1
|
Shih SF, Tasdelen B, Yagiz E, Zhang Z, Zhong X, Cui SX, Nayak KS, Wu HH. Improved liver fat and R 2 * quantification at 0.55 T using locally low-rank denoising. Magn Reson Med 2025; 93:1348-1364. [PMID: 39385473 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2024] [Revised: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 09/13/2024] [Indexed: 10/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To improve liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF) andR 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ quantification at 0.55 T by systematically validating the acquisition parameter choices and investigating the performance of locally low-rank denoising methods. METHODS A Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to design a protocol for PDFF andR 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ mapping at 0.55 T. Using this proposed protocol, we investigated the performance of robust locally low-rank (RLLR) and random matrix theory (RMT) denoising. In a reference phantom, we assessed quantification accuracy (concordance correlation coefficient [ρ c $$ {\rho}_c $$ ] vs. reference values) and precision (using SD) across scan repetitions. We performed in vivo liver scans (11 subjects) and used regions of interest to compare means and SDs of PDFF andR 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ measurements. Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed (p < 0.05 considered significant). RESULTS In the phantom, RLLR and RMT denoising improved accuracy in PDFF andR 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ withρ c $$ {\rho}_c $$ >0.992 and improved precision with >67% decrease in SD across 50 scan repetitions versus conventional reconstruction (i.e., no denoising). For in vivo liver scans, the mean PDFF and meanR 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ were not significantly different between the three methods (conventional reconstruction; RLLR and RMT denoising). Without denoising, the SDs of PDFF andR 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ were 8.80% and 14.17 s-1. RLLR denoising significantly reduced the values to 1.79% and 5.31 s-1 (p < 0.001); RMT denoising significantly reduced the values to 2.00% and 4.81 s-1 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION We validated an acquisition protocol for improved PDFF andR 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ quantification at 0.55 T. Both RLLR and RMT denoising improved the accuracy and precision of PDFF andR 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu-Fu Shih
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Bilal Tasdelen
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ecrin Yagiz
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Zhaohuan Zhang
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Xiaodong Zhong
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Sophia X Cui
- MR R&D Collaborations, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Krishna S Nayak
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Holden H Wu
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yuan K, Liu Q, Luo P, Wang C, Zhou Y, Qi F, Zhang Q, Huang X, Qiu B. Association of proton-density fat fraction with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 2024; 35:2077-2086. [PMID: 39129009 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07220-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between measuring proton-density fat fraction (PDFF) in bone marrow using multi-echo chemical shift-encoded MRI and osteoporosis, assessing its effectiveness as a biomarker for osteoporosis. A systematic review was conducted by two independent researchers using Cochrane, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases up to December 2023. Quality assessments were evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) checklist. Fourteen studies involving 1495 patients were analyzed. The meta-analysis revealed a significant difference in PDFF values between the osteoporosis/osteopenia group and the normal control group, with a mean difference of 11.04 (95% CI: 9.17 to 12.92, Z=11.52, P < 0.00001). Measuring PDFF via MRI shows potential as an osteoporosis biomarker and may serve as a risk factor for osteoporosis. This insight opens new avenues for future diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, potentially improving osteoporosis management and patient care. OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess the correlation between measuring proton-density fat fraction (PDFF) in bone marrow using multi-echo chemical shift-encoded MRI and osteoporosis, evaluating its effectiveness as a biomarker for osteoporosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS This systematic review was carried out by two independent researchers using Cochrane, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases up to December 2023. Quality assessments were evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) checklist. RESULTS Fourteen studies involving 1495 patients were analyzed. The meta-analysis revealed a significant difference in PDFF values between the osteoporosis/osteopenia group and the normal control group, with a (MD = 11.04, 95% CI: 9.17 to 12.92, Z = 11.52, P < 0.00001). Subgroup analyses indicated that diagnostic methods, gender, and echo length did not significantly impact the PDFF-osteoporosis association. CONCLUSION PDFF measurement via MRI shows potential as an osteoporosis biomarker and may serve as a risk factor for osteoporosis. This insight opens new avenues for future diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, potentially improving osteoporosis management and patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kecheng Yuan
- Medical Imaging Center, Department of Electronic Engineering and Information Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Qingyun Liu
- Medical Imaging Center, Department of Electronic Engineering and Information Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Penghui Luo
- Medical Imaging Center, Department of Electronic Engineering and Information Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Changliang Wang
- Medical Imaging Center, Department of Electronic Engineering and Information Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Yufu Zhou
- Anhui Fuqing Medical Equipment Co., Ltd., Hefei, China
| | - Fulang Qi
- Medical Imaging Center, Department of Electronic Engineering and Information Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Qing Zhang
- Medical Imaging Center, Department of Electronic Engineering and Information Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Xiaoyan Huang
- Anhui Fuqing Medical Equipment Co., Ltd., Hefei, China
| | - Bensheng Qiu
- Medical Imaging Center, Department of Electronic Engineering and Information Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma M, Cheng J, Li X, Fan Z, Wang C, Reeder SB, Hernando D. Prediction of MRI R 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ relaxometry in the presence of hepatic steatosis by Monte Carlo simulations. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2024:e5274. [PMID: 39394902 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.5274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2024] [Accepted: 09/30/2024] [Indexed: 10/14/2024]
Abstract
To develop Monte Carlo simulations to predict the relationship ofR 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ with liver fat content at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. For various fat fractions (FFs) from 1% to 25%, four types of virtual liver models were developed by incorporating the size and spatial distribution of fat droplets. Magnetic fields were then generated under different fat susceptibilities at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, and proton movement was simulated for phase accrual and MRI signal synthesis. The synthesized signal was fit to single-peak and multi-peak fat signal models forR 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) predictions. In addition, the relationships betweenR 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ and PDFF predictions were compared with in vivo calibrations and Bland-Altman analysis was performed to quantitatively evaluate the effects of these components (type of virtual liver model, fat susceptibility, and fat signal model) onR 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ predictions. A virtual liver model with realistic morphology of fat droplets was demonstrated, andR 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ and PDFF values were predicted by Monte Carlo simulations at 1.5 T and 3.0 T.R 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ predictions were linearly correlated with PDFF, while the slope was unaffected by the type of virtual liver model and increased as fat susceptibility increased. Compared with in vivo calibrations, the multi-peak fat signal model showed superior performance to the single-peak fat signal model, which yielded an underestimation of liver fat. TheR 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ -PDFF relationships by simulations with fat susceptibility of 0.6 ppm and the multi-peak fat signal model wereR 2 * = 0.490 × PDFF + 28.0 $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast }=0.490\times \mathrm{PDFF}+28.0 $$ (R 2 = 0.967 $$ {R}^2=0.967 $$ ,p < 0.01 $$ p<0.01 $$ ) at 1.5 T andR 2 * = 0.928 × PDFF + 39.4 $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast }=0.928\times \mathrm{PDFF}+39.4 $$ (R 2 = 0.972 $$ {R}^2=0.972 $$ ,p < 0.01 $$ p<0.01 $$ ) at 3.0 T. Monte Carlo simulations provide a new means forR 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ -PDFF prediction, which is primarily determined by fat susceptibility, fat signal model, and magnetic field strength. AccurateR 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ -PDFF calibration has the potential to correct the effect of fat onR 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ quantification, and may be helpful for accurateR 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ measurements in liver iron overload. In this study, a Monte Carlo simulation of hepatic steatosis was developed to predict the relationship betweenR 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ and PDFF. Furthermore, the effects of fat droplet morphology, fat susceptibility, fat signal model, and magnetic field strength were evaluated for theR 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ -PDFF calibration. Our results suggest that Monte Carlo simulations provide a new means forR 2 * $$ {\mathrm{R}}_2^{\ast } $$ -PDFF prediction and this means can be easily generated for various regimes, such as simulations with higher fields and different echo times, as well as correction of magnetic susceptibility measurements for liver iron quantification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengyuan Ma
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Junying Cheng
- Department of MRI, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xiaoben Li
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Zhuangzhuang Fan
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Changqing Wang
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Scott B Reeder
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Diego Hernando
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kubale R, Schneider G, Lessenich CPN, Buecker A, Wassenberg S, Torres G, Gurung A, Hall T, Labyed Y. Ultrasound-Derived Fat Fraction for Hepatic Steatosis Assessment: Prospective Study of Agreement With MRI PDFF and Sources of Variability in a Heterogeneous Population. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024; 222:e2330775. [PMID: 38506537 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.30775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease is a growing global public health concern. Quantitative ultrasound measurements, such as ultrasound-derived fat fraction (UDFF), could provide noninvasive, cost-effective, and portable steatosis evaluation. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to evaluate utility of UDFF for steatosis assessment using proton density fat fraction (PDFF) as reference in patients undergoing liver MRI for heterogeneous indications and to assess UDFF variability. METHODS. This prospective study included a primary analysis of 187 patients (mean age, 53.8 years; 112 men, 75 women) who underwent 3-T liver MRI for any clinical indication from December 2020 to July 2021. Patients underwent investigational PDFF measurement, including determination of PDFFwhole-liver (mean PDFF of entire liver), and PDFFvoxel (PDFF in single voxel within right lobe, measured by MR spectroscopy), as well as investigational ultrasound with UDFF calculation (mean of five inter-costal measurements) within 1 hour after MRI. In a subanalysis, 21 of these patients underwent additional UDFF measurements 1, 3, and 5 hours after meal consumption. The study also included repeatability and reproducibility analysis of 30 patients (mean age, 26.3 years; 10 men, 20 women) who underwent clinical abdominal ultrasound between November 2022 and January 2023; in these patients, three operators sequentially performed UDFF measurements. RESULTS. In primary analysis, UDFF and PDFFwhole-liver measurements showed intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.79. In Bland-Altman analysis, UDFF and PDFFvoxel measurements showed mean difference of 1.5% (95% CI, 0.6-2.4%), with 95% limits of agreement from -11.0% to 14.0%. UDFF measurements exhibited AUC for detecting PDFFvoxel at historic thresholds of 6.5% and greater, 17.4% and greater, and 22.1% and greater of 0.90, 0.95, and 0.95, respectively. In subanalysis, mean UDFF was not significantly different across time points with respect to meal consumption (p = .21). In repeatability and reproducibility analysis, ICC for intraoperator repeatability ranged from 0.98 to 0.99 and for interoperator reproducibility from 0.90 to 0.96. Visual assessment of patient-level data plots indicated increasing variability of mean UDFF measurements across operators and of intercostal measurements within individual patients with increasing steatosis. CONCLUSION. UDFF showed robust agreement with PDFF, diagnostic performance for steatosis grades, and intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility. Nonetheless, UDFF exhibited bias toward slightly larger values versus PDFF; intraoperator and interoperator variation increased with increasing steatosis. CLINICAL IMPACT. UDFF shows promise for steatosis assessment across diverse populations, although continued optimization remains warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinhard Kubale
- Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Hospital, Kirrberger Strasse Geb. 50.1, 66424 Homburg, Germany
| | - Guenther Schneider
- Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Hospital, Kirrberger Strasse Geb. 50.1, 66424 Homburg, Germany
| | - Carl P N Lessenich
- Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Hospital, Kirrberger Strasse Geb. 50.1, 66424 Homburg, Germany
| | - Arno Buecker
- Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Saarland University Hospital, Kirrberger Strasse Geb. 50.1, 66424 Homburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Arati Gurung
- Siemens Healthineers Ultrasound Division, Issaquah, WA
| | - Timothy Hall
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Yassin Labyed
- Siemens Healthineers Ultrasound Division, Issaquah, WA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Song S, Kim H, Choi JI, Kim DH, Kim B, Lee H, Lee J. Validity of an automated screening Dixon technique for quantifying hepatic steatosis in living liver donors. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:406-413. [PMID: 37801142 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-04009-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the validity of an automated screening Dixon (e-DIXON) technique for quantifying hepatic steatosis in living liver-donor patients by comparison with magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) as a reference standard. METHODS A total of 285 living liver-donor candidates were examined with the e-DIXON technique and single-voxel MRS to assess hepatic steatosis and iron deposition between January 2014 and February 2019. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of the e-DIXON technique for hepatic steatosis were calculated. The mean fat signal fractions obtained in MRS were compared between the donors diagnosed with hepatic steatosis and the normal group. The mean R2 values of donors with or without hepatic siderosis also were compared. RESULTS The e-DIXON technique diagnosed normal in 133 (47%), fat in 124 (44%), iron in one (0.4%), and a combination of both fat and iron in 27 (10%) donors. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for diagnosing hepatic steatosis were 94%, 70%, 64%, and 96%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the mean fat signal fraction obtained in MRS between the steatosis and normal groups (p < 0.001), but R2 values were not significantly different between siderosis and normal groups (p = 0.11). The e-DIXON technique showed a strong correlation with MRS in fat measurement (r2 = 0.92, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The e-DIXON technique reliably screens for hepatic steatosis but may not accurate for detecting hepatic iron deposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangkeun Song
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Hokun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
| | - Joon-Il Choi
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Hwan Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Bohyun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyunsoo Lee
- Siemens Healthineers Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jiwon Lee
- Red Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gupta A, Dixit R, Prakash A. Non-invasive hepatic fat quantification: Can multi-echo Dixon help? Radiol Bras 2024; 57:e20230125. [PMID: 38993969 PMCID: PMC11235074 DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multi-echo Dixon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in hepatic fat quantification, in comparison with that of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), on 3.0-T MRI. Materials and Methods Fifty-five adults with no known liver disease underwent MRI in a 3.0-T scanner for determination of the hepatic fat fraction, with two techniques: multi-echo Dixon, in a manually drawn region of interest (ROI) and in the entire liver parenchyma (automated segmentation); and MRS. The diagnostic accuracy and cutoff value for multi-echo Dixon were determined, with MRS being used as the reference standard. Results The mean fat fraction obtained by multi-echo Dixon in the manually drawn ROI and in the entire liver was 5.2 ± 5.8% and 6.6 ± 5.2%, respectively, whereas the mean hepatic fat fraction obtained by MRS was 5.7 ± 6.4%. A very strong positive correlation and good agreement were observed between MRS and multi-echo Dixon, for the ROI (r = 0.988, r2 = 0.978, p < 0.001) and for the entire liver parenchyma (r = 0.960, r2 = 0.922, p < 0.001). A moderate positive correlation was observed between the hepatic fat fraction and body mass index of the participants, regardless of the fat estimation technique employed. Conclusion For hepatic fat quantification, multi-echo Dixon MRI demonstrated a very strong positive correlation and good agreement with MRS (often considered the gold-standard noninvasive technique). Because multi-echo Dixon MRI is more readily available than is MRS, it can be used as a rapid tool for hepatic fat quantification, especially when the hepatic fat distribution is not homogeneous.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akarshi Gupta
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Lok Nayak Hospital - Maulana Azad
Medical College, New Delhi, India
| | - Rashmi Dixit
