Breast cancer remains one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide, underscoring an urgent need for innovative therapeutic strategies. Immunotherapy has emerged as a transformative frontier in this context. In triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), the combination of immunotherapy based on PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy has proven efficacious in both early and advanced clinical trials. These encouraging results have led to the approval of ICIs for TNBC, opening up new therapeutic avenues for challenging-to-treat patient populations. Furthermore, a multitude of ongoing trials are actively investigating the efficacy of immunotherapy-based combinations, including ICIs in conjunction with chemotherapy, targeted therapy and radiation therapy, as well as other novel strategies such as bispecific antibodies, CAR-T cells and cancer vaccines across all breast cancer subtypes, including HR-positive/HER2-negative and HER2-positive disease. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current immunotherapeutic approaches in breast cancer, highlighting pivotal findings from recent clinical trials and the potential impact of these advancements on patient outcomes.

A nomogram to predict shrinkage modes after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) was constructed in HER-2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer. The value and mechanism of targeting long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) as efficacy prediction biomarker was also evaluated.

All enrolled patients received six cycles of chemotherapy (Docetaxel + Carboplatin) and anti-HER-2 dual-targeted therapy (Trastuzumab + Pertuzumab) before surgery. According to pathological three-dimensional (3D) models of residual tumor from 71 HER2+ patients, shrinkage modes were divided into concentric shrinkage mode (CSM) and non-CSM (NCSM). LncRNAs in core biopsy tissues in the CSM and NCSM groups were selected by microarray and validated by RT-PCR. A nomogram was constructed to predict shrinkage modes after NAT in combination with clinical-pathological and transcriptome signatures. Cell proliferation was used CCK-8 and colony formation assay. PAPIS Kit was used to perform nuclear and cytoplasmic separation. The cell drug resistance assays were to explore the value of paclitaxel. The ChIRP-MS assay was to search RNA-binding proteins and verified by WB. Cell cycle analysis was carried out by flow cytometry.

Independent predictors of NCSM were lymph nodes downstaging after NAT, mammographic malignant calcification, hormone receptor expression, and RUVBL1-AS1 expression. A nomogram was constructed in combination with these predictors, which showed an area under the curve of 0.883, supporting the predictive power of the method. Overexpression of RUVBL1-AS1 inhibited HER2+ cells proliferation. Overexpression of RUVBL1-AS1 increased the number of cells in G1/S phase and decreased that of cells in G2 phase. RUVBL1-AS1 increased paclitaxel resistance and downregulated VCP expression. RUVBL1-AS1 affects cell cycle progression by downregulating VCP, resulting in the reduction of cells in G2/M phase, thereby weakening the sensitivity to paclitaxel.

The nomogram could accurately predict shrinkage modes after NAT, and may help guide the individualized selection of breast conserving surgery candidates after NAT. RUVBL1-AS1 might be a promising therapeutic target of paclitaxel-based chemotherapy inHER2+ breast cancer.

Accumulating evidence indicates that about 30-40% of patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer might achieve excellent outcomes without chemotherapy. Therefore, we aimed to test the pathological complete response after the addition of pembrolizumab to dual anti-HER2 blockade and omission of chemotherapy in patients with HER2-enriched breast cancer.

WSG-KEYRICHED-1 was a single-arm, multicentre, open-label, hypothesis-generating phase 2 trial done at 15 breast cancer centres in Germany. Women aged 18 years and older, with previously untreated clinical stage T1c-T3, N0-N2, M0, primary unilateral early invasive breast cancer, and locally confirmed HER2 immunohistochemistry score 2+ or 3+ status, and hormone receptor-positive or receptor-negative status, were enrolled. Women with centrally confirmed HER2-enriched subtype by prediction analysis of microarrays 50 gene set (PAM50) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were allocated to four cycles of intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks for 12 weeks), intravenous trastuzumab biosimilar ABP 980 (8 mg/kg loading dose, then 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 12 weeks), and intravenous pertuzumab (840 mg loading dose, then 420 mg every 3 weeks for 12 weeks). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a pathological complete response (defined as ypN0 or ypT0/is), assessed in the full analysis set, which included all patients who had at least one dose of trial treatment and had central tumour assessment within 3 weeks after the end of trial treatment. For the primary endpoint to be met, at least 52·2% of patients had to have a pathological complete response to support the hypothesis that the proportion of patients with pathological complete response after trial treatment would be higher than 40% with statistical significance. Safety was analysed in all patients who had at least one dose of trial treatment. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03988036, and has been completed.

Between Sept 2, 2020, and May 5, 2021, 48 women were enrolled, of whom four did not have surgery, and one had only a local pathological complete response assessment. Therefore, 43 patients with central pathological complete response assessment were included in the full analysis set. Median follow-up was 8·6 months (IQR 8·3-9·0). 20 (47%) of 43 patients had a pathological complete response by central assessment (lower bound of the one-sided 95% CI 33%), thus the null hypothesis (40% pathological complete response) could not be rejected (p=0·22). Four (8%) of 48 patients had grade 3-4 adverse events deemed related to drug treatment. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were increased alanine aminotransferase (n=1), drug hypersensitivity (n=1), nephritis (n=1), and panic attack (n=1). Serious adverse events occurred in four (8%) of 48 patients, which were drug hypersensitivity (n=1), panic attack (n=1), pyrexia (n=1), and COVID-19 (n=1). Pembrolizumab was discontinued or postponed due to adverse events in three (6%) of 48 patients. No deaths occurred.

