High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTnI) assays can quantify troponin concentrations with low limits of detection, potentially expediting and enhancing myocardial infarction diagnoses. This study investigates the real-world impact of hs-cTnI implementation on operational metrics and downstream cardiac services in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.

We conducted a retrospective study of patients who presented to 3 emergency departments for chest pain and in whom ≥1 troponin concentration was measured. We compared outcomes from January 2021 to March 2022 (conventional cardiac troponin I [cTnI]) against outcomes from April 2022 to March 2023 (post-hs-cTnI implementation). The primary outcome was hospital length of stay. The study included 32 076 emergency department patient-visits (17 267 with cTnI, 14 809 with hs-cTnI). Implementation of hs-cTnI was associated with shorter median total length of stay (6.6 versus 6.0 hours, P [lt]0.001), shorter emergency department length of stay (5.5 versus 5.4 hours, P=0.039), and lower admission rates (32.6% versus 38.2%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.69-0.79]; P [lt]0.0001). Hs-cTnI was also associated with lower odds of cardiology consultation (aOR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.86-0.97]; P=0.004), echocardiography (aOR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.82-0.91]; P [lt]0.001), stress tests (aOR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.67-0.81]; P [lt]0.001), and invasive coronary angiography (aOR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.70-0.83]; P [lt]0.001), but greater odds of computed tomography coronary angiography (aOR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.01-1.56]; P=0.03) and percutaneous coronary intervention (aOR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.20-1.63]; P [lt] 0.001) during the index encounter.

Implementation of the hs-cTnI assay was associated with reduced hospital admissions, shorter length of stay, and decreases in most downstream cardiac testing.

Patients hospitalized with symptoms of acute coronary syndrome remain at high risk for adverse events postdischarge, highlighting a need for modifiable therapeutic targets. The role of sedentary behavior in this risk and the potential benefits of replacing sedentary time with other activities remain unclear. This study examined the association between sedentary behavior and 1-year cardiac events/mortality among patients evaluated for acute coronary syndrome and estimated risk reductions from substituting alternative activities for sedentary time.

Patients presenting to the emergency department of a New York City hospital with acute coronary syndrome symptoms were enrolled from 2016 to 2020. Sedentary behavior, light-intensity physical activity, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, and sleep were measured via a wrist-mounted accelerometer worn for 30 days postdischarge. Cardiac events and all-cause mortality were ascertained 1 year postdischarge via participant contact, electronic health records, and the Social Security Death Index. Participants were categorized into tertiles of sedentary time, with tertile 1 representing the lowest sedentary time and tertile 3 the highest. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate associations.

Of 609 participants (mean age, 62 years; 52% male, 58% Hispanic), 8.2% experienced a cardiac event or died within 1 year. Mean sedentary time was 13.6 h/d (SD, 1.8). Sedentary time was associated with increased risk of cardiac events/mortality (tertile 2: hazard ratio [HR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.37-2.40]; tertile 3: HR, 2.58 [95% CI, 1.11-6.03]; Ptrend=0.011). In isotemporal substitution analyses, replacing 30 minutes of sedentary time (referent) with sleep (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.78-0.95]), light-intensity physical activity (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.32-0.75]), or moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (HR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.16-0.96]) was associated with lower cardiac event/mortality risk.

Sedentary behavior was associated with increased risk of 1-year cardiac events/mortality among patients evaluated for acute coronary syndrome. Replacing sedentary behavior with sleep, light-intensity physical activity, or moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was associated with lower risk. These findings highlight reducing sedentary behavior as a potential strategy to improve posthospitalization outcomes.

Contemporary evaluation of chest pain (CP) utilizes a high-sensitivity troponin (hsTn) accelerated diagnostic protocol (ADP). Whether the addition of a bioclinical risk score such as the HEART score improves performance of a hsTn ADP is not clear.

To determine the effect of an automated best practice alert (BPA) that guided capture of the HEART score on emergency department (ED) discharge decision-making and outcomes when added to a hsTn ADP.

Retrospective cohort study of patients evaluated for CP in a 6 month period before and 10-month period following launch of a HEART score BPA in May 2022. Discharge percentages and 30-day major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates were determined for the pre- vs. post-BPA cohort and stratified by both peak hsTnT value and HEART score.

Compared to the pre-BPA cohort (n = 4438), post-BPA (n = 6794) with a completed HEART score had a higher rate of ED discharge (5.5% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.001). Patients with low (≤3) risk HEART scores had significantly lower (1.6% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.001) and patients with high-risk scores had significantly higher (1.6% vs. 6.6%, p < 0.001) rates of 30-day MACE vs. pre-BPA. The relationship of HEART score to MACE had the most discriminatory power in patients with peak hsTnT 12/51 ng/dL (3.9% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.028).

The addition of a HEART score BPA to a hsTnT ADP was associated with a higher rate of discharge and improved risk stratification of 30-day MACE among patients for whom a discharge disposition was made, particularly among patients with moderate elevations (12-51 ng/dL) of hsTnT.

To compare the effectiveness of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) point-of-care testing to central laboratory hs-cTn measurements when investigating patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with symptoms of acute coronary syndrome.

The WESTCOR point-of-care study was a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial where we randomized patients presenting with possible acute coronary syndrome in a 1:1 fashion to receive either 0/1-hour centralized hs-cTnT measurements (control) or 0/1-hour point-of-care hs-cTnI testing (intervention). We defined length of stay (LOS) in the ED as the primary endpoint and the minimum clinically meaningful difference as 15 minutes.

