Published online Jun 8, 2025. doi: 10.35712/aig.v6.i1.107105
Revised: April 3, 2025
Accepted: April 16, 2025
Published online: June 8, 2025
Processing time: 83 Days and 8 Hours
Metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), formerly referred to as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, represents an escalating worldwide medical burden defined by hepatic steatosis, inflammation, fibrosis, and potential progression to cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool in MASLD management, enhancing diagnostic accuracy, risk stratification, and treatment optimization. This review explores the integration of AI in MASLD diagnosis, including AI-based histopathological assessment, non-invasive screening models, imaging diagnostics, and gut microbiota-based app
Core Tip: Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing the diagnosis and treatment of metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, enabling non-invasive assessments, and guiding personalized treatment strategies. Despite challenges such as data integration, model interpretability, and cost-effectiveness, AI has the potential to improve early detection, facilitate targeted interventions, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes in MASLD care.
- Citation: Gao YN, Chen ML, Li WM, Liu Q, Jiao Y. Advancing the diagnosis and treatment of metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease: The transformative role of artificial intelligence. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2025; 6(1): 107105
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2644-3236/full/v6/i1/107105.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.35712/aig.v6.i1.107105
Metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), formerly designated as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), constitutes a persistent hepatic disorder pathologically manifested through aberrant lipid deposition within hepatocytes, leading to inflammation, fibrosis, and the potential progression to cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). With the global rise in obesity, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome, the prevalence of MASLD has significantly increased, posing a considerable burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Traditional diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for MASLD, such as liver biopsy and histological assessment, have limitations including invasiveness, variability in interpretation, and subjectivity. When hepatic steatosis is less than 20%, ultrasound may miss it[1]. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a revolutionary tool in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of MASLD, offering potential solutions to many of these challenges. This review explores the role of AI in enhancing MASLD diagnosis, guiding personalized treatments, and identifying novel therapeutic strategies, while discussing the challenges and future directions in AI implementation (Table 1).
Application | Description | Ref. |
AI-based pathology tools | Improve histological scoring accuracy and reduce reader variability | Pulaski et al[3], Ratziu et al[4], Solomon et al[2] |
Non-invasive screening models | Predict MASLD using lab and anthropometric data with high accuracy | Masaebi et al[5], Njei et al[6], Leow et al[10], Fan et al[7], Bosch et al[8] |
AI-enhanced ultrasonography | Enhances steatosis and fibrosis diagnosis with improved AUC values | Santoro et al[11], Fujii et al[13], Luetkens et al[12] |
Gut microbiota-based diagnosis | Identifies MASLD using ML models trained on gut microbiota data | Park et al[14] |
Personalized treatment strategies | Guide targeted interventions using clinical and risk factor data | Dabbah et al[15], Wu et al[16], Malik et al[17] |
Treatment response assessment | Evaluates therapeutic efficacy using continuous histological scores | Ratziu et al[4], Pulaski et al[3], Nishida et al[18] |
AI-based pathology tools have made significant strides in improving the accuracy and reproducibility of histological evaluations in MASLD. Traditional liver biopsy is a gold standard for diagnosing MASLD; however, its invasive nature, risk of complications, and interobserver variability pose challenges. As highlighted by Solomon et al[2], the invasive nature of biopsy, coupled with risks of complications (e.g., bleeding and pain), sampling variability, and interobserver discrepancies, restricts its utility for large-scale clinical application. Furthermore, inconsistencies between non-invasive tests and biopsy results may stem from biopsy-related inaccuracies, such as sampling bias or staging subjectivity. AI models, such as AIM-MASH and AIM-NASH, have been developed to assist pathologists in scoring liver biopsies, improving the consistency and repeatability of assessments. These AI-driven tools have demonstrated high accuracy in scoring liver steatosis, inflammation, and ballooning while maintaining non-inferiority in fibrosis assessment[3]. Similarly, PathAI's NASH ML models offer continuous scoring for fibrosis, steatosis, and inflammation, providing a more quantitative approach to histopathological evaluation and increasing diagnostic precision[4].