Although the null hypothesis could not be rejected, the WSG-KEYRICHED-1 trial highlights the potential of a short chemotherapy-free combination of pembrolizumab with dual anti-HER2 therapy, warranting the initiation of randomised trials investigating the immunotherapy without chemotherapy in patients with HER2-enriched breast cancer.

Merck Sharp & Dohme and NanoString Technologies.

While immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) has revolutionized cancer treatment, most patients with advanced disease fail to achieve durable benefit. To address this challenge, it is essential to integrate mechanistic research with clinical studies to: (1) understand response mechanisms, (2) identify patient-specific resistance pathways, (3) develop biomarkers for patient selection, and (4) design novel therapies to overcome resistance. We propose that incorporating "direct-in-patient" studies into clinical trials is crucial for bridging the gap between fundamental science and clinical oncology. In this review, we first highlight recent clinical success of ICT in the neoadjuvant setting, where treatment is given in earlier disease stages to improve outcomes. We then explore how neoadjuvant clinical trials could be utilized to drive mechanistic laboratory-based investigations. Finally, we discuss novel scientific concepts that will potentially aid in overcoming resistance to ICT, which will require future clinical trials to understand their impact on human immune responses.

Liquid biopsy is a laboratory test used to detect and analyze circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and other tumor-derived components, in a blood sample. In the context of breast cancer (BC), liquid biopsies hold significant promise for guiding the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and immune-based combinations, offering real-time insights into tumor dynamics, treatment response, and resistance mechanisms. This review explores the role of liquid biopsy in BC immunotherapy, focusing on its applications, benefits, issues, and current and future research directions.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has rapidly evolved as a novel approach in oncology, reshaping the standard treatment for several malignancies, including melanoma, lung, bladder, colorectal, and breast cancer. While it has an acceptable safety profile, challenges persist due to the complexity of the tumor microenvironment (TME), immune evasion, T-cell exhaustion, and identification of biomarkers. Addressing these issues is critical for optimizing treatment regimens, minimizing immune-related adverse events, and ensuring successful clinical integration.

This review explores current research on neoadjuvant immunotherapy, emphasizing its impact on standard of care treatment, efficacy, safety, and clinical challenges. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published in the last 5 years. Ongoing research aims to enhance the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, identify resistance mechanisms, and broaden indications. Current clinical trials focus on biomarker-driven patient selection, refining immune response modulation through combination strategies, and developing evidence-based protocols for implementation into routine oncology practice.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapeutic options have rapidly changed the oncological treatment landscape in only a few years, and this treatment paradigm has quickly become a new standard of care in multiple solid tumors. With continued clinical investigation, neoadjuvant immunotherapy has the dramatic potential to further advance cancer care.

The clinical application of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)-based neoadjuvant therapy has been approved in breast cancer since 2021. However, no studies have evaluated its efficacy and safety in randomized and non-randomized settings. Additionally, there exists controversy about which specific subpopulation can benefit from this management strategy.

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for prospective clinical trials of ICB-based neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer. Information regarding pathological complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) were pooled to estimate the efficacy and safety. Hazard ratio, relative risk (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Among 22 eligible trials including 6134 women with resectable breast cancer, there were 11 randomized studies with 5574 patients. Pooled analysis on pCR (RR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.20-1.58; P<0.001), EFS (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54-0.81; P<0.001), and OS (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35-0.91; P=0.01) revealed that ICB-based neoadjuvant therapy was associated with favorable outcomes over conventional treatment. Moreover, the benefits of EFS were independent of PD-L1 expression (Pinteraction =0.57) and pCR (Pinteraction =0.37) in neoadjuvant immunotherapy. However, combining ICB with conventional neoadjuvant treatment significantly increased the risk of high-grade TRAE (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12; P=0.03), serious TRAE (RR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.26-1.94; P<0.001), treatment discontinuation due to TRAE (RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.14-1.90; P=0.003), and potentially fatal adverse event (RR, 2.25; 95% CI, 0.80-6.31; P=0.12).

The combination of ICB with conventional neoadjuvant treatment is associated with favorable clinical outcomes and importantly, increased grade 3+ toxicities. Clinicians should meticulously monitor patients to minimize the risk of treatment discontinuation in individuals with potentially curable breast cancer.

