual-energy CT enterography (CTE).

In this prospective study, 114 participants (62 % M; 41.9 ± 16 years) underwent dual-energy CTE. The early-enteric phase was performed using standard-dose (noise index (NI): 8) and images were reconstructed at 70 keV and 50 keV with 40 % strength ASIR-V (ASIR-V40%). The late-enteric phase used low-dose (NI: 12) and images were reconstructed at 50 keV with ASIR-V40%, and DLIR at medium (DLIR-M) and high strength (DLIR-H). Image standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), edge-rise-slope (ERS) were computed. The quantitative comb sign score was calculated for the 27 patients with Crohn's disease. The subjective noise, image contrast, display of rectus artery were scored using a 5-point scale by two radiologists blindly.

Effective dose was reduced by 50 % (P < 0.001) in the late-enteric phase to 3.26 mSv. The lower-dose 50 keV-DLIR-H images (SD:17.7 ± 0.5HU) had similar image noise (P = 0.97) as the standard-dose 70 keV-ASIR-V40% images (SD:17.7 ± 0.73HU), but with higher (P < 0.001) SNR, CNR, ERS and quantitative comb sign score (5.7 ± 0.17, 1.8 ± 0.12, 156.04 ± 5.21 and 5.05 ± 0.73, respectively). Furthermore, the lower-dose 50 keV-DLIR-H images obtained the highest score in the rectus artery visibility (4.27 ± 0.6).

The 50 keV images in dual-energy CTE with DLIR provides high-quality images, with a 50 % reduction in radiation dose. Images with high contrast and density resolutions significantly enhance the diagnostic confidence of Crohn's disease and are essential for the clinical development of individualized treatment plans.

To demonstrate the clinical advantages of a deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in low-dose dual-energy computed tomography enterography (DECTE) by comparing images with standard-dose adaptive iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V) images.

In this Institutional review board approved prospective study, 86 participants who underwent DECTE were enrolled. The early-enteric phase scan was performed using standard-dose (noise index: 8) and images were reconstructed at 5 mm and 1.25 mm slice thickness with ASIR-V at a level of 40% (ASIR-V40%). The late-enteric phase scan used low-dose (noise index: 12) and images were reconstructed at 1.25 mm slice thickness with ASIR-V40%, and DLIR at medium (DLIR-M) and high (DLIR-H). The 70 keV monochromatic images were used for image comparison and analysis. For objective assessment, image noise, artifact index, SNR and CNR were measured. For subjective assessment, subjective noise, image contrast, bowel wall sharpness, mesenteric vessel clarity, and small structure visibility were scored by two radiologists blindly. Radiation dose was compared between the early- and late-enteric phases.

Radiation dose was reduced by 50% in the late-enteric phase [(6.31 ± 1.67) mSv] compared with the early-enteric phase [(3.01 ± 1.09) mSv]. For the 1.25 mm images, DLIR-M and DLIR-H significantly improved both objective and subjective image quality compared to those with ASIR-V40%. The low-dose 1.25 mm DLIR-H images had similar image noise, SNR, CNR values as the standard-dose 5 mm ASIR-V40% images, but significantly higher scores in image contrast [5(5-5), P < 0.05], bowel wall sharpness [5(5-5), P < 0.05], mesenteric vessel clarity [5(5-5), P < 0.05] and small structure visibility [5(5-5), P < 0.05].

DLIR significantly reduces image noise at the same slice thickness, but significantly improves spatial resolution and lesion conspicuity with thinner slice thickness in DECTE, compared to conventional ASIR-V40% 5 mm images, all while providing 50% radiation dose reduction.

Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) is a novel computed tomography (CT) reconstruction technique that minimizes image noise, enhances image quality, and enables radiation dose reduction. This study aims to compare the diagnostic performance of DLIR and iterative reconstruction (IR) in the evaluation of focal hepatic lesions.

We conducted a retrospective study of 216 focal hepatic lesions in 109 adult participants who underwent abdominal CT scanning at our institution. We used DLIR (low, medium, and high strength) and IR (0 %, 10 %, 20 %, and 30 %) techniques for image reconstruction. Four experienced abdominal radiologists independently evaluated focal hepatic lesions based on five qualitative aspects (lesion detectability, lesion border, diagnostic confidence level, image artifact, and overall image quality). Quantitatively, we measured and compared the level of image noise for each technique at the liver and aorta.