Non-invasive diagnostic tools have become a key focus of AI applications in MASLD, particularly for early detection and risk stratification. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have been developed to predict MASLD based on a combination of clinical, laboratory, and anthropometric data, including waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), alanine aminotransferase levels, and cholesterol levels. These AI models have demonstrated high accuracy [area under the curve (AUC) > 0.90] in identifying MASLD and stratifying patients based on their risk of developing advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis[5,6]. Fan et al[7] developed a logistic regression ML model [liver stiffness measurement (LSM)-plus] combining LSM with five clinical indices (age, sex, platelets, albumin, and total bilirubin). This model achieved a 96.8% accuracy for cirrhosis diagnosis in external validation, outperforming standalone LSM (86.4%) and Agile scores (76.0%), with a high specificity (97.4%) and sensitivity (88.9%). Bosch et al[8] devised a machine learning framework employing trichrome-stained hepatic biopsy specimens obtained from individuals diagnosed with cirrhosis secondary to MASLD. This computational tool ascertained pathologically relevant portal hypertension, achieving AUC values of 0.85 and 0.76 during the model training and external validation stages, respectively. Additionally, Lu et al[9] developed a random forest-based AI model integrating clinical features with the mitochondrial gene variant mt.12361A>G, which demonstrated exceptional diagnostic performance. The model achieved a perfect area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 1.000 in the training cohort and maintained strong discriminative ability (AUROC = 0.876) in the validation cohort, sig
AI-enhanced imaging techniques, particularly in ultrasonography, have revolutionized MASLD diagnosis. AI algorithms integrated into ultrasound systems have shown improved accuracy in detecting liver steatosis compared to manual assessments, with higher AUC values (0.87-0.98) and better sensitivity and specificity[11]. For instance, Luetkens et al[12] (2022) demonstrated that deep learning models (ResNet50/DenseNet121) could differentiate alcoholic from non-alcoholic cirrhosis on routine T2-weighted MRI with a 75% accuracy, outperforming traditional imaging assessments. AI-based analysis of liver contours and surface roughness has also been utilized to assess the severity of fibrosis, enabling non-invasive staging of MASLD[13]. These AI-driven imaging approaches provide a cost-effective, scalable alternative to liver biopsy, reducing patient burden and enhancing early detection.
Emerging breakthroughs in gut microbial ecology have revealed that intestinal microbial communities exert a pivotal influence on the disease mechanisms underlying MASLD. AI models trained on 16S rRNA sequencing data have demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (AUC > 0.90) in distinguishing MASLD from other liver diseases, such as alcoholic liver disease. These ML models use gut microbiota profiles as non-invasive biomarkers for MASLD, high
AI has paved the way for personalized medicine in MASLD by integrating clinical, imaging, and laboratory data to predict disease progression and guide individualized treatment strategies. Machine learning models can identify key risk factors, such as HbA1c, gamma-glutamyl transferase, and BMI, that influence disease progression and guide targeted interventions for high-risk patients[15,16]. By analyzing large datasets, AI can predict the likelihood of progression to advanced stages, including cirrhosis and HCC, enabling clinicians to implement early and tailored interventions.
In the treatment of MASLD, evaluating therapeutic efficacy is crucial for optimizing care. Traditional methods, such as liver biopsy, may not always be suitable for monitoring disease response to treatment. AI-driven continuous scores have been used to assess changes in fibrosis, steatosis, and inflammation over time, offering a more sensitive and non-invasive method for evaluating treatment response. For example, clinical trials have demonstrated that AI-based scores were able to detect significant reductions in fibrosis and steatosis following therapeutic administration of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, which were not evident through conventional histopathological assessments[4].
AI is also playing a vital role in the discovery of new therapeutic targets for MASLD. By analyzing large-scale clinical and molecular data, AI models can identify novel drug candidates and predict the effectiveness of potential treatments. This accelerates the drug discovery process and helps to prioritize compounds for further clinical development. AI-driven approaches are being used to predict treatment outcomes, providing valuable insights into the potential success of new therapies[17,18].
One of the primary challenges in implementing AI in MASLD is the integration of diverse data sources, including clinical, imaging, laboratory, and omics data. Current constraints encompass inconsistencies in algorithmic efficacy, absence of independent cohort verification, and reliance on meticulously curated data repositories. Harmonization of artificial intelligence algorithms and rigorous verification through multi-institutional investigations are imperative to guarantee their precision and clinical translatability. Additionally, establishing collaborative data ecosystems will prove indis
Machine learning systems, particularly those employing deep neural network architectures, frequently operate as "black boxes," impeding clinicians from understanding the decision-making process behind AI-driven diagnoses and treatment recommendations. To address this challenge, explainable AI techniques, such as SHAP analysis, are being developed to provide interpretable insights into the AI model’s predictions. Subsequent research priorities must strategically align artificial intelligence-driven systems with existing healthcare delivery frameworks, while establishing transparent algorithmic reasoning mechanisms to optimize therapeutic decision-making efficacy. Enhancing the transparency of AI algorithms will be crucial in building clinician trust and ensuring widespread adoption in clinical settings[6,16,19].