CD8+ T-cell abundance is insufficient to assess antitumor immunity and shows poor performance in predicting breast cancer prognosis and immunotherapy response, presumably owing to the complexity of CD8+ T-cell functionalities. Although single-cell RNA sequencing can dissect the multifaceted functions of CD8+ T cells for better immune assessment, its clinical application is limited. In this study, we developed bulk RNA sequencing-based FuncDimen models from integrative analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing and matched bulk RNA sequencing data to evaluate CD8+ T-cell functionalities across five dimensions: tumor reactivity, cytotoxicity, IFNγ secretion, proliferation, and apoptosis. The FuncDimen models quantifying different functional dimensions of CD8+ T cells were validated in our breast cancer cohort and external databases using immunofluorescence and imaging mass cytometry. We calculated the FuncAggre score by weighted aggregation of all five FuncDimen models to encapsulate the overall antitumor immunity. In our breast cancer cohort and external databases, the FuncAggre score demonstrated superior predictive performance for breast cancer prognosis (time-dependent AUC: 0.56-0.70) and immunotherapy response (AUC: 0.71-0.83) over other immune biomarkers, regardless of the breast cancer molecular subtype. Together, the FuncDimen models offer a refined assessment of antitumor immunity mediated by CD8+ T cells in the clinic, enhancing prognostic prediction and aiding personalized immunotherapy in breast cancer.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide, with significant advances in understanding its multifactorial nature in recent years. The complex structure of molecular and cellular interactions in cancer pathophysiology presents challenges for developing effective treatments. One theoretical model used to study these interactions is the Graph model or Complex Networks, which uses mathematical methods to create graphical figures by connecting vertices (factors) through edges (interactions). This study uses the graph model to determine the complex interactions within the tumour microenvironment of HER2-positive breast cancer. Through a narrative review, 37 factors involved in the pathophysiology of HER2-positive breast cancer were identified and incorporated into a complex network design, starting with the HER2 vertex. The impact of each vertex was determined by calculating the relative error, and a knockout (KO) analysis of vertices was performed to identify their influences within the network. The Wilcoxon test was used to analyze the statistical significance of each KO. Significant alterations in the network structure were observed with the KOs of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPMMP2, MMP9, cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6, TWIST, vascular endothelial growth factor and transforming growth factor-beta. Notably, the KOs of (MMPs) MMP2 and MMP9 significantly impacted the network structure and downregulated the HER2 vertex. This raises questions about the potential applicability of targeting MMPs, including the option of HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugates. Could a metalloprotease inhibitor be a good choice for conjugation? Despite the theoretical nature of this model, the results suggest potential avenues for therapeutic intervention.

The truancy of representation of the estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptors occurs during TNBC. TNBC is recognized for the upper reappearance and has a poorer diagnosis compared with rest breast cancer (BC) types. Presently, as such, no targeted therapy is approved for TNBC and treatment options are subjected to chemotherapy and surgery, which have high mortality rates. Hence, the current article focuses on the scenario of TNBC vital pathways and discusses the latest advances in TNBC treatment, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), PARP suppressors, and cancer vaccines. Immunotherapy and ICIs, like PD 1 and PD L1 suppressors, displayed potential in clinical trials (CTs). These suppressors obstruct the mechanisms which allow tumor cells to evade the system thereby boosting the body's defense against TNBC. Immunotherapy, either alone or combined with chemotherapy has demonstrated patient outcomes such as increased survival rates and reduced treatment-related side effects. Additionally, targeted therapy approaches include BRCA/2 mutation poly ribose polymerase inhibitors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors, Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, Fibroblast growth factor inhibitors, Androgen Receptor inhibitors, PIK3/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors, Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors, Notch signaling pathway inhibitors, Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signaling pathway inhibitors, Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy, Transforming growth factor (TGF) -β inhibitors, Epigenetic modifications (EPM), Aurora Kinase inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates. We also highlight ongoing clinical trials and potential future directions for TNBC therapy. Despite the challenges in treating TNBC, recent developments in understanding the molecular and immune characteristics of TNBC have opened up new opportunities for targeted therapies, which hold promise for improving outcomes in this aggressive disease.

The role of anthracyclines in the treatment of early breast cancer (EBC) is increasingly being challenged, especially in de-escalation strategies. However, owing to their immunogenic effects, anthracyclines are promising combination partners with immunotherapies. In the randomized phase 2 trial ABCSG-52 (EudraCT no. 2019-002364-27), we investigated epirubicin plus immunotherapy in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive EBC. A total of 58 patients were randomized 1:1 to two cycles of a chemotherapy-free induction phase (part 1) of dual HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (TP) plus the anti-programmed death ligand 1 antibody atezolizumab (TP-A) or TP alone. Thereafter, all patients received four cycles of TP-A in combination with epirubicin (part 2). The primary endpoint, pathological complete response (pCR), was met in 35 patients (60.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 47.5% to 71.9%), 19 patients (65.5%) in the TP-A group and 16 patients (55.2%) in the TP group. The residual cancer burden 0/I rate and objective response rate (secondary endpoints) in all patients with evaluable data were 80.0% (n = 44/55; 95% CI 67.6% to 88.4%) and 89.3% (n = 50/56; 95% CI 78.5% to 95.0%), respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events were reported in 17 patients (29.3%). Based on our findings, we conclude that a neoadjuvant chemotherapy de-escalation immunotherapy regimen with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, atezolizumab and epirubicin is effective and safe in patients with HER2-positive EBC.

While immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the clinical management of various malignancies, a large fraction of patients are refractory to ICIs employed as standalone therapeutics, necessitating the development of combinatorial treatment strategies. Immunogenic cell death (ICD) inducers have attracted considerable interest as combinatorial partners for ICIs, at least in part owing to their ability to initiate a tumor-targeting adaptive immune response. However, compared with either approach alone, combinatorial regimens involving ICD inducers and ICIs have not always shown superior clinical activity. Here, we discuss accumulating evidence on the therapeutic interactions between ICD inducers and immunotherapy with ICIs in oncological settings, identify key factors that may explain discrepancies between preclinical and clinical findings, and propose strategies that address existing challenges to increase the efficacy of these combinations in patients with cancer.