There were significant differences (p < 0.001) among the seven reconstruction techniques in terms of lesion borders, image artifacts, and overall image quality. Low-strength DLIR (DLIR-L) exhibited the best overall image quality. Although high-strength DLIR (DLIR-H) had the least image noise and fewest artifacts, it also had the lowest scores for lesion borders and overall image quality. Image noise showed a weak to moderate positive correlation with participants' body mass index and waist circumference.

The optimal-strength DLIR significantly improved overall image quality for evaluating focal hepatic lesions compared to the IR technique. DLIR-L achieved the best overall image quality while maintaining acceptable levels of image noise and quality of lesion borders.

To compare the image quality and pulmonary nodule detectability between deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V) in ultra-low-dose CT (ULD-CT).

142 participants required lung examination who underwent simultaneously ULD-CT (UL-A, 0.57 ± 0.04 mSv or UL-B, 0.33 ± 0.03 mSv), and standard CT (SDCT, 4.32 ± 0.33 mSv) plain scans were included in this prospective study. SDCT was the reference standard using ASIR-V at 50% strength (50%ASIR-V). ULD-CT was reconstructed with 50%ASIR-V, DLIR at medium and high strength (DLIR-M, DLIR-H). The noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and subjective scores were measured. The presence and accuracy of nodules were analyzed using a combination of a deep learning-based nodule evaluation system and a radiologist.

A total of 710 nodules were detected by SDCT, including 358 nodules in UL-A and 352 nodules in UL-B. DLIR-H exhibited superior noise, SNR, and CNR performance, and achieved comparable or even higher subjective scores compared to 50%ASIR-V in ULD-CT. Nodules sensitivity detection of 50%ASIR-V, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H in ULD-CT were identical (96.90%). In multivariate analysis, body mass index (BMI), nodule diameter, and type were independent predictors for the sensitivity of nodule detection (p<.001). DLIR-H provided a lower absolute percent error (APE) in volume (3.10% ± 95.11% vs 8.29% ± 99.14%) compared to 50%ASIR-V of ULD-CT (P<.001).

ULD-CT scanning has a high sensitivity for detecting pulmonary nodules. Compared with ASIR-V, DLIR can significantly reduce image noise, and improve image quality, and accuracy of the nodule measurement in ULD-CT.

To evaluate the image quality of low-dose CT colonography (CTC) using deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) compared to iterative reconstruction (IR).

Adults included in the study were divided into four groups according to body mass index (BMI). Routine-dose (RD: 120 kVp) CTC images were reconstructed with IR (RD-IR); low-dose (LD: 100kVp) images were reconstructed with IR (LD-IR) and DLR (LD-DLR). The subjective image quality was rated on a 5-point scale by two radiologists independently. The parameters for objective image quality included noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The Friedman test was used to compare the image quality among RD-IR, LD-IR and LD-DLR. The KruskalWallis test was used to compare the results among different BMI groups.

A total of 270 volunteers (mean age: 47.94 years ± 11.57; 115 men) were included. The effective dose of low-dose CTC was decreased by approximately 83.18% (5.18mSv ± 0.86 vs. 0.86mSv ± 0.05, P < 0.001). The subjective image quality score of LD-DLR was superior to that of LD-IR (3.61 ± 0.56 vs. 2.70 ± 0.51, P < 0.001) and on par with the RD- IR's (3.61 ± 0.56 vs. 3.74 ± 0.52, P = 0.486). LD-DLR exhibited the lowest noise, and the maximum SNR and CNR compared to RD-IR and LD-IR (all P < 0.001). No statistical difference was found in the noise of LD-DLR images between different BMI groups (all P > 0.05).

Compared to IR, DLR provided low-dose CTC with superior image quality at an average radiation dose of 0.86mSv, which may be promising in future colorectal cancer screening.

To investigate the usefulness of super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) with cardiac option in the assessment of image quality in patients with stent-assisted coil embolization, coil embolization, and flow-diverting stent placement compared with other image reconstructions.

This single-centre retrospective study included 50 patients (mean age, 59 years; range, 44-81 years; 13 men) who were treated with stent-assisted coil embolization, coil embolization, and flow-diverting stent placement between January and July 2023. The images were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR), and SR-DLR. The objective image analysis included image noise in the Hounsfield unit (HU), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and full width at half maximum (FWHM). Subjectively, two radiologists evaluated the overall image quality for the visualization of the flow-diverting stent, coil, and stent.

The image noise in HU in SR-DLR was 6.99 ± 1.49, which was significantly lower than that in images reconstructed with FBP (12.32 ± 3.01) and hybrid IR (8.63 ± 2.12) (P < .001). Both the mean SNR and CNR were significantly higher in SR-DLR than in FBP and hybrid IR (P < .001 and P < .001). The FWHMs for the stent (P < .004), flow-diverting stent (P < .001), and coil (P < .001) were significantly lower in SR-DLR than in FBP and hybrid IR. The subjective visual scores were significantly higher in SR-DLR than in other image reconstructions (P < .001).

SR-DLR with cardiac option is useful for follow-up imaging in stent-assisted coil embolization and flow-diverting stent placement in terms of lower image noise, higher SNR and CNR, superior subjective image analysis, and less blooming artifact than other image reconstructions.

SR-DLR with cardiac option allows better visualization of the peripheral and smaller cerebral arteries. SR-DLR with cardiac option can be beneficial for CT imaging of stent-assisted coil embolization and flow-diverting stent.

The diagnostic impact of deep learning computed tomography (CT) reconstruction on intracranial aneurysm (IA) remains unclear.

To quantify the image quality and diagnostic confidence on IA in craniocervical CT angiography (CTA) reconstructed with DEep Learning Trained Algorithm (DELTA) compared to the routine hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR).

A total of 60 patients who underwent craniocervical CTA and were diagnosed with IA were retrospectively enrolled. Images were reconstructed with DELTA and HIR, where the image quality was first compared in noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Next, two radiologists independently graded the noise appearance, arterial sharpness, small vessel visibility, conspicuity of calcifications that may present in arteries, and overall image quality, each with a 5-point Likert scale. The diagnostic confidence on IAs of various sizes was also graded.

Significantly lower noise and higher SNR and CNR were found on DELTA than on HIR images (all P < 0.05). All five subjective metrics were scored higher by both readers on the DELTA images (all P < 0.05), with good to excellent inter-observer agreement (κ = 0.77-0.93). DELTA images were rated with higher diagnostic confidence on IAs compared to HIR (P < 0.001), particularly for those with size ≤3 mm, which were scored 4.5 ± 0.6 versus 3.4 ± 0.8 and 4.4 ± 0.7 versus 3.5 ± 0.8 by two readers, respectively.

The DELTA shows potential for improving the image quality and the associated confidence in diagnosing IA that may be worth consideration for routine craniocervical CTA applications.

Computed tomography (CT) reconstruction algorithms can improve image quality, especially deep learning reconstruction (DLR). We compared DLR, iterative reconstruction (IR), and filtered back projection (FBP) for lesion detection in neck CT.

Nine patient-mimicking neck phantoms were examined with a 320-slice scanner at six doses: 0.5, 1, 1.6, 2.1, 3.1, and 5.2 mGy. Each of eight phantoms contained one circular lesion (diameter 1 cm; contrast -30 HU to the background) in the parapharyngeal space; one phantom had no lesions. Reconstruction was made using FBP, IR, and DLR. Thirteen readers were tasked with identifying and localizing lesions in 32 images with a lesion and 20 without lesions for each dose and reconstruction algorithm. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and localization ROC (LROC) analysis were performed.

DLR improved lesion detection with ROC area under the curve (AUC) 0.724 ± 0.023 (mean ± standard error of the mean) using DLR versus 0.696 ± 0.021 using IR (p = 0.037) and 0.671 ± 0.023 using FBP (p < 0.001). Likewise, DLR improved lesion localization, with LROC AUC 0.407 ± 0.039 versus 0.338 ± 0.041 using IR (p = 0.002) and 0.313 ± 0.044 using FBP (p < 0.001). Dose reduction to 0.5 mGy compromised lesion detection in FBP-reconstructed images compared to doses ≥ 2.1 mGy (p ≤ 0.024), while no effect was observed with DLR or IR (p ≥ 0.058).

DLR improved the detectability of lesions in neck CT imaging. Dose reduction to 0.5 mGy maintained lesion detectability when denoising reconstruction was used.

Deep learning enhances lesion detection in neck CT imaging compared to iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection, offering improved diagnostic performance and potential for x-ray dose reduction.

Low-contrast lesion detectability was assessed in anatomically realistic neck CT phantoms. Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) outperformed filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction. Dose has little impact on lesion detectability against anatomical background structures.

Detection of liver metastases is crucial for guiding oncological management. Computed tomography through iterative reconstructions is widely used in this indication but has certain limitations. Deep learning image reconstructions (DLIR) use deep neural networks to achieve a significant noise reduction compared to iterative reconstructions. While reports have demonstrated improvements in image quality, their impact on liver metastases detection remains unclear. Our main objective was to determine whether DLIR affects the number of detected liver metastasis. Our secondary objective was to compare metastases conspicuity between the two reconstruction methods.

CT images of 121 patients with liver metastases were reconstructed using a 50% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (50%-ASiR-V), and three levels of DLIR (DLIR-low, DLIR-medium, and DLIR-high). For each reconstruction, two double-blinded radiologists counted up to a maximum of ten metastases. Visibility and contour definitions were also assessed. Comparisons between methods for continuous parameters were performed using mixed models.

A higher number of metastases was detected by one reader with DLIR-high: 7 (2-10) (median (Q₁-Q₃); total 733) versus 5 (2-10), respectively for DLIR-medium, DLIR-low, and ASiR-V (p < 0.001). Ten patents were detected with more metastases with DLIR-high simultaneously by both readers and a third reader for confirmation. Metastases visibility and contour definition were better with DLIR than ASiR-V.

DLIR-high enhanced the detection and visibility of liver metastases compared to ASiR-V, and also increased the number of liver metastases detected.

Deep learning-based reconstruction at high strength allowed an increase in liver metastases detection compared to hybrid iterative reconstruction and can be used in clinical oncology imaging to help overcome the limitations of CT.

Detection of liver metastases is crucial but limited with standard CT reconstructions. More liver metastases were detected with deep-learning CT reconstruction compared to iterative reconstruction. Deep learning reconstructions are suitable for hepatic metastases staging and follow-up.

Low-iodine-dose computed tomography (CT) protocols have emerged to mitigate the risks associated with contrast injection, often resulting in decreased image quality.

To evaluate the image quality of low-iodine-dose CT combined with an artificial intelligence (AI)-based contrast-boosting technique in abdominal CT, compared to a standard-iodine-dose protocol in children.

This single-center retrospective study included 35 pediatric patients (mean age 9.2 years, range 1-17 years) who underwent sequential abdominal CT scans-one with a standard-iodine-dose protocol (standard-dose group, Iobitridol 350 mgI/mL) and another with a low-iodine-dose protocol (low-dose group, Iohexol 240 mgI/mL)-within a 4-month interval from January 2022 to July 2022. The low-iodine CT protocol was reconstructed using an AI-based contrast-boosting technique (contrast-boosted group). Quantitative and qualitative parameters were measured in the three groups. For qualitative parameters, interobserver agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient, and mean values were employed for subsequent analyses. For quantitative analysis of the three groups, repeated measures one-way analysis of variance with post hoc pairwise analysis was used. For qualitative analysis, the Friedman test followed by post hoc pairwise analysis was used. Paired t-tests were employed to compare radiation dose and iodine uptake between the standard- and low-dose groups.

The standard-dose group exhibited higher attenuation, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of organs and vessels compared to the low-dose group (all P-values < 0.05 except for liver SNR, P = 0.12). However, noise levels did not differ between the standard- and low-dose groups (P = 0.86). The contrast-boosted group had increased attenuation, CNR, and SNR of organs and vessels, and reduced noise compared with the low-dose group (all P < 0.05). The contrast-boosted group showed no differences in attenuation, CNR, and SNR of organs and vessels (all P > 0.05), and lower noise (P = 0.002), than the standard-dose group. In qualitative analysis, the contrast-boosted group did not differ regarding vessel enhancement and lesion conspicuity (P > 0.05) but had lower noise (P < 0.05) and higher organ enhancement and artifacts (all P < 0.05) than the standard-dose group. While iodine uptake was significantly reduced in low-iodine-dose CT (P < 0.001), there was no difference in radiation dose between standard- and low-iodine-dose CT (all P > 0.05).

Low-iodine-dose abdominal CT, combined with an AI-based contrast-boosting technique exhibited comparable organ and vessel enhancement, as well as lesion conspicuity compared to standard-iodine-dose CT in children. Moreover, image noise decreased in the contrast-boosted group, albeit with an increase in artifacts.