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Lok Nayak Hospital - Maulana Azad
Medical College, New Delhi, India
| | - Anjali Prakash
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Lok Nayak Hospital - Maulana Azad
Medical College, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang L, Wang D, Chen J, Sun M, Nickel D, Kannengiesser S, Qu F, Zhu J, Ren C, Zhang Y, Cheng J. Preliminary Study of Confounder-Corrected Fat Fraction and R2* Mapping of Bone Marrow in Children With Acute Leukemia. J Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 58:1353-1363. [PMID: 37154163 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The bone marrow (BM) evaluation of acute leukemia (AL) mainly depends on invasive BM puncture biopsy. Noninvasive and accurate MR examination technology has potential clinical application value in the BM evaluation of AL patients. Multi-gradient-echo (MGRE) has been found useful to evaluate changes in BM fat and iron content, but has not yet been applied in AL. PURPOSE To explore the diagnostic capability of BM infiltration of quantitative BM fat fraction (FF) and R2* values obtained from a 3D MGRE sequence in children with primary AL. STUDY TYPE Prospective. POPULATION/SUBJECTS Sixty-two pediatric patients with untreated AL and 68 healthy volunteers. AL patients were divided into acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (n = 39) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (n = 23) groups. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 3T, 3D chemical-shift-encoded multi-gradient-echo, T1WI, T2WI, T2_STIR. ASSESSMENT BM FF and R2* values were assessed by manually drawing regions of interest at the L3, L4, ilium, and 1 cm below the bilateral trochanter of the femur (upper femur). STATISTICAL TESTS Independent sample t-tests, variance analysis, Spearman correlation. RESULTS BM FF and R2* at L3, L4, ilium, and upper femur, FFtotal and R2*total were significantly lower in the AL than control group. BM FF did not significantly differ between ALL and AML groups (PL3 = 0.060, PL4 = 0.086, Pilium = 0.179, Pupper femur = 0.149, and Ptotle = 0.097, respectively). The R2* was significantly lower in ALL group than AML group for L3, L4, and R2*total . BM FF was moderately positively correlated with R2* in ALL group, and strongly positively correlated in AML group. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves showed that BM FF had higher AUC in AL, ALL, and AML (all AUC = 1.000) than R2* (0.976, 0.996, and 0.941, respectively). DATA CONCLUSION MGRE-MRI mapping can be applied to measure BM FF and R2* values, and help evaluate BM infiltration and iron storage in children with AL. EVIDENCE LEVEL 1 Technical Efficacy: 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linlin Wang
- MRI Department of the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Dao Wang
- Department of Paediatrics of the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jiao Chen
- Department of Paediatrics of the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Mengtian Sun
- MRI Department of the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Dominik Nickel
- MR Application Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Feifei Qu
- MR Collaboration, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Beijing, China
| | - Jingxia Zhu
- MR Collaboration, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Beijing, China
| | - Cuiping Ren
- MRI Department of the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yong Zhang
- MRI Department of the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jingliang Cheng
- MRI Department of the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tsujita Y, Sofue K, Ueshima E, Ueno Y, Hori M, Murakami T. Clinical Application of Quantitative MR Imaging in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Magn Reson Med Sci 2023; 22:435-445. [PMID: 35584952 PMCID: PMC10552668 DOI: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Viral hepatitis was previously the most common cause of chronic liver disease. However, in recent years, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) cases have been increasing, especially in developed countries. NAFLD is histologically characterized by fat, fibrosis, and inflammation in the liver, eventually leading to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although biopsy is the gold standard for the assessment of the liver parenchyma, quantitative evaluation methods, such as ultrasound, CT, and MRI, have been reported to have good diagnostic performances. The quantification of liver fat, fibrosis, and inflammation is expected to be clinically useful in terms of the prognosis, early intervention, and treatment response for the management of NAFLD. The aim of this review was to discuss the basics and prospects of MRI-based tissue quantifications of the liver, mainly focusing on proton density fat fraction for the quantification of fat deposition, MR elastography for the quantification of fibrosis, and multifrequency MR elastography for the evaluation of inflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yushi Tsujita
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keitaro Sofue
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Eisuke Ueshima
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Yoshiko Ueno
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Hori
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Takamichi Murakami
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jiang Y, Zou J, Fan F, Yang P, Ma L, Gan T, Wang S, Zhang J. Application of multi-echo Dixon and MRS in quantifying hepatic fat content and staging liver fibrosis. Sci Rep 2023; 13:12555. [PMID: 37532757 PMCID: PMC10397311 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39361-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
This study associated the liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF), measured by multi-echo Dixon (ME-Dixon) and breath-hold single-voxel high-speed T2-corrected multi-echo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (HISTO) at 1.5 T, with serum biomarkers and liver fibrosis stages. This prospective study enrolled 75 patients suspected of liver fibrosis and scheduled for liver biopsy and 23 healthy participants with normal liver function. The participant underwent ME-Dixon and HISTO scanning. The agreement of PDFF measured by ME-Dixon (PDFF-D) and HISTO (PDFF-H) were compared. Correlations between PDFF and serum fat biomarkers (total cholesterol, triglyceride, and high- and low-density lipoproteins) and the liver fibrosis stages were assessed. PDFF were compared among the liver fibrosis stages (F0-F4) based on clinical liver biopsies. The Bland-Altman plot showed agreement between PDFF-D and PDFF-H(LoA, - 4.44 to 6.75), which have high consistency (ICC 0.752, P < 0.001). The correlations with the blood serum markers were mild to moderate (PDFF-H: r = 0.261-0.410, P < 0.01; PDFF-D: r = 0.265-0.367, P < 0.01). PDFF-D, PDFF-H, and steatosis were distributed similarly among the liver fibrosis stages. PDFF-H showed a slight negative correlation with the liver fibrosis stages (r = - 0.220, P = 0.04). Both ME-Dixon and HISTO sequences measured liver fat content noninvasively. Liver fat content was not directly associated with liver fibrosis stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanli Jiang
- Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
- Department of Magnetic Resonance, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730030, People's Republic of China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Functional and Molecular Imaging, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jie Zou
- Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
- Department of Magnetic Resonance, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730030, People's Republic of China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Functional and Molecular Imaging, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Fengxian Fan
- Department of Magnetic Resonance, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730030, People's Republic of China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Functional and Molecular Imaging, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Pin Yang
- Department of Magnetic Resonance, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730030, People's Republic of China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Functional and Molecular Imaging, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Laiyang Ma
- Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
- Department of Magnetic Resonance, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730030, People's Republic of China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Functional and Molecular Imaging, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Tiejun Gan
- Department of Magnetic Resonance, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730030, People's Republic of China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Functional and Molecular Imaging, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Shaoyu Wang
- MR Scientific Marketing, Siemens Healthineers, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Department of Magnetic Resonance, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Cuiyingmen No.82, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730030, People's Republic of China.
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Functional and Molecular Imaging, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nedrud MA, Chaudhry M, Middleton MS, Moylan CA, Lerebours R, Luo S, Farjat A, Guy C, Loomba R, Abdelmalek MF, Sirlin CB, Bashir MR. MRI Quantification of Placebo Effect in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Trials. Radiology 2023; 306:e220743. [PMID: 36318027 PMCID: PMC9968769 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.220743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
Background Several early-phase clinical trials for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) use liver fat content as measured with the MRI-derived proton density fat fraction (PDFF) for a primary outcome. These trials have shown relative reductions in liver fat content with placebo treatment alone, a phenomenon termed "the placebo effect." This phenomenon confounds the results and limits generalizability to future trials. Purpose To quantify the effect of placebo treatment on change in the absolute PDFF value and to identify variables associated with this observed change. Materials and Methods This is a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data from seven early phase clinical trials that included participants with a diagnosis of NASH based on MRI and/or liver biopsy who received placebo treatment. The primary outcome was a greater than or equal to 30% relative reduction in PDFF after placebo treatment. Normalization of PDFF, relative change in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, and normalization of ALT level were also examined. An exploratory linear mixed-effects model was used to estimate an overall change in absolute PDFF and to explore parameters associated with this response. Results A total of 187 participants (median age, 52 years [IQR, 43-60 years]; 114 women) who received placebo treatment were evaluated. A greater than or equal to 30% relative reduction in baseline PDFF was seen in 20% of participants after 12 weeks of placebo treatment (10 of 49), 9% of participants after 16 weeks (two of 22), and 28% of participants after 24 weeks (34 of 122). A repeated-measures linear mixed-effects model estimated a decrease of 2.3 units (median relative reduction of 13%) in absolute PDFF values after 24 weeks of placebo treatment (95% CI: 3.2, 1.4; P < .001). Conclusion In this analysis of 187 participants, a clinically relevant decrease in PDFF was observed with placebo treatment. Based on the study model, assuming an absolute PDFF decrease of approximately 3 units (upper limit of 95% CI) to account for this "placebo effect" in sample size calculations for future clinical trials is suggested. Clinical trial registration nos. NCT01066364, NCT01766713, NCT01963845, NCT02443116, NCT02546609, NCT02316717, and NCT02442687 © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Yoon in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michael S. Middleton
- From the Department of Radiology (M.A.N., M.R.B.), Division of
Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (C.A.M., M.R.B.), Department of
Biostatistics & Bioinformatics (R. Lerebours, S.L., A.F.), Department of
Pathology (C.G.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development
(M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Box 3808,
Durham, NC 27710; Rutgers University Hospital, School of Medicine, Newark, NJ
(M.C.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (M.S.M., C.B.S.), and
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (R. Loomba), University of
California at San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, Calif; Department of
Medicine, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC (C.A.M.); and
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
(M.F.A.)
| | - Cynthia A. Moylan
- From the Department of Radiology (M.A.N., M.R.B.), Division of
Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (C.A.M., M.R.B.), Department of
Biostatistics & Bioinformatics (R. Lerebours, S.L., A.F.), Department of
Pathology (C.G.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development
(M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Box 3808,
Durham, NC 27710; Rutgers University Hospital, School of Medicine, Newark, NJ
(M.C.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (M.S.M., C.B.S.), and
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (R. Loomba), University of
California at San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, Calif; Department of
Medicine, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC (C.A.M.); and
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
(M.F.A.)
| | - Reginald Lerebours
- From the Department of Radiology (M.A.N., M.R.B.), Division of
Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (C.A.M., M.R.B.), Department of
Biostatistics & Bioinformatics (R. Lerebours, S.L., A.F.), Department of
Pathology (C.G.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development
(M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Box 3808,
Durham, NC 27710; Rutgers University Hospital, School of Medicine, Newark, NJ
(M.C.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (M.S.M., C.B.S.), and
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (R. Loomba), University of
California at San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, Calif; Department of
Medicine, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC (C.A.M.); and
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
(M.F.A.)
| | - Sheng Luo
- From the Department of Radiology (M.A.N., M.R.B.), Division of
Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (C.A.M., M.R.B.), Department of
Biostatistics & Bioinformatics (R. Lerebours, S.L., A.F.), Department of
Pathology (C.G.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development
(M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Box 3808,
Durham, NC 27710; Rutgers University Hospital, School of Medicine, Newark, NJ
(M.C.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (M.S.M., C.B.S.), and
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (R. Loomba), University of
California at San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, Calif; Department of
Medicine, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC (C.A.M.); and
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
(M.F.A.)
| | - Alfredo Farjat
- From the Department of Radiology (M.A.N., M.R.B.), Division of
Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (C.A.M., M.R.B.), Department of
Biostatistics & Bioinformatics (R. Lerebours, S.L., A.F.), Department of
Pathology (C.G.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development
(M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Box 3808,
Durham, NC 27710; Rutgers University Hospital, School of Medicine, Newark, NJ
(M.C.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (M.S.M., C.B.S.), and
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (R. Loomba), University of
California at San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, Calif; Department of
Medicine, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC (C.A.M.); and
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
(M.F.A.)
| | - Cynthia Guy
- From the Department of Radiology (M.A.N., M.R.B.), Division of
Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (C.A.M., M.R.B.), Department of
Biostatistics & Bioinformatics (R. Lerebours, S.L., A.F.), Department of
Pathology (C.G.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development
(M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Box 3808,
Durham, NC 27710; Rutgers University Hospital, School of Medicine, Newark, NJ
(M.C.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (M.S.M., C.B.S.), and
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (R. Loomba), University of
California at San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, Calif; Department of
Medicine, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC (C.A.M.); and
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
(M.F.A.)
| | - Rohit Loomba
- From the Department of Radiology (M.A.N., M.R.B.), Division of
Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (C.A.M., M.R.B.), Department of
Biostatistics & Bioinformatics (R. Lerebours, S.L., A.F.), Department of
Pathology (C.G.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development
(M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Box 3808,
Durham, NC 27710; Rutgers University Hospital, School of Medicine, Newark, NJ
(M.C.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (M.S.M., C.B.S.), and
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (R. Loomba), University of
California at San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, Calif; Department of
Medicine, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC (C.A.M.); and
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
(M.F.A.)
| | - Manal F. Abdelmalek
- From the Department of Radiology (M.A.N., M.R.B.), Division of
Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (C.A.M., M.R.B.), Department of
Biostatistics & Bioinformatics (R. Lerebours, S.L., A.F.), Department of
Pathology (C.G.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development
(M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Box 3808,
Durham, NC 27710; Rutgers University Hospital, School of Medicine, Newark, NJ
(M.C.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (M.S.M., C.B.S.), and
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (R. Loomba), University of
California at San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, Calif; Department of
Medicine, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC (C.A.M.); and
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
(M.F.A.)
| | - Claude B. Sirlin
- From the Department of Radiology (M.A.N., M.R.B.), Division of
Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (C.A.M., M.R.B.), Department of
Biostatistics & Bioinformatics (R. Lerebours, S.L., A.F.), Department of
Pathology (C.G.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development
(M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Box 3808,
Durham, NC 27710; Rutgers University Hospital, School of Medicine, Newark, NJ
(M.C.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (M.S.M., C.B.S.), and
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (R. Loomba), University of
California at San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, Calif; Department of
Medicine, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC (C.A.M.); and
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
(M.F.A.)