For AI tools to be widely adopted, they must be both cost-effective and accessible, particularly in resource-limited settings. Certain computational frameworks, particularly those dependent upon high-dimensional omics datasets or sophisticated radiological modalities, encounter substantial deployment challenges in under-resourced healthcare environments[17]. The development of lightweight AI models that utilize readily available clinical data, such as liver function tests and anthropometric measurements, can facilitate the scalability and broader implementation of AI-based solutions. Ensuring that AI tools are affordable and can be easily integrated into existing healthcare infrastructure will be critical to their success[5,15].
The integration of AI in MASLD care relies on vast amounts of sensitive patient data, including clinical records, imaging studies, and multi-omics profiles. Preserving patient privacy and data security requires robust encryption and anonymization technologies, complemented by responsible data management practices such as decentralized sharing frameworks[20].
Divergent global regulatory landscapes pose barriers to AI adoption in health care. Whereas governing authorities including the United States Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency have promulgated regulatory frameworks for artificial intelligence-based healthcare technologies, the absence of harmonized criteria to assess algorithmic reliability, therapeutic effectiveness, and sociodemographic parity persists as a critical implementation barrier[17]. This necessitates international collaboration to establish harmonized regulatory frameworks while resolving critical challenges including cross-jurisdictional liability and intellectual property standardization.
AI applications in MASLD raise ethical concerns regarding fairness, accountability, and patient autonomy. Inherent biases in training datasets may disproportionately affect underrepresented populations, leading to disparities in diagnostic accuracy or treatment recommendations. Algorithmic bias presents a substantial impediment, necessitating heterogeneous data repositories and persistent oversight mechanisms to safeguard equitable outcomes[20]. Mitigation strategies include diversifying training cohorts, implementing fairness audits, and incorporating bias-correction al
AI has significantly enhanced the management of MASLD by improving diagnostic accuracy, enabling non-invasive assessments, and facilitating personalized treatment strategies. While challenges such as data integration, model interpretability, and cost-effectiveness persist, ongoing advancements in AI promise to further transform MASLD care. AI-driven innovations offer the potential for earlier detection, more effective treatments, and ultimately improved patient outcomes. As AI technology continues to evolve, its integration into clinical practice will become increasingly essential for optimizing the care of patients with MASLD. AI is poised to revolutionize MASLD management in the next decade via multimodal monitoring, AI-driven pathology subtyping, and digital twin-validated personalized therapeutics.
1. | Fitzpatrick E, Dhawan A. Noninvasive biomarkers in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: current status and a glimpse of the future. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:10851-10863. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in CrossRef: 74] [Cited by in RCA: 79] [Article Influence: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Solomon A, Cipăian CR, Negrea MO, Boicean A, Mihaila R, Beca C, Popa ML, Grama SM, Teodoru M, Neamtu B. Hepatic Involvement across the Metabolic Syndrome Spectrum: Non-Invasive Assessment and Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning. J Clin Med. 2023;12. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in RCA: 5] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Pulaski H, Harrison SA, Mehta SS, Sanyal AJ, Vitali MC, Manigat LC, Hou H, Madasu Christudoss SP, Hoffman SM, Stanford-Moore A, Egger R, Glickman J, Resnick M, Patel N, Taylor CE, Myers RP, Chung C, Patterson SD, Sejling AS, Minnich A, Baxi V, Subramaniam GM, Anstee QM, Loomba R, Ratziu V, Montalto MC, Anderson NP, Beck AH, Wack KE. Clinical validation of an AI-based pathology tool for scoring of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. Nat Med. 2025;31:315-322. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in RCA: 5] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Ratziu V, Francque S, Behling CA, Cejvanovic V, Cortez-Pinto H, Iyer JS, Krarup N, Le Q, Sejling AS, Tiniakos D, Harrison SA. Artificial intelligence scoring of liver biopsies in a phase II trial of semaglutide in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2024;80:173-185. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in RCA: 13] [Article Influence: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Masaebi F, Azizmohammad Looha M, Mohammadzadeh M, Pahlevani V, Farjam M, Zayeri F, Homayounfar R. Machine-Learning Application for Predicting Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Using Laboratory and Body Composition Indicators. Arch Iran Med. 2024;27:551-562. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Njei B, Osta E, Njei N, Al-Ajlouni YA, Lim JK. An explainable machine learning model for prediction of high-risk nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Sci Rep. 2024;14:8589. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in RCA: 9] [Article Influence: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Fan R, Yu N, Li G, Arshad T, Liu WY, Wong GL, Liang X, Chen Y, Jin XZ, Leung HH, Chen J, Wang XD, Yip TC, Sanyal AJ, Sun J, Wong VW, Zheng MH, Hou J. Machine-learning model comprising five clinical indices and liver stiffness measurement can accurately identify MASLD-related liver fibrosis. Liver Int. 2024;44:749-759. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in RCA: 8] [Article Influence: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Bosch J, Chung C, Carrasco-Zevallos OM, Harrison SA, Abdelmalek MF, Shiffman ML, Rockey DC, Shanis Z, Juyal D, Pokkalla H, Le QH, Resnick M, Montalto M, Beck AH, Wapinski I, Han L, Jia C, Goodman Z, Afdhal N, Myers RP, Sanyal AJ. A Machine Learning Approach to Liver Histological Evaluation Predicts Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension in NASH Cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2021;74:3146-3160. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in RCA: 36] [Article Influence: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Lu MY, Wei YJ, Wang CW, Liang PC, Yeh ML, Tsai YS, Tsai PC, Ko YM, Lin CC, Chen KY, Lin YH, Jang TY, Hsieh MY, Lin ZY, Huang CF, Huang JF, Dai CY, Chuang WL, Yu ML. Mitochondrial mt12361A>G increased risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease among non-diabetes. World J Gastroenterol. 2025;31:103716. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
10. | Leow YW, Chan WL, Lai LL, Mustapha NRN, Mahadeva S, Quiambao R, Munteanu M, Chan WK. LIVERSTAT for risk stratification for patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;39:2182-2189. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
11. | Santoro S, Khalil M, Abdallah H, Farella I, Noto A, Dipalo GM, Villani P, Bonfrate L, Di Ciaula A, Portincasa P. Early and accurate diagnosis of steatotic liver by artificial intelligence (AI)-supported ultrasonography. Eur J Intern Med. 2024;125:57-66. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in RCA: 9] [Article Influence: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Luetkens JA, Nowak S, Mesropyan N, Block W, Praktiknjo M, Chang J, Bauckhage C, Sifa R, Sprinkart AM, Faron A, Attenberger U. Deep learning supports the differentiation of alcoholic and other-than-alcoholic cirrhosis based on MRI. Sci Rep. 2022;12:8297. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in RCA: 17] [Article Influence: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Fujii I, Matsumoto N, Ogawa M, Konishi A, Kaneko M, Watanabe Y, Masuzaki R, Kogure H, Koizumi N, Sugitani M. Artificial Intelligence and Image Analysis-Assisted Diagnosis for Fibrosis Stage of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Using Ultrasonography: A Pilot Study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14:2585. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
14. | Park IG, Yoon SJ, Won SM, Oh KK, Hyun JY, Suk KT, Lee U. Gut microbiota-based machine-learning signature for the diagnosis of alcohol-associated and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Sci Rep. 2024;14:16122. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
15. | Dabbah S, Mishani I, Davidov Y, Ben Ari Z. Implementation of Machine Learning Algorithms to Screen for Advanced Liver Fibrosis in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: An In-Depth Explanatory Analysis. Digestion. 2024;1-14. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
16. | Wu Y, Yang X, Morris HL, Gurka MJ, Shenkman EA, Cusi K, Bril F, Donahoo WT. Noninvasive Diagnosis of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Advanced Liver Fibrosis Using Machine Learning Methods: Comparative Study With Existing Quantitative Risk Scores. JMIR Med Inform. 2022;10:e36997. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
17. | Malik S, Das R, Thongtan T, Thompson K, Dbouk N. AI in Hepatology: Revolutionizing the Diagnosis and Management of Liver Disease. 2024 Preprint. [DOI] [Full Text] |
18. | Nishida N. Advancements in Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Imaging Diagnostics for the Management of Liver Disease-Applications and Challenges in Personalized Care. Bioengineering (Basel). 2024;11:1243. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
19. | Trifylli EM, Angelakis A, Kriebardis AG, Papadopoulos N, Fortis SP, Pantazatou V, Koskinas I, Kranidioti H, Koustas E, Sarantis P, Manolakopoulos S, Deutsch M. Extracellular Vesicles as Biomarkers for Steatosis Stages in MASLD Patients: an Algorithmic Approach Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence. 2024 Preprint. [DOI] [Full Text] |
20. | Elendu C, Amaechi DC, Elendu TC, Jingwa KA, Okoye OK, John Okah M, Ladele JA, Farah AH, Alimi HA. Ethical implications of AI and robotics in healthcare: A review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102:e36671. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 108] [Cited by in RCA: 53] [Article Influence: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |