This study assesses the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to traditional anticoagulants in managing portal vein thrombosis (PVT), aiming to address critical gaps in both research and clinical practice.

We conducted a retrospective analysis at Rochester General Hospital from January 2011 to December 2023, involving 275 cirrhotic patients with PVT. The inclusion criteria included confirmed non-neoplastic PVT by imaging.

Analysis of 275 cirrhotic patients with PVT revealed no significant differences in age and gender between those treated with anticoagulants and those untreated. The mortality rate was significantly lower in the treated group (37.7%) compared to the untreated group (51.7%; P = 0.029). Gastrointestinal bleeding was slightly more prevalent in the treated group (60.7%) than in the untreated group (58.1%; P = 0.690), though not statistically significant. A significant reduction in intracranial hemorrhage was observed in the treated group (2.5% vs. 8.5% in the untreated group; P = 0.038). In a subgroup analysis comparing the outcomes and side effects of DOACs, Warfarin, and low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) in treated PVT patients, the DOAC group showed improved survival rates compared to traditional [vitamin K antagonists (VKA)/LMWH] treatment, a log-rank test indicated significant survival improvement (chi2 (1) = 8.27, P = 0.0040). DOACs demonstrated comparable mortality rates to VKAs (34.2% vs. 34.5%, P = 0.979) and a significant survival benefit over LMWH (33.3% vs. 60.0%, P = 0.030).

DOAC in treating PVT among patients with liver cirrhosis, demonstrating better significant survival rate when compared to traditional anticoagulation. Key message What is already known on this topic  Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is significantly more prevalent in patients with liver cirrhosis compared to the general population, posing substantial management challenges. Previous studies have primarily focused on small cohorts and retrospective data, underscoring the need for robust, large-scale analyses to validate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus traditional therapies. What this study adds  This study provides concrete evidence from a large cohort that DOACs not only offer a survival benefit over traditional anticoagulation therapies like Warfarin and LMWH in cirrhotic patients with PVT but also maintain comparable safety profiles. These findings bridge significant gaps in current research by comparing the outcomes of modern versus traditional anticoagulant approaches in a real-world setting. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy  The results advocate for the inclusion of DOACs in clinical guidelines for managing PVT in cirrhosis, potentially shifting clinical practice toward these agents. Furthermore, the detailed comparison and subgroup analyses provide a strong foundation for future randomized controlled trials, which could further refine anticoagulation strategies in this high-risk population.

Individuals with cirrhosis maintain a delicate balance between pro- and anticoagulation, which can lead to a state of hypercoagulability. This hypercoagulable condition not only exacerbates liver fibrosis but also increases the risk of venous thrombosis, particularly portal vein thrombosis (PVT). PVT has detrimental effects on liver function, complicates the success of liver transplantation, and negatively impacts the survival rate of patients with cirrhosis. Currently, multiple studies have confirmed that individuals with cirrhosis responded well to treatment with novel direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), showing both safety and efficacy. Furthermore, the use of DOACs as a preventive measure in patients with cirrhosis following surgery has been shown to lower the occurrence of portal vein thrombosis and postpone the progression of liver fibrosis.

We assessed clinical, procoagulant and genetic risk factors and clinical outcomes in dabigatran-treated patients with non-tumoural acute and acute-on-chronic portal vein thrombosis (PVT).

Patients with a new diagnosis of non-tumoural acute and acute-on-chronic PVT between January 2021 and January 2024 (aged ≥ 18 years) in those without/with cirrhosis (Child-Pugh (CP)-A/B/C ≤ 10) were started on dabigatran and followed and compared with those on vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and untreated individuals.

Dabigatran was prescribed in 119 patients with PVT type 1 (61, 51.3%), type 2 (34, 28.6%), type 3 (24, 20.2%); 72 (60.5%) with cirrhosis [CP-A (27, 37.5%), CP-B (43, 59.7%) and CP-C10 (2, 2.8%)]. Procoagulant factors noted were JAK2V617F (10.1%), CALR (2.5%) and factor V Leiden (1.6%) mutations, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS, 15.2%), isolated Protein C (14.3%) and Protein S (16.8%) deficiency.

28 patients who declined anticoagulation/were unable to come for follow-up, and six with CP-C received VKA. Overall recanalization rate (RR) on dabigatran was 56 (47.1%); 25 (21%) complete recanalization, 31 (26%) partial recanalization and 63 (52.9%) stable PVT over median follow-up of 32 months. Patients not anticoagulated had a spontaneous RR in 21.4% (28 patients; p = 0.005 compared with dabigatran group) and none recanalized on VKA. On multivariable analysis, predictors of recanalization on dabigatran were Factor VIII Antigen level (FVIII:Ag, HR 0.6; 95% CI 0.3-0.9, p = 0.032), non-occlusive PVT (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.9-5.6, p = 0.025) and acute PVT (HR 2.1; 95% CI 1.5-3.2, p = 0.003). Mortality was 14 (11.8%).

On dabigatran, 47% of 119 patients achieved portal vein recanalization over 32 months of follow-up which was higher than the spontaneous RR (21.4%) in an untreated cohort. High Factor VIII:Ag was a predictor of non-recanalization. Dabigatran was safe in cirrhosis (CP-A and B) while further work is needed in CP-C.

Chronic liver disease is a frequently encountered disorder and a major concern worldwide with a complex pathophysiology, which often affects the hemostatic system. Such alterations, which affect both primary and secondary hemostasis, are heterogenous, including prohemorrhagic (i.e., decreased coagulation factors, increased fibrinolysis, thrombocytopenia, and platelet dysfunction) and prothrombotic (i.e., decreased natural anticoagulants) changes. As a consequence of this unstable balance, patients with liver cirrhosis may experience both hemorrhagic complications and venous thromboembolic events, which are often unpredictable and whose management is particularly challenging for clinicians. This narrative review will address the most recent advances in the pathophysiology of key derangements of hemostasis in patients with chronic liver disease, focusing on their clinical implications and management.

Background: Portal hypertension is a major complication of chronic liver diseases, leading to serious issues such as esophageal variceal bleeding. The increase in portal vein pressure is driven by both an organic component and a functional component, including tonic contraction of hepatic stellate cells. These processes result in a pathological rise in intrahepatic vascular resistance, stemming from partial impairment of hepatic microcirculation, which is further exacerbated by abnormalities in extrahepatic vessels, including increased portal blood flow. Objectives: This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolving pharmacological therapies for portal hypertension, with consideration and discussion of pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical complications, and pharmacogenetic considerations, highlighting potential directions for future research. Methods: A review of recent literature was performed to evaluate current knowledge and potential therapeutic strategies in portal hypertension. Results: For over 35 years, non-selective beta-blockers have been the cornerstone therapy for portal hypertension by reducing portal vein inflow as an extrahepatic target, effectively preventing decompensation and variceal hemorrhages. However, since not all patients exhibit an adequate response to non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs), and some may not tolerate NSBBs, alternative or adjunctive therapies that enhance the effects of NSBBs on portal pressure are being investigated in preclinical and early clinical studies. Conclusions: A better understanding of pharmacogenetic factors and pathophysiological mechanisms could lead to more individualized and effective treatments for portal hypertension. These insights highlight potential directions for future research.

Evidences for anticoagulation strategies in cirrhotic with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) are still insufficient. This study aims to comprehensively compare the therapeutic effects of different therapeutic therapeutic measures in individuals suffering from cirrhosis with PVT, with the ultimate goal of providing evidence-based recommendations for thrombolytic therapy in this population.

Starting from 20 October 2023, a comprehensive search about therapeutic strategies for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library.

19 studies were eventually incorporated into this study. Comparison with control in network meta-analysis, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (RR = 2.15, 95%CI: 1.33, 3.48), LMWH (RR = 1.41, 95%CI: 1.01, 1.99), TIPS (RR = 5.68, 95%CI: 2.63, 12.24), warfarin (RR = 2.16, 95%CI: 1.46, 3.21), EBL plus propranolol (RR = 2.80, 95%CI: 1.18, 6.60), LMWH-DOACs sequential (RR = 7.92, 95%CI: 2.85, 21.99) and LMWH-warfarin sequential (RR = 2.26, 95%CI: 1.16, 4.42) significantly improved the incidence of complete recanalization. The anticoagulation drugs were ranked based on their SUCRA values, with the LMWH-DOACs sequential (92.7%), TIPS plus warfarin (91.3%), and TIPS (80.3%) emerging as the top three effective treatments.

In this study, active anticoagulants were recommended for cirrhosis with PVT. The TIPS plus warfarin, LMWH-DOACs sequential, and TIPS improved the complete recanalization rate most effectively, and the EBL plus propranolol, heparin plus DOACs plus warfarin, and DOACs were highly recommended for increasing the incidence of partial recanalization. Warfarin and TIPS were recommended for reducing the frequency of bleeding events, while LMWH plus warfarin and DOACs proved to be most effective in decreasing the rate of major bleeding events. Warfarin, heparin plus DOACs plus warfarin, and DOACs demonstrated the most significant reduction in mortality rates, highlighting its potential as an effective intervention. TIPS plus warfarin, LMWH-DOACs sequential, and TIPS were recommended for reducing the occurrence of PVT expansion. Heparin plus DOACs plus warfarin was recommended for reducing the occurrence of hepatic encephalopathy, and protocols that involve TIPS were generally associated with a higher risk of hepatic encephalopathy. However, a longer follow-up period is necessary to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of active anticoagulants therapy in patients with PVT in cirrhosis.

(1) Background: Danaparoid sodium is a heparinoid antithrombotic that has been used for over 40 years for prophylaxis of DVT in non-HIT patients and for the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) with and without thrombosis. This update summarises current information on its pharmacology and reviews danaparoid dose management in a broad spectrum of clinical situations, including off-label indications. (2) Methods: Evidence from published clinical studies, case reports, compassionate use of danaparoid, and spontaneously reported serious adverse events is summarised and analysed by an interdisciplinary expert group to develop a consensus on dosing regimens of danaparoid for complex clinical situations, including vulnerable patient populations. (3) Results: Dosing regimens are proposed, together with monitoring recommendations and target anti-factor Xa ranges. (4) Conclusion: In a comprehensive summary detailed interdisciplinary dosing recommendations are described to provide a basis for safe and effective use of danaparoid.

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is one of the common complications of cirrhosis. The incidence of PVT correlates with liver disease severity-higher incidence in patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) C, large spontaneous portosystemic shunts, hepatofugal portal flow, and in the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma. PVT may worsen ascites, increase the risk and poor control of variceal bleeding. The occurrence of PVT may increase morbidity and lower survival after a liver transplant. Using statins prevents the occurrence of PVT, whereas beta-blockers may aggravate its occurrence. Cross-sectional imaging is mandatory for the precise diagnosis and classification of PVT. Symptomatic, occlusive PVT and candidacy for liver transplantation are the main indications for anticoagulation. Vitamin K antagonists, low-molecular-weight heparin, and newer anticoagulants are effective and safe in cirrhosis. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants are agents of choice in early cirrhosis (CTP A, B). The duration of anticoagulant therapy, predictors of response, and management of complications of cirrhosis while on therapy require in-depth knowledge and individualized treatment. Transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt can be considered in nonresponsive cases or when anticoagulants are contraindicated. This manuscript reviews the latest updated knowledge about managing PVT in cirrhosis.

With the growth of the older adult population, the number of older adults waitlisted for and undergoing kidney and liver transplantation has increased. Transplantation is an important and definitive treatment for this population. We present a contemporary review of the unique preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative issues that patients older than 65 y face when they undergo kidney or liver transplantation. We focus on geriatric syndromes that are common in older patients listed for kidney or liver transplantation including frailty, sarcopenia, and cognitive dysfunction; discuss important considerations for older transplant recipients, which may impact preoperative risk stratification; and describe unique challenges in intraoperative and postoperative management for older patients. Intraoperative challenges in the older adult include using evidence-based best anesthetic practices, maintaining adequate perfusion pressure, and using minimally invasive surgical techniques. Postoperative concerns include controlling acute postoperative pain; preventing cardiovascular complications and delirium; optimizing immunosuppression; preventing perioperative kidney injury; and avoiding nephrotoxicity and rehabilitation. Future studies are needed throughout the perioperative period to identify interventions that will improve patients' preoperative physiologic status, prevent postoperative medical complications, and improve medical and patient-centered outcomes in this vulnerable patient population.

Cirrhosis is a major health concern worldwide with a complex pathophysiology affecting various biological systems, including all aspects of haemostasis. Bleeding risk is mainly driven by portal hypertension, but in end-stage liver disease it is further increased by alterations in haemostatic components, including platelet function, coagulation, and fibrinolysis. Concurrently, patients with cirrhosis are prone to venous thromboembolic events (VTE) because of the altered haemostatic balance, in particular an increase in thrombin generation. In patients with cirrhosis, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are currently the standard of care for VTE prevention, with VKA also being standard of care for stroke prevention in those with atrial fibrillation. However, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) could have specific advantages in this patient population. Clinical experience suggests that DOAC are a safe and possibly more effective alternative to traditional anticoagulants for the treatment of VTE in patients with compensated cirrhosis. In addition, emerging data suggest that primary prophylactic treatment with anticoagulants may improve clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis by reducing the risk of hepatic decompensation. The selection of the most appropriate DOAC remains to be clarified. This review focuses on the rationale for the use of DOAC in patients with cirrhosis, the specific effects of the different DOAC (as assessed by in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies), as well as clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis on DOAC.

The popularity of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is increasing among patients with cirrhosis. Cirrhosis has a major impact on the pharmacokinetics of drugs, potentially increasing adverse events. Safe use of drugs in cirrhosis requires a diligent risk-benefit analysis. The aim of this study is to develop practice recommendations for safe use of DOACs in cirrhosis based on a systematic review of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety data.

We conducted a systematic literature search to identify studies on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of DOACs in cirrhosis. Data were collected and presented in summary tables by severity of cirrhosis using the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) classification. A multidisciplinary expert panel evaluated the results and classified the DOACs according to safety.

Fifty four studies were included. All DOACs were classified as 'no additional risks known' for CTP A. For CTP B, apixaban, dabigatran and edoxaban were classified as 'no additional risks known'. Apixaban and edoxaban showed fewer adverse events in patients with cirrhosis, while dabigatran may be less impacted by severity of cirrhosis based on its pharmacokinetic profile. Rivaroxaban was classified as 'unsafe' in CTP B and C based on significant pharmacokinetic alterations. Due to lack of data, apixaban, dabigatran and edoxaban were classified as 'unknown' for CTP C.

DOACs can be used in patients with CTP A cirrhosis, and apixaban, dabigatran and edoxaban can also be used in CTP B. It is recommended to avoid rivaroxaban in CTP B and C. There is insufficient evidence to support safe use of other DOACs in CTP C cirrhosis.

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) worsens the long-term prognosis of patients with cirrhosis; however, the optimal treatment remains to be determined. Reports on the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants are increasing, and further evidence is needed. Therefore, we investigated the effectiveness of treatment with edoxaban in patients with PVT. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of edoxaban and warfarin as antithrombotic therapies for PVT. The median overall survival time was 4.2 years in patients with PVT, with a 1-year survival rate of 70.7% and a 5-year survival rate of 47.9%. The leading cause of death was hepatocellular carcinoma. The overall response rate for thrombolysis in the edoxaban group was 76.7% compared to 29.4% in the warfarin group, and edoxaban significantly improved PVT compared to warfarin. In addition, edoxaban provided long-term improvement of PVT. Warfarin, on the other hand, was temporarily effective but did not provide long-term benefits. The Child-Pugh and albumin-bilirubin scores did not change after edoxaban or warfarin use. No deaths occurred due to adverse events associated with edoxaban or warfarin. Edoxaban as a single agent can achieve long-term recanalization without compromising the hepatic reserves. Edoxaban is easy to initiate, even in an outpatient setting, and could become a major therapeutic agent for the treatment of PVT.

Background: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare disease with an estimated incidence of 2 to 4 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. The most common predisposing conditions for PVT are chronic liver diseases (cirrhosis), primary or secondary hepatobiliary malignancy, major infectious or inflammatory abdominal disease, or myeloproliferative disorders. Methods: PVT can be classified on the basis of the anatomical site, the degree of venous occlusion, and the timing and type of presentation. The main differential diagnosis of PVT, both acute and chronic, is malignant portal vein invasion, most frequently by hepatocarcinoma, or constriction (typically by pancreatic cancer or cholangiocarcinoma). Results: The management of PVT is based on anticoagulation and the treatment of predisposing conditions. The aim of anticoagulation in acute thrombosis is to prevent the extension of the clot and enable the recanalization of the vein to avoid the development of complications, such as intestinal infarction and portal hypertension. Conclusions: The treatment with anticoagulant therapy favors the reduction of portal hypertension, and this allows for a decrease in the risk of bleeding, especially in patients with esophageal varices. The anticoagulant treatment is generally recommended for at least three to six months. Prosecution of anticoagulation is advised until recanalization or lifelong if the patient has an underlying permanent pro-coagulant condition that cannot be corrected or if there is thrombosis extending to the mesenteric veins.

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), a thrombosis which involves the portal, mesenteric, and splenic veins, and the Budd-Chiari syndrome, represents an uncommon type of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Like with deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities and pulmonary embolism, ample evidence suggests a significant association between SVT and cancer, particularly intra-abdominal solid malignancies (e.g. hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Clinical symptoms of SVT in cancer patients can be ambiguous, and frequently attributed to the primary cancer itself. Alternatively, SVT may be asymptomatic and detected incidentally during cancer staging or follow-up evaluations. SVT can also precede the diagnosis of cancer and has been associated with poorer outcomes in patients with liver or pancreatic cancers. Therefore, an unprovoked SVT warrants a thorough evaluation for an underlying malignancy or MPN. Cancer-associated SVT carries a high risk of VTE extension, recurrence and bleeding. Extended anticoagulant treatment is often required in the absence of a high bleeding risk. Guidelines suggest treatment with either low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), although available data on the safety and effectiveness of DOACs in these patients is limited. This comprehensive review outlines the epidemiology, pathogenesis, risk factors, and diagnosis of cancer-associated SVT and underscores the importance of comprehensive patient evaluation and evidence-based management.

Limited evidence is available on management of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT).

This study aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for SVT treatment.

Studies were systematically searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases according to PRISMA guidelines. We assessed any recanalization, full recanalization, recurrence, mortality, and major bleeding as outcomes of interest. Results were reported as weighted mean prevalence (WMP) with 95% CI. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions have been performed to address heterogeneity and adjust for potential confounders.

We included a total of 16 studies (17 datasets) on 648 patients with SVT treated with DOACs. We found any recanalization in 60.3% (95% CI: 41.8%-76.3%; I2 = 84.9%; P < .001) and full recanalization in 51.7% (95% CI: 36.0%-67.0%; I2 = 87.4%; P < .001). Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 2.8% (95% CI: 1.4%-5.9%; I2 = 0%; P = .787) and death in 3.4% (95% CI: 1.6%-7.3%; I2 = 13.2%; P = .318) of patients. Major bleeding was reported by 5.8% (95% CI: 3.7%-8.9%; I2 = 29.2%; P = .125) of patients. Results were consistent when separately analyzing prospective studies, retrospective studies, studies on cirrhotic patients, and studies enrolling patients with portal vein thrombosis. Meta-regression analyses showed that an increasing age and cancer impacted the rate of recanalization. Cirrhosis was associated with a higher rate of major bleeding and mortality.

The results of the present study, mostly based on observational studies, suggest good safety and efficacy profiles of DOACs in patients with SVT. Randomized studies are needed to corroborate our findings.

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to traditional anticoagulation (vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparins) in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT).

We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Embase databases up to May 2024. Studies were selected according to the PICOS criteria, focusing on cirrhotic patients with PVT treated with DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban) compared to traditional anticoagulation.

Our systematic review included four observational studies conducted in Japan, China, and the United States, involving a total of 223 patients with cirrhosis and PVT. The included studies collectively suggested that anticoagulation therapy, including DOACs, was associated with improved recanalization rates and reduced progression of PVT in patients with liver cirrhosis, without a significant increase in bleeding complications. Specifically, edoxaban demonstrated superior effectiveness in reducing PVT volume compared to traditional anticoagulation, while maintaining a favorable safety profile.

DOACs may provide a promising therapeutic option for PVT in cirrhotic patients. Further research is needed to confirm the potential benefits and risks of DOACs in this population.

Currently, there is limited evidence regarding the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus warfarin in this population.

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus databases from inception to August 2024. Clinical studies comparing the use of DOACs with warfarin in cirrhotic patients were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated by either fixed or random effects models. Primary efficacy outcomes were ischemic stroke/thromboembolism (IS/TE) and all-cause death, the primary safety outcomes were the bleeding risks.

Sixteen studies were included (16 829 individuals). DOACs had similar benefits in preventing IS/TE (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.69-1.10), but DOACs were significantly associated with reduced risk of all-cause death (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.97). On the other hand, we observed significantly reduced risks of any bleeding (HR = 0.60; 95%CI: 0.37-0.95), major bleeding (HR = 0.72; 95%CI: 0.63-0.82), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (HR = 0.47; 95%CI: 0.30-0.73), and gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.60-0.87) in patients receiving DOACs. Results were consistent in cirrhotic patients with AF. Furthermore, DOACs reduced the incidence of major bleeding (HR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.55-0.78) and ICH (HR = 0.17, 95%CI: 0.04-0.76) in patients with moderate to severe cirrhosis.

Our study demonstrates that DOACs, compared with warfarin, exerted comparable efficacy and better safety and may represent a safer alternative to warfarin in cirrhotic patients.

Coagulation management in the patient with cirrhosis has undergone a significant transformation since the beginning of this century, with the concept of a rebalancing between procoagulant and anticoagulant factors. The paradigm that patients with cirrhosis have a greater bleeding tendency has changed, as a result of this rebalancing. In addition, it has brought to light the presence of complications related to thrombotic events in this group of patients. These guidelines detail aspects related to pathophysiologic mechanisms that intervene in the maintenance of hemostasis in the patient with cirrhosis, the relevance of portal hypertension, mechanical factors for the development of bleeding, modifications in the hepatic synthesis of coagulation factors, and the changes in the reticuloendothelial system in acute hepatic decompensation and acute-on-chronic liver failure. They address new aspects related to the hemorrhagic complications in patients with cirrhosis, considering the risk for bleeding during diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, as well as the usefulness of different tools for diagnosing coagulation and recommendations on the pharmacologic treatment and blood-product transfusion in the context of hemorrhage. These guidelines also update the knowledge regarding hypercoagulability in the patient with cirrhosis, as well as the efficacy and safety of treatment with the different anticoagulation regimens. Lastly, they provide recommendations on coagulation management in the context of acute-on-chronic liver failure, acute liver decompensation, and specific aspects related to the patient undergoing liver transplantation.

Since several studies have examined the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in treating patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), we conducted a meta-analyses to assess the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in this population.

We conducted a comprehensive search using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until June 2024. We used odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as the effect measures to compare DOACs with VKAs.

A total of 9 observational studies were included. The pooled analysis revealed that a trend towards higher complete recanalization rates with DOACs (71.4%) compared to VKAs (55.3%), though not statistically significant (OR 1.95; 95%CI 0.70 to 5.44). For SVT extension, a significant effect was observed favoring DOACs (OR 0.12; 95%CI 0.03 to 0.54). No significant differences were found in other efficacy outcomes or safety outcomes, except for major bleeding, which was significantly lower with DOACs (OR 0.27; 95%CI 0.13 to 0.56).

DOACs are superior to VKAs in SVT extension and major bleeding, suggesting that DOACs may be a favorable treatment option in the treatment of SVT.

Liver cirrhosis and splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) are strictly correlated. Portal vein thrombosis, the most common location of SVT, is frequently diagnosed in liver cirrhosis (pooled incidence 4.6 per 100 patient-years), and liver cirrhosis is a common risk factor for SVT (reported in 24%-28% of SVT patients). In cirrhosis-associated SVT, anticoagulant treatment reduces mortality rates, thrombosis extension, and major bleeding, and increases the rates of recanalization, compared to no treatment. Achieving vessel recanalization improves the prognosis of cirrhotic patients by reducing liver-related complications (such as variceal bleeding, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy). Anticoagulation should be therefore routinely prescribed to cirrhotic patients with acute SVT unless contraindicated by active bleeding associated with hemodynamic impairment or by excessively high bleeding risk. Of note, early treatment is associated with higher probability of achieving vessel recanalization. The standard treatment consists of low-molecular-weight heparin, followed by oral anticoagulants (eg, vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants), if not contraindicated by severe liver dysfunction. Cirrhotic patients with SVT should be treated long-term (especially if candidate for liver transplantation) since liver cirrhosis is a persistent risk factor for recurrent thrombosis. In this review, we discuss the management of SVT in patients with liver cirrhosis, with a focus on the anticoagulant treatment in terms of indications, timing, drugs, duration, and particular scenarios, such as gastroesophageal varices and thrombocytopenia.

 Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective for the management of thromboembolic disorders. However, bleeding remains a major concern in cirrhotic patients receiving DOACs.

 PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. The incidence of bleeding episodes in cirrhotic patients receiving DOACs was pooled. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to compare the incidence of bleeding episodes in cirrhotic patients who received DOACs versus those who received conventional anticoagulants and did not receive anticoagulants.

 Twenty-nine studies were included. All bleeding, major bleeding, fatal bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage episodes were observed in 310/2,469, 100/1,388, 2/611, 166/1,886, and 5/1,147 cirrhotic patients receiving DOACs, respectively. Their pooled incidences were 13, 6, 0, 8, and 0%, respectively. They became higher in subgroup analyses of studies with advanced age, a longer treatment duration, and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C. Compared with conventional anticoagulants, DOACs were associated with lower incidences of all bleeding (OR = 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52-0.98) and major bleeding (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.37-0.83) in cirrhotic patients, but not those of fatal bleeding (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.04-1.28), gastrointestinal bleeding (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.52-1.17), or intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.12-1.12). The incidences of all bleeding (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.22-4.79) and major bleeding (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.26-3.61) did not significantly differ between cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) who received DOACs and those who did not receive anticoagulants.

 DOACs carry a low risk of bleeding in liver cirrhosis. Age, treatment duration, and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class may be associated with bleeding in cirrhotic patients receiving DOACs. The risk of bleeding is not increased by DOACs in cirrhotic patients with PVT.

Our understanding of the function of the liver has evolved over the centuries. Early theories proposing that the liver could be used to divine the future have been superseded by our current knowledge of the importance of the liver in processes such as digestion and detoxification. Similarly, although liver disease was previously associated with only an increased risk of bleeding, there is now a substantial body of evidence demonstrating an increased thrombotic potential in patients with this disease. Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is increasing in frequency and is likely to overtake alcoholic liver disease as the primary indication for liver transplant in the future. In this review, we discuss the evidence linking liver disease, and MAFLD in particular, with arterial and venous thromboembolic disease. We review the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation in advanced liver disease and consider whether antithrombotic agents could slow or halt the progression of fibrosis in MAFLD.

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a manifestation of venous thromboembolism in an unusual site. Portal, mesenteric, and splenic veins are the most common vessels involved in SVT which occurs mainly in patients with liver cirrhosis, although non-cirrhotic patients could be affected as well. Thrombosis of hepatic veins, also known as Budd-Chiari syndrome, is another manifestation of SVT. Prompt diagnosis and intervention are mandatory in order to increase the recalization rate and reduce the risk of thrombus progression and hypertensive complications. Traditional anticoagulation with heparin and vitamin-K antagonists is the treatment of choice in these cases. However, recent studies have shown promising results on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this setting. Available results are mainly based on retrospective studies with small sample size, but first clinical trials have been published in the last years. This manuscript aims to provide an updated overview of the current evidence regarding the role of DOACs for SVT in both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients.

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is an uncommon manifestation of venous thromboembolism in the splanchnic venous system, with scarce evidence surrounding its management. We assessed the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) to low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH), vitamin-k antagonists (VKAs), or no anticoagulation.

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with the primary efficacy outcome being complete recanalization of affected vessels and primary safety outcome being major bleeding. Meta-analysis was done using a random-effects model, with dichotomous outcomes being synthesized with odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95 % CIs.

Seven non-randomized and one randomized study involving 883 participants were included for analysis. DOACs were more effective than VKAs (OR = 4.33; 95 % CI: 2.4, 7.83; n = 1 study) in non-cirrhotic patients and no anticoagulation in cirrhotic patients (OR = 3.86; 95 % CI: 1.49, 10.03; n = 3 studies). DOACs had a statistically significant reduction in major bleeding compared to observation [OR = 0.09; 95 % CI: 0.03, 0.29; n = 3 studies], LMWHs [OR = 0.13; 95 % CI: 0.03, 0.29; n = 1 study] and VKAs [OR = 0.12; 95 % CI: 0.02, 0.69; n = 2 studies] in non-cirrhotic patients. No difference in major bleeding was found between DOACs and observation, LMWH, or VKAs in cirrhotic patients.

DOACs appear to be a favorable alternative to VKAs and LMWHs in non-cirrhotic patients. This avenue of research would benefit from larger studies that adjust for SVT etiologies, patient risk factors, and overall bleeding risk.

Portal Vein Thrombosis (PVT), a common complication of advanced liver disease, is defined as an obstruction of the portal vein due to thrombus formation that can extend to the superior mesenteric and splenic veins. It was believed that PVT occurred predominantly due to prothrombotic potential. However, recent studies have shown that decreased blood flow related to portal hypertension appears to increase PVT risk as per Virchow's triad. It is well known that there is a higher incidence of PVTs in cirrhosis with a higher MELD and Child Pugh score. The controversy for management of PVTs in cirrhotics lies in the individualized assessment of risks versus benefits of anticoagulation, since these patients have a complex hemostatic profile with both bleeding and procoagulant propensities. In this review, we will systematically compile the etiology, pathophysiology, clinical features, and management of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis.

The expression splanchnic vein thrombosis encompasses Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis. These disorders have common characteristics: they are both rare diseases which can cause portal hypertension and its complications. Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis in the absence of underlying liver disease share many risk factors, among which myeloproliferative neoplasms represent the most common; a rapid comprehensive work-up for risk factors of thrombosis is needed in these patients. Long-term anticoagulation is indicated in most patients. Portal vein thrombosis can also develop in patients with cirrhosis and in those with porto-sinusoidal vascular liver disease. The presence and nature of underlying liver disease impacts the management of portal vein thrombosis. Indications for anticoagulation in patients with cirrhosis are growing, while transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is now a second-line option. Due to the rarity of these diseases, studies yielding high-grade evidence are scarce. However, collaborative studies have provided new insight into the management of these patients. This article focuses on the causes, diagnosis, and management of patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, portal vein thrombosis without underlying liver disease, or cirrhosis with non-malignant portal vein thrombosis.

Intra-abdominal venous thromboembolism is rare with heterogeneous management. We aim to evaluate these thrombosis and compare them to deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism.

A 10-year retrospective evaluation of consecutive venous thromboembolism presentations (January 2011-December 2020) at Northern Health, Australia, was conducted. A subanalysis of intraabdominal venous thrombosis involving splanchnic, renal and ovarian veins was performed.

There were 3343 episodes including 113 cases of intraabdominal venous thrombosis (3.4%) - 99 splanchnic vein thrombosis, 10 renal vein thrombosis and 4 ovarian vein thrombosis. Of the splanchnic vein thrombosis presentations, 34 patients (35 cases) had known cirrhosis. Patients with cirrhosis were numerically less likely to be anticoagulated compared to noncirrhotic patients (21/35 vs. 47/64, P  = 0.17). Noncirrhotic patients ( n  = 64) were more likely to have malignancy compared to those with deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism (24/64 vs. 543/3230, P  < 0.001), including 10 patients diagnosed at time of splanchnic vein thrombosis presentation. Cirrhotic patients reported more recurrent thrombosis/clot progression (6/34) compared to noncirrhotic patients (3/64) (15.6 vs. 2.3 events/100-person-years; hazard ratio 4.7 (95% confidence interval 1.2-18.9), P  = 0.030) and other venous thromboembolism patients (2.6/100-person-years; hazard ratio 4.7, 95% confidence interval 2.1-10.7; P  < 0.001) with comparable major bleeding rates. All renal vein thrombosis were provoked including five malignant-related cases while three ovarian vein thrombosis occurred postpartum. No recurrent thrombotic or bleeding complications were reported in renal vein thrombosis and ovarian vein thrombosis.

These rare intraabdominal venous thromboses are often provoked. Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) patients with cirrhosis have a higher rate of thrombotic complications, while SVT without cirrhosis was associated with more malignancy. Given the concurrent comorbidities, careful assessment and individualized anticoagulation decision is needed.

Liver cirrhosis is accompanied by several hemostatic alterations, which contribute to the current theory of "rebalanced hemostasis." Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a frequent complication of liver cirrhosis (17-26% of the cirrhotic patients), and liver cirrhosis is a common risk factor for SVT (24-28% of SVT cases).

This narrative review aims to describe the current state of the art on the anticoagulant treatment of cirrhotic SVT, with a particular focus on the possible role of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and recent guidelines on this topic.

Early anticoagulant therapy is recommended in cirrhotic patients with acute SVT, to obtain vessel recanalization and decrease the rates of portal hypertension-related complications. Gastroesophageal varices do not represent a contraindication to anticoagulation, if adequate prophylaxis of variceal bleeding is established, and varices band ligation can be safely performed without the need to stop the anticoagulant treatment. The conventional treatment of cirrhotic SVT consisted of low molecular weight heparin, as initial treatment of choice, eventually followed by vitamin K antagonists, but the DOACs can be considered as a reasonable alternative in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis.

Patients with cirrhosis were long thought to be coagulopathic. However, this paradigm has changed in recent years and currently, cirrhosis is recognised as a prothrombotic state. Due to the increasing incidence of cirrhosis from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis which is closely associated with cardiac disease, patients with cirrhosis increasingly require therapy with anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents. However, their potential for causing catastrophic and life-threatening bleeding in patients with cirrhosis leads to hesitancy about their use in patients with cirrhosis. Overall, traditional anticoagulation is safe for all Child-Pugh classes while newer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are mostly safe in Child-Pugh class A/B and contraindicated in severe hepatic impairment. For different indications, published data to date suggest that anticoagulation is overall safe for patients with cirrhosis who have venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation and portal vein thrombosis, and does not increase the risk of variceal bleeding. Moreover, DOACs appear to have similar safety profiles as traditional anticoagulants. Finally, most studies suggest that antiplatelet agents are also safe to use in patients with cirrhosis although they are mostly contraindicated in severe hepatic impairment. For both anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, severe thrombocytopaenia presents a relative contraindication to their use. More prospective trials and large cohort studies are needed to advance our understanding of the safety and nuances of DOACs and antiplatelet agents in patients with advanced cirrhosis.

The association between thrombolytic therapy and the outcome in patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome in patients with PVT who received antithrombin III-based therapy.

This study was a retrospective, multicenter study to investigate the liver-related events and the survival rates in 240 patients with PVT who received the therapy.

The patients comprised 151 men and 89 women, with a median age of 69 years. The rate of favorable response, defined as maximum area of PVT changed to ≤75%, was 67.5% (162/240). The cumulative rates of liver-related events at 1, 2, and 3 years were 38.2%, 53.9%, and 68.5%, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that viable hepatocellular carcinoma, absence of maintenance therapy, non-responder, and PVT progression were significantly associated with liver-related events. The PVT progression was observed in 23.3% (56/240). The multivariate analysis identified older age, absence of maintenance therapy, and non-responder as independent factors associated with PVT progression. The multivariate analysis revealed that younger age, no hepatocellular carcinoma, presence of maintenance therapy, and lower Model for End-stage Liver Disease-Sodium score significantly contributed to 3-year survival. Of the 240 patients, 13 (8.9%) prematurely discontinued treatment due to any adverse events.

This study suggests that maintenance therapy, favorable response, and absence of PVT progression may suppress or control liver-related events in antithrombin III-based therapy for patients with PVT. Specifically, maintenance therapy could suppress not only liver-related events, but also PVT progression and improve the prognosis.

Portal vein thrombosis constitutes the most common thrombotic event in patients with cirrhosis, with increased rates in the setting of advanced liver disease. Despite being a well-known complication of cirrhosis, the contribution of portal vein thrombosis to hepatic decompensation and overall mortality is still a matter of debate. The incorporation of direct oral anticoagulants and new radiological techniques for portal vein recanalization have expanded our therapeutic arsenal. However, the lack of large prospective observational studies and randomized trials explain the heterogenous diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations of current guidelines. This article seeks to make a comprehensive review of the pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran, are an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) and deep venous thromboembolism. We hope to evaluate the safety of DOACs versus warfarin/low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in improving bleeding events in patients with different severity of the liver disease.

We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases for studies reporting the effects of DOACs in patients with liver cirrhosis. A random-effects model or fixed-effects model was selected to pool risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

A total of 18 studies involving 41,447 participants was included in this meta-analysis. Compare with warfarin/ LMWH, the use of DOACs significantly reduced the incidence of all bleeding (RR: 0.76; 95%CI: 0.66 to 0.87), major bleeding (RR: 0.51; 95%CI: 0.28 to 0.91), intracranial hemorrhage (RR: 0.50; 95%CI: 0.31 to 0.81), and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.97), and all-cause death in patients with liver disease (RR: 0.77; 95%CI: 0.62 to 0.95). Similar results were observed in atrial fibrillation patients with liver disease and cirrhosis subgroups. Furthermore, the pooled estimates of the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class indicated that DOACs reduced the incidence of all bleeding (RR: 0.61; 95%CI: 0.45 to 0.82), gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.55; 95%CI: 0.37 to 0.83), and all-cause death (RR: 0.62; 95%CI: 0.49 to 0.79) in patients with mild to moderate cirrhosis.

Our study demonstrates that DOACs significantly reduce the risk of bleeding in patients with liver disease compared with warfarin/LMWH.

Along with the worldwide increase in obesity and metabolic syndrome, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its more severe subset, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), are on path to become the leading cause of liver transplantation in the United States. NAFLD, as well as obesity, create an inflammatory milieu via the release of adipocytokines. In turn, the inflammatory environment can trigger an increase in prothrombotic factors. Independent of inflammation, the severity of NASH is associated with a graded increase in hypercoagulability such as an increase in factor VIII, increase in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and decrease in protein C. Ultimately, this environment creates an increase in thrombotic risk, leading to higher rates of pre-transplant portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with NASH cirrhosis vesus other causes of cirrhosis. Many studies have shown worse outcomes in liver transplant recipients with PVT as it complicates anastomotic reconstruction which can negatively affect portal blood supply needed for adequate liver functioning. Management and treatment of PVT is not standardized, but from a pharmacologic standpoint, multiple classes of anticoagulants have shown to be successful in recanalization of the portal vein and preventing recurrence of clot with minimal bleeding complications. The increasing prevalence of NASH cirrhosis and subsequent increase in PVT require further research for improved outcomes.

The clinical utility of anticoagulation for patients with cirrhosis and asymptomatic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is widely debated. Complex hemostatic derangements in cirrhosis that increase risk of both bleeding and thrombosis, as well as a lack of randomized controlled data, limit conclusive assessments regarding optimal management of anticoagulation in this setting. In this review, we summarize the relevant literature pertaining to PVT in cirrhosis, including the effect of untreated PVT on the natural progression of liver disease and the overall impact of anticoagulation on clot burden and other relevant clinical outcomes. Apart from patients who are symptomatic or listed for liver transplantation, data supporting anticoagulation for the treatment of PVT is limited and without clear consensus guidelines. In patients with cirrhosis without PVT, emerging evidence for the role of prophylactic anticoagulation to mitigate the progression of fibrosis suggests an optimal risk-benefit tradeoff with decreased rates of liver decompensation and mortality, without a heightened risk of bleeding. In summation, as our understanding of the role of both prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation in cirrhosis continues to evolve, ongoing risk stratification of patients with asymptomatic PVT demands further attention.

The prevention and management of bleeding and thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis poses several difficult clinical questions. These Clinical Practice Guidelines have been developed to provide practical guidance on debated topics, including current views on haemostasis in liver disease, controversy regarding the need to correct thrombocytopenia and abnormalities in the coagulation system in patients undergoing invasive procedures, and the need for thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised patients with haemostatic abnormalities. Multiple recommendations in this document are based on interventions that the panel feels are not useful, even though widely applied in clinical practice.

In recent years, the traditional concept that cirrhosis-related coagulopathy is an acquired bleeding disorder has evolved. Currently, it is known that in cirrhotic patients, the hemostatic system is rebalanced, which involves coagulation factors, fibrinolysis and platelets. These alterations disrupt homeostasis, skewing it toward a procoagulant state, which can lead to thromboembolic manifestations, especially when hemodynamic and endothelial factors co-occur, such as in the portal vein system in cirrhosis. Portal vein thrombosis is a common complication of advanced liver cirrhosis that negatively affects the course of liver disease, prognosis of cirrhotic patients and success of liver transplantation. It is still debated whether portal vein thrombosis is the cause or the consequence of worsening liver function. Anticoagulant therapy is the mainstay treatment for acute symptomatic portal vein thrombosis. In chronic portal vein thrombosis, the role of anticoagulant therapy is still unclear. Traditional anticoagulants, vitamin K antagonists and low-molecular-weight heparin are standard-of-care treatments for portal vein thrombosis. In the last ten years, direct oral anticoagulants have been approved for the prophylaxis and treatment of many thromboembolic-related diseases, but evidence on their use in cirrhotic patients is very limited. The aim of this review was to summarize the evidence about the safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants for treating portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients.

Portomesenteric thrombosis (PMT) is a serious condition encountered mainly in cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation. More recently, this potentially fatal complication has been described after bariatric surgery and inflammatory bowel disease. Several consensus guidelines have been published over the past few years and this mini review was conducted to discuss updated nontransplant treatment options based on currently available evidence.

Anticoagulation is the mainstay of treatment for PMT involving <50% of the main portal vein. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt are usually preserved for patients with more extensive disease or those with clinically significant portal hypertension that are treatment refractory.

The extent of PMT, response to therapy, and complications related with PMT are the determinants of therapy.