| | - Mustafa R. Bashir
- From the Department of Radiology (M.A.N., M.R.B.), Division of
Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (C.A.M., M.R.B.), Department of
Biostatistics & Bioinformatics (R. Lerebours, S.L., A.F.), Department of
Pathology (C.G.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development
(M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Box 3808,
Durham, NC 27710; Rutgers University Hospital, School of Medicine, Newark, NJ
(M.C.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (M.S.M., C.B.S.), and
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (R. Loomba), University of
California at San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, Calif; Department of
Medicine, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC (C.A.M.); and
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
(M.F.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Park S, Kwon JH, Kim SY, Kang JH, Chung JI, Jang JK, Jang HY, Shim JH, Lee SS, Kim KW, Song GW. Cutoff Values for Diagnosing Hepatic Steatosis Using Contemporary MRI-Proton Density Fat Fraction Measuring Methods. Korean J Radiol 2022; 23:1260-1268. [PMID: 36447414 PMCID: PMC9747271 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To propose standardized MRI-proton density fat fraction (PDFF) cutoff values for diagnosing hepatic steatosis, evaluated using contemporary PDFF measuring methods in a large population of healthy adults, using histologic fat fraction (HFF) as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective search of electronic medical records between 2015 and 2018 identified 1063 adult donor candidates for liver transplantation who had undergone liver MRI and liver biopsy within a 7-day interval. Patients with a history of liver disease or significant alcohol consumption were excluded. Chemical shift imaging-based MRI (CS-MRI) PDFF and high-speed T2-corrected multi-echo MR spectroscopy (HISTO-MRS) PDFF data were obtained. By temporal splitting, the total population was divided into development and validation sets. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the MRI-PDFF method. Two cutoff values with sensitivity > 90% and specificity > 90% were selected to rule-out and rule-in, respectively, hepatic steatosis with reference to HFF ≥ 5% in the development set. The diagnostic performance was assessed using the validation set. RESULTS Of 921 final participants (624 male; mean age ± standard deviation, 31.5 ± 9.0 years), the development and validation sets comprised 497 and 424 patients, respectively. In the development set, the areas under the ROC curve for diagnosing hepatic steatosis were 0.920 for CS-MRI-PDFF and 0.915 for HISTO-MRS-PDFF. For ruling-out hepatic steatosis, the CS-MRI-PDFF cutoff was 2.3% (sensitivity, 92.4%; specificity, 63.0%) and the HISTO-MRI-PDFF cutoff was 2.6% (sensitivity, 88.8%; specificity, 70.1%). For ruling-in hepatic steatosis, the CS-MRI-PDFF cutoff was 3.5% (sensitivity, 73.5%; specificity, 88.6%) and the HISTO-MRI-PDFF cutoff was 4.0% (sensitivity, 74.7%; specificity, 90.6%). CONCLUSION In a large population of healthy adults, our study suggests diagnostic thresholds for ruling-out and ruling-in hepatic steatosis defined as HFF ≥ 5% by contemporary PDFF measurement methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohee Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Hyun Kwon
- Department of Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea
| | - So Yeon Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hun Kang
- Department of Radiology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea
| | - Jung Il Chung
- University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Keon Jang
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Young Jang
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Ju Hyun Shim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Soo Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyoung Won Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gi-Won Song
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Song R, Hwang SN, Goode C, Storment D, Scoggins M, Abramson Z, Hillenbrand CM, Mandrell B, Krull K, Reddick WE. Assessment of Fat Fractions in the Tongue, Soft Palate, Pharyngeal Wall, and Parapharyngeal Fat Pad by the GOOSE and DIXON Methods. Invest Radiol 2022; 57:802-809. [PMID: 36350068 PMCID: PMC9663130 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The 2-point DIXON method is widely used to assess fat fractions (FFs) in magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the tongue, pharyngeal wall, and surrounding tissues in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, the method is semiquantitative and is susceptible to B0 field inhomogeneities and R2* confounding factors. Using the method, although several studies have shown that patients with OSA have increased fat deposition around the pharyngeal cavity, conflicting findings was also reported in 1 study. This discrepancy necessitates that we examine the FF estimation method used in the earlier studies and seek a more accurate method to measure FFs. MATERIALS AND METHODS We examined the advantages of using the GOOSE (globally optimal surface estimation) method to replace the 2-point DIXON method for quantifying fat in the tongue and surrounding tissues on MRIs. We first used phantoms with known FFs (true FFs) to validate the GOOSE method and examine the errors in the DIXON method. Then, we compared the 2 methods in the tongue, soft palate, pharyngeal wall, and parapharyngeal fat pad of 63 healthy participants to further assess the errors caused by the DIXON method. Six participants were excluded from the comparison of the tongue FFs because of technical failures. Paired Student t tests were performed on FFs to detect significant differences between the 2 methods. All measures were obtained using 3 T Siemens MRI scanners. RESULTS In the phantoms, the FFs measured by GOOSE agreed with the true FF, with only a 1.2% mean absolute error. However, the same measure by DIXON had a 10.5% mean absolute error. The FFs obtained by DIXON were significantly lower than those obtained by GOOSE (P < 0.0001) in the human participants. We found strong correlations between GOOSE and DIXON in the tongue (R2 = 0.90), soft palate (R2 = 0.66), and parapharyngeal fat pad (R2 = 0.88), but the correlation was weaker in the posterior pharyngeal walls (R2 = 0.32) in participants. CONCLUSIONS The widely used 2-point DIXON underestimated FFs, relative to GOOSE, in phantom measurements and tissues studied in vivo. Thus, an advanced method, such as GOOSE, that uses multiecho complex data is preferred for estimating FF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruitian Song
- From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | | | - Chris Goode
- From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Diana Storment
- From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Matthew Scoggins
- From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Zachary Abramson
- From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | | | | | - Kevin Krull
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Wilburn E Reddick
- From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moylan CA, Mavis AM, Jima D, Maguire R, Bashir M, Hyun J, Cabezas MN, Parish A, Niedzwiecki D, Diehl AM, Murphy SK, Abdelmalek MF, Hoyo C. Alterations in DNA methylation associate with fatty liver and metabolic abnormalities in a multi-ethnic cohort of pre-teenage children. Epigenetics 2022; 17:1446-1461. [PMID: 35188871 PMCID: PMC9586600 DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2022.2039850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-Alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the leading cause of chronic liver disease in children. Epigenetic alterations, such as through DNA methylation (DNAm), may link adverse childhood exposures and fatty liver and provide non-invasive methods for identifying children at high risk for NAFLD and associated metabolic dysfunction. We investigated the association between differential DNAm and liver fat content (LFC) and liver injury in pre-adolescent children. Leveraging data from the Newborn Epigenetics Study (NEST), we enrolled 90 mother-child dyads and used linear regression to identify CpG sites and differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in peripheral blood associated with LFC and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in 7-12yo children. DNAm was measured using Infinium HumanMethylationEPIC BeadChips (Illumina). LFC and fibrosis were quantified by magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction and elastography. Median LFC was 1.4% (range, 0.3-13.4%) and MRE was 2.5 kPa (range, 1.5-3.6kPa). Three children had LFC ≥ 5%, while six (7.6%) met our definition of NAFLD (LFC ≥ 3.7%). All children with NAFLD were obese and five were Black. LFC was associated with 88 DMRs and 106 CpGs (FDR<5%). The top two CpGs, cg25474373 and cg07264203, mapped to or near RFTN2 and PRICKLE2 genes. These two CpG sites were also significantly associated with a NAFLD diagnosis. As higher LFC associates with an adverse cardiometabolic profile already in childhood, altered DNAm may identify these children early in disease course for targeted intervention. Larger, longitudinal studies are needed to validate these findings and determine mechanistic relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia A. Moylan
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Alisha M. Mavis
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Dereje Jima
- Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States
| | - Rachel Maguire
- Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States
| | - Mustafa Bashir
- Department of Radiology, Center of Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jeongeun Hyun
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Melanie N. Cabezas
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Alice Parish
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Anna Mae Diehl
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Susan K. Murphy
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States
- Department of Radiology, Center of Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Manal F. Abdelmalek
- Department of Radiology, Center of Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Cathrine Hoyo
- Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Li YW, Jiao Y, Chen N, Gao Q, Chen YK, Zhang YF, Wen QP, Zhang ZM. How to select the quantitative magnetic resonance technique for subjects with fatty liver: A systematic review. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10:8906-8921. [PMID: 36157636 PMCID: PMC9477046 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i25.8906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early quantitative assessment of liver fat content is essential for patients with fatty liver disease. Mounting evidence has shown that magnetic resonance (MR) technique has high accuracy in the quantitative analysis of fatty liver, and is suitable for monitoring the therapeutic effect on fatty liver. However, many packaging methods and postprocessing functions have puzzled radiologists in clinical applications. Therefore, selecting a quantitative MR imaging technique for patients with fatty liver disease remains challenging. AIM To provide information for the proper selection of commonly used quantitative MR techniques to quantify fatty liver. METHODS We completed a systematic literature review of quantitative MR techniques for detecting fatty liver, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol. Studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, and their quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies criteria. The Reference Citation Analysis database (https:// www.referencecitationanalysis.com) was used to analyze citation of articles which were included in this review. RESULTS Forty studies were included for spectroscopy, two-point Dixon imaging, and multiple-point Dixon imaging comparing liver biopsy to other imaging methods. The advantages and disadvantages of each of the three techniques and their clinical diagnostic performances were analyzed. CONCLUSION The proton density fat fraction derived from multiple-point Dixon imaging is a noninvasive method for accurate quantitative measurement of hepatic fat content in the diagnosis and monitoring of fatty liver progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- You-Wei Li
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China
| | - Yang Jiao
- Department of Rehabilitation Psychology, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China
| | - Na Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China
| | - Qiang Gao
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China
| | - Yu-Kun Chen
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China
| | - Yuan-Fang Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China
| | - Qi-Ping Wen
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China
| | - Zong-Ming Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Electric Power Hospital, State Grid Corporation of China, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100073, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hummel J, Machann J, Dannecker C, Kullmann S, Birkenfeld AL, Häring HU, Peter A, Fritsche A, Wagner R, Heni M. Eight weeks of empagliflozin does not affect pancreatic fat content and insulin secretion in people with prediabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2022; 24:1661-1666. [PMID: 35475570 DOI: 10.1111/dom.14733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Hummel
- Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center, Munich at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Machann
- Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center, Munich at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany
- Department of Radiology, Section on Experimental Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Corinna Dannecker
- Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center, Munich at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie Kullmann
- Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center, Munich at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Diabetology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas L Birkenfeld
- Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center, Munich at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Diabetology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hans-Ulrich Häring
- Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center, Munich at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Diabetology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Peter
- Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center, Munich at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry, Department for Diagnostic Laboratory Medicine, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Fritsche
- Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center, Munich at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Diabetology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Robert Wagner
- Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center, Munich at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Diabetology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- German Diabetes Center (Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum/DDZ), Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Martin Heni
- Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center, Munich at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Diabetology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry, Department for Diagnostic Laboratory Medicine, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Machann J, Hasenbalg M, Dienes J, Wagner R, Sandforth A, Fritz V, Birkenfeld AL, Nikolaou K, Kullmann S, Schick F, Heni M. Short‐Term Variability of Proton Density Fat Fraction in Pancreas and Liver Assessed by Multiecho Chemical‐Shift Encoding‐Based
MRI
at 3 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2022; 56:1018-1026. [DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jürgen Machann
- Section on Experimental Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology University Hospital Tübingen Germany
- Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases (IDM) of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD) Neuherberg Germany
| | - Maytee Hasenbalg
- Section on Experimental Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology University Hospital Tübingen Germany
| | - Julia Dienes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
| | - Robert Wagner
- Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases (IDM) of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD) Neuherberg Germany
- Department of Diabetology, Endocrinology and Nephrology University Hospital Tübingen Germany
| | - Arvid Sandforth
- Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases (IDM) of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD) Neuherberg Germany
- Department of Diabetology, Endocrinology and Nephrology University Hospital Tübingen Germany
| | - Victor Fritz
- Section on Experimental Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology University Hospital Tübingen Germany
| | - Andreas L. Birkenfeld
- Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases (IDM) of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD) Neuherberg Germany
- Department of Diabetology, Endocrinology and Nephrology University Hospital Tübingen Germany
| | - Konstantin Nikolaou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology University Hospital Tübingen Germany
| | - Stephanie Kullmann
- Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases (IDM) of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD) Neuherberg Germany
- Department of Diabetology, Endocrinology and Nephrology University Hospital Tübingen Germany
| | - Fritz Schick
- Section on Experimental Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology University Hospital Tübingen Germany
| | - Martin Heni
- Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases (IDM) of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD) Neuherberg Germany
- Department of Diabetology, Endocrinology and Nephrology University Hospital Tübingen Germany
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry, Department for Diagnostic Laboratory Medicine University Hospital Tübingen Tübingen Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wang N, Cao T, Han F, Xie Y, Zhong X, Ma S, Kwan A, Fan Z, Han H, Bi X, Noureddin M, Deshpande V, Christodoulou AG, Li D. Free-breathing multitasking multi-echo MRI for whole-liver water-specific T 1 , proton density fat fraction, and R2∗ quantification. Magn Reson Med 2022; 87:120-137. [PMID: 34418152 PMCID: PMC8616772 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 07/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a 3D multitasking multi-echo (MT-ME) technique for the comprehensive characterization of liver tissues with 5-min free-breathing acquisition; whole-liver coverage; a spatial resolution of 1.5 × 1.5 × 6 mm3 ; and simultaneous quantification of T1 , water-specific T1 (T1w ), proton density fat fraction (PDFF), and R2∗ . METHODS Six-echo bipolar spoiled gradient echo readouts following inversion recovery preparation was performed to generate T1 , water/fat, and R2∗ contrast. MR multitasking was used to reconstruct the MT-ME images with 3 spatial dimensions: 1 T1 recovery dimension, 1 multi-echo dimension, and 1 respiratory dimension. A basis function-based approach was developed for T1w quantification, followed by the estimation of R2∗ and T1 -corrected PDFF. The intrasession repeatability and agreement against references of MT-ME measurements were tested on a phantom and 15 clinically healthy subjects. In addition, 4 patients with confirmed liver diseases were recruited, and the agreement between MT-ME measurements and references was assessed. RESULTS MT-ME produced high-quality, coregistered T1 , T1w , PDFF, and R2∗ maps with good intrasession repeatability and substantial agreement with references on phantom and human studies. The intra-class coefficients of T1 , T1w , PDFF, and R2∗ from the repeat MT-ME measurements on clinically healthy subjects were 0.989, 0.990, 0.999, and 0.988, respectively. The intra-class coefficients of T1 , PDFF, and R2∗ between the MT-ME and reference measurements were 0.924, 0.987, and 0.975 in healthy subjects and 0.980, 0.999, and 0.998 in patients. The T1w was independent to PDFF (R = -0.029, P = .904). CONCLUSION The proposed MT-ME technique quantifies T1 , T1w , PDFF, and R2∗ simultaneously and is clinically promising for the comprehensive characterization of liver tissue properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan Wang
- Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tianle Cao
- Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA,Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Fei Han
- MR Research and Development, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yibin Xie
- Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Xiaodong Zhong
- MR Research and Development, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sen Ma
- Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alan Kwan
- Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA,Departments of Imaging and Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Zhaoyang Fan
- Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA,Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Hui Han
- Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Xiaoming Bi
- MR Research and Development, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mazen Noureddin
- Karsh Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Vibhas Deshpande
- MR Research and Development, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Austin, TX, USA
| | - Anthony G. Christodoulou
- Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA,Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Debiao Li
- Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA,Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA,Corresponding Author Contact Information: Debiao Li, Ph.D., Director, Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, PACT 400, Los Angeles, California, USA 90048, Phone: 310-423-7743,
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Simchick G, Zhao R, Hamilton G, Reeder SB, Hernando D. Spectroscopy-based multi-parametric quantification in subjects with liver iron overload at 1.5T and 3T. Magn Reson Med 2021; 87:597-613. [PMID: 34554595 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the precision profile (repeatability and reproducibility) of quantitative STEAM-MRS and to determine the relationships between multiple MR biomarkers of chronic liver disease in subjects with iron overload at both 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3T. METHODS MRS data were acquired in patients with known or suspected liver iron overload. Two STEAM-MRS sequences (multi-TE and multi-TE-TR) were acquired at both 1.5T and 3T (same day), including test-retest acquisition. Each acquisition enabled estimation of R1, R2, and FWHM (each separately for water and fat); and proton density fat fraction. The test-retest repeatability and reproducibility across acquisition modes (multi-TE vs. multi-TE-TR) of the estimates were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients, linear regression, and Bland-Altman analyses. Multi-parametric relationships between parameters at each field strength, across field strengths, and with liver iron concentration were also evaluated using linear and nonlinear regression. RESULTS Fifty-six (n = 56) subjects (10 to 73 years, 37 males/19 females) were successfully recruited. Both STEAM-MRS sequences demonstrated good-to-excellent precision (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.81) for the quantification of R1water , R2water , FWHMwater , and proton density fat fraction at both 1.5T and 3T. Additionally, several moderate (R2 = 0.50 to 0.69) to high (R2 ≥ 0.70) correlations were observed between biomarkers, across field strengths, and with liver iron concentration. CONCLUSIONS Over a broad range of liver iron concentration, STEAM-MRS enables rapid and precise measurement of multiple biomarkers of chronic liver disease. By evaluating the multi-parametric relationships between biomarkers, this work may advance the comprehensive MRS-based assessment of chronic liver disease and may help establish biomarkers of chronic liver disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Simchick
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Ruiyang Zhao
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Gavin Hamilton
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Scott B Reeder
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Diego Hernando
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Harrison SA, Bashir MR, Lee KJ, Shim-Lopez J, Lee J, Wagner B, Smith ND, Chen HC, Lawitz EJ. A structurally optimized FXR agonist, MET409, reduced liver fat content over 12 weeks in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Hepatol 2021; 75:25-33. [PMID: 33581174 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.01.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The benefits of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) have been validated, although improvements in efficacy and/or tolerability remain elusive. Herein, we aimed to assess the performance of a structurally optimized FXR agonist in patients with NASH. METHODS In this 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled study, we evaluated MET409 - a non-bile acid agonist with a unique chemical scaffold - in patients with NASH. Patients were randomized to receive either 80 mg (n = 20) or 50 mg (n = 19) of MET409, or placebo (n = 19). RESULTS At Week 12, MET409 lowered liver fat content (LFC), with mean relative reductions of 55% (80 mg) and 38% (50 mg) vs. 6% in placebo (p <0.001). MET409 achieved ≥30% relative LFC reduction in 93% (80 mg) and 75% (50 mg) of patients vs. 11% in placebo (p <0.001) and normalized LFC (≤5%) in 29% (80 mg) and 31% (50 mg) of patients vs. 0% in placebo (p <0.05). An increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was observed with MET409, confounding Week 12 changes from baseline (-25% for 80 mg, 28% for 50 mg). Nonetheless, MET409 achieved ≥30% relative ALT reduction in 50% (80 mg) and 31% (50 mg) of patients vs. 17% in placebo. MET409 was associated with on-target high-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreases (mean changes of -23.4% for 80 mg and -20.3% for 50 mg vs. 2.6% in placebo) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) increases (mean changes of 23.7% for 80 mg and 6.8% for 50 mg vs. -1.5% in placebo). Pruritus (mild-moderate) occurred in 16% (50 mg) and 40% (80 mg) of MET409-treated patients. CONCLUSION MET409 lowered LFC over 12 weeks in patients with NASH and delivered a differentiated pruritus and LDL-C profile at 50 mg, providing the first clinical evidence that the risk-benefit profile of FXR agonists can be enhanced through structural optimization. LAY SUMMARY Activation of the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a clinically validated approach for treating non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), although side effects such as itching or increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol are frequently dose-limiting. MET409, an FXR agonist with a unique chemical structure, led to significant liver fat reduction and delivered a favorable side effect profile after 12 weeks of treatment in patients with NASH. These results provide the first clinical evidence that the risk-benefit profile of FXR agonists can be enhanced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen A Harrison
- Summit Clinical Research, San Antonio, TX, USA; Pinnacle Clinical Research, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Eric J Lawitz
- Texas Liver Institute, San Antonio, TX, USA; University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jiang H, Chen HC, Lafata KJ, Bashir MR. Week 4 Liver Fat Reduction on MRI as an Early Predictor of Treatment Response in Participants with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Radiology 2021; 300:361-368. [PMID: 34060937 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021204325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Pharmacologic treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is long term in nature; thus, early noninvasive treatment response assessment is important for therapeutic decision making. Purpose To investigate potential early predictors of the 12-week treatment response estimated by using the MRI-based proton-density fat fraction (PDFF). Materials and Methods In this secondary analysis of a prospective phase Ib clinical trial evaluating a candidate treatment (MET409, a farnesoid X receptor agonist) for NASH, participants were analyzed at baseline and at 4 and 12 weeks after either active treatment with MET409 or placebo treatment between June 2019 and January 2020. Correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were used to identify clinical, laboratory, and imaging predictors of the relative PDFF change at week 12 (W12). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to develop predictive models for an at least 30% relative PDFF reduction at W12, a well-validated indicator of histologic improvement. Model performance was characterized by using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis, sensitivity, and specificity. Results A total of 48 participants were analyzed (median age, 57 years; age range, 40-62 years; 32 women), among whom 30 received MET409 and 18 received a placebo. The week 4 (W4) relative changes in PDFF (regression coefficient = 1.24, P < .001) and the serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level (regression coefficient = -0.29, P = .03) were predictors of the W12 relative PDFF change. An at least 19.3% relative PDFF reduction at W4 yielded an AUC of 0.98 (sensitivity, 89%; specificity, 95%) for predicting an at least 30% relative PDFF reduction at W12. The addition of ALP to the predictive model did not improve model performance. Conclusion In participants with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis enrolled in a phase Ib treatment trial, the relative change in the MRI-based proton-density fat fraction (PDFF) at week 4 was highly predictive of the treatment response estimated by using the week 12 MRI-based PDFF. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanyu Jiang
- From the Department of Radiology (H.J., K.J.L., M.R.B.), Center for Advanced MR Development (M.R.B.), Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (M.R.B.), and Department of Radiation Oncology (K.J.L.), Duke University Medical Center, School of Medicine, and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering (K.J.L.), Duke University, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J.); and Metacrine, San Diego, Calif (H.C.C.)
| | - Hubert C Chen
- From the Department of Radiology (H.J., K.J.L., M.R.B.), Center for Advanced MR Development (M.R.B.), Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (M.R.B.), and Department of Radiation Oncology (K.J.L.), Duke University Medical Center, School of Medicine, and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering (K.J.L.), Duke University, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J.); and Metacrine, San Diego, Calif (H.C.C.)
| | - Kyle J Lafata
- From the Department of Radiology (H.J., K.J.L., M.R.B.), Center for Advanced MR Development (M.R.B.), Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (M.R.B.), and Department of Radiation Oncology (K.J.L.), Duke University Medical Center, School of Medicine, and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering (K.J.L.), Duke University, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J.); and Metacrine, San Diego, Calif (H.C.C.)
| | - Mustafa R Bashir
- From the Department of Radiology (H.J., K.J.L., M.R.B.), Center for Advanced MR Development (M.R.B.), Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (M.R.B.), and Department of Radiation Oncology (K.J.L.), Duke University Medical Center, School of Medicine, and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering (K.J.L.), Duke University, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J.); and Metacrine, San Diego, Calif (H.C.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shrestha U, van der Merwe M, Kumar N, Jacobs E, Satapathy SK, Morin C, Tipirneni-Sajja A. Morphological characterization of hepatic steatosis and Monte Carlo modeling of MRI signal for accurate quantification of fat fraction and relaxivity. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2021; 34:e4489. [PMID: 33586261 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Chemical-shift-based fat-water MRI signal models with single- or dual-R2 * correction have been proposed for quantification of fat fraction (FF) and assessment of hepatic steatosis. However, there is a void in our understanding of which model truly mimics the underlying biophysical mechanism of steatosis on MRI signal relaxation. The purpose of this study is to morphologically characterize and build realistic steatosis models from histology and synthesize MRI signal using Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the accuracy of single- and dual-R2 * models in quantifying FF and R2 *. Fat morphology was characterized by performing automatic segmentation on 16 mouse liver histology images and extracting the radius, nearest neighbor (NN) distance, and regional anisotropy of fat droplets. A gamma distribution function (GDF) was used to generalize extracted features, and regression analysis was performed to derive relationships between FF and GDF parameters. Virtual steatosis models were created based on derived morphological and statistical descriptors, and the MRI signal was synthesized at 1.5 T and 3 T. R2 * and FF values were calculated using single- and dual-R2 * models and compared with in vivo R2 *-FF calibrations and simulated FFs. The steatosis models generated with regional anisotropy and NN distribution closely mimicked the true in vivo fat morphology. For both R2 * models, predicted R2 * values showed positive correlation with FFs, with slopes similar to those of the in vivo calibrations (P > 0.05), and predicted FFs showed excellent agreement with true FFs (R2 > 0.99), with slopes close to unity. Our study, hence, demonstrates the proof of concept for generating steatosis models from histologic data and synthesizing MRI signal to show the expected signal relaxation under conditions of steatosis. Our results suggest that a single R2 * is sufficient to accurately estimate R2 * and FF values for lower FFs, which agrees with in vivo studies. Future work involves characterizing and building steatosis models at higher FFs and testing single- and dual-R2 * models for accurate assessment of steatosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Utsav Shrestha
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Computer Science, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Marie van der Merwe
- College of Health Sciences, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Nirman Kumar
- Department of Computer Science, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Eddie Jacobs
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Sanjaya K Satapathy
- Department of Medicine, North Shore University Hospital/Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | - Cara Morin
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Aaryani Tipirneni-Sajja
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Holzhütter HG, Berndt N. Computational Hypothesis: How Intra-Hepatic Functional Heterogeneity May Influence the Cascading Progression of Free Fatty Acid-Induced Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Cells 2021; 10:cells10030578. [PMID: 33808045 PMCID: PMC7999144 DOI: 10.3390/cells10030578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is the most common type of chronic liver disease in developed nations, affecting around 25% of the population. Elucidating the factors causing NAFLD in individual patients to progress in different rates and to different degrees of severity, is a matter of active medical research. Here, we aim to provide evidence that the intra-hepatic heterogeneity of rheological, metabolic and tissue-regenerating capacities plays a central role in disease progression. We developed a generic mathematical model that constitutes the liver as ensemble of small liver units differing in their capacities to metabolize potentially cytotoxic free fatty acids (FFAs) and to repair FFA-induced cell damage. Transition from simple steatosis to more severe forms of NAFLD is described as self-amplifying process of cascading liver failure, which, to stop, depends essentially on the distribution of functional capacities across the liver. Model simulations provided the following insights: (1) A persistently high plasma level of FFAs is sufficient to drive the liver through different stages of NAFLD; (2) Presence of NAFLD amplifies the deleterious impact of additional tissue-damaging hits; and (3) Coexistence of non-steatotic and highly steatotic regions is indicative for the later occurrence of severe NAFLD stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermann-Georg Holzhütter
- Institute of Biochemistry, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Nikolaus Berndt
- Institute for Imaging Science and Computational Modelling in Cardiovascular Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hu HH, Yokoo T, Bashir MR, Sirlin CB, Hernando D, Malyarenko D, Chenevert TL, Smith MA, Serai SD, Middleton MS, Henderson WC, Hamilton G, Shaffer J, Shu Y, Tkach JA, Trout AT, Obuchowski N, Brittain JH, Jackson EF, Reeder SB. Linearity and Bias of Proton Density Fat Fraction as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker: A Multicenter, Multiplatform, Multivendor Phantom Study. Radiology 2021; 298:640-651. [PMID: 33464181 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021202912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) estimated by using chemical shift-encoded (CSE) MRI is an accepted imaging biomarker of hepatic steatosis. This work aims to promote standardized use of CSE MRI to estimate PDFF. Purpose To assess the accuracy of CSE MRI methods for estimating PDFF by determining the linearity and range of bias observed in a phantom. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, a commercial phantom with 12 vials of known PDFF values were shipped across nine U.S. centers. The phantom underwent 160 independent MRI examinations on 27 1.5-T and 3.0-T systems from three vendors. Two three-dimensional CSE MRI protocols with minimal T1 bias were included: vendor and standardized. Each vendor's confounder-corrected complex or hybrid magnitude-complex based reconstruction algorithm was used to generate PDFF maps in both protocols. The Siemens reconstruction required a configuration change to correct for water-fat swaps in the phantom. The MRI PDFF values were compared with the known PDFF values by using linear regression with mixed-effects modeling. The 95% CIs were calculated for the regression slope (ie, proportional bias) and intercept (ie, constant bias) and compared with the null hypothesis (slope = 1, intercept = 0). Results Pooled regression slope for estimated PDFF values versus phantom-derived reference PDFF values was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.98) in the biologically relevant 0%-47.5% PDFF range. The corresponding pooled intercept was -0.27% (95% CI: -0.50%, -0.05%). Across vendors, slope ranges were 0.86-1.02 (vendor protocols) and 0.97-1.0 (standardized protocol) at 1.5 T and 0.91-1.01 (vendor protocols) and 0.87-1.01 (standardized protocol) at 3.0 T. The intercept ranges (absolute PDFF percentage) were -0.65% to 0.18% (vendor protocols) and -0.69% to -0.17% (standardized protocol) at 1.5 T and -0.48% to 0.10% (vendor protocols) and -0.78% to -0.21% (standardized protocol) at 3.0 T. Conclusion Proton density fat fraction estimation derived from three-dimensional chemical shift-encoded MRI in a commercial phantom was accurate across vendors, imaging centers, and field strengths, with use of the vendors' product acquisition and reconstruction software. © RSNA, 2021 See also the editorial by Dyke in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Houchun H Hu
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Takeshi Yokoo
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Mustafa R Bashir
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Diego Hernando
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Dariya Malyarenko
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Thomas L Chenevert
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Mark A Smith
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Suraj D Serai
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Michael S Middleton
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Walter C Henderson
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Gavin Hamilton
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Jean Shaffer
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Yunhong Shu
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Jean A Tkach
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Andrew T Trout
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Nancy Obuchowski
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Jean H Brittain
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Edward F Jackson
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | - Scott B Reeder
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| | -
- From the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr, Columbus, OH 43235 (H.H.H., M.A.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., J.S.), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (M.R.B.), and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B., J.S.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S., M.S.M., W.C.H., G.H.); Departments of Radiology (D.H., J.H.B., S.B.R.), Medical Physics (D.H., E.F.J., S.B.R.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (D.M., T.L.C.); Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Y.S.); Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (J.A.T., A.T.T.); Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.O.); and Calimetrix, LLC, Madison, Wis (J.H.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Labyed Y, Milkowski A. Novel Method for Ultrasound-Derived Fat Fraction Using an Integrated Phantom. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2020; 39:2427-2438. [PMID: 32525261 DOI: 10.1002/jum.15364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the clinical feasibility of an integrated reference phantom method for quantitative ultrasound by creating an ultrasound-derived fat fraction (UDFF) tool. This tool was evaluated with respect to its diagnostic performance as a biomarker for assessing histologic hepatic steatosis and its agreement with the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proton density fat fraction (PDFF). METHODS Adults (n = 101) with known or suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease consented to participate in this prospective cross-sectional study. All patients underwent MRI-PDFF and ultrasound scans, whereas 90 underwent liver biopsy. A linear least-squares analysis used the attenuation coefficient and backscatter coefficient to create the UDFF model for predicting MRI-PDFF. RESULTS The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values were 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.98) for histologic steatosis grade 0 (n = 6) versus 1 or higher (n = 84), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.8-0.94) for grade 1 or lower (n = 45) versus 2 or higher (n = 45), and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.73-0.9) for grade 2 or lower (n = 78) versus 3 (n = 12). The Pearson correlation coefficient between UDFF and PDFF was ρ = 0.87 with 95% limits of agreement of ±8.5%. Additionally, the diagnosis of steatosis, defined as MRI-PDFF higher than 5% and 10%, had area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.9-0.98), respectively. The body mass index was not correlated with either UDFF or PDFF. CONCLUSIONS An on-system, integrated UDFF tool provides a simple, noninvasive, accessible, low-cost, and commercially viable clinical tool for quantifying the hepatic fat fraction with a high degree of agreement with histologic biopsy or the MRI-PDFF biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yassin Labyed
- Ultrasound Division, Siemens Healthineers, Issaquah, Washington, USA
| | - Andy Milkowski
- Ultrasound Division, Siemens Healthineers, Issaquah, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Liver fat quantification: where do we stand? Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:3386-3399. [PMID: 33025153 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02783-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Excessive intracellular accumulation of triglycerides in the liver, or hepatic steatosis, is a highly prevalent condition affecting approximately one billion people worldwide. In the absence of secondary cause, the term nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is used. Hepatic steatosis may progress into nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, the more aggressive form of NAFLD, associated with hepatic complications such as fibrosis, liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatic steatosis is associated with metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease and represents an independent risk factor for type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and malignancy. Percutaneous liver biopsy is the current reference standard for NAFLD assessment; however, it is an invasive procedure associated with complications and suffers from high sampling variability, impractical for clinical routine and drug efficiency studies. Therefore, noninvasive imaging methods are increasingly used for the diagnosis and monitoring of NAFLD. Among the methods quantifying liver fat, chemical-shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI)-based proton density fat-fraction (PDFF) has shown the most promise. MRI-PDFF is increasingly accepted as quantitative imaging biomarker of liver fat that is transforming daily clinical practice and influencing the development of new treatments for NAFLD. Furthermore, CT is an important imaging method for detection of incidental steatosis, and the practical advantages of quantitative ultrasound hold great promise for the future. Understanding the disease burden of NAFLD and the role of imaging may initiate important interventions aimed at avoiding the hepatic and extrahepatic complications of NAFLD. This article reviews clinical burden of NAFLD, and the role of noninvasive imaging techniques for quantification of liver fat.
Collapse
|
26
|
Mojtahed A, Gee MS, Yokoo T. Pearls and Pitfalls of Metabolic Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Pediatric Population. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2020; 41:451-461. [DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2020.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|
27
|
Mamidipalli A, Fowler KJ, Hamilton G, Wolfson T, Covarrubias Y, Tran C, Fazeli S, Wiens CN, McMillan A, Artz NS, Funk LM, Campos GM, Greenberg JA, Gamst A, Middleton MS, Schwimmer JB, Reeder SB, Sirlin CB. Prospective comparison of longitudinal change in hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) estimated by magnitude-based MRI (MRI-M) and complex-based MRI (MRI-C). Eur Radiol 2020; 30:5120-5129. [PMID: 32318847 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06858-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare longitudinal hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) changes estimated by magnitude- vs. complex-based chemical-shift-encoded MRI during a weight loss surgery (WLS) program in severely obese adults with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). METHODS This was a secondary analysis of a prospective dual-center longitudinal study of 54 adults (44 women; mean age 52 years; range 27-70 years) with obesity, biopsy-proven NAFLD, and baseline PDFF ≥ 5%, enrolled in a WLS program. PDFF was estimated by confounder-corrected chemical-shift-encoded MRI using magnitude (MRI-M)- and complex (MRI-C)-based techniques at baseline (visit 1), after a 2- to 4-week very low-calorie diet (visit 2), and at 1, 3, and 6 months (visits 3 to 5) after surgery. At each visit, PDFF values estimated by MRI-M and MRI-C were compared by a paired t test. Rates of PDFF change estimated by MRI-M and MRI-C for visits 1 to 3, and for visits 3 to 5 were assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS MRI-M PDFF estimates were lower by 0.5-0.7% compared with those of MRI-C at all visits (p < 0.001). There was high agreement and no difference between PDFF change rates estimated by MRI-M vs. MRI-C for visits 1 to 3 (ICC 0.983, 95% CI 0.971, 0.99; bias = - 0.13%, p = 0.22), or visits 3 to 5 (ICC 0.956, 95% CI 0.919-0.977%; bias = 0.03%, p = 0.36). CONCLUSION Although MRI-M underestimates PDFF compared with MRI-C cross-sectionally, this bias is consistent and MRI-M and MRI-C agree in estimating the rate of hepatic PDFF change longitudinally. KEY POINTS • MRI-M demonstrates a significant but small and consistent bias (0.5-0.7%; p < 0.001) towards underestimation of PDFF compared with MRI-C at 3 T. • Rates of PDFF change estimated by MRI-M and MRI-C agree closely (ICC 0.96-0.98) in adults with severe obesity and biopsy- proven NAFLD enrolled in a weight loss surgery program. • Our findings support the use of either MRI technique (MRI-M or MRI-C) for clinical care or by individual sites or for multi-center trials that include PDFF change as an endpoint. However, since there is a bias in their measurements, the same technique should be used in any given patient for longitudinal follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrija Mamidipalli
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California - San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California - San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Gavin Hamilton
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California - San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Tanya Wolfson
- Computational and Applied Statistics Laboratory, Supercomputer Center, University of California - San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Yesenia Covarrubias
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California - San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Calvin Tran
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California - San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Soudabeh Fazeli
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California - San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Curtis N Wiens
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Alan McMillan
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Nathan S Artz
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Luke M Funk
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.,William S. Middleton VA, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Guilherme M Campos
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Anthony Gamst
- Computational and Applied Statistics Laboratory, Supercomputer Center, University of California - San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Michael S Middleton
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California - San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey B Schwimmer
- Division of Gastroenterology; Hepatology and Nutrition; Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Department of Gastroenterology, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Scott B Reeder
- Departments of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California - San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Schneider M, Benkert T, Solomon E, Nickel D, Fenchel M, Kiefer B, Maier A, Chandarana H, Block KT. Free-breathing fat and R 2 * quantification in the liver using a stack-of-stars multi-echo acquisition with respiratory-resolved model-based reconstruction. Magn Reson Med 2020; 84:2592-2605. [PMID: 32301168 PMCID: PMC7396291 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Revised: 03/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To develop a free‐breathing hepatic fat and
R2∗ quantification method by extending a previously described stack‐of‐stars model‐based fat‐water separation technique with additional modeling of the transverse relaxation rate
R2∗. Methods The proposed technique combines motion‐robust radial sampling using a stack‐of‐stars bipolar multi‐echo 3D GRE acquisition with iterative model‐based fat‐water separation. Parallel‐Imaging and Compressed‐Sensing principles are incorporated through modeling of the coil‐sensitivity profiles and enforcement of total‐variation (TV) sparsity on estimated water, fat, and
R2∗ parameter maps. Water and fat signals are used to estimate the confounder‐corrected proton‐density fat fraction (PDFF). Two strategies for handling respiratory motion are described: motion‐averaged and motion‐resolved reconstruction. Both techniques were evaluated in patients (n = 14) undergoing a hepatobiliary research protocol at 3T. PDFF and
R2∗ parameter maps were compared to a breath‐holding Cartesian reference approach. Results Linear regression analyses demonstrated strong (r > 0.96) and significant (P ≪ .01) correlations between radial and Cartesian PDFF measurements for both the motion‐averaged reconstruction (slope: 0.90; intercept: 0.07%) and the motion‐resolved reconstruction (slope: 0.90; intercept: 0.11%). The motion‐averaged technique overestimated hepatic
R2∗ values (slope: 0.35; intercept: 30.2 1/s) compared to the Cartesian reference. However, performing a respiratory‐resolved reconstruction led to better
R2∗ value consistency (slope: 0.77; intercept: 7.5 1/s). Conclusions The proposed techniques are promising alternatives to conventional Cartesian imaging for fat and
R2∗ quantification in patients with limited breath‐holding capabilities. For accurate
R2∗ estimation, respiratory‐resolved reconstruction should be used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Schneider
- Pattern Recognition Lab, Department of Computer Science, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.,MR Applications Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Thomas Benkert
- MR Applications Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Eddy Solomon
- Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dominik Nickel
- MR Applications Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias Fenchel
- MR R&D Collaborations, Siemens Medical Solutions, New York, NY, USA
| | - Berthold Kiefer
- MR Applications Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Andreas Maier
- Pattern Recognition Lab, Department of Computer Science, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hersh Chandarana
- Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kai Tobias Block
- Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gulani V, Seiberlich N. Quantitative MRI: Rationale and Challenges. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-817057-1.00001-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
|
30
|
Aliyari Ghasabeh M, Shaghaghi M, Khoshpouri P, pan L, Pandy A, Pandy P, Zhong X, Kannengiesser S, Kamel IR. Correlation between incidental fat deposition in the liver and pancreas in asymptomatic individuals. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:203-210. [PMID: 31482380 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02206-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the utility of two different fat quantification methods in the liver and pancreas and to test the accuracy of multi-echo Dixon as a single sequence in detecting early stage of fat deposition. METHODS 58 healthy potential liver donors underwent abdominal 3T MRI, prospectively. Single-voxel MR Spectroscopy (MRS), dual-echo Dixon, and multi-echo Dixon were performed. Two independent readers obtained proton density fat fraction (PDFF) of the liver and pancreas by placing ROIs on the 2 Dixon sequences. Correlation between the two PDFF measurements was assessed in the liver and pancreas. Values in the liver were also compared to those obtained by MRS. RESULTS PDFF in the liver was 6.3 ± 4.2%, 5.5 ± 3.9%, and 5.1 ± 4.1% by MRS, dual-echo Dixon, and multi-echo Dixon, respectively. Dual-echo Dixon and multi-echo Dixon showed good correlation in PDFF quantification of the liver (r = 0.82, p < 0.0005). Multi-echo Dixon showed a good correlation (r = 0.72, p = 0.0005) between the fat measured in the liver and in the pancreas. To differentiate between normal (PDFF ≤ 6%) and mild fat deposition (PDFF: 6-33%) in the liver, analysis showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 74%, 81%, and 80% for dual-echo Dixon and 85%, 96%, and 89% for multi-echo Dixon, respectively. Mean PDFF in the pancreas was 7.2 ± 2.8% and 6.7 ± 3.3%, by dual-echo and multi-echo Dixon, respectively. Dual-echo Dixon and multi-echo Dixon showed good correlation in PDFF quantification of the pancreas (r = 0.58, p < 0.0005). CONCLUSION Multi-echo Dixon in liver has high accuracy in distinguishing between subjects with normal liver fat and those with mildly elevated liver fat. Multi-echo Dixon can be used to screen for early fat deposition in the liver and pancreas.