Substantial therapeutic advancement has been made in the field of immunotherapy in breast cancer. The immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy received FDA approval for both PD-L1 positive metastatic and early-stage triple-negative breast cancer, while ongoing clinical trials seek to expand the current treatment landscape for immune checkpoint inhibitors in hormone receptor positive and HER2 positive breast cancer. Antibody drug conjugates are FDA approved for triple negative and HER2+ disease, and are being studied in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Vaccines and bispecific antibodies are areas of active research. Studies of cellular therapies such as tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, chimeric antigen receptor-T cells and T cell receptor engineered cells are promising and ongoing. This review provides an update of recent major clinical trials of immunotherapy in breast cancer and discusses future directions in the treatment of breast cancer.

Immune checkpoint therapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, leading to dramatic clinical outcomes for a subset of patients. However, many patients do not experience durable responses following immune checkpoint therapy owing to multiple resistance mechanisms, highlighting the need for effective combination strategies that target these resistance pathways and improve clinical responses. The development of combination strategies based on an understanding of the complex biology that regulates human antitumor immune responses has been a major challenge. In this Review, we describe the current landscape of combination therapies. We also discuss how the development of effective combination strategies will require the integration of small, tissue-rich clinical trials, to determine how therapy-driven perturbation of the human immune system affects downstream biological responses and eventual clinical outcomes, reverse translation of clinical observations to immunocompetent preclinical models, to interrogate specific biological pathways and their impact on antitumor immune responses, and novel computational methods and machine learning, to integrate multiple datasets across clinical and preclinical studies for the identification of the most relevant pathways that need to be targeted for successful combination strategies.

In HER2-positive breast cancer, clinical outcome and sensitivity to HER2-targeted therapies are influenced by both tumor and microenvironment features. However, we are currently unable to depict the molecular heterogeneity of this disease with sufficient granularity. Here, by performing gene expression profiling in HER2-positive breast cancers from patients receiving adjuvant trastuzumab in the ALTTO clinical trial (NCT00490139), we identify and characterize five molecular subtypes associated with the risk of distant recurrence: immune-enriched, proliferative/metabolic-enriched, mesenchymal/stroma-enriched, luminal, and ERBB2-dependent. Additionally, we validate the biological profiles of the subtypes and explore their prognostic/predictive value in external cohorts, namely the NeoALTTO trial (NCT00553358), SCAN-B (NCT02306096), I-SPY2 (NCT01042379), METABRIC and TCGA. Immune-enriched tumors present better survival outcomes, in contrast to mesenchymal/stroma-enriched and proliferative/metabolic-enriched tumors, while luminal and ERBB2-dependent tumors are characterized by low and high rates of pathological complete response, respectively. Of note, these molecular subtypes provide the rationale for treatment approaches leveraging the heterogeneous biology of HER2-positive breast cancer.

HER2-positive breast cancer is an aggressive subtype that accounts for 15% to 20% of all breast cancers. Recent studies have suggested that HER2-positive breast cancer is a group of heterogeneous diseases with different sensitivities to standard treatment regimens. Revealing the molecular heterogeneity of HER2-positive breast cancer could potentially enable more precise treatment strategies. In this study, we performed multiomics profiling on a HER2-positive breast cancer cohort and identified four transcriptome-based subtypes. The classical HER2 (HER2-CLA) subtype comprised 28.3% of the samples and displayed high ERBB2 activation and significant benefit from anti-HER2 therapy. The immunomodulatory (HER2-IM) subtype (20%) featured an immune-activated microenvironment, potentially suitable for de-escalated treatment and immunotherapy. The luminal-like (HER2-LUM) subtype (30.6%) possessed similar molecular features of hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer, suggesting endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors as a potential therapeutic strategy. Lastly, the basal/mesenchymal-like (HER2-BM) subtype (21.1%) had a poor response to current dual HER2-targeted therapy and could potentially benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The molecular characteristics and clinical features of the subtypes were further explored across multiple cohorts, and the feasibility of the proposed treatment strategies was validated in patient-derived organoid and patient-derived tumor fragment models. This study elucidates the molecular heterogeneity of HER2-positive breast cancer and paves the way for a more tailored treatment. Significance: Illumination of the inherent heterogeneity within HER2-positive breast cancers through the delineation of distinct molecular subtypes lays the groundwork for developing more personalized treatment strategies based on specific patient characteristics.

Immunotherapies have found limited success in breast cancerdue to significant challenges within the tumor that block T-cell activity and function.

The current review discusses clinically relevant immunotherapeutics and trials within the framework of the cancer-immunity cycle.

Current therapies such as antibody-drug conjugates and immune checkpoint blockade require proper biomarker selection, such as PD1 expression and the degree of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) infiltration to subset potential responders. HER2 and other tumor-associated antigens have served as valuable benchmarks for developing novel therapies, such as antibody engagers and CAR T-cells. However, further research is essential to identify and validate new target antigens that can enhance therapeutic efficacy and broaden the clinical applicability of these approaches.

Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases have few effective systemic therapy options. In a prior study, pertuzumab with high-dose trastuzumab demonstrated a high clinical benefit rate (CBR) in the central nervous system (CNS) in patients with brain metastases. The current trial evaluated whether the addition of atezolizumab to this regimen would produce further improvements in CNS response.

This was a single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial of atezolizumab, pertuzumab, and high-dose trastuzumab for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases. Participants received atezolizumab 1,200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks, pertuzumab (loading dosage 840 mg i.v., then 420 mg i.v. every 3 weeks), and high-dose trastuzumab (6 mg/kg i.v. weekly for 24 weeks, then 6 mg/kg i.v. every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was CNS overall response rate per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases criteria. Key secondary endpoints included CBR, overall survival, and safety and tolerability of the combination.

Among 19 enrolled participants, two had a confirmed intracranial partial response for a CNS overall response rate of 10.5% (90% confidence interval, 1.9%-29.6%). The study did not meet the prespecified efficacy threshold and was terminated early. The CBR was 42.1% at 18 weeks and 31.6% at 24 weeks. Seven patients (36.8%) required a dose delay or hold, and the most frequent any-grade adverse events were diarrhea (26.3%) and fatigue (26.3%).

The addition of atezolizumab to pertuzumab plus high-dose trastuzumab does not result in improved CNS responses in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases.

Recent studies have investigated the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer. However, there is an ongoing debate about the optimal approach for integrating this strategy.

To evaluate the association of neoadjuvant ICIs with pathologic complete response (pCR) across molecular phenotypes, to quantify the survival benefits of ICIs beyond pCR status, and to estimate the incidence of specific adverse events.

The PubMed database was searched on December 10, 2023, to identify all potential eligible studies.

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that assessed (neo)adjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy in early breast cancer.

Data from the eligible RCTs were extracted by 2 reviewers. An extracted individual patient data meta-analysis and a trial-level random-effect meta-analysis were performed.

Outcomes were pCR, event-free survival (EFS) in patients with and without pCR, and adverse events. Hazard ratios were estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazards regression models.

Nine RCTs involving 5114 patients met the inclusion criteria (2097 triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC], 1924 hormone receptor-positive [HR+]/ERBB2-negative [ERBB2-], and 1115 ERBB2+ tumors). In TNBC, the addition of ICIs was associated with an improved pCR rate regardless of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status (absolute improvement, >10%). In HR+/ ERBB2- tumors, the administration of ICIs was associated with improved pCR only in the PD-L1-positive (PD-L1+) population (absolute improvement, +12.2%), whereas no benefit was observed in ERBB2+ tumors. In patients with TNBC achieving a pCR, the addition of ICIs was associated with improved EFS (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-1.00), resulting in a 5-year EFS of 92.0% with ICIs compared with 88.0% without them. In patients with residual disease, ICIs also showed better EFS (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.98), resulting in a 5-year EFS of 63.3% with ICIs and 56.1% without them. Adjuvant ICI did not show numerical improvement in patients with either pCR or residual disease (all hazard ratios >1). During the neoadjuvant treatment, the incidence of grade 3 or greater immune-related adverse events with ICI was 10.3%.

These findings suggest that neoadjuvant ICI therapy improves efficacy outcomes in early-stage TNBC and PD-L1+ HR+/ERBB2- tumors with an acceptable safety profile; however, no benefit was observed with adjuvant ICI. Given the financial and toxicity costs associated with ICIs, future research should prioritize identifying patients most likely to benefit from the addition of ICIs to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

The use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) has become increasingly important in the treatment of breast cancer because of its various advantages. These include the ability to downstage tumors without compromising locoregional control and the potential to obtain valuable information about clinical and biological response to therapy with implications for individual prognoses. Surgical response assessment paves the way for response-adapted therapy, and pathological complete response (pCR; defined as ypT0/is ypN0) serves as an additional endpoint for drug development trials. Recommended NST regimens commonly consist of anthracyclines and taxane, with dose-dense anthracyclines and weekly paclitaxel often preferred, whenever feasible. For patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive tumors, dual anti-HER2 therapy (trastuzumab and pertuzumab) is indicated together with NST in case of elevated risk of recurrence. For patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), adding carboplatin to NST correlates with improved pCR and survival rates, as does the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors. For hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative cancers, emerging data on NST including immune checkpoint inhibitors may elevate the significance of NST in high-risk luminal breast cancer. Here, we present a synthesis of the results from neoadjuvant clinical trials that aim at optimizing treatment options for patients with high-risk breast cancer.

This perspective underscores the evolution and significance of neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer, tracing its history and efficacy in improving outcomes. It delves into the correlation between achieving complete response and long-term survival, emphasizing the predictive value of treatment response estimation. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer, particularly with taxanes and anti-HER2 therapies, emerges as a cornerstone, offering enhanced breast conservation rates and prognostic insights. The focus on individualized care, tailored to treatment response, underscores the need for adaptive strategies. Additionally, the article discusses the ongoing debate surrounding anthracyclines' role and the benefits of dual HER2 blockade. Ultimately, advocating for a personalized approach, guided by treatment response assessment, ensures optimal outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer management.

The advent of immunotherapy and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have revolutionized breast cancer treatment, offering new hope to patients. However, challenges, such as resistance and limited efficacy in certain cases, remain. Recently, the combination of these therapies has emerged as a promising approach to address these challenges. ADCs play a crucial role by delivering cytotoxic agents directly to breast cancer cells, minimizing damage to healthy tissue and enhancing the tumor-killing effect. Concurrently, immunotherapies harness the body's immune system to recognize and eliminate cancer cells. This integration offers potential to overcome resistance mechanisms and significantly improve therapeutic outcomes. This review explores the rationale behind combining immunotherapies with ADCs, recent advances in this field, and the potential implications for breast cancer treatment.

