In high-risk patients, prostatic stents may alleviate obstruction at the prostate level. Since 2020 we have used thermo-expandable intraprostatic nitinol stents. Here we document outcomes through the first years with the procedure.

We reviewed  patients who had undergone stent treatment between May 2020 and October 2023. Patient and procedural data, urinary symptoms, complications and side effects were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize outcomes and we evaluated predictors of success and complications using robust multiple regression analyses.

We included 52 consecutive patients with a median age of 82 years (range 71-96) and a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 6 (3-11). Forty-seven men used indwelling catheters, two used clean intermittent catheterization, and three had severe lower urinary tract symptoms. Stents were placed under general anesthesia, sedation, and local anesthesia in 39, 4, and 9 men, respectively. The median treatment time was 14 min (range 8-40). One complication, in the form of an infection requiring IV antibiotics, occurred. Subsequently, 45 men (87%) were able to void spontaneously without bothersome symptoms. After a median of 11 (2-44) months, 8 men had their stents removed due to recurring symptoms. This gives an overall success rate of 37/52 patients (71%). No predictors of success or complications were identified.

Thermo-expandable intraprostatic nitinol stents demonstrate a high success rate with a low risk of complications and may serve as an alternative to permanent or intermittent catheterization for men who are unable or unwilling to undergo flow-improving surgery.

Past decade has seen a renewed interest in minimally invasive surgical techniques (MISTs) for management of enlarged prostate. This narrative review aims to explore newer MIST for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) which are not yet integrated into established societal guidelines.

We conducted a literature search across PubMed, Google Scholar, and FDA ClinicalTrials.gov databases on June 1st, 2023, to identify studies published within the past decade exploring various MISTs for BPH. Additionally, we gathered insights from abstracts presented in meetings of professional associations and corporate websites. We broadly classified these procedures into three distinct categories: energy-based, balloon dilation, and implant/stent treatments. We collected detail information about the device, procedure details, its inclusion and exclusion criteria, and outcome.

Our review reveals that newer energy-based MISTs include Transperineal Laser Ablation, Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation, and High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound. In the sphere of balloon dilation, Transurethral Columnar Balloon Dilation and the Optilume BPH Catheter System were gaining momentum. The noteworthy implants/stents that are on horizon include Butterfly Prostatic Retraction Device, Urocross Expander System, Zenflow Spring System, and ProVee Urethral Expander System.

The exploration of various MISTs reflects ongoing efforts to enhance patient care and address limitations of existing treatments. This review provides a bird-eye view and valuable insights for urologists and researchers seeking to navigate the dynamic landscape of MISTs in the quest for effective and minimally invasive solutions for enlarged prostates.

Thermo-expandable urethral stent (Memokath 028) implantation is an alternative treatment for older patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic obstruction. Following prostatic urethral stent implantation, minor complications such as urinary tract infection, irritative symptoms, gross hematuria, and urethral pain have been observed; however, there are no reports of life-threatening events. Herein, we report a critical case of Fournier's gangrene that occurred 7 years after prostatic stenting.

An 81-years-old man with benign prostatic hyperplasia (volume, 126 ccs; as measured by transrectal ultrasound) had undergone insertion of a thermo-expandable urethral stent (Memokath 028) as he was unfit for surgery under general anesthesia. However, the patient had undergone a suprapubic cystostomy for recurrent acute urinary retention 4 years after the insertion of prostatic stent (Memokath 028). We had planned to remove the Memokath 028; however, the patient was lost to follow-up. The patient presented to the emergency department 3 years after the suprapubic cystostomy with necrotic changes from the right scrotum to the right inguinal area. In digital rectal examination, tenderness and heat of prostate was identified. Also, the black skin color change with foul-smelling from right scrotum to right inguinal area was identified. In computed tomography finding, subcutaneous emphysema was identified to same area. He was diagnosed with Fournier's gangrene based on the physical examination and computed tomography findings. In emergency room, Fournier's gangrene severity index value is seven points. Therefore, he underwent emergent extended surgical debridement and removal of the Memokath 028. Broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics were administered and additional necrotic tissue debridement was performed. However, the patient died 14 days after surgery due to multiorgan failure.

If Memokath 028 for benign prostatic hyperplasia is not working in older patients, its rapid removal may help prevent severe complications.

The Butterfly Prostatic Retraction device is a novel transurethral implant designed to dilate the prostatic urethra and treat lower urinary tract symptoms. We assessed its safety, efficacy and impact on urinary flow, ejaculation, and quality of life.