Collapse
|
31
|
Harrison SA, Bashir MR, Guy CD, Zhou R, Moylan CA, Frias JP, Alkhouri N, Bansal MB, Baum S, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Taub R, Moussa SE. Resmetirom (MGL-3196) for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet 2019; 394:2012-2024. [PMID: 31727409 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32517-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 508] [Impact Index Per Article: 84.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is characterised by hepatic steatosis, inflammation, hepatocellular injury, and progressive liver fibrosis. Resmetirom (MGL-3196) is a liver-directed, orally active, selective thyroid hormone receptor-β agonist designed to improve NASH by increasing hepatic fat metabolism and reducing lipotoxicity. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of resmetirom in patients with NASH. METHODS MGL-3196-05 was a 36-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study at 25 centres in the USA. Adults with biopsy confirmed NASH (fibrosis stages 1-3) and hepatic fat fraction of at least 10% at baseline when assessed by MRI-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 by a computer-based system to receive resmetirom 80 mg or matching placebo, orally once a day. Serial hepatic fat measurements were obtained at weeks 12 and 36, and a second liver biopsy was obtained at week 36. The primary endpoint was relative change in MRI-PDFF assessed hepatic fat compared with placebo at week 12 in patients who had both a baseline and week 12 MRI-PDFF. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02912260. FINDINGS 348 patients were screened and 84 were randomly assigned to resmetirom and 41 to placebo at 18 sites in the USA. Resmetirom-treated patients (n=78) showed a relative reduction of hepatic fat compared with placebo (n=38) at week 12 (-32·9% resmetirom vs -10·4% placebo; least squares mean difference -22·5%, 95% CI -32·9 to -12·2; p<0·0001) and week 36 (-37·3% resmetirom [n=74] vs -8·5 placebo [n=34]; -28·8%, -42·0 to -15·7; p<0·0001). Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate and were balanced between groups, except for a higher incidence of transient mild diarrhoea and nausea with resmetirom. INTERPRETATION Resmetirom treatment resulted in significant reduction in hepatic fat after 12 weeks and 36 weeks of treatment in patients with NASH. Further studies of resmetirom will allow assessment of safety and effectiveness of resmetirom in a larger number of patients with NASH with the possibility of documenting associations between histological effects and changes in non-invasive markers and imaging. FUNDING Madrigal Pharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen A Harrison
- Pinnacle Clinical Research, San Antonio, TX, USA; Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Mustafa R Bashir
- Department of Radiology, Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Department of Pathology, and Division of Hepatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Cynthia D Guy
- Department of Radiology, Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Department of Pathology, and Division of Hepatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Cynthia A Moylan
- Department of Radiology, Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Department of Pathology, and Division of Hepatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Juan P Frias
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Naim Alkhouri
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Meena B Bansal
- Division of Hepatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Seth Baum
- Department of Integrated Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Sam E Moussa
- Department of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Cahill D, Zamboni F, Collins MN. Radiological Advances in Pancreatic Islet Transplantation. Acad Radiol 2019; 26:1536-1543. [PMID: 30709732 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2018] [Revised: 01/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is characterized by hyperglycemia, owing to the loss of pancreatic β cells in response to an autoimmune reaction leading to a state of absolute insulin deficiency. T1DM treatment is shifting from exogenous insulin replacement therapy toward pancreatic β-cell replacement, to restore physiologically responsive insulin secretion to variations in blood glucose levels. β-cell replacement strategies include human whole pancreas transplantation, islet transplantation with cell encapsulation and bioengineered pancreas. Interventional radiology and imaging modalities including positron emission tomography, single-photon emission computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and molecular imaging are imperative to enable successful β-cell replacement. Herein, the role of radiological modalities in the treatment of T1DM and its prospective use for noninvasive post-transplantation graft monitoring is discussed.
Collapse
|
33
|
Hu F, Yang R, Huang Z, Wang M, Yuan F, Xia C, Wei Y, Song B. 3D Multi-Echo Dixon technique for simultaneous assessment of liver steatosis and iron overload in patients with chronic liver diseases: a feasibility study. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2019; 9:1014-1024. [PMID: 31367555 PMCID: PMC6629573 DOI: 10.21037/qims.2019.05.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with chronic liver diseases (CLDs) often suffer from lipidosis or siderosis. Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* can be used as quantitative parameters to assess the fat/iron content of the liver. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of liver fibrosis and inflammation on the 3D Multi-echo Dixon (3D ME Dixon) parameters (MRI-PDFF and R2*) in patients with CLDs and to determine the feasibility of 3D ME Dixon technique for the simultaneous assessment of liver steatosis and iron overload using histopathologic findings as the reference standard. METHODS Ninety-nine consecutive patients with CLDs underwent T1-independent, T2*-corrected 3D ME Dixon sequence with reconstruction using multipeak spectral modeling on a 3T MR scanner. Liver specimen was reviewed in all cases, grading liver steatosis, siderosis, fibrosis, and inflammation. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to determine the relationship between 3D ME Dixon parameters (MRI-PDFF and R2*) and histopathological and biochemical features [liver steatosis, iron overload, liver fibrosis, inflammation, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL)]. Multiple regression analysis was applied to identify variables associated with 3D ME Dixon parameters. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic performance of these parameters to differentiate liver steatosis or iron overload. RESULTS In multivariate analysis, only liver steatosis independently influenced PDFF values (R2=0.803, P<0.001), liver iron overload and fibrosis influenced R2* values (R2=0.647, P<0.001). The Spearman analyses showed that R2* values were moderately correlated with fibrosis stages (r=0.542, P<0.001) in the subgroup with the absence of iron overload. The area under the ROC curve of PDFF was 0.989 for the diagnosis of steatosis grade 1 or greater, and 0.986 for steatosis grade 2 or greater. The area under the ROC curve of R2* was 0.815 for identifying iron overload grade 1 or greater, and 0.876 for iron overload grade 2 or greater. CONCLUSIONS 3D Multi-Echo Dixon can be used to simultaneously evaluate liver steatosis and iron overload in patients with CLDs, especially for quantification of liver steatosis. However, liver R2* value may be affected by the liver fibrosis in the setting of CLDs with absence of iron overload.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fubi Hu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu 610041, China
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Ru Yang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Zixing Huang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Min Wang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Fang Yuan
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Chunchao Xia
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yi Wei
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Bin Song
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Karlsson M, Ekstedt M, Dahlström N, Forsgren MF, Ignatova S, Norén B, Dahlqvist Leinhard O, Kechagias S, Lundberg P. Liver R2* is affected by both iron and fat: A dual biopsy-validated study of chronic liver disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 50:325-333. [PMID: 30637926 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver iron content (LIC) in chronic liver disease (CLD) is currently determined by performing an invasive liver biopsy. MRI using R2* relaxometry is a noninvasive alternative for estimating LIC. Fat accumulation in the liver, or proton density fat fraction (PDFF), may be a possible confounder of R2* measurements. Previous studies of the effect of PDFF on R2* have not used quantitative LIC measurement. PURPOSE To assess the associations between R2*, LIC, PDFF, and liver histology in patients with suspected CLD. STUDY TYPE Prospective. POPULATION Eighty-one patients with suspected CLD. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 1.5 T. Multiecho turbo field echo to quantify R2*. PRESS MRS to quantify PDFF. ASSESSMENT Each patient underwent an MR examination, followed by two needle biopsies immediately following the MR examination. The first biopsy was used for conventional histological assessment of LIC, whereas the second biopsy was used to quantitatively measure LIC using mass spectrometry. R2* was correlated with both LIC and PDFF. A correction for the influence of fat on R2* was calculated. STATISTICAL TESTS Pearson correlation, linear regression, and area under the receiver operating curve. RESULTS There was a positive linear correlation between R2* and PDFF (R = 0.69), after removing data from patients with elevated iron levels, as defined by LIC. R2*, corrected for PDFF, was the best method for identifying patients with elevated iron levels, with a correlation of R = 0.87 and a sensitivity and specificity of 87.5% and 98.6%, respectively. DATA CONCLUSION PDFF increases R2*. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:325-333.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Karlsson
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Mattias Ekstedt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Nils Dahlström
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Department of Radiology, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Mikael F Forsgren
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Wolfram MathCore AB and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Simone Ignatova
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Clinical Genetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Bengt Norén
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Stergios Kechagias
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Peter Lundberg
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Department of Radiation Physics, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kim HJ, Cho HJ, Kim B, You MW, Lee JH, Huh J, Kim JK. Accuracy and precision of proton density fat fraction measurement across field strengths and scan intervals: A phantom and human study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 50:305-314. [PMID: 30430684 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Revised: 10/27/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complex-based chemical shift imaging-based magnetic resonance imaging (CSE-MRI) is emerging as a preferred method for noninvasively quantifying proton density fat fraction (PDFF), a promising quantitative imaging biomarker (QIB) for longitudinal hepatic steatosis measurement. PURPOSE To determine linearity, bias, repeatability, and reproducibility of the PDFF measurement using CSE-MRI (CSE-PDFF) across scan intervals, MR field strengths, and readers in phantom and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients. STUDY TYPE Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved prospective. SUBJECTS Fat-water phantom and 20 adult patients. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 1.5 T and 3.0 T MR systems and a commercially available CSE-MRI sequence (IDEAL-IQ). ASSESSMENT Two independent readers measured CSE-PDFF of fat-water phantom and NAFLD patients across two field strengths and scan intervals (same-day and 2-week) each and in a combination of both. MR spectroscopy-based PDFF (MRS-PDFF) was used as the reference standard for phantom PDFF. STATISTICAL TESTS Linearity and bias of measurement were evaluated by linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots, respectively. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed by coefficient of variance and repeatability / reproducibility coefficients (RC). The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to validate intra- and interobserver agreements. RESULTS CSE-PDFF showed high linearity and small bias (-0.6-0.4 PDFF%) with 95% limits of agreement within ±2.9 PDFF% across field strengths, 2-week interscan period, and readers in the clinical scans. CSE-PDFF was highly repeatable and reproducible both in phantom and clinical scans, with the largest observed RC across field strengths and 2-week interscan period being 3 PDFF%. DATA CONCLUSION CSE-PDFF is a robust QIB with high linearity, small bias, and excellent repeatability/reproducibility. A change of more than 3 PDFF% across field strengths within 2 weeks of scan interval likely reflects a true change, which is well within the clinically acceptable range. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:305-314.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye Jin Kim
- Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Hyo Jung Cho
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Bohyun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Myung-Won You
- Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jei Hee Lee
- Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Jimi Huh
- Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Jai Keun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hepatic fat content and bone mineral density in children with overweight/obesity. Pediatr Res 2018; 84:684-688. [PMID: 30120405 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-018-0129-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2018] [Revised: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the influence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and hepatic fat content on bone mineral density (BMD), and to investigate whether the relationship between NAFLD and BMD is independent of lifestyle factors related to BMD. METHODS Hepatic fat content (magnetic resonance imaging), BMD, lean mass index, total and abdominal fat mass (dual-energy-X-ray absorptiometry), moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) (accelerometry), and calcium and vitamin D intake (two 24 h recalls) were measured in 115 children with overweight/obesity aged 10.6 ± 1.1 years old. RESULTS Children with NAFLD had lower BMD than children without NAFLD regardless of sex, puberty stage, lean mass index, fat mass, MVPA, and calcium and vitamin D intake (0.89 ± 0.01 vs. 0.93 ± 0.01 g/cm2 for NAFLD and non-NAFLD, respectively, P < 0.01). Higher hepatic fat content was significantly associated with lower BMD regardless of confounders (adjusted P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Findings of the current study suggest that hepatic fat accumulation is associated with decreased BMD independently of adiposity, and regardless of those lifestyle factors closely related to bone mineral accrual in children. These results may have implication in the clinical management of children with overweight/obesity given the high prevalence of pediatric NAFLD.