Dynamic myocardial computed tomography perfusion (CTP) is a novel imaging technique that increases the applicability of CT for cardiac imaging; however, the scanning requires a substantial radiation dose.

To investigate the feasibility of dose reduction in dynamic CTP by comparing all-heartbeat acquisitions to periodic skipping of heartbeats.

We retrieved imaging data of 38 dynamic CTP patients and created new datasets with every fourth, third or second beat (Skip1:4, Skip1:3, Skip1:2, respectively) removed. Seven observers evaluated the resulting images and perfusion maps for perfusion deficits. The mean blood flow (MBF) in each of the 16 myocardial segments was compared per skipped-beat level, normalized by the respective MBF for the full dose, and averaged across patients. The number of segments/cases whose MBF was <1.0 mL/g/min were counted.

Out of 608 segments in 38 cases, the total additional number of false-negative (FN) segments over those present in the full-dose acquisitions and the number of additional false-positive cases were shown as acquisition (segment [%], case): Skip1:4: 7 (1.2%, 1); Skip1:3: 12 (2%, 3), and Skip1:2: 5 (0.8%, 2). The variability in quantitative MBF analysis in the repeated analysis for the reference condition resulted in 8 (1.3%) additional FN segments. The normalized results show a comparable MBF across all segments and patients, with relative mean MBFs as 1.02 ± 0.16, 1.03 ± 0.25, and 1.06 ± 0.30 for the Skip1:4, Skip1:3, and Skip1:2 protocols, respectively.

Skipping every second beat acquisition during dynamic myocardial CTP appears feasible and may result in a radiation dose reduction of 50%. Diagnostic performance does not decrease after removing 50% of time points in dynamic sequence.

Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted medical imaging technology is a new research area of great interest that has developed rapidly over the last decade. However, there has been no bibliometric analysis of published studies in this field. The present review focuses on AI-related studies on computed tomography imaging in the Web of Science database and uses CiteSpace and VOSviewer to generate a knowledge map and conduct the basic information analysis, co-word analysis, and co-citation analysis. A total of 7265 documents were included and the number of documents published had an overall upward trend. Scholars from the United States and China have made outstanding achievements, and there is a general lack of extensive cooperation in this field. In recent years, the research areas of great interest and difficulty have been the optimization and upgrading of algorithms, and the application of theoretical models to practical clinical applications. This review will help researchers understand the developments, research areas of great interest, and research frontiers in this field and provide reference and guidance for future studies.

Urolithiasis is a chronic condition that leads to repeated CT scans throughout the patient's life. The goal was to assess the diagnostic performance and image quality of submillisievert abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) using deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) in urolithiasis.

57 patients with suspected urolithiasis underwent both non-contrast low-dose (LD) and ULD abdominopelvic CT. Raw image data of ULD CT were reconstructed using hybrid iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V 70%) and high-strength-level DLIR (DLIR-H). The performance of ULD CT for the detection of urinary stones was assessed by two readers and compared with LD CT with ASIR-V 70% as a reference standard. Image quality was assessed subjectively and objectively.

266 stones were detected in 38 patients. Mean effective dose was 0.59 mSv for ULD CT and 1.96 mSv for LD CT. For diagnostic performance, sensitivity and specificity were 89% and 94%, respectively, for ULDCT with DLIR-H. There was an almost perfect intra-observer concordance on ULD CT with DLIR-H versus LDCT with ASIR-V 70% (ICC = 0.90 and 0.90 for the two readers). Image noise was significantly lower and signal-to-noise ratio significantly higher with DLIR-H compared to ASIR-V 70%. Subjective image quality was also significantly better with ULDCT with DLIR-H.

ULD CT with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction maintains a good diagnostic performance in urolithiasis, with better image quality than hybrid iterative reconstruction and a significant radiation dose reduction.

To verify the optimal imaging conditions for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) examinations when using high-definition (HD) mode and deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in combination.

A chest phantom and an in-house phantom using 3D printer were scanned with a 256-row detector CT scanner. The scan parameters were as follows - acquisition mode: ON (HD mode) and OFF (normal resolution [NR] mode), rotation time: 0.28 s/rotation, beam coverage width: 160 mm, and the radiation dose was adjusted based on CT-AEC. Image reconstruction was performed using ASiR-V (Hybrid-IR), TrueFidelity Image (DLIR), and HD-Standard (HD mode) and Standard (NR mode) reconstruction kernels. The task-based transfer function (TTF) and noise power spectrum (NPS) were measured for image evaluation, and the detectability index (d') was calculated. Visual evaluation was also performed on an in-house coronary phantom.

The in-plane TTF was better for the HD mode than for the NR mode, while the z-axis TTF was lower for DLIR than for Hybrid-IR. The NPS values in the high-frequency region were higher for the HD mode compared to those for the NR mode, and the NPS was lower for DLIR than for Hybrid-IR. The combination of HD mode and DLIR showed the best value for in-plane d', whereas the combination of NR mode and DLIR showed the best value for z-axis d'. In the visual evaluation, the combination of NR mode and DLIR showed the best values from a noise index of 45 HU.

The optimal combination of HD mode and DLIR depends on the image noise level, and the combination of NR mode and DLIR was the best imaging condition under noisy conditions.

Objective. Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithms exhibit object-dependent resolution and noise performance. Thus, traditional geometric CT phantoms cannot fully capture the clinical imaging performance of DLR. This study uses a patient-derived 3D-printed PixelPrint lung phantom to evaluate a commercial DLR algorithm across a wide range of radiation dose levels.Method. The lung phantom used in this study is based on a patient chest CT scan containing ground glass opacities and was fabricated using PixelPrint 3D-printing technology. The phantom was placed inside two different size extension rings to mimic a small- and medium-sized patient and was scanned on a conventional CT scanner at exposures between 0.5 and 20 mGy. Each scan was reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), iterative reconstruction, and DLR at five levels of denoising. Image noise, contrast to noise ratio (CNR), root mean squared error, structural similarity index (SSIM), and multi-scale SSIM (MS SSIM) were calculated for each image.Results.DLR demonstrated superior performance compared to FBP and iterative reconstruction for all measured metrics in both phantom sizes, with better performance for more aggressive denoising levels. DLR was estimated to reduce dose by 25%-83% in the small phantom and by 50%-83% in the medium phantom without decreasing image quality for any of the metrics measured in this study. These dose reduction estimates are more conservative compared to the estimates obtained when only considering noise and CNR.Conclusion. DLR has the capability of producing diagnostic image quality at up to 83% lower radiation dose, which can improve the clinical utility and viability of lower dose CT scans. Furthermore, the PixelPrint phantom used in this study offers an improved testing environment with more realistic tissue structures compared to traditional CT phantoms, allowing for structure-based image quality evaluation beyond noise and contrast-based assessments.

To perform a comprehensive within-subject image quality analysis of abdominal CT examinations reconstructed with DLIR and to evaluate diagnostic accuracy compared to the routinely applied adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V) algorithm.

Oncologic patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent contrast-enhanced CT. Images were reconstructed with DLIR with three intensity levels of reconstruction (high, medium, and low) and ASiR-V at strength levels from 10 to 100% with a 10% interval. Three radiologists characterized the lesions and two readers assessed diagnostic accuracy and calculated signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), figure of merit (FOM), and subjective image quality, the latter with a 5-point Likert scale.

Fifty patients (mean age: 70 ± 10 years, 23 men) were enrolled and 130 liver lesions (105 benign lesions, 25 metastases) were identified. DLIR_H achieved the highest SNR and CNR, comparable to ASiR-V 100% (p ≥ .051). DLIR_M returned the highest subjective image quality (score: 5; IQR: 4-5; p ≤ .001) and significant median increase (29%) in FOM (p < .001). Differences in detection were identified only for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm: 32/33 lesions were detected with DLIR_M and 26 lesions were detected with ASiR-V 50% (p = .031). Lesion accuracy of was 93.8% (95% CI: 88.1, 97.3; 122 of 130 lesions) for DLIR and 87.7% (95% CI: 80.8, 92.8; 114 of 130 lesions) for ASiR-V 50%.

DLIR yields superior image quality and provides higher diagnostic accuracy compared to ASiR-V in the assessment of hypovascular liver lesions, in particular for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm.

Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm demonstrates higher diagnostic accuracy compared to iterative reconstruction in the identification of hypovascular liver lesions, especially for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm.