We included 64 men, treated for benign prostate hyperplasia for at least 1 year. All patients had Qmax≤ 13 mL/s and IPSS >12. Insertion of the device was performed via cystoscopy. Follow-up visits were performed at 2 weeks, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and included uroflowmetry, IPSS, QoL, and sexual function questionnaires. Cystoscopy was performed on 3 and 12 months.

Patients age was 50-83 years. 28 patients completed a 1-year follow-up with an intact device. Mean Qmax improved by 2 mL/s (25%), IPSS median drop was 10 points (40%), and QoL score was 1.5 points (38%). Sexually active patients reported antegrade ejaculation. On cystoscopy, gradual coverage of the devices with urethral mucosa was observed. In 1 patient, the device was repositioned. In 19 patients, the device was removed. 12 patients returned to alpha-blocker therapy and 7 patients underwent TURP. One patient developed a bulbar urethral stricture.

We demonstrated feasibility and good tolerability of the Butterfly device.

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is considered the 'gold standard' for the surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). However, during recent years TURP has been challenged by several minimally invasive therapies (MITs). The reasons for the development of these MITs are the need for anesthesia and the rather unchanged morbidity of TURP, including ejaculation disorders. Mechanical MITs may represent an attractive option for treating LUTS/BPO by using mechanical forces to maintain urethral patency without cutting, ablating, heating or removing prostatic tissue. The present paper provides an update on currently available mechanical devices for the treatment of LUTS/BPO including the prostatic urethral lift (PUL), the temporary implantable nitinol device, and new intraprostatic implants. It analyzes the evidence for their safety, tolerability, and efficacy in clinical practice and aims to define those subpopulations of patients who will benefit from these MITs. It is obvious that there is a wide variation in the degree of mature of the available mechanical MITs. Time and high-quality long-term studies will decide which of these therapies will be accepted by patients and urologists. At the moment, PUL is claiming its position in the armamentarium of BPO treatment.

The minimally invasive procedures (mips) for the treatment of symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (bph) are presented as attractive techniques due to their ease of accomplishment and the possibility of outpatient treatment. This guideline aims to present recommendations that may assist in decision making in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and indication of the different minimally invasive therapies. For this, a systematic review of the literature was performed, with the descriptors according to the pico: patient with benign prostatic hyperplasia, minimally invasive therapy, clinical outcome and adverse events. With no time restriction, in medline, cochrane central and lilacs databases via vhl, 1,007 papers were retrieved, of which 16 were selected to respond to clinical doubt. Details of the methodology and results of this guideline are set out in annex I.

To report our outcomes with the use of a thermo-expandable metallic intraprostatic stent (Memokath) for patients with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) secondary to prostatic obstruction, and to assess it is a feasible option for many frail and elderly men unsuitable for surgery.

We reviewed patients who underwent insertion of a Memokath stent for BOO over 17 years (January 1999 to December 2015) at one regional center over a long follow-up period (median, 7 years). Patients were selected if they had obstructive urinary symptoms or urinary retention with an indwelling catheter in situ, and were ineligible for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) under general or spinal anesthesia. Primary outcomes assessed were the improvement in urinary symptoms and voiding parameters, as well as the ability to void spontaneously if catheterized, along with complications.

One hundred forty-four patients who presented with BOO or urinary retention had a Memokath stent inserted. Ninety patients (62.5%) had a successful stent insertion with a significant difference between the median preoperative (550 mL) and postoperative residual volume (80 mL, p<0.0001). Nearly two-thirds of men (64%) returned to unassisted voiding with no increased risk of complications over time. Fifty-four patients (37.5%) experienced stent failure. Main complications requiring stent removal or repositioning were migration, occlusion, refractory urinary retention and irritative voiding symptoms.

In elderly and frail men with BOO deemed unsuitable to undergo TURP, prostatic stent is a safe and practical alternative to long-term catheterization.

The number of patients with prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia is on the rise. As a result, the volume of prostate treatment and treatment-related complications is also increasing. Urethral strictures and stenoses are relatively common complications that require individualized management based on the length and location of the obstruction, and the patient's overall health, and goals of care. In general, less invasive options such as dilation and urethrotomy are preferred as first-line therapy, followed by more invasive substitution, flap, and anastomotic urethroplasty.

Several prostatic stents were developed in the last three decades, none of which were able to provide a real alternative in patients unfit or unwilling to undergo classical prostatic surgeries. In this study, we report the results of the use of a newly developed prostatic stent--the Allium™ Triangular Prostatic Stent (TPS).

The Allium TPS is a highly flexible, nitinol-built polymer-covered stent, which prevents tissue ingrowth and reduces encrustations. Between 2008 and 2014, at two centers (Israel and Turkey), the stent was inserted under local or regional anesthesia in 51 patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) who are unwilling or unfit for surgery. Patients were followed for 12 months from surgery. The primary outcome was symptom improvement as measured by the international prostate symptom score (IPSS) and improvement in peak urinary flow.

Stent insertion was successful in all patients. The mean IPSS decreased from 26.4 to 7.7 on the last follow-up. The mean peak flow increased from 5.5 mL/second before stent insertion to 16.0 mL/second 1 year thereafter. The main adverse effect was transient pain in nine patients. No stent migration or obstruction was seen. Patients reported satisfaction and improvement in quality of life.

Our short-term results show that Allium TPS is safe and effective for the treatment of patients with BPO.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) represents a spectrum of related lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The cost of currently recommended medications and the discontinuation rate due to side effects are significant drawbacks limiting their long-term use in clinical practice. Interventional procedures, considered as the definitive treatment for BPH, carry a significant risk of treatment-related complications in frail patients. These issues have contributed to the emergence of new approaches as alternative options to standard therapies. This paper reviews the recent literature regarding the experimental treatments under investigation and presents the currently available experimental devices and techniques used under local anesthesia for the treatment of LUTS/BPH in the vast majority of cases. Devices for delivery of thermal treatment (microwaves, radiofrequency, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and the Rezum system), mechanical devices (prostatic stent and urethral lift), fractionation of prostatic tissue (histotripsy and aquablation), prostate artery embolization, and intraprostatic drugs are discussed. Evidence for the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of these "minimally invasive procedures" is analyzed.

There continues to be a strong interest in the novel minimally invasive therapies for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). There has been an emergence of new approaches, particularly with mechanical approaches such as the Urolift and new agents suitable for intraprostatic injection. Our purpose is to review the recent literature regarding the safety and efficacy of these therapies, and introduce a number of promising experimental therapies.

The Urolift device has shown safety and efficacy for BPH treatment in phase III clinical trials, with the advantage of a local anaesthetic outpatient procedure, no catheter, and no sexual dysfunction. Intraprostatic injection of botulinum toxin or ethanol has provided mixed results and need further well designed studies. NX-1207 and PRX302 are newer injectable agents under clinical trial. Several novel therapies such as Rezum, Histotripsy, and Aquablation have no published efficacy and safety data available.

Urolift appears to be a well tolerated and effective minimally invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms due to BPH in men who wish to preserve sexual function or who are not suitable for invasive surgery. Further studies will confirm the currently mixed results regarding intraprostatic botulinum toxin or ethanol injections. Rezum, Histotripsy, and Aquablation are experimental treatments under investigation.

To investigate whether the insertion of a thermoexpandable metallic prostate stent (Memokath) facilitates the removal of Foley catheters in elderly patients ineligible for urethral obstruction surgery because of the potential complications involved in long-term catheter management.

A total of 37 male patients (mean age 79.8 ± 6.2 years) ineligible for surgery under general anesthesia because of advanced age, the presence of post-cerebrovascular disorders or anticoagulant therapy use and who subsequently had a Memokath stent inserted between June 2007 and November 2009 were enrolled in the present study. Patients with spinal injury were excluded. We compared the correlation between prostatic urethral length and total prostate volume (TPV). We also evaluated the postoperative postvoid residual (PVR) and presence of pyuria, and reviewed postoperative complications and unassisted urination ability.

We found a positive correlation between prostatic urethral length and TPV. After the insertion of the Memokath stent, the catheters were removed from all patients who could urinate unassisted. The PVR was <50 mL in 76.4% patients, and there was a 52% improvement in pyuria after insertion of the Memokath stent. The mean postoperative follow-up duration was 33.2 ± 16.7 months. A total of 21 patients (56.7%) were able to urinate unassisted after receiving the Memokath stent. Unassisted urination was difficult in patients with poor performance status. No serious complications were observed after insertion of the Memokath stent.

The Memokath stent was safe and useful for elderly patients with urethral obstruction and good performance status requiring long-term management with urethral Foley catheters.

To evaluate the long-term results of using Memotherm (Angiomed Gmbh & Co.) prostatic stents in the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in patients with high anesthetic risk for surgery.