Collapse
|
37
|
Wildman-Tobriner B, Middleton MM, Moylan CA, Rossi S, Flores O, Chang ZA, Abdelmalek MF, Sirlin CB, Bashir MR. Association Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Proton Density Fat Fraction and Liver Histology Features in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease or Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology 2018; 155:1428-1435.e2. [PMID: 30031769 PMCID: PMC6456892 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2017] [Revised: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) often require histologic assessment via liver biopsy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based methods for measuring liver triglycerides based on proton density fat fraction (PDFF) are increasingly used as a noninvasive tool to identify patients with hepatic steatosis and to assess for change in liver fat over time. We aimed to determine whether MRI-PDFF accurately reflects a variety of liver histology features in patients with NAFLD or NASH. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of pooled data from 3 phase 2a trials of pharmacotherapies for NAFLD or NASH. We collected baseline clinical, laboratory, and histopathology data on all subjects who had undergone MRI analysis in 1 of the trials. We assessed the relationship between liver PDFF values and liver histologic findings using correlation and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) analyses. As an ancillary analysis, we also simulated a clinical trial selection process and calculated subject exclusion rates and differences in population characteristics caused by PDFF inclusion thresholds of 6% to 15%. RESULTS In 370 subjects, the mean baseline PDFF was 17.4% ± 8.6%. Baseline PDFF values correlated with several histopathology parameters, including steatosis grade (r = 0.78; P < .001), NAFLD activity score (NAS, r = 0.54; P < .001), and fibrosis stage (r = -0.59; P < .001). However, PDFF did not accurately identify patients with NAS ≥ 4 (AUROC = 0.72) or fibrosis stage ≥3 (AUROC = 0.66). In a theoretical trial of these subjects, exclusion rates increased as PDFF minimum threshold level increased. There were no significant differences in cohort demographics when PDFF thresholds ranging from 6% to 15% were used, and differences in laboratory and histopathology data were small. CONCLUSIONS In an analysis of patients with NAFLD or NASH, we determined that although The MRI-PDFF correlated with steatosis grade and NAS, and inversely with fibrosis stage, it was suboptimal in identification of patients with NAS >4 or advanced fibrosis. Although MRI-PDFF is an important imaging biomarker for continued evaluation of this patient population, liver biopsy analysis is still necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael M. Middleton
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, UC San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Cynthia A. Moylan
- Department of Medicine, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina,Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Stephen Rossi
- Clinical Development, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, California
| | | | | | - Manal F. Abdelmalek
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Claude B. Sirlin
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, UC San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Mustafa R. Bashir
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina,Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North
Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Schneider M, Janas G, Lugauer F, Hoppe E, Nickel D, Dale BM, Kiefer B, Maier A, Bashir MR. Accurate fatty acid composition estimation of adipose tissue in the abdomen based on bipolar multi‐echo MRI. Magn Reson Med 2018; 81:2330-2346. [DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Revised: 08/18/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Schneider
- Pattern Recognition Lab, Department of Computer Science Friedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg Erlangen Germany
| | - Gemini Janas
- Radiology Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina
- Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina
| | - Felix Lugauer
- Pattern Recognition Lab, Department of Computer Science Friedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg Erlangen Germany
| | - Elisabeth Hoppe
- Pattern Recognition Lab, Department of Computer Science Friedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg Erlangen Germany
| | - Dominik Nickel
- MR Applications Predevelopment Siemens Healthcare GmbH Erlangen Germany
| | - Brian M. Dale
- MR R&D Collaborations Siemens Healthineers Cary North Carolina
| | - Berthold Kiefer
- MR Applications Predevelopment Siemens Healthcare GmbH Erlangen Germany
| | - Andreas Maier
- Pattern Recognition Lab, Department of Computer Science Friedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg Erlangen Germany
| | - Mustafa R. Bashir
- Radiology Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina
- Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bashir MR, Wolfson T, Gamst AC, Fowler KJ, Ohliger M, Shah SN, Alazraki A, Trout AT, Behling C, Allende DS, Loomba R, Sanyal A, Schwimmer J, Lavine JE, Shen W, Tonascia J, Van Natta ML, Mamidipalli A, Hooker J, Kowdley KV, Middleton MS, Sirlin CB. Hepatic R2* is more strongly associated with proton density fat fraction than histologic liver iron scores in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 49:1456-1466. [PMID: 30318834 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The liver R2* value is widely used as a measure of liver iron but may be confounded by the presence of hepatic steatosis and other covariates. PURPOSE To identify the most influential covariates for liver R2* values in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). STUDY TYPE Retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data. POPULATION Baseline data from 204 subjects enrolled in NAFLD/NASH (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis) treatment trials. FIELD STRENGTH 1.5T and 3T; chemical-shift encoded multiecho gradient echo. ASSESSMENT Correlation between liver proton density fat fraction and R2*; assessment for demographic, metabolic, laboratory, MRI-derived, and histological covariates of liver R2*. STATISTICAL TESTS Pearson's and Spearman's correlations; univariate analysis; gradient boosting machines (GBM) multivariable machine-learning method. RESULTS Hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) was the most strongly correlated covariate for R2* at both 1.5T (r = 0.652, P < 0.0001) and at 3T (r = 0.586, P < 0.0001). In the GBM analysis, hepatic PDFF was the most influential covariate for hepatic R2*, with relative influences (RIs) of 61.3% at 1.5T and 47.5% at 3T; less influential covariates had RIs of up to 11.5% at 1.5T and 16.7% at 3T. Nonhepatocellular iron was weakly associated with R2* at 3T only (RI 6.7%), and hepatocellular iron was not associated with R2* at either field strength. DATA CONCLUSION Hepatic PDFF is the most influential covariate for R2* at both 1.5T and 3T; nonhepatocellular iron deposition is weakly associated with liver R2* at 3T only. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:1456-1466.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa R Bashir
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (CAMRD), Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tanya Wolfson
- Computational and Applied Statistics Laboratory (CASL), San Diego Supercomputing Center (SDSC), University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Anthony C Gamst
- Computational and Applied Statistics Laboratory (CASL), San Diego Supercomputing Center (SDSC), University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- Department of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Michael Ohliger
- Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Shetal N Shah
- Section of Abdominal Imaging and Nuclear Medicine Department, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Adina Alazraki
- Departments of Radiology and Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine/Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Andrew T Trout
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Cynthia Behling
- Department of Pathology, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | | | - Rohit Loomba
- NAFLD Research Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Arun Sanyal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Jeffrey Schwimmer
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Joel E Lavine
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Wei Shen
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics and the Institute of Human Nutrition, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - James Tonascia
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mark L Van Natta
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Adrija Mamidipalli
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Hooker
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Kris V Kowdley
- Liver Care Network and Organ Care Research, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Michael S Middleton
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | -
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Blew RM, Lee VR, Bea JW, Hetherington-Rauth MC, Galons JP, Altbach MI, Lohman TG, Going SB. Validation of Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography-Derived Thigh Adipose Tissue Subcompartments in Young Girls Using a 3 T MRI Scanner. J Clin Densitom 2018; 21:583-594. [PMID: 29705002 PMCID: PMC6151299 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2018.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2017] [Accepted: 03/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The ability to assess skeletal muscle adipose tissue is important given the negative clinical implications associated with greater fat infiltration of the muscle. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are highly accurate for measuring appendicular soft tissue and muscle composition, but have limitations. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) is an alternative that investigators find valuable because of its low radiation, fast scan time, and comparatively lower costs. The present investigation sought to assess the accuracy of pQCT-derived estimates of total, subcutaneous, skeletal muscle, intermuscular, and calculated intramuscular adipose tissue areas, and muscle density in the midthigh of young girls using the gold standard, 3 T MRI, as the criterion. Cross-sectional data were analyzed for 26 healthy girls aged 9-12 years. Midthigh soft tissue composition was assessed by both pQCT and 3 T MRI. Mean tissue area for corresponding adipose compartments by pQCT and MRI was compared using t tests, regression analysis, and Bland-Altman plots. Muscle density was regressed on MRI skeletal muscle adipose tissue, intermuscular adipose tissue, and intramuscular adipose tissue, each expressed as a percentage of total muscle area. Correlations were high between MRI and pQCT for total adipose tissue (r2 = 0.98), subcutaneous adipose tissue (r2 = 0.95), skeletal muscle adipose tissue (r2 = 0.83), and intermuscular adipose tissue (r2 = 0.82), and pQCT muscle density correlated well with both MRI skeletal muscle adipose tissue (r2 = 0.70) and MRI intermuscular adipose tissue (r2 = 0.70). There was a slight, but statistically significant underestimation by pQCT for total and subcutaneous adipose tissue, whereas no significant difference was observed for skeletal muscle adipose tissue. Both pQCT-estimated intramuscular adipose tissue and muscle density were weakly correlated with MRI-intramuscular adipose tissue. We conclude that pQCT is a valid measurement technique for estimating all adipose subcompartments, except for intramuscular adipose tissue, for the midthigh region in young/adolescent girls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Blew
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Vinson R Lee
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Jennifer W Bea
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Maria I Altbach
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Timothy G Lohman
- Department of Physiological Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Scott B Going
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Accuracy of Automated Liver Contouring, Fat Fraction, and R2* Measurement on Gradient Multiecho Magnetic Resonance Images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2018; 42:697-706. [PMID: 29901506 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000000759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the performance of an automated workflow of volumetric liver proton density fat fraction (PDFFvol) and R2* quantification with automated inline liver volume (LV) segmentation. METHODS Dual-echo and multiecho Dixon magnetic resonance images were evaluated in 74 consecutive patients (group A, PDFF < 10%; B, PDFF ≥ 10%; C, R2* ≥ 100 s; D, post-hemihepatectomy). The values of PDFFvol and R2*vol measurements across the LV were generated on multiecho images in an automated fashion based on inline liver segmentation on dual-echo images. Similar measurements were performed manually. RESULTS Using the inline algorithm, the mis-segmented LV was highest in group D (80%). There were no significant differences between automated and manual measurements of PDFFvol. Automated R2*vol was significantly lower than manual R2*vol in group A (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS Inline LV segmentation performed well in patients without and with hepatic steatosis. In cases with iron overload and post-hemihepatectomy, extrahepatic areas were erroneously included to a greater extent, with a tendency toward overestimation of PDFFvol.
Collapse
|
42
|
Caussy C, Reeder SB, Sirlin CB, Loomba R. Noninvasive, Quantitative Assessment of Liver Fat by MRI-PDFF as an Endpoint in NASH Trials. Hepatology 2018; 68:763-772. [PMID: 29356032 PMCID: PMC6054824 DOI: 10.1002/hep.29797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 339] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Revised: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 07/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is currently the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide, and the progressive form of this condition, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), has become one of the leading indications for liver transplantation. Despite intensive investigations, there are currently no United States Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for treating NASH. A major barrier for drug development in NASH is that treatment response assessment continues to require liver biopsy, which is invasive and interpreted subjectively. Therefore, there is a major unmet need for developing noninvasive, objective, and quantitative biomarkers for diagnosis and assessment of treatment response. Emerging data support the use of magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) as a noninvasive, quantitative, and accurate measure of liver fat content to assess treatment response in early-phase NASH trials. In this review, we discuss the role and utility, including potential sample size reduction, of MRI-PDFF as a quantitative and noninvasive imaging-based biomarker in early-phase NASH trials. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is currently the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide.() NAFLD can be broadly classified into two categories: nonalcoholic fatty liver, which has a minimal risk of progression to cirrhosis, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the more progressive form of NAFLD, which has a significantly increased risk of progression to cirrhosis.() Over the past two decades, NASH-related cirrhosis has become the second leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States.() For these reasons, pharmacological therapy for NASH is needed urgently. Despite intensive investigations, there are currently no therapies for treating NASH that have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration.().
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyrielle Caussy
- NAFLD Research Center, Department of Medicine, La Jolla, CA,Université Lyon 1, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Scott B. Reeder
- Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, and Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Claude B. Sirlin
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Rohit Loomba
- NAFLD Research Center, Department of Medicine, La Jolla, CA,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, La Jolla, CA,Division of Epidemiology, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Fatty liver disease is characterized histologically by hepatic steatosis, the abnormal accumulation of lipid in hepatocytes. It is classified into alcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and is an increasingly important cause of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Assessing the severity of hepatic steatosis in these conditions is important for diagnostic and prognostic purposes, as hepatic steatosis is potentially reversible if diagnosed early. The criterion standard for assessing hepatic steatosis is liver biopsy, which is limited by sampling error, its invasive nature, and associated morbidity. As such, noninvasive imaging-based methods of assessing hepatic steatosis are needed. Ultrasound and computed tomography are able to suggest the presence of hepatic steatosis based on imaging features, but are unable to accurately quantify hepatic fat content. Since Dixon's seminal work in 1984, magnetic resonance imaging has been used to compute the signal fat fraction from chemical shift-encoded imaging, commonly implemented as out-of-phase and in-phase imaging. However, signal fat fraction is confounded by several factors that limit its accuracy and reproducibility. Recently, advanced chemical shift-encoded magnetic resonance imaging methods have been developed that address these confounders and are able to measure the proton density fat fraction, a standardized, accurate, and reproducible biomarker of fat content. The use of these methods in the liver, as well as in other abdominal organs such as the pancreas, adrenal glands, and adipose tissue will be discussed in this review.
Collapse
|
44
|
Free-breathing quantification of hepatic fat in healthy children and children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease using a multi-echo 3-D stack-of-radial MRI technique. Pediatr Radiol 2018; 48:941-953. [PMID: 29728744 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-018-4127-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2017] [Revised: 02/07/2018] [Accepted: 03/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In adults, noninvasive chemical shift encoded Cartesian magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and single-voxel magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy (SVS) accurately quantify hepatic steatosis but require breath-holding. In children, especially young and sick children, breath-holding is often limited or not feasible. Sedation can facilitate breath-holding but is highly undesirable. For these reasons, there is a need to develop free-breathing MRI technology that accurately quantifies steatosis in all children. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare non-sedated free-breathing multi-echo 3-D stack-of-radial (radial) MRI versus standard breath-holding MRI and SVS techniques in a group of children for fat quantification with respect to image quality, accuracy and repeatability. MATERIALS AND METHODS Healthy children (n=10, median age [±interquartile range]: 10.9 [±3.3] years) and overweight children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (n=9, median age: 15.2 [±3.2] years) were imaged at 3 Tesla using free-breathing radial MRI, breath-holding Cartesian MRI and breath-holding SVS. Acquisitions were performed twice to assess repeatability (within-subject mean difference, MDwithin). Images and hepatic proton-density fat fraction (PDFF) maps were scored for image quality. Free-breathing and breath-holding PDFF were compared using linear regression (correlation coefficient, r and concordance correlation coefficient, ρc) and Bland-Altman analysis (mean difference). P<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS In patients with NAFLD, free-breathing radial MRI demonstrated significantly less motion artifacts compared to breath-holding Cartesian (P<0.05). Free-breathing radial PDFF demonstrated a linear relationship (P<0.001) versus breath-holding SVS PDFF and breath-holding Cartesian PDFF with r=0.996 and ρc=0.994, and r=0.997 and ρc=0.995, respectively. The mean difference in PDFF between free-breathing radial MRI, breath-holding Cartesian MRI and breath-holding SVS was <0.7%. Repeated free-breathing radial MRI had MDwithin=0.25% for PDFF. CONCLUSION In this pediatric study, non-sedated free-breathing radial MRI provided accurate and repeatable hepatic PDFF measurements and improved image quality, compared to standard breath-holding MR techniques.