We included 1,494 patients in the final analysis, 728 in the point-of-care group, and 766 in the control group. The median (interquartile range) age was 61 (22) years, and 635 (42.5%) were women. Median LOS in the ED was 174 (95% confidence interval [CI] 167 to 181) and 180 (95% CI 175 to 189) minutes in the point-of-care and control group, respectively, resulting in a reduction in median LOS of 6 minutes (95% CI -4 to 17). Acute myocardial infarction, death, or acute revascularization occurred in 83/728 (11.4%) of point-of-care and 72/766 (9.4%) of control patients.

We found that implementing point-of-care hs-cTnI testing in the ED with a 0/1-hour diagnostic algorithm did not lead to a clinically meaningful reduction in ED LOS. We observed no difference in the incidence of myocardial infarction, acute coronary revascularization, or death during 30 days follow-up.

To determine whether coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can improve the diagnostic work-up of patients with acute chest pain and inconclusively high-sensitivity troponins (hs-troponin).

We conducted a prospective, blinded, observational, multicentre study. Patients aged 30-80 years presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain and inconclusively elevated hs-troponins were included and underwent CCTA. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of ≥ 50% stenosis on CCTA to identify patients with type-1 non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).

A total of 106 patients (mean age 65 ± 10, 29% women) were enrolled of whom 20 patients (19%) had an adjudicated diagnosis of type-1 NSTE-ACS. In 45 patients, CCTA revealed non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) or no CAD. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value and area-under-the-curve (AUC) of ≥ 50% stenosis on CCTA to identify patients with type 1 NSTE-ACS, was 95% (95% confidence interval: 74-100), 56% (45-68), 98% (87-100), 35% (29-41) and 0.83 (0.73-0.94), respectively. When only coronary segments with a diameter ≥ 2 mm were considered for the adjudication of type 1 NSTE-ACS, the sensitivity and NPV increased to 100%. In 8 patients, CCTA enabled the detection of clinically relevant non-coronary findings.

The absence of ≥ 50% coronary artery stenosis on CCTA can be used to rule out type 1 NSTE-ACS in acute chest pain patients with inconclusively elevated hs-troponins. Additionally, CCTA can help improve the diagnostic work-up by detecting other relevant conditions that cause acute chest pain and inconclusively elevated hs-troponins.

Coronary CTA (CCTA) can safely rule out type 1 non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) in patients presenting to the ED with acute chest pain and inconclusively elevated hs-troponins, while also detecting other relevant non-coronary conditions.

Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03129659). Registered on 26 April 2017 KEY POINTS: Acute chest discomfort is a common presenting complaint in the emergency department. CCTA achieved very high negative predictive values for type 1 NSTE-ACS in this population. CCTA can serve as an adjunct for evaluating equivocal ACS and evaluates for other pathology.

About 5% of annual access to emergency departments (EDs) and up to 25-30% of hospital admissions involve patients with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The process of evaluating and treating these patients is highly challenging for clinicians because failing to correctly identify an ACS can result in fatal or life-threatening consequences. However, about 50-60% of these patients who are admitted to the hospital because of chest pain are found to have no ACS. Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) has emerged as a proposed new frontline test for managing acute chest pain in the ED, particularly for patients with low-to-intermediate risk. This narrative review explores the potential of adopting an early CCTA-based approach in the ED, its significance in the era of high-sensitivity troponins, its application to high-risk patients and its prognostic value concerning atherosclerotic burden and high-risk plaque features. Additionally, we address clinical and technical issues related to CCTA use for triaging acute chest pain in the ED, as well as the role of functional testing. Finally, we aim to provide insight into future perspectives for the clinical application of CCTA in the ED.

Chest pain is a common condition in the emergency department (ED). High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays are crucial for diagnosing acute coronary syndrome, but the implications of "negative but measurable" hs-cTn levels are not well understood. This study assesses the outcomes of patients with acute chest pain discharged from the ED based on their hs-cTn levels.

This retrospective cohort study analyzed medical records of patients aged 18 and older presenting with chest pain to the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center ED from 2017 to 2022. We compared patients with negative but measurable hs-cTn levels (3-50 ng/L) to those with very low hs-cTn levels (< 3 ng/L). Primary outcomes included 90- days coronary angiogram (CAG), and secondary outcomes were 7- days ED revisits, 14-days hospital admissions, and 30- days mortality.

Of 32,162 eligible patients, 23,297 had hs-cTn levels ≤ 50 ng/L. Patients with negative but measurable hs-cTn levels had higher rates of 90-days CAG (1.8% vs. 0.5%, p < 0.001), 7-day ED revisits (5.2% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.001), 14-day hospital admissions (3.1% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.001), and 30-day mortality (0.3% vs. 0.01%, p < 0.001) compared to those with very low hs-cTn levels. Independent predictors for 90 days CAG included age ≥ 57 years, male sex, and hs-cTn ≥ 3.5 ng/L.

Negative but measurable hs-cTn levels are linked to worse outcomes than very low hs-cTn levels in discharged ED patients. Closer follow-up and further cardiac evaluation may be warranted for these patients.

Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinics (RACPC) are widely used for the outpatient assessment of chest pain, but there appears to be limited high-quality evidence justifying this model of care. This study aimed to review the literature to determine the effectiveness of RACPCs.

A systematic review of studies evaluating the effectiveness of RACPCs was conducted to assess the quality of the evidence supporting this model. Outcomes related to effectiveness included major adverse cardiovascular events, emergency department reattendance, cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction. Study quality was assessed using the RoB 2 tool, Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment tool or the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies checklist, as appropriate.