• Iterative reconstruction algorithm impacts image texture, with negative effects on diagnostic capabilities. • Medium-strength deep learning image reconstruction algorithm outperforms iterative reconstruction in the diagnostic accuracy of ≤ 0.5 cm hypovascular liver lesions (93.9% vs 78.8%), also granting higher objective and subjective image quality. • Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm can be safely implemented in routine abdominal CT protocols in place of iterative reconstruction.

Radiological image analysis using machine learning has been extensively applied to enhance biopsy diagnosis accuracy and assist radiologists with precise cures. With improvements in the medical industry and its technology, computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems have been essential in detecting early cancer signs in patients that could not be observed physically, exclusive of introducing errors. CAD is a detection system that combines artificially intelligent techniques with image processing applications thru computer vision. Several manual procedures are reported in state of the art for cancer diagnosis. Still, they are costly, time-consuming and diagnose cancer in late stages such as CT scans, radiography, and MRI scan. In this research, numerous state-of-the-art approaches on multi-organs detection using clinical practices are evaluated, such as cancer, neurological, psychiatric, cardiovascular and abdominal imaging. Additionally, numerous sound approaches are clustered together and their results are assessed and compared on benchmark datasets. Standard metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and false-positive rate are employed to check the validity of the current models reported in the literature. Finally, existing issues are highlighted and possible directions for future work are also suggested.

This study aimed to evaluate the ability of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) compared to that of hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) to depict small vessels on computed tomography (CT). DLR and two types of hybrid IRs were used for image reconstruction. The target vessels were the basilar artery (BA), superior cerebellar artery (SCA), anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA), and posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA). The peak value, ΔCT values defined as the difference between the peak value and background, and full width at half maximum (FWHM), were obtained from the profile curves. In all target vessels, the peak and ΔCT values of DLR were significantly higher than those of the two types of hybrid IR (p < 0.001). Compared to that associated with hybrid IR, the FWHM of DLR was significantly lower in the SCA (p < 0.001), AICA (p < 0.001), and PICA (p < 0.001). In conclusion, DLR has the potential to improve visualization of small vessels.

The objective of this study is to investigate whether a newly introduced deep learning-based iterative reconstruction algorithm, namely, the artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction (AIIR), has a clinical value in computed tomography angiography (CTA), especially for visualizing vascular structures and related lesions, with routine dose settings.

A total of 63 patients were retrospectively collected from the triple rule-out CTA examinations, where both pulmonary and aortic data were available for each patient and were taken as the example for investigation. The images were reconstructed using the filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR), and the AIIR. The visibility of vasculature and pulmonary emboli and the general image quality were assessed.

Artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction resulted in significantly ( P < 0.001) lower noise as well as higher signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio compared with FBP and HIR. Besides, AIIR achieved the highest subjective scores on general image quality ( P < 0.05). For the vasculature visibility, AIIR offered the best vessel conspicuity, especially for the small vessels ( P < 0.05). Also, >90% of emboli on the AIIR images were graded as sharp (score 5), whereas <15% of emboli on FBP and HIR images were scored 5.

As demonstrated for pulmonary and aortic CTAs, AIIR improves the image quality and offers a better depiction for vascular structures compared with FBP and HIR. The visibility of the pulmonary emboli was also increased by AIIR.

The computed tomography (CT) technique is extensively employed as an imaging modality in clinical settings. The radiation dose of CT, however, is significantly high, thereby raising concerns regarding the potential radiation damage it may cause. The reduction of X-ray exposure dose in CT scanning may result in a significant decline in imaging quality, thereby elevating the risk of missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis. The reduction of CT radiation dose and acquisition of high-quality images to meet clinical diagnostic requirements have always been a critical research focus and challenge in the field of CT. Over the years, scholars have conducted extensive research on enhancing low-dose CT (LDCT) imaging algorithms, among which deep learning-based algorithms have demonstrated superior performance. In this review, we initially introduced the conventional algorithms for CT image reconstruction along with their respective advantages and disadvantages. Subsequently, we provided a detailed description of four aspects concerning the application of deep neural networks in LDCT imaging process: preprocessing in the projection domain, post-processing in the image domain, dual-domain processing imaging, and direct deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR). Furthermore, an analysis was conducted to evaluate the merits and demerits of each method. The commercial and clinical applications of the LDCT-DLR algorithm were also presented in an overview. Finally, we summarized the existing issues pertaining to LDCT-DLR and concluded the paper while outlining prospective trends for algorithmic advancement.