Collapse
|
45
|
Kiefer LS, Fabian J, Lorbeer R, Machann J, Storz C, Kraus MS, Wintermeyer E, Schlett C, Roemer F, Nikolaou K, Peters A, Bamberg F. Inter- and intra-observer variability of an anatomical landmark-based, manual segmentation method by MRI for the assessment of skeletal muscle fat content and area in subjects from the general population. Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20180019. [PMID: 29658780 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Changes in skeletal muscle composition, such as fat content and mass, may exert unique metabolic and musculoskeletal risks; however, the reproducibility of their assessment is unknown. We determined the variability of the assessment of skeletal muscle fat content and area by MRI in a population-based sample. METHODS A random sample from a prospective, community-based cohort study (KORA-FF4) was included. Skeletal muscle fat content was quantified as proton-density fat fraction (PDFF) and area as cross-sectional area (CSA) in multi-echo Dixon sequences (TR 8.90 ms, six echo times, flip angle 4°) by a standardized, anatomical landmark-based, manual skeletal muscle segmentation at level L3 vertebra by two independent observers. Reproducibility was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), scatter and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS From 50 subjects included (mean age 56.1 ± 8.8 years, 60.0% males, mean body mass index 28.3 ± 5.2) 2'400 measurements were obtained. Interobserver agreement was excellent for all muscle compartments (PDFF: ICC0.99, CSA: ICC0.98) with only minor absolute and relative differences (-0.2 ± 0.5%, 31 ± 44.7 mm2; -2.6 ± 6.4% and 2.7 ± 3.9%, respectively). Intra-observer reproducibility was similarly excellent (PDFF: ICC1.0, 0.0 ± 0.4%, 0.4%; CSA: ICC1.0, 5.5 ± 25.3 mm2, 0.5%, absolute and relative differences, respectively). All agreement was independent of age, gender, body mass index, body height and visceral adipose tissue (ICC0.96-1.0). Furthermore, PDFF reproducibility was independent of CSA (ICC0.93-0.99). Conclusions: Quantification of skeletal muscle fat content and area by MRI using an anatomical landmark-based, manual skeletal muscle segmentation is highly reproducible. Advances in knowledge: An anatomical landmark-based, manual skeletal muscle segmentation provides high reproducibility of skeletal muscle fat content and area and may therefore serve as a robust proxy for myosteatosis and sarcopenia in large cohort studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Sophie Kiefer
- 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tuebingen , Tuebingen , Germany
| | - Jana Fabian
- 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tuebingen , Tuebingen , Germany
| | - Roberto Lorbeer
- 2 Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Hospital , Munich , Germany
| | - Jürgen Machann
- 3 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Section of Experimental Radiology, University of Tuebingen , Tuebingen , Germany.,4 Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases (IDM) of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tuebingen , Tuebingen , Germany.,5 German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD) , Neuherberg , Germany
| | - Corinna Storz
- 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tuebingen , Tuebingen , Germany
| | - Mareen Sarah Kraus
- 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tuebingen , Tuebingen , Germany
| | - Elke Wintermeyer
- 6 BG Trauma Center, University of Tuebingen , Tuebingen , Germany
| | - Christopher Schlett
- 7 Department of Radiology, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Heidelberg , Heidelberg , Germany
| | - Frank Roemer
- 8 Department of Radiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg , Erlangen , Germany
| | - Konstantin Nikolaou
- 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tuebingen , Tuebingen , Germany
| | - Annette Peters
- 9 German Center for Cardiovascular Disease Research (DZHK e.V.) , Munich , Germany.,10 Institute for Cardiovascular Prevention, Ludwig-Maximilian-University-Hospital , Munich , Germany.,11 Institute of Epidemiology II, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health , Neuherberg , Germany
| | - Fabian Bamberg
- 1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tuebingen , Tuebingen , Germany.,9 German Center for Cardiovascular Disease Research (DZHK e.V.) , Munich , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Harrison SA, Rinella ME, Abdelmalek MF, Trotter JF, Paredes AH, Arnold HL, Kugelmas M, Bashir MR, Jaros MJ, Ling L, Rossi SJ, DePaoli AM, Loomba R. NGM282 for treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet 2018. [PMID: 29519502 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30474-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 345] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis is a chronic liver disease characterised by the presence of hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and hepatocellular injury, for which no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment exists. FGF19 is a hormone that regulates bile acid synthesis and glucose homoeostasis. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of NGM282, an engineered FGF19 analogue, for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. METHODS In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study, we recruited patients aged 18-75 years with biopsy-confirmed non-alcoholic steatohepatitis as defined by the non-alcoholic steatohepatitis clinical research network histological scoring system, from hospitals and gastroenterology and liver clinics in Australia and the USA. Key eligibility criteria included a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score of 4 or higher, stage 1-3 fibrosis, and at least 8% liver fat content. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) via a web-based system and stratified by diabetic status to receive either 3 mg or 6 mg subcutaneous NGM282 or placebo. The primary endpoint was the absolute change from baseline to week 12 in liver fat content. Responders were patients who achieved a 5% or larger reduction in absolute liver fat content as measured by MRI-proton density fat fraction. Efficacy analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02443116. FINDINGS Between July 14, 2015, and Aug 30, 2016, 166 patients were screened across 18 sites in Australia and the USA. 82 patients were randomly assigned to receive 3 mg NGM282 (n=27), 6 mg NGM282 (n=28), or placebo (n=27). At 12 weeks, 20 (74%) patients in the 3 mg dose group and 22 (79%) in the 6 mg dose group achieved at least a 5% reduction in absolute liver fat content from baseline (relative risk 10·0 [95% CI 2·6-38·7] vs 11·4 [3·0-43·8], respectively; p<0·0001 for both comparisons) versus two (7%) in the placebo group. Overall, 76 (93%) of 82 patients experienced at least one adverse event, most of which were grade 1 (55 [67%]), and only five (6%) were grade 3 or worse. The most commonly (≥10%) reported adverse events were injection site reactions (28 [34%]), diarrhoea (27 [33%]), abdominal pain (15 [18%]), and nausea (14 [17%]). These adverse events were reported more frequently in the NGM282 groups compared with the placebo group. No life-threatening events or patient deaths occurred during the study. INTERPRETATION NGM282 produced rapid and significant reductions in liver fat content with an acceptable safety profile in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Further study of NGM282 is warranted in this patient population. FUNDING NGM Biopharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mary E Rinella
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - James F Trotter
- Clinical Research and Education, Texas Digestive Disease Consultants, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Angelo H Paredes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Hays L Arnold
- Gastroenterology Consultants of San Antonio, Live Oak, TX, USA
| | | | - Mustafa R Bashir
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Lei Ling
- NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Rohit Loomba
- Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Research Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Epidemiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Fraum TJ, Ludwig DR, Kilian S, Curtis WA, Pilgram TK, Sirlin CB, Fowler KJ. Epidemiology of Hepatic Steatosis at a Tertiary Care Center: An MRI-based Analysis. Acad Radiol 2018; 25:317-327. [PMID: 29199057 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2017] [Revised: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 10/16/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Little is known about the frequency and risk factors of hepatic steatosis in the tertiary care setting. Such knowledge is essential to clinicians making decisions about testing for this condition. Thus, our aim was to describe the epidemiology of hepatic steatosis, as captured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), at a tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS A near-consecutive cohort of 1006 adult patients underwent standard-of-care liver MRIs. Images were retrospectively processed to derive proton density fat fraction (PDFF) maps. Data from three spatially distinct regions of interest (ROIs) were aggregated to derive overall hepatic PDFF values. Demographic, anthropometric, clinical, and laboratory variables were included in a multivariate analysis to determine predictors of hepatic steatosis grades (based on established PDFF cutoffs). Hepatic steatosis grades derived from single vs aggregated ROIs were compared. RESULTS Hepatic steatosis was observed in 25% of patients (19% grade 1; 3% grade 2; 3% grade 3). Controlling for all other variables, the odds of hepatic steatosis increased by 7%-9% (P <.001) for each whole point increase in body mass index (BMI), whereas elevated serum bilirubin was associated with lower odds of hepatic steatosis (P = .002). Race, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome were not independently predictive of hepatic steatosis when controlling for other variables (eg, BMI). Employing single ROIs (rather than three aggregated ROIs) resulted in incorrect steatosis grading in up to 8.0% of patients. CONCLUSION Many adult patients undergoing liver MRI at a tertiary care center have hepatic steatosis, with larger BMIs as the only independent predictor of higher grades. This information can be used by clinicians at such centers to make evidence-based decisions about when to test for hepatic steatosis in their patients.
Collapse
|
48
|
Mancini M, Summers P, Faita F, Brunetto MR, Callea F, De Nicola A, Di Lascio N, Farinati F, Gastaldelli A, Gridelli B, Mirabelli P, Neri E, Salvadori PA, Rebelos E, Tiribelli C, Valenti L, Salvatore M, Bonino F. Digital liver biopsy: Bio-imaging of fatty liver for translational and clinical research. World J Hepatol 2018; 10:231-245. [PMID: 29527259 PMCID: PMC5838442 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v10.i2.231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2017] [Revised: 01/27/2018] [Accepted: 02/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The rapidly growing field of functional, molecular and structural bio-imaging is providing an extraordinary new opportunity to overcome the limits of invasive liver biopsy and introduce a "digital biopsy" for in vivo study of liver pathophysiology. To foster the application of bio-imaging in clinical and translational research, there is a need to standardize the methods of both acquisition and the storage of the bio-images of the liver. It can be hoped that the combination of digital, liquid and histologic liver biopsies will provide an innovative synergistic tri-dimensional approach to identifying new aetiologies, diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the optimization of personalized therapy of liver diseases and liver cancer. A group of experts of different disciplines (Special Interest Group for Personalized Hepatology of the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver, Institute for Biostructures and Bio-imaging of the National Research Council and Bio-banking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure) discussed criteria, methods and guidelines for facilitating the requisite application of data collection. This manuscript provides a multi-Author review of the issue with special focus on fatty liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Mancini
- Institute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, National Research Council, Naples 80145, Italy
| | - Paul Summers
- European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Francesco Faita
- Institute of Clinical Physiology (IFC), National Research Council (CNR), Pisa 56124, Italy
| | - Maurizia R Brunetto
- Hepatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa 56125, Italy
| | - Francesco Callea
- Department of Pathology, Children Hospital Bambino Gesù IRCCS, Rome 00165, Italy
| | | | - Nicole Di Lascio
- Institute of Clinical Physiology (IFC), National Research Council (CNR), Pisa 56124, Italy
| | - Fabio Farinati
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oncology and Surgical Sciences, University of Padua, Padua 35121, Italy
| | - Amalia Gastaldelli
- Cardio-metabolic Risk Laboratory, Institute of Clinical Physiology (IFC), National Research Council (CNR), Pisa 56124, Italy
| | - Bruno Gridelli
- Institute for Health, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Chianciano Terme 53042, Italy
| | | | - Emanuele Neri
- Diagnostic Radiology 3, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa and "Ospedale S. Chiara" AOUP, Pisa 56126, Italy
| | - Piero A Salvadori
- Institute of Clinical Physiology (IFC), National Research Council (CNR), Pisa 56124, Italy
| | - Eleni Rebelos
- Hepatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa 56125, Italy
| | - Claudio Tiribelli
- Fondazione Italiana Fegato (FIF), Area Science Park, Campus Basovizza, Trieste 34012, Italy
| | - Luca Valenti
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano and Department of Internal Medicine and Metabolic Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | | | - Ferruccio Bonino
- Institute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, National Research Council, Naples 80145, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Alcohol consumption, but not smoking is associated with higher MR-derived liver fat in an asymptomatic study population. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0192448. [PMID: 29401483 PMCID: PMC5798849 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2017] [Accepted: 01/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of our study was to determine the relation of alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking on continuous-measured hepatic fat fraction (HFF) in a population free of cardiovascular disease. We suggested a direct correlation of alcohol consumption with HFF and increased HFF in former smokers compared to current smokers. Methods Data from 384 subjects (mean age: 56 years, 58% men) of a population-based cohort study (KORA) were included in a cross-sectional design. Liver fat was assessed by 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a multi-echo Dixon sequence and T2-corrected single voxel multi-echo spectroscopy (1H-MRS). Smoking status was classified as never, former or current smoker and alcohol consumption as non-, moderate (0.1–39.9 g/day for men and 0.1–19.9 g/day for women), or heavy drinker (≥ 40 g/day for men and ≥ 20 g/day for women). Fatty liver disease was defined as HFF≥5.56%. Results Average HFF was 8.8% by 1H-MRS and 8.5% by MRI. Former smokers showed a higher HFF (MRI: β = 2.64; p = 0.006) and a higher FLD prevalence (MRI: OR = 1.91; p = 0.006) compared to never smokers. Current smokers showed decreased odds for FLD measured by 1H-MRS after multivariable adjustment (OR = 0.37; p = 0.007) with never smoker as reference. Heavy drinking was positively associated with HFF (1H-MRS: β = 2.99; p = 0.003) and showed highest odds for FLD (1H-MRS: OR = 3.05; p = 0.008) with non-drinker as reference. Moderate drinking showed a positive association with HFF (1H-MRS: β = 1.54; p = 0.061 and MRI: β = 1.75; p = 0.050). Conclusions Our data revealed lowest odds for FLD in current smokers, moderate drinkers showing higher HFF than non-drinkers and heavy drinkers showing highest HFF and odds for FLD. These findings partly conflict with former literature and underline the importance of further studies to investigate the complex effects on liver metabolism.
Collapse
|
50
|
Mamidipalli A, Hamilton G, Manning P, Hong CW, Park CC, Wolfson T, Hooker J, Heba E, Schlein A, Gamst A, Durelle J, Paiz M, Middleton MS, Schwimmer JB, Sirlin CB. Cross-sectional correlation between hepatic R2* and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) in children with hepatic steatosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 47:418-424. [PMID: 28543915 PMCID: PMC5702271 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 04/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the relationship between hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant, Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, cross-sectional study, we conducted a secondary analysis of 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams performed as part of prospective research studies in children in whom conditions associated with iron overload were excluded clinically. Each exam included low-flip-angle, multiecho magnitude (-M) and complex (-C) based chemical-shift-encoded MRI techniques with spectral modeling of fat to generate hepatic PDFF and R2* parametric maps. For each technique and each patient, regions of interest were placed on the maps in each of the nine Couinaud segments, and composite whole-liver PDFF and R2* values were calculated. Pearson's correlation coefficients between PDFF and R2* were computed for each MRI technique. Correlations were compared using Steiger's test. RESULTS In all, 184 children (123 boys, 61 girls) were included in this analysis. PDFF estimated by MRI-M and MRI-C ranged from 1.1-35.4% (9.44 ± 8.76) and 2.1-38.1% (10.1 ± 8.7), respectively. R2* estimated by MRI-M and MRI-C ranged from 32.6-78.7 s-1 (48.4 ± 9.8) and 27.2-71.5 s-1 (42.2 ± 8.6), respectively. There were strong and significant correlations between hepatic PDFF and R2* values estimated by MRI-M (r = 0.874; P < 0.0001) and MRI-C (r = 0.853; P < 0.0001). The correlation coefficients (0.874 vs. 0.853) were not significantly different (P = 0.15). CONCLUSION Hepatic PDFF and R2* are strongly correlated with each other in vivo. This relationship was observed using two different MRI techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:418-424.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrija Mamidipalli
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Gavin Hamilton
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Paul Manning
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Cheng William Hong
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Charlie C. Park
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Tanya Wolfson
- Computational and Applied Statistics Laboratory, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California – San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Hooker
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Elhamy Heba
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Alexandra Schlein
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Anthony Gamst
- Computational and Applied Statistics Laboratory, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California – San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Janis Durelle
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Melissa Paiz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Michael S. Middleton
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey B. Schwimmer
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of California - San Diego, San Diego, California
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Claude B. Sirlin
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|