Thirty-two studies were eligible for inclusion, including one randomised trial. Five analytical cohort studies were included, with three comparing outcomes against non-RACPC controls. Three qualitative studies were included. Most reports were descriptive. Findings were consistent with RACPCs being associated with favourable clinical outcomes, reduced emergency department reattendance, cost-effectiveness and high patient satisfaction. However, there was significant heterogeneity in care models, and overall literature quality was low, with a high risk of publication bias.

While the literature suggests RACPCs are safe and efficient, the quality of the available evidence is limited. Further high-quality data from adequately controlled clinical trials or large scare registries are needed to inform healthcare resource allocation decisions.

CRD42023417110.

European guidelines recommend the use of a 0h/1h hs-cTn (high-sensitivity cardiac troponin) protocol in patients with acute chest pain. We aimed to determine the performance of this protocol in routine care when supplemented with patient history and ECG and a recommendation to refrain from noninvasive testing in low-risk patients.

This was a pre- and postimplementation study with concurrent controls. Patients with chest pain were enrolled at 5 Swedish emergency departments (EDs) during a 10-month period in both 2017 and 2018. All hospitals used a 0h/3h hs-cTnT protocol in 2017 and 3 EDs implemented a 0h/1h hs-cTnT protocol during 10 months in 2018. The 2 coprimary outcomes were the incidence of acute myocardial infarction and all-cause death within 30 days and ED length of stay. The study included 26 040 consecutive patients. In the intervention hospitals, 21 (0.40%) of the discharged patients had an acute myocardial infarction/death event during the control period (0h/3h testing) and 22 (0.45%) in the intervention period (0h/1h testing), which met the criteria for noninferiority. There was no significant difference in ED length of stay (ratio 0.99, P=0.48) or ED discharge rate between the periods in the intervention versus the control hospitals. A total of 3142 patients met low-risk 0h/1h hs-cTnT criteria and were discharged, of whom 2 had an acute myocardial infarction/death event.

A 0h/1h hs-cTnT protocol incorporating patient history and ECG was as safe as using a 0h/3h protocol but did not reduce ED length of stay or increase the discharge rate. Refraining from noninvasive testing in patients identified as low risk was safe.

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03421873.

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of adoption of a new cardiac chest pain pathway that included hs-cTnI in the emergency department (ED) when evaluating chest pain patients.

A new pathway incorporating both hs-cTnI testing (Seimens Healthineers Atellica) and risk stratification tools was developed. The impact of the new algorithm was assessed through a retrospective observational review of patients admitted to the ED with chest pain before implementation and after implementation. Before implementation, the conventional Seimens troponin Vista assay was utilized without a defined algorithmic approach. Bivariate analyses were performed comparing the time periods to determine differences in patient discharge dispositions, length of stay, outcomes, and rate of diagnostic cardiac catheterization.

The proportion of patients discharged from the ED increased while the proportion of patients placed in observation or admitted as in-patient decreased. Variation amongst providers regarding patient disposition decreased. The stress testing rate of patients placed in observation decreased over baseline. There was no change in 30-day MACE rate, but there was a decrease in 30-day MI rate.

The new standardized hs-cTnI algorithm approach is safe as demonstrated by no change in 30-day MACE and is also more appropriate and efficient for patients presenting to the ED with chest pain compared to the non-standardized approach with cTnI used previously.

Our investigation aimed to determine how the diverse backgrounds and medical specialties of emergency physicians (Eps) influence the accuracy of diagnoses and the subsequent treatment pathways for patients presenting preclinically with MI symptoms. By scrutinizing the relationships between EPs' specialties and their approaches to patient care, we aimed to unveil potential variances in diagnostic accuracy and treatment choices.

In this retrospective, monocenter cohort study, we leveraged machine learning techniques to analyze a comprehensive dataset of 2328 patients with suspected MI, encompassing preclinical diagnoses, electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretations, and subsequent treatment strategies by attending EPs.

We demonstrated that diagnosis and treatment patterns of different specialties were distinct enough, that machine learning (ML) was able to differentiate between specialties (maximum area under the receiver operating characteristic = 0.80 for general medicine and 0.80 for surgery). In our study, internist demonstrated the highest accuracy for preclinical identification of STEMI (0.96) whereas surgeons showed the highest accuracy for identifying NSTEMI. Our findings highlight significant correlations between EP specialties and the accuracy of both preclinical diagnoses and subsequent treatment pathways for patients with suspected MI.

Our results offer valuable insights into how the diverse backgrounds and specialties of EPs can influence the optimization of patient care in emergency settings. Understanding these patterns can help in the development of tailored training programs and protocols to enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy in emergency cardiac care, ultimately optimizing patient treatment and improving outcomes.

We evaluated the ability of the assessment of regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) detected via transthoracic echocardiography to predict the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department.

Prospective single-centre observational study.

Tertiary care university hospital emergency unit.

Patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain suggestive of obstructive CAD.

The primary endpoint was defined as the presence of obstructive CAD, requiring revascularisation therapy.

Overall, 657 patients (age 58.1±18.0 years, 53% men) were included in our study. RWMA were detected in 76 patients (11.6%). RWMA were significantly more frequent in patients reaching the primary endpoint (26.2% vs 7.6%, p<0.001). In multivariable regression analysis, the presence of RWMA was associated with threefold increased odds of the presence of obstructive CAD (3.41 (95% CI 1.99 to 5.86), p<0.001). Adding RWMA to a multivariable model of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score, cardiac biomarkers and traditional risk factors significantly improved the area under the curve for prediction of obstructive CAD (95% CI 0.777 to 0.804, p=0.0092).

RWMA strongly and independently predicts the presence of obstructive CAD in patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department.

The study has been registered online (NCT03787797).

Guidelines recommend high-sensitivity cardiac troponin to risk stratify patients with possible myocardial infarction and identify those eligible for discharge. Our aim was to evaluate adoption of this approach in practice and to determine whether effectiveness and safety varies by age, sex, ethnicity, or socioeconomic deprivation status.

A multi-centre cohort study was conducted in 13 hospitals across the United Kingdom from November 1st, 2021, to October 31st, 2022. Routinely collected data including high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I or T measurements were linked to outcomes. The primary effectiveness and safety outcomes were the proportion discharged from the Emergency Department, and the proportion dead or with a subsequent myocardial infarction at 30 days, respectively. Patients were stratified using peak troponin concentration as low (<5 ng/L), intermediate (5 ng/L to sex-specific 99th percentile), or high-risk (>sex-specific 99th percentile).

In total 137,881 patients (49% [67,709/137,881] female) were included of whom 60,707 (44%), 42,727 (31%), and 34,447 (25%) were stratified as low-, intermediate- and high-risk, respectively. Overall, 65.8% (39,918/60,707) of low-risk patients were discharged from the Emergency Department, but this varied from 26.8% [2200/8216] to 93.5% [918/982] by site. The safety outcome occurred in 0.5% (277/60,707) and 11.4% (3917/34,447) of patients classified as low- or high-risk, of whom 0.03% (18/60,707) and 1% (304/34,447) had a subsequent myocardial infarction at 30 days, respectively. A similar proportion of male and female patients were discharged (52% [36,838/70,759] versus 54% [36,113/67,109]), but discharge was more likely if patients were <70 years old (61% [58,533/95,227] versus 34% [14,428/42,654]), from areas of low socioeconomic deprivation (48% [6697/14,087] versus 43% [12,090/28,116]) or were black or asian compared to caucasian (62% [5458/8877] and 55% [10,026/18,231] versus 46% [35,138/75,820]).

Despite high-sensitivity cardiac troponin correctly identifying half of all patients with possible myocardial infarction as being at low risk, only two-thirds of these patients were discharged. Substantial variation in the discharge of patients by age, ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation, and site was observed identifying important opportunities to improve care.

UK Research and Innovation.

This study strove to assess the impact of the implementation of an accelerated diagnostic protocol (ADP), using shortened serial-testing intervals and a conventional troponin I (c-TnI) test, on emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS).

This retrospective cohort study included adults (aged ≥ 18 years) presenting to a Canadian ED with a primary complaint of cardiac chest pain between January 14, 2017 and January 15, 2019. For non-high-risk patients, the troponin delta timing decreased from 6 hours to 3 hours, and a different conventional troponin I level cut-point was implemented on January 15, 2018. The primary outcome was ED LOS. Secondary outcomes included disposition status, consultation proportions, and major adverse cardiac events within 30 days.

A total of 3133 patient interactions were included. Although the overall decrease in median ED LOS was not significant (P = 0.074), a significant reduction occurred in ED LOS (-33 minutes; 95% confidence interval: -53.6 to -12.4 minutes) among patients who were discharged in the post-ADP group. Consultations were unchanged between groups (36.1% before vs 33.8% after; P = 0.17). The major adverse cardiac events outcomes were unchanged across cohorts (15.9% vs 15.3%; P = 0.62).

The implementation of an ADP, with a conventional troponin I test, for cardiac chest pain in a Canadian ED was not associated with a significant reduction of LOS for all patients; however, a significant reduction occurred for patients who were discharged, and the strategy appears safe.

In acute chest pain management, risk stratification tools, including medical history, are recommended. We compared the fraction of patients with sufficient clinical data obtained using computerized history taking software (CHT) versus physician-acquired medical history to calculate established risk scores and assessed the patient-by-patient agreement between these 2 ways of obtaining medical history information.

This was a prospective cohort study of clinically stable patients aged ≥ 18 years presenting to the emergency department (ED) at Danderyd University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden) in 2017-2019 with acute chest pain and non-diagnostic ECG and serum markers. Medical histories were self-reported using CHT on a tablet. Observations on discrete variables in the risk scores were extracted from electronic health records (EHR) and the CHT database. The patient-by-patient agreement was described by Cohen's kappa statistics.

Of the total 1000 patients included (mean age 55.3 ± 17.4 years; 54% women), HEART score, EDACS, and T-MACS could be calculated in 75%, 74%, and 83% by CHT and in 31%, 7%, and 25% by EHR, respectively. The agreement between CHT and EHR was slight to moderate (kappa 0.19-0.70) for chest pain characteristics and moderate to almost perfect (kappa 0.55-0.91) for risk factors.

CHT can acquire and document data for chest pain risk stratification in most ED patients using established risk scores, achieving this goal for a substantially larger number of patients, as compared to EHR data. The agreement between CHT and physician-acquired history taking is high for traditional risk factors and lower for chest pain characteristics.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03439449.

Preclinical management of patients with acute chest pain and their identification as candidates for urgent coronary revascularization without the use of high sensitivity troponin essays remains a critical challenge in emergency medicine. We enrolled 2760 patients (average age 70 years, 58.6% male) with chest pain and suspected ACS, who were admitted to the Emergency Department of the University Hospital Tübingen, Germany, between August 2016 and October 2020. Using 26 features, eight Machine learning models (non-deep learning models) were trained with data from the preclinical rescue protocol and compared to the "TropOut" score (a modified version of the "preHEART" score which consists of history, ECG, age and cardiac risk but without troponin analysis) to predict major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and acute coronary artery occlusion (ACAO). In our study population MACE occurred in 823 (29.8%) patients and ACAO occurred in 480 patients (17.4%). Interestingly, we found that all machine learning models outperformed the "TropOut" score. The VC and the LR models showed the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) for predicting MACE (AUROC = 0.78) and the VC showed the highest AUROC for predicting ACAO (AUROC = 0.81). A SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analyses based on the XGB model showed that presence of ST-elevations in the electrocardiogram (ECG) were the most important features to predict both endpoints.

Cardiac pathology contributes to a significant proportion of emergency department (ED) attendances. Many could be managed as urgent outpatients and avoid hospital admission. We evaluated a novel rapidaccess general cardiology clinic to achieve this, implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. We performed a retrospective review of baseline characteristics, investigations, final diagnoses, and 90-day safety (readmission, major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE], mortality) from electronic records and conducted a patient experience survey. There were 216 ED referrals made between 1 June and 30 October 2020. The median time to review was two days (interquartile range 1-5). At 90 days, there were three (1.4%) representations requiring admission, two (0.9%) MACE, and no deaths. There were 205 (95%) successfully managed without hospital admission. Among surveyed patients, 96% felt they had concerns adequately addressed in a timely manner. In conclusion, our rapid-access cardiology clinic is a safe model for outpatient management of a range of cardiovascular presentations to the ED.

Introduction Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is a critical condition characterized by reduced blood flow to the heart and includes various conditions such as ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, and unstable angina. Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate age-related patterns of symptoms and risk factors in ACS patients and to evaluate how diagnostic test results differ among various age groups of ACS patients. Methodology This retrospective study was conducted from May to November of 2023 on patients with acute coronary syndrome admitted to the cardiology ward of Rehman Medical Institute (RMI), Peshawar. The sample size was 137 ACS-diagnosed patients based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. After getting ethical approval from the institutional ethical approval board, data were collected for the entire year of 2022 based on proforma with the variables demographic data, troponin I level, presented symptoms, and associated co-morbidities of the patients. The inclusion criteria were patients of all genders, patients diagnosed with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), and patients whose records were available in the cardiology department of Rehman Medical Institute.  Results The results show that ACS is more prevalent in the age group of 50-69 years (p=0.037) and is significantly more common in males (p=0.019). Chest pain emerged as the predominant symptom, with a significant association of p=0.029 between chest pain and patients of ACS in the age group 30-49 years. While raised troponin I levels were prevalent across all age groups. Moreover, specific risk factors such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and family history of CAD showed the significance of p= 0.04, p=0.006, and p=0.021, respectively, with the age group 50-69 years old. Conclusion This study highlights the importance of considering age and gender in ACS management and provides insights into age-related patterns of symptoms and risk factors, which can contribute to optimizing preventive strategies and improving patient care. Further research is needed to explore the underlying mechanisms and assess long-term outcomes in different age groups.

The HEART score successfully risk stratifies emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain in high-income settings. However, this tool has not been validated in low-income countries.

This is a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study that was conducted in a Tanzanian ED from January 2019 through January 2023. Adult patients with chest pain were consecutively enrolled, and their presenting symptoms and medical history were recorded. Electrocardiograms and point-of-care troponin assays were obtained for all participants. Thirty-day follow-up was conducted, assessing for major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention). HEART scores were calculated for all participants. Likelihood ratios, sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values (NPVs) were calculated for each HEART cutoff score to predict 30-day MACEs, and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated from the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Of 927 participants with chest pain, the median (IQR) age was 61 (45.5-74.0) years. Of participants, 216 (23.3%) patients experienced 30-day MACEs, including 163 (17.6%) who died, 48 (5.2%) with myocardial infarction, and 23 (2.5%) with coronary revascularization. The positive likelihood ratio for each cutoff score ranged from 1.023 (95% CI 1.004-1.042; cutoff ≥ 1) to 3.556 (95% CI 1.929-6.555; cutoff ≥ 7). The recommended cutoff of ≥4 to identify patients at high risk of MACEs yielded a sensitivity of 59.4%, specificity of 52.8%, and NPV of 74.7%. The AUC was 0.61.

Among patients with chest pain in a Tanzanian ED, the HEART score did not perform as well as in high-income settings. Locally validated risk stratification tools are needed for ED patients with chest pain in low-income countries.

Protocols to evaluate for myocardial infarction (MI) using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) have the potential to drive costs upward due to the added sensitivity. We performed an economic evaluation of an accelerated protocol (AP) to evaluate for MI using hs-cTn to identify changes in costs of treatment and length of stay compared with conventional testing.

We performed a planned secondary economic analysis of a large, cluster randomized trial across nine emergency departments (EDs) from July 2020 to April 2021. Patients were included if they were 18 years or older with clinical suspicion for MI. In the AP, patients could be discharged without further testing at 0 h if they had a hs-cTnI < 4 ng/L and at 1 h if the initial value were 4 ng/L and the 1-h value ≤7 ng/L. Patients in the standard of care (SC) protocol used conventional cTn testing at 0 and 3 h. The primary outcome was the total cost of treatment, and the secondary outcome was ED length of stay.

Among 32,450 included patients, an AP had no significant differences in cost (+$89, CI: -$714, $893 hospital cost, +$362, CI: -$414, $1138 health system cost) or ED length of stay (+46, CI: -28, 120 min) compared with the SC protocol. In lower acuity, free-standing EDs, patients under the AP experienced shorter length of stay (-37 min, CI: -62, 12 min) and reduced health system cost (-$112, CI: -$250, $25).

Overall, the implementation of AP using hs-cTn does not result in higher costs.

Acute chest pain is a common presentation in emergency departments worldwide. Differentiating between cardiac and non-cardiac chest pain is crucial for patient management and resource allocation.

This study analyzed 714 patients presenting with acute chest pain in a tertiary care hospital in North India. We investigated demographic characteristics, chief complaints, risk factors, ECG findings, and final diagnoses to identify patterns associated with cardiac (CCP) and non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP).

CCP was diagnosed in 53.7% (n=383) and NCCP in 46.3% (n=331). Significant predictors of CCP included age (OR=1.05, p<0.001), smoking (OR=2.22, p<0.001), diabetes (OR=1.57, p=0.003), hypertension (OR=1.82, p<0.001), and family history of ischemic heart disease (IHD) (OR=1.42, p=0.01). Central chest pain was more common in CCP (60% vs. 40%, p<0.001), as were abnormal ECG findings such as ST-segment depression (35% vs. 10%, p<0.001) and elevation (29% vs. 6%, p<0.001). Normal ECG was more prevalent in NCCP (60%, p<0.001).

Traditional cardiovascular risk factors remain strongly associated with CCP. Smoking has a particularly high odds ratio, suggesting the need for targeted interventions. ECG findings significantly aid in differentiating CCP from NCCP. This study underscores the importance of a comprehensive approach in evaluating acute chest pain to ensure accurate diagnosis and effective treatment.

Kuanxiong Aerosol (KXA)(CardioVent®), consisting of Asarum sieboldii Miq. oil, Santalum album L. oil, Alpinia officinarum Hance oil, Piper longum L. oil and borneol, seems to relieve the symptoms of chest pain and serve as a supplementary treatment for prehospital chest pain in emergency department.

This randomized controlled trial aimed to determine the clinical effect and safety of KXA for patients with prehospital chest pain.

A total of 200 patients were recruited from Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine and randomly divided into KXA group (n = 100) and Nitroglycerin Aerosol (NA) group (n = 100) by SAS 9.2 software. All patients were treated with standardized Western medicine according to the pre-hospital procedure. The experimental group and NA group was additionally treated with KXA and NA respectively. The primary outcome was the relieving time of prehospital chest pain (presented as relief rate) after first-time treatment. The secondary outcomes included the evaluation of chest pain (NRS scores, degree of chest pain, frequency of chest pain after first-time treatment), efficacy in follow-up time (the frequency of average aerosol use, emergency department visits, 120 calls, medical observations and hospitalization at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks), alleviation of chest pain (Seattle angina questionnaire, chest pain occurrence, and degree of chest pain at 12-weeks treatment) and the change of TCM symptoms before and after 12-weeks treatment. In addition, the safety of KXA was also assessed by the occurrence of adverse events. The database was created using Epidata software, and statistical analysis was conducted by SPSS 23.0 software.

A total of 194 participants finally completed the trial, the results showed that after first-time treatment, KXA had a higher relief rate (72.2%) of chest pain within 30 min than that of NA group (59.4%, p = 0.038), KXA group had a lower degree of chest pain (p = 0.005), lower NRS score (p = 0.011) and higher reduction of NRS score (p = 0.005) than the NA. In the follow-up period, KXA group decreased the frequency of 120 call better than that of NA group at 4 weeks (p = 0.040), but KXA had a similar efficacy as NA in the improvement on the of frequency of chest pain, aerosol use, emergency department visits, 120 call, medical observation and hospitalization at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks (p>0.05). There also had no difference between the two groups on the occurrence of chest pain, degree of chest pain, physical limitation, angina stability, treatment satisfaction, and disease perception between the two groups at 12 weeks (p>0.05). In addition, KXA and NA both improved the patient's chest pain, but not the TCM symptoms. In terms of safety, KXA showed similar safety as NA in this study.

KXA relieved prehospital chest pain faster than NA and had a better remission effect on the prehospital chest pain than that of the NA group in short-period. In long-period, KXA showed similar efficacy on the improvement of prehospital chest pain as NA. KXA may be a safe and reliable therapy for prehospital chest pain.

Patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) contribute to a high workload and overcrowding in the Emergency Department (ED). Accelerated diagnostic protocols for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction have proved challenging to implement. One obstacle is the turnaround time for analyzing high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn). In the WESTCOR-POC study (Clinical Trials number NCT05354804) we aim to evaluate safety and efficiency of a 0/1 h hs-cTn algorithm utilizing a hs-cTnI point of care (POC) instrument in comparison to central laboratory hs-cTnT measurements.

This is a prospective single-center randomized clinical trial aiming to include 1500 patients admitted to the ED with symptoms suggestive of ACS. Patients will receive standard investigations following the European Society of Cardiology 0/1h protocols for centralized hs-cTnT measurements or the intervention using a 0/1h POC hs-cTnI algorithm. Primary end-points are 1) Safety; death, myocardial infarction or acute revascularization within 30 days 2) Efficiency; length of stay in the ED, 3) Cost- effectiveness; total episode cost, 4) Patient satisfaction, 5) Patient symptom burden and 6) Patients quality of life. Secondary outcomes are 12-months death, myocardial infarction or acute revascularization, percentage discharged after 3 and 6 h, total length of hospital stay and all costs related to hospital contact within 12 months.

Results from this study may facilitate implementation of POC hs-cTn testing assays and accelerated diagnostic protocols in EDs, and may serve as a valuable resource for guiding future investigations for the use of POC high sensitivity troponin assays in outpatient clinics and prehospital settings.

The History, Electrocardiogram (ECG), Age, Risk factors and Troponin, (HEART) score is useful for early risk stratification in chest pain patients. The aim was to validate previous findings that a simplified score using history, ECG and troponin (HET-score) has similar ability to stratify risk.

Patients presenting with chest pain with duration of ≥10 min and an onset of last episode ≤12 h but without ST-segment elevation on ECG at 6 emergency departments were eligible for inclusion. The HEART-score and the simplified HET-score were calculated. The endpoint was a composite of myocardial infarction (MI) as index diagnosis, readmission due to new MI or death within 30 days.

HEART-score identified 32% as low risk (0-2p), 47% as intermediate risk (3-5p), and 20% as high risk (6-10p) patients. The endpoint occurred in 0.5%, 7.3% and 35.7%, respectively. HET-score identified 39%, 42% and 19% as low- (0p), intermediate- (1-2p) and high-risk (3-6p) patients, with the endpoint occurring in 0.6%, 6.2% and 43.2%, respectively. When all variables included in the HEART-score were included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis, only History (OR, CI [95%]): 2.97(2.16-4.09), ECG (1.61[1.14-2.28]) and troponin level (5.21[3.91-6.95]) were significantly associated with cardiovascular events. When HEART- and HET-score were compared in a ROC-analysis, HET-score had a significantly larger AUC (0.887 vs 0.853, p < 0.001).

Compared with HEART-score, HET-score is simpler and appears to have similar ability to discriminate between chest pain patients with and without cardiovascular event.

The present acute myocardial infarction (AMI) rule-out strategies are challenged by the late temporal release of cardiac troponin. Copeptin is a non-specific biomarker of endogenous stress and rises early in AMI, covering the early period where troponin is still normal. An accelerated dual-marker rule-out strategy combining prehospital copeptin and in-hospital high-sensitivity troponin T could reduce length of hospital stay and thus the burden on the health care systems worldwide. The AROMI trial aimed to evaluate if the accelerated dual-marker rule-out strategy could safely reduce length of stay in patients discharged after early rule-out of AMI.

Patients with suspected AMI transported to hospital by ambulance were randomized 1:1 to either accelerated rule-out using copeptin measured in a prehospital blood sample and high-sensitivity troponin T measured at arrival to hospital or to standard rule-out using a 0 h/3 h rule-out strategy. The AROMI study included 4351 patients with suspected AMI. The accelerated dual-marker rule-out strategy reduced mean length of stay by 0.9 h (95% confidence interval 0.7-1.1 h) in patients discharged after rule-out of AMI and was non-inferior regarding 30-day major adverse cardiac events when compared to standard rule-out (absolute risk difference -0.4%, 95% confidence interval -2.5 to 1.7; P-value for non-inferiority = 0.013).

Accelerated dual marker rule-out of AMI, using a combination of prehospital copeptin and first in-hospital high-sensitivity troponin T, reduces length of hospital stay without increasing the rate of 30-day major adverse cardiac events as compared to using a 0 h/3 h rule-out strategy.

Recent guidelines recommend the use of a short 0-1h high sensitive cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) algorithm in patients presenting with chest pain at the emergency department (ED). This retrospective observational study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of the new 0-1h hs-cTn I protocol in comparison with the standard 0-3h cTn I protocol for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

A total of two times 100 consecutive chest pain patients presenting at the ED in November/December 2018 (standard 0-3h cTn I group) and in November/December 2020 (short 0-1h hs-cTn I group) were enrolled. Decision making was based upon validated assay-specific cut-off values.

The new 0-1h hs-cTn I protocol had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 83.2-100) and a negative predictive value of 100% to rule out AMI. The accuracy of rule-in was slightly lower with a specificity of 92.5% (95% CI 84.4-97.2). The overall protocol accuracy was 94% (95% CI 87.4-97.8) in the short 0-1h hs-cTn I group compared to 88% (95% CI 80.0-93.6) in the standard 0-3h cTn I group (p-value 0.14). The 0-1h hs-cTn I protocol was associated with a numerically higher rate of early hospital discharge compared to the conventional 0-3h cTn I protocol (47% versus 59%; p-value 0.09) and with a shorter median length of stay for those patients (mean 316 min versus 289 min; p-value 0.09).

The abbreviated protocol based on the 0-1h hs-cTn I assays is effective and safe for the exclusion of AMI at the ED.

Overcrowding in the Emergency department (ED) necessitates a major challenge in delivering high-quality care in acute settings. This study presents a novel approach to modeling the relationship between the day of the week, ED arrivals, chest pain (CP), and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) using regression analysis. We analyzed data from 2016 to 2019 across three platforms: a nationwide representative sample (NHAMCS), a federated data network (TriNetX), and a regional medical center. For the stated three outcomes, the number of patients in that category on each day of the week was calculated; these were then calculated separately for each year, as well as across all four years. In line with prior studies, this study demonstrates the highest percentage of ED arrival on Mondays and the lowest on the weekends. Similarly, chest pain was more prevalent on Mondays, with similar patterns for TriNetX and the regional medical center. Analyzing NHAMCS data demonstrated Wednesdays as the busiest day for AMI-related ED arrivals, although this observation was not statistically significant. This knowledge will better aid us in resource allocation and system awareness, paving a path toward better patient care, improving disease management, and reducing healthcare costs.

Use of CT coronary angiography (CTCA) to evaluate chest pain has rapidly increased over the recent years. While its utility in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in stable chest pain syndromes is clear and is strongly endorsed by international guidelines, the role of CTCA in the acute setting is less certain. In the low-risk setting, CTCA has been shown to be accurate, safe and efficient but inherent low rates of adverse events in this population and the advent of high-sensitivity troponin testing have left little room for CTCA to show any short-term clinical benefit.In higher-risk populations, CTCA has potential to fulfil a gatekeeper role to invasive angiography. The high negative predictive value of CTCA is maintained while also identifying non-obstructive coronary disease and alternative diagnoses in the substantial group of patients presenting with chest pain who do not have type 1 myocardial infarction. For those with obstructive coronary disease, CTCA provides accurate assessment of stenosis severity, characterisation of high-risk plaque and findings associated with perivascular inflammation. This may allow more appropriate selection of patients to proceed to invasive management with no disadvantage in outcomes and can provide a more comprehensive risk stratification to guide both acute and long-term management than routine invasive angiography.

The majority of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome presenting to the emergency department will be discharged once myocardial infarction has been ruled out, although a proportion will have unrecognised coronary artery disease. In this setting, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin identifies those at increased risk of future cardiac events. In patients with intermediate cardiac troponin concentrations in whom myocardial infarction has been ruled out, this trial aims to investigate whether outpatient computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) reduces subsequent myocardial infarction or cardiac death.

TARGET-CTCA is a multicentre prospective randomised open label with blinded endpoint parallel group event driven trial. After myocardial infarction and clear alternative diagnoses have been ruled out, participants with intermediate cardiac troponin concentrations (5 ng/L to 99th centile upper reference limit) will be randomised 1:1 to outpatient CTCA plus standard of care or standard of care alone. The primary endpoint is myocardial infarction or cardiac death. Secondary endpoints include clinical, patient-centred, process and cost-effectiveness. Recruitment of 2270 patients will give 90% power with a two-sided P value of 0.05 to detect a 40% relative risk reduction in the primary endpoint. Follow-up will continue until 97 primary outcome events have been accrued in the standard care arm with an estimated median follow-up of 36 months.

This randomised controlled trial will determine whether high-sensitivity cardiac troponin-guided CTCA can improve outcomes and reduce subsequent major adverse cardiac events in patients presenting to the emergency department who do not have myocardial infarction.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03952351. Registered on May 16, 2019.

Since early identification of potential critical patients in the Emergency Department (ED) can lower mortality and morbidity, this study seeks to develop a machine learning model capable of predicting possible critical outcomes based on the history and vital signs routinely collected at triage. We compare emergency physicians and the predictive performance of the machine learning model. Predictors including patients' chief complaints, present illness, past medical history, vital signs, and demographic data of adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) visiting the ED at Shuang-Ho Hospital in New Taipei City, Taiwan, are extracted from the hospital's electronic health records. Critical outcomes are defined as in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) or intensive care unit (ICU) admission. A clinical narrative-aware deep neural network was developed to handle the text-intensive data and standardized numerical data, which is compared against other machine learning models. After this, emergency physicians were asked to predict possible clinical outcomes of thirty visits that were extracted randomly from our dataset, and their results were further compared to our machine learning model. A total of 4,308 (2.5 %) out of the 171,275 adult visits to the ED included in this study resulted in critical outcomes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of our proposed prediction model is 0.874 and 0.207, respectively, which not only outperforms the other machine learning models, but even has better sensitivity (0.95 vs 0.41) and accuracy (0.90 vs 0.67) as compared to the emergency physicians. This model is sensitive and accurate in predicting critical outcomes and highlights the potential to use predictive analytics to support post-triage decision-making.

Electrocardiography and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing are routinely applied as the initial step for clinical evaluation of patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Once diagnosed, patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction are commenced on antithrombotic and secondary preventative therapies before undergoing invasive coronary angiography to determine the strategy of coronary revascularisation. However, this clinical pathway is imperfect and can lead to challenges in the diagnosis, management, and clinical outcomes of these patients. Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) has increasingly been utilised in the setting of patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, where it has an important role in avoiding unnecessary invasive coronary angiography and reducing downstream non-invasive functional testing for myocardial ischaemia. CTCA is an excellent gatekeeper for the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. In addition, CTCA provides complementary information for patients with myocardial infarction in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease and highlights alternative or incidental diagnoses for those with cardiac troponin elevation. However, the routine application of CTCA has yet to demonstrate an impact on subsequent major adverse cardiovascular events. There are several ongoing studies evaluating CTCA and its associated technologies that will define and potentially expand its application in patients with suspected or diagnosed non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. We here review the current evidence relating to the clinical application of CTCA in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and highlight the areas where CTCA is likely to have an increasing important role and impact for our patients.

Many patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) concentrations between rule-in and rule-out thresholds and hence need serial testing, which is time consuming. The Prospective RandOmised Trial of Emergency Cardiac Computerised Tomography (PROTECCT) assessed the utility of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in patients with suspected ACS, non-ischaemic ECG and intermediate initial hs-cTn concentration.

Patients were randomised to CCTA-guided management versus standard of care (SOC). The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included cost of in-hospital stay and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12 months of follow-up. Data are mean (SD); for LOS harmonic means, IQRs are shown.

250 (aged 55 (14) years, 25% women) patients were randomised. Harmonic mean (IQR) LOS was 7.53 (6.0-9.6) hours in the CCTA arm and 8.14 (6.3-9.8) hours in the SOC arm (p=0.13). Inpatient cost was £1285 (£2216) and £1108 (£3573), respectively, p=0.68. LOS was shorter in the CCTA group in patients with <25% stenosis, compared with SOC; 6.6 (5.6-7.8) hours vs 7.5 (6.1-9.4) hours, respectively; p=0.021. More referrals for cardiology outpatient clinic review and cardiac CT-related outpatient referrals occurred in the SOC arm (p=0.01). 12-month MACE rates were similar between the two arms (7 (5.6%) in the CCTA arm and 8 (6.5%) in the SOC arm-log-rank p=0.78).

CCTA did not lead to reduced hospital LOS or cost, largely because these outcomes were influenced by the detection of ≥25% grade stenosis in a proportion of patients.

NCT03583320.