The tumour immune microenvironment is shaped by the crosstalk between cancer cells, immune cells, fibroblasts, endothelial cells and other stromal components. Although the immune tumour microenvironment (TME) serves as a source of therapeutic targets, it is also considered a friend or foe to tumour-directed therapies. This is readily illustrated by the importance of T cells in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), culminating in the advent of immune checkpoint therapy in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy as standard of care for both early and advanced-stage TNBC, as well as recent promising signs of efficacy in a subset of hormone receptor-positive disease. In this Review, we discuss the various components of the immune TME in breast cancer and therapies that target or impact the immune TME, as well as the complexity of host physiology.

Breast cancer is a disease encompassing a spectrum of molecular subtypes and clinical presentations, each with distinct prognostic implications and treatment responses. Breast cancer has traditionally been considered an immunologically "cold" tumor, unresponsive to immunotherapy. However, clinical trials in recent years have found immunotherapy to be an efficacious therapeutic option for select patients. Breast cancer is categorized into different subtypes ranging from the most common positive hormone receptor (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative type, to less frequent HER2- positive breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), highlighting the necessity for tailored treatment strategies aimed at maximizing patient outcomes. Despite notable progress in early detection and new therapeutic modalities, breast cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer death in the USA. Moreover, in recent decades, breast cancer incidence rates have been increasing, especially in women younger than the age of 50. This has prompted the exploration of new therapeutic approaches to address this trend, offering new therapeutic prospects for breast cancer patients. Immunotherapy is a class of therapeutic agents that has revolutionized the treatment landscape of many cancers, namely melanoma, lung cancer, and gastroesophageal cancers, amongst others. Though belatedly, immunotherapy has entered the treatment armamentarium of breast cancer, with the approval of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in the neoadjuvant and advanced settings, thereby paving the path for further research and integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors in other subtypes of breast cancer. Trials exploring various combination therapies to harness the power of immunotherapy in symbiosis with various chemotherapeutic agents are ongoing in hopes of improving response rates and prolonging survival for breast cancer patients. Biomarkers and precise patient selection for the utilization of immunotherapy remain cardinal and are currently under investigation, with some biomarkers showing promise, such as Program Death Lignat-1 (PDL-1) Combined Positive Score, Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB), and Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs). This review will present the current landscape of immunotherapy, particularly checkpoint inhibitors, in different types of breast cancer.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent an effective class of agents for the treatment of several tumor types, including breast cancer (BC), featuring approved molecules such as trastuzumab-emtansine, trastuzumab-deruxtecan, and sacituzumab-govitecan. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) also showed activity in selected BC subtypes, and two agents, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab, are currently approved for the treatment of triple-negative BC patients. The potential synergy between ADCs and immunotherapy in BC remains an area of active investigation. Preclinical studies suggest that ADCs promote immune surveillance, modulating tumor microenvironment, inducing immunogenic cell death, and enhancing antitumor immunity. Translational evidence has shown potential predictive biomarkers for ADCs alone or in combination with immunotherapy, including expression of target antigen, oncogenic pathways, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Given this background, several clinical trials evaluated ADC-ICI combinations in BC patients, demonstrating promising outcomes with an overall manageable toxicity profile, and many studies are currently ongoing to confirm the efficacy and feasibility of this therapeutic approach. In the present review, we summarized the available evidence about the integration of ADCs and immunotherapy for the management of BC, emphasizing the need for further translational and clinical investigations to optimize this treatment strategy and elucidate predictive biomarkers, eventually improving patient outcomes.

Breast cancer (BC) is currently the most common malignant tumour in women and one of the leading causes of their death around the world. New and increasingly personalised diagnostic and therapeutic tools have been introduced over the last few decades, along with significant advances regarding the study and knowledge related to BC. The tumour microenvironment (TME) refers to the tumour cell-associated cellular and molecular environment which can influence conditions affecting tumour development and progression. The TME is composed of immune cells, stromal cells, extracellular matrix (ECM) and signalling molecules secreted by these different cell types. Ever deeper understanding of TME composition changes during tumour development and progression will enable new and more innovative therapeutic strategies to become developed for targeting tumours during specific stages of its evolution. This review summarises the role of BC-related TME components and their influence on tumour progression and the development of resistance to therapy. In addition, an account on the modifications in BC-related TME components associated with therapy is given, and the completed or ongoing clinical trials related to this topic are presented.

Patients with human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer are experiencing a consistent shift toward better survival across the years, thanks to tremendous advancements in treatment strategies. The consistent improvements of outcomes set a high bar for new drug development and the need to explore new ways to overcome resistance mechanisms. Emerging treatments in HER2-positive breast cancer aim to tackle the disease by acting on different targets, including not only HER2 (both at the extra- and intracellular level), but also HER3, PD-(L)1, CTLA4, NKG2A, AKT, PI3K, and, in triple-positive tumors, the estrogen receptors and the cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6. This review describes the evolving treatment landscape of HER2-positive breast cancer, from the current approved therapies to the future perspectives, with a focus on the new agents which are likely to get approved in the next future.

The prevalent treatment paradigm for locally advanced head and neck squamous carcinoma (HNSCC) typically entails surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Despite this, a significant proportion of patients experience recurrence and metastasis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), notably pembrolizumab and nivolumab, have been established as the first and second lines of treatment for recurrent and metastatic HNSCC (R/M HNSCC). The application of ICIs as neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this context is currently under rigorous investigation. This review synthesizes data from clinical trials focusing on neoadjuvant ICIs, highlighting that the pathological responses elicited by these treatments are promising. Furthermore, it is noted that the safety profiles of both monotherapy and combination therapies with ICIs are manageable, with no new safety signals identified. The review concludes by contemplating the future direction and challenges associated with neoadjuvant ICI therapy, encompassing aspects such as the refinement of imaging and pathological response criteria, selection criteria for adjuvant therapies, evaluation of the efficacy and safety of various combination treatment modalities, and the identification of responsive patient cohorts.

Tumors employ various strategies to evade immune surveillance. Central nervous system (CNS) has multiple features to restrain immune response. Whether tumors and CNS share similar programs of immunosuppression is elusive. Here, we analyze multi-omics data of tumors from HER2+ breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab and anti-PD-L1 antibody and find that CNS-enriched N-acetyltransferase 8-like (NAT8L) and its metabolite N-acetylaspartate (NAA) are overexpressed in resistant tumors. In CNS, NAA is released during brain inflammation. NAT8L attenuates brain inflammation and impairs anti-tumor immunity by inhibiting cytotoxicity of natural killer (NK) cells and CD8+ T cells via NAA. NAA disrupts the formation of immunological synapse by promoting PCAF-induced acetylation of lamin A-K542, which inhibits the integration between lamin A and SUN2 and impairs polarization of lytic granules. We uncover that tumor cells mimic the anti-inflammatory mechanism of CNS to evade anti-tumor immunity and NAT8L is a potential target to enhance efficacy of anti-cancer agents.

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) exhibit heightened T cell infiltration, contributing to an enhanced response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) compared with other subtypes. An immune-rich immune microenvironment correlates with improved prognosis in early and advanced TNBC. Combination chemotherapy and ICB is now the standard of care in early- and late-stage TNBC. Although programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) positivity predicts ICB response in advanced stages, its role in early-stage disease remains uncertain. Despite neoadjuvant ICB becoming common in early-stage TNBC, the necessity of adjuvant ICB after surgery remains unclear. Understanding the molecular basis of the immune response in breast cancer is vital for precise biomarkers for ICB and effective combination therapy strategies.

Patients with HER2-positive cancers often face a poor prognosis, and treatment regimens containing anti-HER2 have become the first-line treatment options for breast and gastric cancers. However, these approaches are faced with significant challenges in terms of drug resistance. Hence, it is crucial to explore precise treatment strategies aimed at improving survival outcomes.

Over the past few years, there has been rapid advancement in the realm of tumor therapy, particularly with the swift progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors, including PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. They exert anti-tumor effects by disrupting immune-suppressive factors within the tumor microenvironment. However, monotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has several limitations. Consequently, numerous studies have explored combinatorial immunotherapeutic strategies and demonstrated highly promising avenues of development.

This article aims to review the clinical trials investigating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combination therapy for HER2-positive tumors. Additionally, it provides a summary of ongoing trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of these combined treatments, with the intention of furnishing valuable insights for the clinical management of HER2-positive cancer.

Combinatorial immunotherapeutic strategies involving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors hold considerable promise in the treatment of HER2-positive tumors. Continued research efforts and clinical trials are warranted to elucidate optimal treatment regimens that maximize therapeutic benefits while minimizing adverse effects.

The introduction of immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment and improved outcomes of multiple types of cancer. Although breast cancer is a less immune-responsive tumor type, the incorporation of pembrolizumab into chemotherapy regimens in the neoadjuvant and first-line metastatic setting for the triple-negative disease has improved outcomes. However, the use of this type of treatment is associated with a spectrum of adverse events. Although rarely affected, kidneys can be a target for immunotherapy, leading to irreversible injury if not recognized and addressed early. A 52-year-old woman presented with clinical stage II right breast cancer diagnosed at an outside facility. Neoadjuvant docetaxel/carboplatin/pembrolizumab every 3 weeks was started. Given the partial response on MRI after the 4th cycle, treatment was switched to doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide. However, pembrolizumab was held in cycle 2 due to the rash and then resumed in cycle 3 after the resolution of symptoms. Elevated creatinine was noted 3 weeks after the last dose of pembrolizumab without improvement despite adequate fluid resuscitation. Diagnostic workup was unremarkable except for pyuria and minimal albuminuria on urinalysis. In the absence of other risk factors and the temporal relationship between pembrolizumab administration and the onset of acute kidney injury (AKI), immune-related nephrotoxicity was the underlying diagnosis. After initiation of corticosteroids, creatinine decreased back to baseline without the need for kidney biopsy. An addendum to the original pathology report from the outside facility surfaced 5 months after starting treatment, revealing that the second breast lesion had a Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test performed that was positive. Given this fact, therapy was changed to two cycles of neoadjuvant paclitaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab/pertuzumab, with approximately 8 weeks between the last pembrolizumab dose and the first dose of trastuzumab. Thereafter, she underwent a right breast mastectomy which showed residual invasive carcinoma with negative margins and lymph nodes. She completed 1 year of trastuzumab. Immune-related AKI is a rare, but potentially serious complication associated with an increase in mortality. Further research is needed in the development and early detection. There is promising research in the development of noninvasive biomarkers which has the added benefit of identifying patients who can be re-challenged with immunotherapy.