A total of 29 patients with BPH, who were ruled unfit for surgery, underwent a prostatic stenting procedure between 1998 and 2005 at our hospital, with a mean age of 75 years (range, 65-87) and a mean symptomatic period of 62.5 months (range, 7-180). All patients had previous failed medical treatment for severe lower urinary tract symptoms and evaluated as high risk for anesthesia. Mean follow-up period was 6.8 years (range, 60-125 months). Preprocedural, first year, and fifth year postprocedural values for peak flow rates, residual urine volumes, Turkish symptom scores, and quality of life index scores were compared and evaluated.

Memotherm prostatic stent placement was successful in treating 25 patients with BPH (86%) at high risk for surgery who had prostate-related urinary obstruction. For the remaining 4 patients (13.8%), stent migration into the bladder prompted removal of the stents. Marked improvement in residual urine volume, Turkish symptom score, quality of life index scores, and peak flow rates were observed 1 and 5 years after the procedure.

The results of our study suggest that placement of Memotherm prostatic stents is an effective treatment option in elderly patients with BPH at high anesthetic risk. And by this way, the possible unwanted results of continuous catherization and patient discomfort might be prevented.

Brachytherapy may be complicated by serious obstructive voiding symptoms (OVS). Only conservative treatment options are available in the first 6 months after brachytherapy. We evaluated safety, efficacy and patient tolerance of the Memokath prostatic stent (MPS).

A MPS was placed in 10 patients with OVS after brachytherapy. Evaluation included uroflowmetry, international prostate symptom score (IPSS), prostate volume and urethrocystoscopy before and 3 months after placement of the stent.

Both the IPSS and uroflowmetry results significantly improved after stent insertion. The mean IPSS decreased from 29/5 to 11/1 and the mean Qmax from the uroflowmetry improved from 4.7 to 11.2 ml/s. The 5 patients who were catheter dependent voided spontaneously with a mean Qmax of 15 ml/s. Two stents migrated towards the bladder, and those patients needed a second stent which was placed without complications. Removal of the stent was easy to perform. Adverse effects were minor with perineal pain and irritative voiding symptoms occurring in 5 patients mainly in the first weeks after insertion. This did not negatively influence quality of life and all patients were more satisfied with the stent than without.

The MPS provides a safe, effective, and completely reversible treatment for patients with OVS after brachytherapy and was well tolerated.

To present a summary of the 2013 version of the European Association of Urology guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

We conducted a literature search in computer databases for relevant articles published between 1966 and 31 October 2012. The Oxford classification system (2001) was used to determine the level of evidence for each article and to assign the grade of recommendation for each treatment modality.

Men with mild symptoms are suitable for watchful waiting. All men with bothersome LUTS should be offered lifestyle advice prior to or concurrent with any treatment. Men with bothersome moderate-to-severe LUTS quickly benefit from α1-blockers. Men with enlarged prostates, especially those >40ml, profit from 5α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) that slowly reduce LUTS and the probability of urinary retention or the need for surgery. Antimuscarinics might be considered for patients who have predominant bladder storage symptoms. The phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor tadalafil can quickly reduce LUTS to a similar extent as α1-blockers, and it also improves erectile dysfunction. Desmopressin can be used in men with nocturia due to nocturnal polyuria. Treatment with an α1-blocker and 5-ARI (in men with enlarged prostates) or antimuscarinics (with persistent storage symptoms) combines the positive effects of either drug class to achieve greater efficacy. Prostate surgery is indicated in men with absolute indications or drug treatment-resistant LUTS due to benign prostatic obstruction. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the current standard operation for men with prostates 30-80ml, whereas open surgery or transurethral holmium laser enucleation is appropriate for men with prostates >80ml. Alternatives for monopolar TURP include bipolar TURP and transurethral incision of the prostate (for glands <30ml) and laser treatments. Transurethral microwave therapy and transurethral needle ablation are effective minimally invasive treatments with higher retreatment rates compared with TURP. Prostate stents are an alternative to catheterisation for men unfit for surgery. Ethanol or botulinum toxin injections into the prostate are still experimental.

These symptom-oriented guidelines provide practical guidance for the management of men experiencing LUTS. The full version is available online (www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/12_Male_LUTS.pdf).

The first Italian national guidelines were developed by the Italian Association of Urologists and published in 2007. Since then, a number of new drugs or classes of drugs have emerged for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), new data have emerged on medical therapy (monotherapies and combination therapies), new surgical techniques have come into practice, and our understanding of disease pathogenesis has increased. Consequently, a new update of the guidelines has become necessary.

A structured literature review was conducted to identify relevant papers published between 1 August 2006 and 12 December 2010. Publications before or after this timeframe were considered only if they were recognised as important milestones in the field or if the literature search did not identify publications within this timeframe. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were determined according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework.

Decisions on therapeutic intervention should be based on the impact of symptoms on quality of life (QoL) rather than the severity of symptoms (International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score). A threshold for intervention was therefore based on the IPSS Q8, with intervention recommended for patients with a score of at least 4. Several differences in clinical recommendations have emerged. For example, combination therapy with a 5α-reductase inhibitor plus α blocker is now the recommended option for the treatment of patients at risk of BPH progression. Other differences include the warning of potential worsening of cognitive disturbances with use of anticholinergics in older patients, the distinction between Serenoa repens preparations (according to the method of extraction), and the clearly defined threshold of prostate size for performing open surgery (>80 g). While the recommendations included in these guidelines are evidence based, clinical decisions should also be informed by patients' clinical and physical circumstances, as well as patients' preferences and actions.

These guidelines are intended to assist physicians and patients in the decision-making process regarding the management of LUTS/BPH, and support the process of continuous improvement of the quality of care and services to patients.

To evaluate the technical feasibility of a covered, retrievable, barbed prostatic stent and to determine stent-induced histologic changes of the prostate in canine benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

BPH was induced in 8 male beagles by administration of dihydrotestosterone and beta-estradiol. Under fluoroscopy guidance, covered, retrievable, barbed stents were placed in the prostatic urethras. Urethrograms were obtained every three to 4 weeks until sacrifice. The stents were removed 8 weeks after placement. The dogs were sacrificed immediately (group A, n = 4) and 8 weeks after stent removal (group B, n = 4). Histologic changes of prostates were microscopically evaluated.

Stent placement was technically successful in all dogs. The diameters of the prostatic urethra were 14.1 mm + or - 0.5 and 13.7 mm + or - 0.5 on urethrograms obtained immediately after and 8 weeks after stent removal (P = .268). Stent removal was successful in all dogs except one, in which the stent was obstructed by stone formation. Small sandy stones were identified attached to the removed stents of two dogs. Histologic examination revealed extensive prostatic glandular atrophy involving 95.1% + or - 2.2 (group A) and 94.5% + or - 2.4 (group B) of entire prostate (P = .773).

A covered, retrievable, barbed prostatic stent seems to be feasible for use in hormone-induced canine BPH. The stent induced prostatic urethral dilatation, and extensive prostatic glandular atrophy persisted up to 8 weeks after stent removal.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia, which is usually treated conservatively (except in the presence of complications) in non-neurological patients, needs to be managed even more cautiously in patients with neurogenic bladder. The treatment decision must include analysis of the previous voiding mode. The development of detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia in an elderly man with a neurological disease must raise the suspicion of prostatic obstruction. The difficulty of establishing a diagnosis of obstruction, that cannot always be confirmed by clinical tools, urodynamic assessment or the search for renal complications, may lead to temporary prostatic stenting as a diagnostic procedure. Certain situations are more specifically encountered in patients with neurogenic bladder: spinal cord injury patients with reflex voiding, patients with stroke and its sequelae, ageing men and diabetic patients.

We systematically reviewed the literature on the effectiveness, durability and safety of the UroLume stent for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for 1989 to 2005. Reference lists of included studies and review articles were also searched. We contacted the UroLume manufacturer and key authors for additional information. Primary outcomes were treatment failure and urological symptom scores. Secondary outcomes were uroflow parameters and minor complications. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the studies and extracted data.

A total of 20 case series evaluated the UroLume stent in a total of 990 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Of the patients 84% who were catheter dependent voided spontaneously after stent insertion. Ten studies assessed symptoms before stent insertion and at some point within 1 year after stent insertion. All reported decreases in symptom scores, including Madsen-Iversen by 7.9 to 14.3 points and International Prostate Symptom Score by 10 to 12.4 points. Peak urine flow rates increased by 4.2 to 13.1 ml per second. A total of 104 stents (16%) failed in 606 patients who were evaluable at 1 year and migration was the commonest cause of failure (38 stents or 37%). Most patients initially experienced perineal pain or irritative voiding symptoms following stent placement.

Of men who were catheter dependent 84% voided spontaneously after insertion of a UroLume stent and the improvement in symptoms was similar to that seen after transurethral prostate resection. However, 1 of 6 men needed the UroLume removed within a year because of complications. Inadequate followup prevented conclusions on stent durability beyond 1 year. This review supports the recommendation that stents should be considered only in patients at high risk.