T cells are fundamental components in tumour immunity and cancer immunotherapies, which have made immense strides and revolutionized cancer treatment paradigm. However, recent studies delineate the predicament of T cell dysregulation in tumour microenvironment and the compromised efficacy of cancer immunotherapies. CRISPR screens enable unbiased interrogation of gene function in T cells and have revealed functional determinators, genetic regulatory networks, and intercellular interactions in T cell life cycle, thereby providing opportunities to revamp cancer immunotherapies. In this review, we briefly described the central roles of T cells in successful cancer immunotherapies, comprehensively summarised the studies of CRISPR screens in T cells, elaborated resultant master genes that control T cell activation, proliferation, fate determination, effector function, and exhaustion, and highlighted genes (BATF, PRDM1, and TOX) and signalling cascades (JAK-STAT and NF-κB pathways) that extensively engage in multiple branches of T cell responses. In conclusion, this review bridged the gap between discovering element genes to a specific process of T cell activities and apprehending these genes in the global T cell life cycle, deepened the understanding of T cell biology in tumour immunity, and outlined CRISPR screens resources that might facilitate the development and implementation of cancer immunotherapies in the clinic.

Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have become integral elements within the current landscape of breast cancer treatment modalities; however, they are associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD), which is rare but potentially fatal. Notably, only a few studies have compared the difference in ILD incidence between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the discrepancies regarding ILD risk between the two immune checkpoint inhibitors. We also reported three cases of ILD after PD-1 inhibitor treatment.

We comprehensively searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify clinical trials that investigated PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment for patients with breast cancer. Pooled overall estimates of incidence and risk ratio (RR) were calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and a mirror group analysis was performed using eligible studies.

This meta-analysis included 29 studies with 4639 patients who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment. A higher ILD incidence was observed among 2508 patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors than among 2131 patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors (0.05 vs. 0.02). The mirror group analysis further revealed a higher ILD event risk in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors than in those treated with PD-L1 inhibitors (RR = 2.34, 95% CI, 1.13-4.82, P = 0.02).

Our findings suggest a greater risk of ILD with PD-1 inhibitors than with PD-L1 inhibitors. These findings are instrumental for clinicians in treatment deliberations, and the adoption of more structured diagnostic approaches and management protocols is necessary to mitigate the risk of ILD.

Impressive advances have been seen in cancer immunotherapy during the last years. Although breast cancer (BC) has been long considered as non-immunogenic, immunotherapy for the treatment of BC is now emerging as a new promising therapeutic approach with considerable potential. This is supported by a plethora of completed and ongoing preclinical and clinical studies in various types of immunotherapies. However, a significant gap between clinical oncology and basic cancer research impairs the understanding of cancer immunology and immunotherapy, hampering cancer therapy research and development. To exploit the accumulating available data in an optimal way, both fundamental mechanisms at play in BC immunotherapy and its clinical pitfalls must be integrated. Then, clinical trials must be critically designed with appropriate combinations of conventional and immunotherapeutic strategies. While there is room for major improvement, this updated review details the immunotherapeutic tools available to date, from bench to bedside, in the hope that this will lead to rethinking and optimizing standards of care for BC patients.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy has transformed the treatment paradigm for early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer, providing personalized and effective interventions. This comprehensive review delves into the current state of HER2-targeted therapies, emphasizing pivotal clinical trials that have demonstrated their substantial impact on long-term outcomes. Combination therapies that integrate HER2-targeted agents with chemotherapy exhibit enhanced tumor responses, particularly in neoadjuvant settings. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is explored for its role in tumor downsizing, facilitating breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and incorporating oncoplastic solutions to address both oncologic efficacy and aesthetic outcomes. Innovative axillary management post-NACT, such as targeted axillary dissection (TAD), is discussed for minimizing morbidity. The review further explores the delicate balance between maximal therapy and de-escalation, reflecting recent trends in treatment approaches. The therapeutic landscape of HER2-low breast cancer is examined, highlighting considerations in HER2-positive breast cancer with BReast CAncer gene (BRCA) mutations. Emerging immunotherapeutic strategies, encompassing immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, are discussed in the context of their potential integration into treatment paradigms. In conclusion, the evolving landscape of HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer treatment, characterized by targeted therapies and multidisciplinary approaches, underscores the need for ongoing research and collaborative efforts. The aim is to refine treatment strategies and enhance patient outcomes in this dynamic and rapidly evolving field.

Neoplastic meningitis (NM), also known as leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, is characterized by the infiltration of tumor cells into the meninges, and poses a significant therapeutic challenge owing to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options. Breast cancer is a common cause of NM among solid tumors, further highlighting the urgent need to explore effective therapeutic strategies. This review aims to provide insights into the evolving landscape of NM therapy in breast cancer by collating existing research, evaluating current treatments, and identifying potential emerging therapeutic options.

This review explores the clinical features, therapeutic strategies, recent advances, and challenges of managing NM in patients with breast cancer. Its management includes multimodal strategies, including systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and supportive care. This review also emphasizes targeted drug options and optimal drug concentrations, and discusses emerging therapies. Additionally, it highlights the variability in treatment outcomes and the potential of combination regimens to effectively manage NM in breast cancer.

Challenges in treating NM include debates over clinical trial end points and the management of adverse effects. Drug resistance and low response rates are significant hurdles, particularly inHER2-negative breast cancer. The development of more precise and cost-effective medications with improved selectivity is crucial. Additionally, global efforts are needed for infrastructure development and cancer control considering the diverse nature of the disease.