Over 300,000 colorectal surgeries are performed annually in the U.S. with up to 10% complicated by anastomotic leaks, which cause significant morbidity and mortality. Despite its significant association with anastomotic leaks, tension is predominantly assessed intraoperatively using subjective metrics. This study aims to assess the feasibility of a novel objective method to assess mechanical tension in ex vivo porcine colons.

This research was conducted using the da Vinci Research Kit (dVRK). First, a machine learning algorithm based on a long short-term memory neural network was developed to estimate the pulling forces on robotic arms of dVRK. Next, two robotic arms were used to apply upward forces to five ex vivo porcine colon segments. A force sensor was placed underneath the colons to measure ground-truth forces, which were compared to estimated forces calculated by the machine learning algorithm. Root mean square error and Spearman's Correlation were calculated to evaluate force estimation accuracy and correlation between measured and estimated forces, respectively.

Measured forces ranged from 0 to 17.2 N for an average experiment duration of two minutes. The algorithm's force estimates closely tracked the ground-truth sensor measurements with an accuracy of up to 88% and an average accuracy of 74% across all experiments. The estimated and measured forces showed a very strong correlation, with no Spearman's Correlation less than 0.80 across all experiments.

This study proposes a machine learning algorithm that estimates colonic tension with a close approximation to ground-truth data from a force sensor. This is the first study to objectively measure tissue tension (and report it in Newtons) using a robot. Our method can be adapted to measure tension on multiple types of tissue and can help prevent surgical complications and mortality.

Bowel preparation has long been used to prevent infectious complications and facilitate easy colorectal surgery. Both mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation have been thoroughly studied in the elective colorectal resection population, but no studies exist on their use before adult colostomy reversals. This study aims to evaluate the effect of preoperative bowel preparation on anastomotic leak and infectious complication rates after colostomy reversal surgery.

Retrospective cohort analysis of the 2016-2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program colorectal-specific database was performed. Adults who underwent elective colostomy reversal were stratified into 4 groups: no bowel preparation, oral antibiotic only, mechanical bowel preparation only, or combined oral antibiotic + mechanical bowel preparation. Outcomes measured were infectious complications, anastomotic leak, prolonged ileus, wound disruption, acute kidney injury, Clostridium difficile colitis, return to the operating room, survivor-only length of stay, mortality, and unplanned readmissions. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of infectious complications and anastomotic leak.

A total of 793 patients who underwent colostomy takedown were identified (no bowel preparation: 37%; oral antibiotic only: 7%; mechanical bowel preparation only: 13%; combined oral antibiotic + mechanical bowel preparation: 42%). Patients who had oral antibiotic + mechanical bowel preparation had significantly lower 30-day rates of organ/space surgical site infection, sepsis, septic shock, anastomotic leak, prolonged ileus, wound disruption, and length of stay (P < .05). On multivariate analysis, combined oral antibiotic + mechanical bowel preparation was associated with lower adjusted odds of infectious complications (adjusted odds ratio: 0.52, P < .05) and anastomotic leak (adjusted odds ratio: 0.37, P < .05).

This is the first study specifically demonstrating that combined oral antibiotic and mechanical bowel preparation may reduce infectious complications and anastomotic leaks without increasing Clostridium difficile colitis and acute kidney injury after adult elective colostomy reversal. Granular, large-scale, prospective studies are warranted to replicate these findings and identify opportunities for quality improvement.

Whether the level of the inferior mesenteric artery ligation affects the incidence of anastomotic leakage remains unclear.

To assess the impact of the level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation on blood flow to the anastomotic site and the incidence of anastomotic leakage using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging.

A post hoc analysis of the EssentiAL trial.

This study was conducted at 41 tertiary referral centers in Japan.

A total of 839 patients with rectal cancer (<12 cm from the anal verge) were included.

The incidence of anastomotic leakage and perfusion status were compared between the high and low ligation groups.

The median fluorescence time was similar at 25 seconds in both groups (p = 0.74). Although no statistical difference was noted, the high ligation group was more likely to have greater outliers in fluorescence time compared to the low ligation group. The high ligation group demonstrated higher poor perfusion rates than the low ligation group (2.8% vs 1.5%). In the high ligation group, anastomotic leakage occurred in 1 case of poor perfusion where additional resection was not performed by the surgeon's intraoperative judgment. In addition, the additional resection rate nearly doubled with the use of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging. After propensity score matching (129 patients per group), the overall anastomotic leakage rate was 13.2% in the high ligation group and 10.9% in the low ligation group ( p = 0.57).

This study was a post hoc analysis, the sample size was small, and the anastomosis methods varied.

The level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation did not affect blood flow at the anastomotic site or the incidence of anastomotic leakage statistically, but assessing bowel perfusion using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging can offer clinical benefits, optimizing patient outcomes. See Video Abstract .

The Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs-CRB3180007), the Japanese Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR000030240).

ANTECEDENTES:No está claro si el nivel de la ligadura de la arteria mesentérica inferior afecta la incidencia de fuga anastomótica.OBJETIVO:Evaluar el impacto del nivel de ligadura de la arteria mesentérica inferior en el flujo sanguíneo al sitio de la anastomosis y la incidencia de fuga anastomótica mediante imágenes de fluorescencia con verde de indocianina.DISEÑO:Análisis post hoc del ensayo EssentiAL.ESCENARIO:Este estudio se realizó en 41 centros de referencia terciarios en Japón.PACIENTES:839 pacientes con cáncer rectal (<12 cm desde el márgen anal).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS:Se compararon la incidencia de fuga anastomótica y el estado de perfusión entre los grupos de ligadura alta y baja.RESULTADOS:El tiempo de fluorescencia medio fue similar a 25 segundos en ambos grupos (p = 0.74). Aunque no se observó ninguna diferencia estadística, el grupo de ligadura alta tuvo más probabilidades de tener mayores valores atípicos en el tiempo de fluorescencia en comparación con el grupo de ligadura baja. El grupo de ligadura alta demostró tasas de perfusión deficiente más altas que el grupo de ligadura baja (2.8 % frente a 1.5 %). En el grupo de ligadura alta, se produjo una fuga anastomótica en un caso de perfusión deficiente en el que no se realizó una resección adicional según el criterio intraoperatorio del cirujano. Además, la tasa de resección adicional casi se duplicó con el uso de imágenes de fluorescencia con verde de indocianina. Después de la comparación por puntaje de propensión (129 pacientes por grupo), la tasa general de fuga anastomótica fue del 13.2 % en el grupo de ligadura alta y del 10.9 % en el grupo de ligadura baja ( p = 0.57).LIMITACIONES:Este estudio fue un análisis post hoc, el tamaño de la muestra fue pequeño y los métodos de anastomosis variaron.CONCLUSIONES:El nivel de ligadura de la arteria mesentérica inferior no afectó estadísticamente el flujo sanguíneo en el sitio de la anastomosis ni la incidencia de fuga anastomótica, pero la evaluación de la perfusión intestinal mediante imágenes de fluorescencia con verde de indocianina puede ofrecer beneficios clínicos, optimizando los resultados del paciente. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco)REGISTRO DEL ENSAYO:Registro japonés de ensayos clínicos (jRCTs-CRB3180007), Registro japonés de ensayos clínicos (UMIN-CTR000030240).

The relationship between the number of stapler firings (SFs) during robotic rectal transection and the risk of colorectal/coloanal anastomotic leakage (AL) is controversial. This study investigates whether the number of robotic SFs is associated with an increased risk of AL.

Retrospective review of adult patients who underwent robotic total mesorectal excision (TME) and partial mesorectal excision (PME) with double-stapled colorectal or coloanal anastomosis for both benign and malignant colorectal diseases between 2015 and 2023 across three enterprise-wide hospitals.

the effect of multiple SFs on postoperative AL rate among patients who underwent one, two, or three or more SFs.

the effects of other potential risk factors on postoperative AL.

Of 503 patients who underwent robotic colorectal resection with a double-stapled anastomosis, 56 (11%) developed a postoperative AL. The number of SFs was not associated with the AL rate (p = 0.51): the univariable and multivariate analyses found no correlation between the AL rate and the increasing number of SFs required, compared with one SF as the reference (adjusted two SFs, OR = 1.1, 95% CI: 0.6-2.2, p = 0.77 vs. adjusted three or more SFs, OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.4-2.3, p = 0.96). On multivariate analysis, AL was strongly associated with male gender (OR = 2.5, 95% CI: 1.3-4.9, p = 0.005) and with TME versus PME (OR = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.5-5.5, p = 0.002).

The number of robotic SFs for rectal transection is not correlated with postoperative AL.

Rectal cancer has increased in incidence, and surgery remains the cornerstone of multimodal treatment. Pelvic anatomy, particularly a narrow pelvis, poses challenges in rectal cancer surgery, potentially affecting oncological outcomes and postoperative complications.

To investigate the relationship between radiologically assessed pelvic anatomy and surgical outcomes as well as the impact on local recurrence following rectal cancer surgery.

We retrospectively analyzed 107 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with elective rectal surgery between January 1, 2017, and September 1, 2022. Pelvimetric measurements were performed using computed tomography (CT)-based two-dimensional methods (n = 77) by assessing the pelvic inlet area in mm², and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based three-dimensional techniques (n = 52) using the pelvic cavity index (PCI). Patient demographic, clinical, radiological, surgical, and pathological characteristics were collected and analyzed in relation to their pelvimetric data.

When patients were categorized based on CT measurements into narrow and normal/wide pelvis groups, a significant association was observed with male sex, and a lower BMI was more common in the narrow pelvis group (P = 0.002 for both). A significant association was found between a narrow pelvic structure, indicated by low PCI, and increased surgical morbidity (P = 0.049). Advanced age (P = 0.003) and male sex (P = 0.020) were significantly correlated with higher surgical morbidity. Logistic regression analysis identified four parameters that were significantly correlated with local recurrence: older age, early perioperative readmission, longer operation time, and a lower number of dissected lymph nodes (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences between the narrow and normal/wide pelvis groups in terms of the operation time, estimated blood loss, or overall local recurrence rate (P > 0.05).

MRI-based pelvimetry may be valuable in predicting surgical difficulty and morbidity in rectal cancer surgery, as indicated by the PCI. The observed correlation between low PCI and increased surgical morbidity suggests the potential importance of a preoperative MRI-based pelvimetric evaluation. In contrast, CT-based pelvimetry did not show significant differences in predicting surgical outcomes or cancer recurrence, indicating that the utility of pelvimetry alone may be limited in these respects.

Evidence of superiority of robotic-assisted surgery for colorectal resections remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgical techniques in high-risk patients undergoing resections for colorectal cancer.

Systematic searches were performed using Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane library databases from inception until December 2024. Randomised and non-randomised studies reporting outcomes of robotic-assisted or laparoscopic resections in the following high-risk categories were included: obesity, male gender, the elderly, low rectal cancer, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and previous abdominal surgery. Comparative meta-analyses for all sufficiently reported outcomes were completed. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I and RoB 2 tools for non-randomised and randomised studies, respectively.

48 studies, including a total of 34,846 patients were eligible for inclusion and 32 studies were utilised in the comparative meta-analyses. Conversion to open rates were significantly lower for robotic-assisted surgery in patients with obesity, male patients and patients with low rectal tumours (obese OR 0.41 [CI 0.32-0.51], p < 0.00001); male gender (OR 0.28 [CI 0.22-0.34], p < 0.00001); low tumours OR 0.10 [CI 0.02-0.58], p = 0.01). Length of stay was significantly reduced for robotic-assisted surgery in patients with obesity (SMD 0.25 [CI - 0.41 to - 0.09], p = 0.002). Operative time was significantly longer in all subgroups (obesity SMD 0.57 [CI 0.31-0.83], p < 0.0001; male gender SMD 0.77 [CI 0.17-1.37], p = 0.01; elderly SMD 0.50 [CI 0.18-0.83], p = 0.002; low rectal tumours SMD 0.48 [CI 0.12-0.84], p = 0.008; neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy SMD 0.72 [CI 0.34-1.09], p = 0.0002; previous surgery SMD 1.55 [CI 0.05-3.06], p = 0.04). When calculable, blood loss, length of stay, complication rate and lymph node yield were comparable in all subgroups.

This review provides further evidence of non-inferiority of robotic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer and demonstrates conversion rates are superior in specific, technically challenging operations.

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major complication in colorectal surgery, particularly following rectal cancer surgery, necessitating effective prevention strategies. The increasing frequency of colorectal resections and anastomoses during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for peritoneal carcinomatosis further complicates this issue owing to the diverse patient populations with varied tumor distributions and surgical complexities. This study aims to assess and compare AL incidence and associated risk factors across conventional colorectal cancer surgery (CRC), gastrointestinal CRS (GI-CRS), and ovarian CRS (OC-CRS), with a secondary focus on evaluating the role of protective ostomies.

A retrospective analysis was performed on 1324 patients undergoing CRC, GI-CRS, and OC-CRS between January 2015 and December 2022. Multivariate analysis was utilized to identify preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables as potential AL risk factors.

The overall AL rate was 3.0% (40/1324), with no significant differences among the three groups. Distinct risk factors were identified for each group: CRC (preoperative chemoradiotherapy), GI-CRS (ECOG score ≥ 2, preoperative albumin < 30 mg/dL), and OC-CRS (BMI < 18 kg/m2, pelvic lymphadenectomy, preoperative albumin < 30 mg/dL, anastomosis distance < 10 cm, postoperative anemia). Protective ostomies did not reduce AL incidence, and a notable discrepancy exists between AL risk factors and those influencing protective ostomy decisions.

AL, while rare, remains a serious postoperative complication in CRC and CRS. Key risk factors include preoperative nutritional status and surgical details such as blood supply and anastomosis level. Each patient group presents unique risks, which must be carefully weighed when considering protective ileostomy.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the utilization of intraoperative colonoscopy (IOC) for determining the integrity of the anastomosis and to establish an IOC scoring system.

A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2021 to June 2024, we analyzed the clinical data of 160 patients registered in a database who underwent laparoscopic left-sided colectomy at Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital. IOC was performed on all patients, and Mucosal color (MC), stapled line bleeding (BL), proximal redundancy (PR), and bowel preparation (BP) were evaluated and scored as variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) and Cohen's kappa was applied to assess the reproducibility of the evaluation.

Of 160 patients, 10 (6.25%) experienced AL. All the IOC variables had kappa values of 0.8 or higher, indicating good agreement. The logistic regression analysis revealed significant differences in the MC 2 (P = 0.017, OR 12.86), PR 2 (P = 0.001, OR 27.64), BP 2 (p = 0.016, OR 10.50) PR 2 score (P = 0.016, OR 10.50) and the sum of the scores (p = 0.001, OR 3.51).

IOC can be performed as a reference procedure to assess the integrity of the anastomosis during left-sided colorectal surgery.

One of the critical steps involved is the distal transection of the rectum in rectal cancer surgeries. Multiple staple firings have been proven to increase the rate of anastomotic leakage. In this study, we intended to learn the effectiveness of the robotic SureForm SmartFire (SS) stapling system and its application in robotic sigmoid colon and rectal procedures performed at our institution.

Prospective study of patients who underwent surgeries for sigmoid/rectal cancer at our centre was considered. During the surgery, SS staplers were used, and its internal data log with regard to reload selection by the colour, reloads, clamp attempts and staple fires was considered along with intra- and post-operative outcomes.

246 firings were done in 147 cases with mean body mass index of 26.3 ± 4.3 kg/m2; mean blood loss was 53.6 ± 21.8 ml. None of our patients had stapler-related complications, and the mean length of stay was 7.18 ± 1.5 days. Average reloads used in robotic-low anterior resection (LAR) were 1.73 with the fire attempts beyond lap angle occurring only in robotic-assisted LAR (RA-LAR)/abdominoperineal resection in 87 fires (41%) with 120 instances of controlled and sequential pauses occurred in 246 fires once fire pedal was activated.

Apart from oncological nodal and margin clearance in the carcinoma rectum surgery, obtaining adequate distal margin, sphincter preserving approach and distal transection of the rectum forms one of the key steps in the low anterior resection. Robotic SS staplers have 120° angulation in both axes with EndoWrist technology that has better manoeuvrability within the confines of the pelvis.

Introduction Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most severe complications following rectal cancer (RC) surgery, with significant implications for morbidity, mortality, and oncological outcomes. Identifying risk factors associated with AL may enhance surgical decision-making and improve patient prognosis. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including 42 adult patients who underwent RC resection at a hospital in Mexico City between January 2015 and December 2022. Demographic, clinical, pathological, and surgical variables were analyzed to assess their association with AL. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors. Results The overall incidence of AL was 11.9%, consistent with previous literature. Univariate analysis revealed no significant differences in patient-related factors such as age, BMI, ASA classification, diabetes mellitus, smoking, or biochemical markers (p>0.05). Treatment-related factors such as neoadjuvant therapy and diverting stoma (DS) placement did not show a significant association with AL. However, surgical factors played a crucial role: operative time was significantly longer in patients with AL (349.0 vs. 232.9 minutes, p=0.024), intraoperative blood loss was markedly higher (800.0 vs. 198.6 mL, p<0.001), and transfusion rates were elevated (60.0% vs. 13.5%, p=0.040). Tumor location in the middle rectum was more frequent among AL cases (60.0% vs. 18.9%, p=0.090). Postoperative complications were significantly more severe in patients with AL, with prolonged hospital stays (20.0 vs. 10.2 days, p=0.043) and increased reintervention rates (80.0% vs. 5.6%, p<0.001). In the logistic regression model, none of the analyzed variables reached statistical significance (p>0.99). However, operative time showed an odds ratio (OR) of 1.736 (p=0.997), suggesting that for each additional minute of surgery, the risk of AL could increase by 73.6%. Despite this trend, the wide confidence interval limits its precision and clinical applicability. Age showed an OR of 0.023 (p=0.998), potentially suggesting a 97.7% reduction in leakage risk for each additional year, although this result was not statistically significant and should be interpreted with caution. Conclusion Although no statistically significant risk factors were identified in the multivariate analysis, intraoperative variables such as prolonged surgical time, high blood loss, and transfusion requirement emerged as clinically relevant trends. These findings emphasize the need for optimizing surgical techniques and perioperative management to mitigate AL risk. Further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to validate these associations and improve risk stratification models.

Rectal eversion (RE) is a natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) method that allows anus-sparing resection in very low rectal tumors. This study aims to share the long-term results of RE in laparoscopic rectal resection performed with double stapling anastomosis.

A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted for patients who underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection with RE. Age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, type of surgery, distance of the tumor to the dentate line, specimen extraction site, cancer stage, preoperative chemoradiotherapy, postoperative complications, and postoperative clinical follow-up findings were recorded. Incontinence was assessed using the Wexner score (WS). Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is determined by the LARS score. A 7-point Likert scale was used to evaluate the satisfaction of the patients.

A total of 17 patients underwent resection by RE for rectal tumors. Of the 11 patients included in the study, 4 were female and 7 were male. The mean age was 66.09±15.04 years. The mean follow-up was 64.18±16.83 months. The mean tumor diameter was 3.1 cm (range: 0.9 to 7.2 cm). The mean distance of the tumor from the dentate line was 2.7 cm (range: 1.2 to 5.6 cm). No anastomotic leak was observed in any patient. One patient had an anastomotic stenosis and was treated with balloon dilatation. The median LARS score was 16 (range 0 to 32) and 64% of the patients had no LARS. Two patients had minor LARS and 2 patients had major LARS. The median Wexner score was 3.5 (range 0 to 14). The median Likert scale was 7 (range 5 to 7). It was found that 55% of the patients were extremely satisfied, 18% were satisfied, and 27% were slightly satisfied with their surgery. There were no dissatisfied patients.

RE is a safe NOSE technique in laparoscopic double stapling anastomosis for rectal resection. There is a high level of long-term patient satisfaction with anus-sparing procedures via RE, even in the presence of various symptoms.

Oral antibiotic prophylaxis (OAP) lowers rates of surgical site infection (SSI) and may aid anastomotic healing in colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to analyse the understudied impact of OAP on SSI microbiology after colorectal surgery.

A post hoc analysis was performed on a previous prospective, multicentre study of elective colorectal surgery. For 1000 patients with SSI, this study compared the microbiology of SSIs in procedures without OAP (SSI/OAP-) and with OAP (SSI/OAP+).

There were 340 patients in the SSI/OAP- group and 660 in the SSI/OAP+ group. The use of OAP increased the presence of Gram-positive cocci (GPC) (OR 1.542, 95% CI 1.153-2.062) and fungi (OR 2.037, 95% CI 1.206-3.440), but reduced rates of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) (OR 1.461, 95% CI 1.022-2.088) and anaerobe isolation (OR 0.331, 95% CI 0.158-0.696). Specifically, it led to increases in the isolation of Enterococcus faecium (OR 1.450, 95% CI 0.812-2.591), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (OR 2.000, 95% CI 1.043-3.834) and Candida spp. (OR 2.037, 95% CI 1.206-3.440). In colon surgery with OAP, GPC infections were more likely (OR 1.461, 95% CI 1.022-2.088). In rectal surgery, organ/space SSIs had a higher risk of harbouring GPC (OR 1.860, 95% CI 1.153-2.999) and a lower risk of GNB (OR 0.321, 95% CI 0.200-0.515).

OAP reduced the presence of anaerobes and GNB in SSIs, but increased the isolation of GPCs and fungi, with E. faecium and Candida being of particular concern. This information should guide empirical antibiotic therapy for postoperative colorectal SSIs in patients who have received preoperative OAP.

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a significant complication following rectal cancer surgery, adversely affecting both quality of life and oncological outcomes. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning and deep learning, offer promising avenues for predicting and preventing AL. These technologies can analyze extensive clinical datasets to identify preoperative and perioperative risk factors such as malnutrition, body composition, and radiological features. AI-based models have demonstrated superior predictive power compared to traditional statistical methods, potentially guiding clinical decision-making and improving patient outcomes. Additionally, AI can provide surgeons with intraoperative feedback on blood supply and anatomical dissection planes, minimizing the risk of intraoperative complications and reducing the likelihood of AL development.

Introduction Anastomotic leakage (AL) following stoma closure is a significant complication that can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Identifying risk factors associated with AL is essential for improving surgical outcomes, especially in resource-limited settings like Yemen. Methods We conducted this retrospective study at Al-Thawra Modern General Hospital and the Republican Teaching Hospital Authority in Sana'a, Yemen, between August 2020 and April 2024. The analysis included 50 patients aged 18-65 years who underwent stoma closure. We analyzed patient data, including demographics, comorbidities, surgical technique, and outcomes, to identify risk factors for AL. Results The incidence of AL was six (12%) out of 50 cases. Significant risk factors included smoking, with AL present in four (67%) smokers and two (33%) non-smokers (p = 0.045). Patients with diverticulitis were more likely to require a stoma in two (33%) cases, and perforated small bowel with peritonitis in one (17%) case, compared to trauma cases in two (7%) and colorectal cancer cases at one (11%) (p = 0.038). AL was most common in colorectal anastomosis, observed in four (67%) cases, compared to other sites in two (5%) cases (p = 0.001). The surgical technique impacted the incidence of AL, with hand-sewn anastomosis showing a higher rate in four (67%) cases compared to stapled anastomosis in two (33%) cases (p = 0.036). No significant associations were found for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, or surgeon experience. Conclusion This study identifies key risk factors for AL following stoma closure in the context of hospitals in Yemen, emphasizing the need for targeted preoperative and intraoperative strategies, such as smoking cessation and careful surgical technique selection, to reduce the risk of AL. Future studies should focus on larger cohorts and the impact of enhanced perioperative care protocols in low-resource settings.

The efficacy of diversion ileostomy followed by radical surgery for locally advanced upper-half rectal cancer remains uncertain. This study seeks to compare the effectiveness of treatment with and without diversion ileostomy in preventing anastomotic leakage (AL) and to identify a subset who may benefit from diversion ileostomy after AL occurs in Chinese patients with stage II and III upper-half rectal cancer. A retrospective study enrolled a total of 809 patients with locally advanced upper-half rectal cancer between 2017 and 2021, with 27.6% (n = 223) treated with diversion ileostomy and 72.4% (n = 586) treated without diversion ileostomy. The Diversion(+) group (n = 172) and Diversion(-) group (n = 172) were compared for perioperative outcomes through 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). The selection of variables for multivariable logistic regression was determined through bivariate logistic regression analysis. Additionally, optimal cutoff values for risk factors were identified using ROC curve analysis. Within the entire cohort, patients in the Diversion(+) group exhibited a lower distance from the anal verge (DAV) and higher rates of chemoradiotherapy (CRT), diabetes, cN2 stage, mrCRM positivity, EMVI positivity, and CEA elevation compared to those in the Diversion(-) group. Following PSM, a satisfactory balance of baseline variables was achieved between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in AL rates (7.0% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.659) or AL grade distribution (Grade A: 0.6% vs. 0%, Grade B: 5.2% vs. 4.1%, Grade C: 1.2% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.691) between the two groups. However, the Diversion(+) group demonstrated a higher incidence of postoperative complications (30.8% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.004), Clavien‒Dindo III-IV complications (2.9% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.013), particularly wound infections (8.1% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.002), and early postoperative inflammatory small bowel obstruction (EPISBO) (8.7% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.001) compared to the Diversion(-) group. Results from multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that male gender (OR = 2.354, p = 0.014) was the only independent risk factor associated with AL, while the presence of diversion ileostomy (with vs. without, OR = 1.144, p = 0.686) did not show significant associations. In patients with AL, the onset of the AL was observed to occur later in the Diversion(+) group compared to the Diversion(-) group (7.0 ± 3.3 vs. 3.4 ± 1.4 days, p < 0.001), while the recovery time was significantly shorter (11.3 ± 4.7 vs. 20.3 ± 7.2 days, p < 0.001). Similarly, in Grade C AL patients, the occurence time was delayed in the Diversion(+) group compared to the Diversion(-) group (8.7 ± 4.7 vs. 3.2 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.008), with a shorter recovery time (19.3 ± 2.1 vs. 25.7 ± 6.7 days, p = 0.031). A trend was observed indicating a longer interval before ileostomy restoration in the AL patients compared to the non-AL patients (7.6 ± 4.9 months vs. 5.5 ± 2.9 months, p = 0.079). In addition, DAV (OR = 0.078, p = 0.002) was identified as the only independent factor associated with potential-diversion-benefit in patients with AL, with an optimal cutoff point of 8.6 cm. The utilization of diversion ileostomy as a preventative measure for AL in cases of locally advanced upper-half rectal cancer is not universally endorsed due to potential complications such as small bowel obstruction and wound infection. Nevertheless, in the occurrence of AL, diversion ileostomy may prove advantageous for patient recuperation. Particularly, male patients with a DAV ranging from 7 to 8.6 cm may experience benefits from undergoing diversion ileostomy subsequent to AL in cases of locally advanced upper-half rectal cancer.

Anastomotic leakage in visceral surgery is associated with a large number of known and also unknown or even unmeasurable parameters. Furthermore, the associations between the individual factors are intertwined and complex. According to current data a preoperative prediction is not reliably possible and should be distinguished from intraoperative or postoperative prediction models. Most studies on this topic do not exceed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.70. A thorough understanding of statistics and prediction models is necessary to correctly interpret the published works. Due to the relatively low incidence rate of anastomotic leakage from a statistical point of view, large datasets are required for adequate prediction. Multimodal data and complex algorithms can potentially handle big data more accurately and improve predictability; however, these models have so far not been applied in the clinical routine.

Anastomotic stricture occurs in up to 30% of colorectal resections; however, evidence on risk factors and preventive measures remains scarce. This study aimed to identify technical factors responsible for increasing the risk for colorectal and coloanal anastomotic strictures.

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with anastomotic stricture who underwent resection and/or redo anastomosis between January 1, 2011 and August 1, 2021 in a tertiary referral centre. Patients with anastomotic stricture were compared with an equal number of randomly selected patients without anastomotic complications, who were operated on during the same time period. The main outcome measures were technical risk factors of anastomotic stricture.

Each group included 50 patients who were similar for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, distance of anastomosis to the dentate line and indication for surgery. Median follow-up was significantly longer in the non-stricture group (38.6 months vs. 12.6 months, p = 0.04). Splenic flexure mobilization [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.18 [2], 95% CI: 0.08-0.39, p < 0.001], high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (HR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.09-0.5, p < 0.001) and high ligation of the inferior mesenteric vein (HR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.09-0.50, p < 0.001) were associated with a lower likelihood of anastomotic stricture. Conversely, use of a 25-mm-diameter circular stapler (HR = 22.69, 95% CI: 2.69-191.10, p < 0.001), clinically significant anastomotic leak (HR = 3.94, 95% CI: 2.04-7.64, p < 0.001), firing the stapler more than once for rectal division (HR = 24.75, 95% CI: 6.85-89.38, p < 0.001) and diverting stoma (HR = 3.087, 95% CI: 1.736-5.491, p < 0.0001) were predictive of an anastomotic stricture.

Failure to mobilize the splenic flexure and to perform high ligation of the inferior mesenteric vessels were associated with higher odds of anastomotic stricture. A small-diameter circular stapler and multiple distal stapler firings were also associated with anastomotic stricture. These data support routine splenic flexure ligation and high ligation of the inferior mesenteric vessels as well as avoidance of both multiple  stapler firings for rectal transection and a 25-mm circular stapler for anastomosis.

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a novel method for anastomosis reinforcement to minimize the occurrence of anastomotic complications after surgical resection of rectal and sigmoid cancer.

We recruited 378 patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal anterior resection of rectal cancer and sigmoid cancer in SYSUCC. The occurrence rates of intraoperative bleeding, operation time, and postoperative anastomotic complications were compared between the treatment group receiving anastomotic reinforcement and the control group without anastomotic reinforcement.

The incidence of anastomotic leakage in the treatment group was significantly lower than that in the control group (1.59% vs. 11.64%, p < 0.001). Following the application of inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust for factors influencing the occurrence of anastomotic leakage, the incidence of anastomotic leakage remained significantly lower in the treatment group compared to the control group (2.54% vs. 12.08%, p < 0.001).

The circumferential continuous anastomosis reinforcing suture method, recommended for laparoscopic surgery for rectal and sigmoid cancer, has the potential to effectively minimize the occurrence of anastomotic complications.

Anastomotic leak is a relatively common and debilitating complication. Colorectal leak rates vary widely in the literature, ranging from 1% to 20%. In modern surgical practice, there is much emphasis on the use of indocyanine green (ICG). This is a fluorescent dye administered intravenously to locate and predict an adequate line of anastomosis. We sought to analyse the current literature and supporting evidence behind the use of ICG in the context of elective colorectal surgery.

A literature search was conducted for papers published between January 1991 and December 2022 concerning the use of ICG in colorectal surgery. Data on anastomotic leak, overall complication rate, operative time and involvement of artificial intelligence (AI) were compared.

A total of 24 studies were selected, including 3 randomised controlled trials. There was an anastomotic leak rate of 4.3% in cases with ICG administration compared with 9.5% in the control group (p<0.00001). Seven studies mentioned overall complication rates. These were lower in the ICG cohort than in the control group (15.5% vs 24.5%). There was no significant correlation between ICG use and operative time (p=0.78). Five studies looked at AI, with results suggesting that use of AI leads to much better accuracy in ICG metric analysis. However, the current literature is still inconclusive.

While there is strong evidence behind ICG use in the existing literature, more randomised controlled trials are required for better recommendations. AI in ICG metric interpretation has proved to be difficult owing to interpatient variability. Nevertheless, new data suggest better understanding and standardisation.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and intraperitoneal CRP, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in early diagnostics of anastomotic leakage in the first 4 postoperative days after colorectal surgery.

Between January 2023 and June 2023, one hundred patients with colorectal carcinoma were operated on with primary anastomosis. Ten patients had anastomotic leak (10%).

Based on serum CRP, a patient with a leak will be detected with a 78% probability on postoperative day 3 with values above 169.0 mg/L and on postoperative day 4 with values equal to 159.0 mg/L and above. Intraperitoneal CRP values greater than 56 mg/L on the fourth postoperative day indicate a 78% probability of a diagnosis of leakage. An anastomotic leak will be detected with a 70.0% probability based on an IL-6 value on the first day, at a cut-off value of 42,150. The accuracy of TNF-alpha in predicting anastomotic leak in the first two days is 70% at values higher than 78.00 on the first and 58.50 on the second postoperative day.

In this study serum CRP proved to be the most accurate in predicting anastomotic dehiscence after colorectal surgery.

Excessive tension at the anastomosis contributes to anastomotic leakage (AL) in low anterior resection (LAR). However, the specific tension has not been measured. We assessed whether "Bridging," characterized by the proximal colon resembling a suspension bridge above the pelvic floor, is a significant risk factor for AL following LAR for rectal cancer.

This retrospective study reviewed the medical records and laparoscopic videos of 102 patients who underwent laparoscopic LAR using the double stapling technique at Yachiyo Hospital between January 2014 and December 2023. Patients were classified based on whether they had Bridging (tight or sagging) or were in a Resting state of the proximal colon, and the association between Bridging and AL was examined.

AL occurred in 31.3% of the Tight Bridging group, 20% of the Sagging Bridging group, and 2.2% of the Resting group (P = 0.002). The incidence of AL was significantly higher in patients with Bridging than in those without (23.2% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis revealed that Bridging is an independent risk factor for AL (odds ratio = 6.97; 95% confidence interval: 1.45-33.6; P = 0.016).

The presence of Bridging is a significant risk factor for AL following LAR for rectal cancer, suggesting the need for implementing preventive measures in patients with this condition.

Despite rapid advances in colorectal surgery, morbidity and mortality rates in elective gastrointestinal surgery play a significant role. For decades, there have been tempestuous discussions on preventative measures to minimize the risk of anastomotic dehiscence. When mechanical bowel preparation before an elective procedure, one of the key hypotheses, was introduced into practice, it was assumed that it would decrease the number of infectious complications and anastomotic dehiscence. The advancements in antibiotic treatment supported the concomitant administration of oral antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation. In the prospective study conducted at our clinic, we performed left-side colorectal procedures without prior mechanical preparation. All patients enrolled in the study underwent the surgery and were observed in the 3rd Surgical Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia, from January 2019 to January 2020. As a control group, we used a similar group of patients with MBP. Our observed group included 87 patients with tumors in the left part of their large intestine (lineal flexure, descendent colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum). Dixon laparoscopic resection was performed in 26 patients. Sigmoid laparoscopic resection was performed in 27 patients. In 12 patients, the procedure was started laparoscopically but had to be converted due to adverse anatomical conditions. The conservative approaches mostly included Dixon resections (19 patients), sigmoid colon resections (5 patients), left-side hemicolectomies (6 patients), and Miles' tumor resections, with rectal amputation (4 patients). Our study highlighted the fact that MBP does not have an unequivocal benefit for patients with colorectal infection, which has an impact on the development of anastomotic dehiscence.

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most frequent life-threating complication following colorectal surgery. Several attempts have been made to prevent AL. This prospective, randomized, multicentre trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nebulised modified cyanoacrylate in preventing AL after rectal surgery.

Patients submitted to colorectal surgery for carcinoma of the high-medium rectum across five high-volume centres between June 2021 and January 2023 entered the study and were randomized into group A (anastomotic reinforcement with cyanoacrylate) and group B (no reinforcement) and followed up for 30 days. Anastomotic reinforcement was performed via nebulisation of 1 mL of a modified cyanoacrylate glue. Preoperative features and intraoperative and postoperative results were recorded and compared. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID number NCT03941938).

Out of 152 patients, 133 (control group, n = 72; cyanoacrylate group, n = 61) completed the follow-up. ALs were detected in nine patients (12.5%) in the control group (four grade B and five grade C) and in four patients (6.6%), in the cyanoacrylate group (three grade B and one grade C); however, despite this trend, the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.36). However, Clavien-Dindo complications grade > 2 were significantly higher in the control group (12.5% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.04). No adverse effects related to the glue application were reported.

The role of modified cyanoacrylate application in AL prevention remains unclear. However its use to seal colorectal anastomoses is safe and could help to reduce severe postoperative complications.

(1) Background: In recent years, there has been a change in practice for diverting stomas in rectal cancer surgery, shifting from routine diverting stomas to a more selective approach. Studies suggest that the benefits of temporary ileostomies do not live up to their risks, such as high-output stomas, stoma dysfunction, and reoperation. (2) Methods: All rectal cancer patients treated with a robotic resection in a single tertiary colorectal centre in the UK from 2013 to 2021 were analysed. In 2015, our unit made a shift to a more selective approach to temporary diverting ileostomies. The cohort was divided into a routine diversion group treated before 2015 and a selective diversion group treated after 2015. Both groups were analysed and compared for short-term outcomes and morbidities. (3) Results: In group A, 63/70 patients (90%) had a diverting stoma compared to 98/135 patients (72.6%) in group B (p = 0.004). There were no significant differences between the groups in anastomotic leakages (11.8% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.312) or other complications (p = 0.117). There were also no significant differences in readmission (3.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.312) or reoperation (3.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 1.000) after stoma closure. After 1 year, 71.6% and 71.9% (p = 1.000) of patients were stoma-free. One major reason for the delay in stoma reversal was the COVID-19 pandemic, which only occurred in group B (0% vs. 22%, p = 0.054). (4) Conclusions: A more selective approach to diverting stomas for robotic rectal cancer patients does not lead to more complications or leaks and can be considered in the treatment of rectal cancer tumours.

Anastomotic leakage (AL), a severe complication following colorectal surgery, arises from defects at the anastomosis site. This study evaluates the feasibility of predicting AL using machine learning (ML) algorithms based on preoperative data.

We retrospectively analyzed data including 21 predictors from patients undergoing colorectal surgery with bowel anastomosis at four Swiss hospitals. Several ML algorithms were applied for binary classification into AL or non-AL groups, utilizing a five-fold cross-validation strategy with a 90% training and 10% validation split. Additionally, a holdout test set from an external hospital was employed to assess the models' robustness in external validation.

Among 1244 patients, 112 (9.0%) suffered from AL. The Random Forest model showed an AUC-ROC of 0.78 (SD: ± 0.01) on the internal test set, which significantly decreased to 0.60 (SD: ± 0.05) on the external holdout test set comprising 198 patients, including 7 (3.5%) with AL. Conversely, the Logistic Regression model demonstrated more consistent AUC-ROC values of 0.69 (SD: ± 0.01) on the internal set and 0.61 (SD: ± 0.05) on the external set. Accuracy measures for Random Forest were 0.82 (SD: ± 0.04) internally and 0.87 (SD: ± 0.08) externally, while Logistic Regression achieved accuracies of 0.81 (SD: ± 0.10) and 0.88 (SD: ± 0.15). F1 Scores for Random Forest moved from 0.58 (SD: ± 0.03) internally to 0.51 (SD: ± 0.03) externally, with Logistic Regression maintaining more stable scores of 0.53 (SD: ± 0.04) and 0.51 (SD: ± 0.02).

In this pilot study, we evaluated ML-based prediction models for AL post-colorectal surgery and identified ten patient-related risk factors associated with AL. Highlighting the need for multicenter data, external validation, and larger sample sizes, our findings emphasize the potential of ML in enhancing surgical outcomes and inform future development of a web-based application for broader clinical use.

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most serious complication after rectal cancer surgery. Risk factors associated with AL have been documented in previous studies; however, the consensus is still lacking. In this retrospective study, we aimed to identify risk factors for AL after rectal cancer resection and to create an accurate and effective tool for predicting the risk of this complication.

The study cohort comprised of 276 patients with rectal cancer who had undergone anterior resection between 2015 and 2020. Twenty-four selected variables were assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify independent risk factors of AL. A risk assessment model for predicting the risk of AL was established on the basis of the regression coefficients of each identified independent risk factor.

Anastomotic leakage occurred in 20 patients (7.2%, 20/276). Multivariate analysis identified the following variables as independent risk or protective factors of AL: perioperative ileus ( P < 0.001, odds ratio [OR] = 14.699), tumor size ≥5 cm ( P = 0.025, OR = 3.925), distance between tumor and anal verge <7.5 cm ( P = 0.045, OR = 3.512), obesity ( P = 0.032, OR = 7.256), and diverting stoma ( P = 0.008, OR = 0.143). A risk assessment model was constructed and patients were allocated to high-, medium-, and low-risk groups on the basis of risk model scores of 5-7, 2-4, and 0-1, respectively. The incidences of AL in these three groups were 61.5%, 11.9%, and 2.0%, respectively ( P < 0.001).

Our risk assessment model accurately and effectively identified patients at high risk of AL and could be useful in aiding decision-making aimed at minimizing adverse outcomes associated with leakage.

Anatomical and physiological differences exist between sex, leading to variations in how diseases, such as rectal cancer, are prevalence and treatment outcomes of diseases including rectal cancer. In particular, in the case of rectal cancer, anatomical differences may be associated with surgical challenges, and these factors are believed to be important contributors to potential disparities in postoperative recovery, associated complications, and oncological outcomes between male and female patients. However, there is still ongoing debate regarding this matter. Significantly, the male pelvic anatomy is distinguished by its narrower dimensions, which can present surgical challenges and impede visual access during operative procedures, rendering it more complex than surgical interventions in the female pelvis. As a result, this anatomical difference leads to a greater occurrence of postoperative complications, such as anastomotic leakage. Moreover, the pelvis houses nerves that are vital for urinary and genital functions, underscoring the need to assess the potential risks of sexual and urinary dysfunction in rectal cancer surgery. These postoperative complications can significantly impact the quality of life; therefore, it is imperative to perform surgery with an understanding of the structural differences between sexes. Therefore, to address the limitations imposed by anatomical structures, new approaches such as robotic surgery, trans-anal total mesorectal excision, and intraoperative neuromonitoring are being introduced. Furthermore, it is essential to conduct research into fundamental mechanisms that may give rise to differences in surgical outcomes and oncological results between sexes. By comprehending the disparities between males and females, we can advance toward personalized treatments. Consequently, this review outlines variations in surgical approaches, complications, and treatments for rectal cancer in male and female patients.

Transanal endoscopic intersphincteric resection (ISR) surgery currently lacks sufficient clinical research and reporting.

To investigate the clinical effectiveness of transanal endoscopic ISR, in order to promote the clinical application and development of this technique.

This study utilized a retrospective case series design. Clinical and pathological data of patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent transanal endoscopic ISR at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University between May 2018 and May 2023 were included. All patients underwent transanal endoscopic ISR as the surgical approach. We conducted this study to determine the perioperative recovery status, postoperative complications, and pathological specimen characteristics of this group of patients.

This study included 45 eligible patients, with no perioperative mortalities. The overall incidence of early complications was 22.22%, with a rate of 4.44% for Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III events. Two patients (4.4%) developed anastomotic leakage after surgery, including one case of grade A and one case of grade B. Postoperative pathological examination confirmed negative circumferential resection margins and distal resection margins in all patients. The mean distance between the tumor lower margin and distal resection margin was found to be 2.30 ± 0.62 cm. The transanal endoscopic ISR procedure consistently yielded high quality pathological specimens.

Transanal endoscopic ISR is safe, feasible, and provides a clear anatomical view. It is associated with a low incidence of postoperative complications and favorable pathological outcomes, making it worth further research and application.

To prevent anastomotic leakage and other postoperative complications after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery, a protective ileostomy is often used. However, the necessity of performing ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the benefit of ileostomy on wound infection after laparoscopic rectal cancer. The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PubMed were used to retrieve all related documents up to September 2023. Completion of the trial literature was submitted once the eligibility and exclusion criteria were met and the literature quality assessment was evaluated. This study compared the post-operative post-operative complications of an ileostomy with that of non-ileostomy in a laparoscope. We used Reman 5.3 to analyse meta-data. Controlled studies were evaluated with ROBINS-I. The meta-analyses included 525 studies, and 5 publications were chosen to statistically analyse the data according to the classification criteria. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of postoperative wound infections among ostomate and nonostomate (odds ratio [OR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66, 4.84; p = 0.25). In 5 trials, the incidence of anastomotic leak was increased after surgery in nonostomate patients (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.12, 0.57; p = 0.0009). Two studies reported no significant difference in the length of operation time when nonstomal compared to stomal operations in patients with rectal cancer (mean difference, 0.87; 95% CI, -2.99, 4.74; p = 0.66). No significant difference was found in the rate of wound infection and operation time after operation among the two groups, but the incidence of anastomosis leak increased after operation. Protective ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer was effective in reducing the risk of anastomotic leakage in patients, and we found no additional risk of infection. We cautiously conclude that protective ileostomy is active and necessary for patients with a high risk of anastomotic leakage after surgery, which needs to be further confirmed by high-quality studies with larger samples.

Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains the most dreaded and unpredictable major complication after low anterior resection for mid-low rectal cancer. The aim of this study is to identify patients with high risk for AL based on the machine learning method.

Patients with mid-low rectal cancer undergoing low anterior resection were enrolled from West China Hospital between January 2008 and October 2019 and were split by time into training cohort and validation cohort. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method and stepwise method were applied for variable selection and predictive model building in the training cohort. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration curves were used to evaluate the performance of the models.

The rate of AL was 5.8% (38/652) and 7.2% (15/208) in the training cohort and validation cohort, respectively. The LASSO-logistic model selected almost the same variables (hypertension, operating time, cT4, tumor location, intraoperative blood loss) compared to the stepwise logistic model except for tumor size (the LASSO-logistic model) and American Society of Anesthesiologists score (the stepwise logistic model). The predictive performance of the LASSO-logistics model was better than the stepwise-logistics model (AUC: 0.790 vs. 0.759). Calibration curves showed mean absolute error of 0.006 and 0.013 for the LASSO-logistics model and stepwise-logistics model, respectively.

Our study developed a feasible predictive model with a machine-learning algorithm to classify patients with a high risk of AL, which would assist surgical decision-making and reduce unnecessary stoma diversion. The involved machine learning algorithms provide clinicians with an innovative alternative to enhance clinical management.

Laparoscopic anterior rectal resection (LAR) is a commonly performed surgery for rectal cancer patients. Pelvic floor peritoneum closure (PC), a vital procedure in conventional anterior rectal resection, is not routinely performed in LAR.

A total of 1118 consecutive patients with rectal cancer receiving LAR were included in this retrospective study. Patients were allocated into the PC group and the non-PC group. The occurrence of postoperative complications was compared between the 2 groups. Influential factors in anastomotic leakage (AL) were explored using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

There was no difference between the groups in terms of baseline characteristics. The occurrence of postoperative complications was similar between the groups. The PC group had significantly shorter postoperative hospitalization and longer operation duration compared with the non-PC group. The occurrences of Clavien-Dindo (CD) III-IV complications, CD III-IV AL, and reoperation were significantly lower in the PC group than the non-PC group. PC and a protective ileostomy were independent protective factors for CD III-IV AL.

PC could reduce the occurrence of CD III-IV complications, especially CD III-IV AL, and the rate of secondary surgery, especially in patients with a lower body mass index and patients who did not receive protective ileostomies.

The prevalence of obesity in the Eastern Mediterranean is increasing significantly up to 20.8% in 2016. Therefore, a higher percentage of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are expected to be obese. Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery (LCRCS) is regarded as a safe and feasible procedure as laparoscopic approach is becoming the gold standard in CRC surgery, especially in the early stages of disease. However, LCRCS is correlated with a higher risk of short-term post-operative complications in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 Kg/m 2 ) than in patients with BMI <30 Kg/m 2 . This study aims to evaluate the impact of obesity on short-term post-operative complications in patients undergoing LCRCS.

A retrospective study was conducted. Clinical data of case and control patients were extracted from medical records. These patients underwent LCRCS between January 2018 and June 2021 at Hôtel-Dieu de France Hospital, Beirut-Lebanon. Patients were divided into two groups: obese and non-obese. BMI ≥30 Kg/m 2 was used to define obese patients. Post-operative complications in the 30 days following surgery were the primary outcome. The severity of post-operative complications was evaluated using the Clavien-Dindo score. Chi-square test was used to evaluate the statistical correlation between collected variables.

We identified 107 patients who underwent LCRCS during this study period at our institution. Among the patients, 23 were obese (21.49%). At 30 days post-operative, 26 patients were reported to having at least one complication. Non-significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the early post-operative complications rate (obese 26.1% and non-obese 23.8% with P = 0.821). Obesity was not demonstrated as a stratification risk by severity of the early post-operative complications ( P = 0.92).

Obesity, which was defined as BMI ≥30 Kg/m 2 , was not a risk factor for early post-operative complications as well as a stratification risk by severity of post-operative complications in LCRCS.

Discontinuity resection is commonly conducted to avoid anastomotic leakage in high-risk patients but potentially results in rectal stump leakage. Although risk factors for anastomotic leakage have been widely studied, data on rectal stump leakage rates and underlying risk factors are scarce.

To determine rectal stump leakage rates following Hartmann's procedure and to identify patient-and surgery-associated risk factors.

A retrospective study with univariate and multivariate analyses was performed to identify risk factors of rectal stump leakage. A subgroup analysis of scheduled operations was performed.

The study was conducted at Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany.

Patients were included who underwent discontinuity resection with rectal stump formation between 2010 and 2020.

The main outcome measures included rectal stump leakage rates, 30-day mortality, length of hospitalization, and necessity for further invasive treatment.

Rectal stump leakage occurred in 11.78% of patients. Rectal stump leakage rates varied considerably depending on the surgical procedure performed and were highest following subtotal pelvic exenteration (34%). Diagnosis of rectal stump leakage peaked on postoperative day 7. A short rectal stump ( p = 0.001), previous pelvic radiotherapy ( p = 0.04), chemotherapy ( p = 0.004), and previous laparotomy ( p = 0.03) were independent risk factors for rectal stump leakage in the entire patient collective. In patients undergoing scheduled surgery, a short rectal stump was the only independent risk factor ( p = 0.003). Rectal stump leakage was not associated with increased 30-day mortality but prolonged length of hospitalization and frequently necessitated further invasive treatment.

Study results are limited by the retrospective design, a high number of emergency operations, and the mere inclusion of symptomatic leakages.

Rectal stump leakage is a relevant complication after discontinuity resection. Risk factors should be considered during surgical decision-making when both discontinuity resection and abdominoperineal resection are feasible. See Video Abstract.

ANTECEDENTES:La resección de discontinuidad se realiza comúnmente para evitar la fuga anastomótica en pacientes de alto riesgo, pero potencialmente da como resultado una fuga del muñón rectal. Si bien los factores de riesgo de fuga anastomótica se han estudiado ampliamente, los datos sobre las tasas de fuga del muñón rectal y los factores de riesgo subyacentes son escasos.OBJETIVO:Determinar las tasas de fuga del muñón rectal después del procedimiento de Hartmann e identificar los factores de riesgo asociados con el paciente y la cirugía.DISEÑO:Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo con análisis univariado y multivariado para identificar los factores de riesgo de fuga del muñón rectal. Se llevó a cabo un análisis de subgrupos de las operaciones programadas.AJUSTES:El estudio se realizó en el Hospital Universitario de Heidelberg, Alemania.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes que se sometieron a resección de discontinuidad con formación de muñón rectal entre 2010 y 2020.MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO PRINCIPALES:Las principales medidas de resultado incluyeron las tasas de fuga del muñón rectal, la mortalidad a los 30 días, la duración de la hospitalización y la necesidad de un tratamiento invasivo adicional.RESULTADOS:La fuga del muñón rectal ocurrió en el 11,78% de los pacientes. Las tasas de fuga del muñón rectal variaron considerablemente según el procedimiento quirúrgico realizado y fueron más altas después de la exenteración pélvica subtotal (34%). El diagnóstico de fuga del muñón rectal alcanzó su punto máximo en el día 7 del postoperatorio. Un muñón rectal corto (p = 0,001), radioterapia pélvica previa (p = 0,04), quimioterapia (p = 0,004) y laparotomía previa (p = 0,03) fueron factores de riesgo independientes de fuga rectal. Fuga del muñón en todo el colectivo de pacientes. En los pacientes sometidos a cirugía programada, el muñón rectal corto fue el único factor de riesgo independiente (p = 0,003). La fuga del muñón rectal no se asoció con un aumento de la mortalidad a los 30 días, pero con una duración prolongada de la hospitalización y con frecuencia requirió un tratamiento invasivo adicional.LIMITACIONES:Los resultados del estudio están limitados por el diseño retrospectivo, un alto número de operaciones de emergencia y la mera inclusión de fugas sintomáticas.CONCLUSIONES:La fuga del muñón rectal es una complicación relevante tras la resección por discontinuidad. Se deben considerar los factores de riesgo durante la toma de decisiones quirúrgicas cuando son factibles tanto la resección por discontinuidad como la resección abdominoperineal. (Traducción-Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

This case involves a 53-year-old male who was diagnosed with stenotic ascending colon cancer and peritoneal metastatic deposits. He was initially planned for cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS and HIPEC), along with resection of the primary tumor in the form of right hemicolectomy. Intraoperatively, the disease was found to be more extensive than anticipated. Consequently, the plan was modified to include debulking right hemicolectomy with hand-sewn ileocolic anastomosis and extensive peritoneal procedures. Postoperatively, he experienced an anastomotic leak, leading to another laparotomy. However, due to anatomical challenges, creating a stoma was considered unsafe. Therefore, innovative interventions were performed, including controlling the anastomotic defect with a 30Fr Foley catheter without disrupting the anastomosis. A collaborative effort from various medical teams facilitated the patient's discharge home after an extended stay in the critical care unit (CCU).

Multiple linear stapler firings is a risk factor for anastomotic leakage (AL) in laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR) using double stapling technique (DST) anastomosis. In this study, our objective was to establish the risk factors for ≥ 3 linear stapler firings, and to create and validate a predictive model for ≥ 3 linear stapler firings in laparoscopic LAR using DST anastomosis. We retrospectively enrolled 328 mid-low rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic LAR using DST anastomosis. With a split ratio of 4:1, patients were randomly divided into 2 sets: the training set (n = 260) and the testing set (n = 68). A clinical predictive model of ≥ 3 linear stapler firings was constructed by binary logistic regression. Based on three-dimensional convolutional networks, we built an image model using only magnetic resonance (MR) images segmented by Mask region-based convolutional neural network, and an integrated model based on both MR images and clinical variables. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and Youden index were calculated for each model. And the three models were validated by an independent cohort of 128 patients. There were 17.7% (58/328) patients received ≥ 3 linear stapler firings. Tumor size ≥ 5 cm (odds ratio (OR) = 2.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.15-5.60, p = 0.021) and preoperative carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA) level > 5 ng/mL [OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.20-4.04, p = 0.011] were independent risk factors associated with ≥ 3 linear stapler firings. The integrated model (AUC = 0.88, accuracy = 94.1%) performed better on predicting ≥ 3 linear stapler firings than the clinical model (AUC = 0.72, accuracy = 86.7%) and the image model (AUC = 0.81, accuracy = 91.2%). Similarly, in the validation set, the integrated model (AUC = 0.84, accuracy = 93.8%) performed better than the clinical model (AUC = 0.65, accuracy = 65.6%) and the image model (AUC = 0.75, accuracy = 92.1%). Our deep-learning model based on pelvic MR can help predict the high-risk population with ≥ 3 linear stapler firings in laparoscopic LAR using DST anastomosis. This model might assist in determining preoperatively the anastomotic technique for mid-low rectal cancer patients.

Although non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are useful options for multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, their effect on anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the association between early postoperative NSAID use and AL occurrence in patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery at a high-volume tertiary care center.

This retrospective observational study included all adult patients who underwent elective colorectal cancer resection surgery during 2011-2021 at a tertiary teaching hospital. Based on NSAID use within five postoperative days, patients were classified into either NSAID or no NSAID groups. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis for the primary outcome, AL, within the first 30 postoperative days, before and after propensity score analysis using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW).

Among the 7928 patients analyzed, 0.6% experienced AL after surgery. The occurrence rates of AL were 1.7% (12/714) and 0.5% (37/7214) in the NSAID and no NSAID groups, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that early postoperative NSAID use was significantly associated with AL [odds ratio (OR), 3.41; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.76-6.60; P < 0.001]. Significance was maintained after sIPTW (OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.86-6.72; P < 0.001).

Early postoperative NSAID use was significantly associated with AL in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery at a high-volume tertiary care center. Further prospective studies are required to investigate NSAIDs' clinically meaningful unfavorable effects following colorectal cancer surgery.

Closure of temporary diverting ostomies is commonly preceded by an endoscopic study of the colonic mucosa and anastomosis, despite lacking evidence of its relevance and impact on subsequent operative management.

We sought to determine the incidence of pathological findings and therefore evaluate the clinical benefit of routine pre-operative endoscopy in asymptomatic patients, hypothesizing sole evaluation of the anastomotic integrity to be sufficient in these cases.

We retrospectively identified all adult patients with ostomy installations who were followed up for potential reversal surgery between 2002 and 2020 at the University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland. Main outcome measures were the incidence of endoscopically identified pathological findings in the asymptomatic case cohort and their impact on the subsequent course of treatment.

Pre-procedural endoscopic data of 187 cases evaluated for ostomy closure were evaluated. Relevant mucosal findings in the asymptomatic cohort were documented in 26.3% and findings at the anastomotic site detected in 8.7%. A change in subsequent surgical management was noted in 10 patients of the entire cohort (5.3%) and in 9 (5.1%) of all asymptomatic cases. Upon multivariate analyses, the age range of 51 to 60 years old was found to be significantly linked to the presence of endoscopic findings entailing a change in patient management.

Our findings strongly suggest ostomy closure surgery without previous assessment of the bowel mucosa by means of endoscopy to be acceptable in asymptomatic patients. However, we found it to be indicated in all patients meeting the screening criteria for colorectal carcinoma.

Background: Despite design enhancements in endocutters, key challenges related to limited surgical access and space can impact stapling and, potentially, surgical outcomes. Objectives: This study aimed to develop consensus statements outlining the clinical value of precise articulation and greater anatomical access in minimally invasive surgery performed by bariatric, colorectal, and thoracic surgeons. Methods: Colorectal, bariatric, and thoracic surgeons from Japan, the United States, United Kingdom, and France participated in a 2-round modified Delphi panel. Round 1 included binary, Likert scale-type, multiple-response, and open-ended questions. These were converted to affirmative statements for round 2 if sufficient agreement was reached. Consensus was set at a predefined threshold of at least 90% of panelists across all surgical specialties and regions selecting the same option ("agree" or "disagree") for the affirmative statements. Results: Of the 49 statements in the round 2 questionnaire, panelists (n=135) reached consensus that (1) tissue slippage outside stapler jaws can occur due to limited access and space; (2) greater jaw aperture could help to manipulate thick or fragile tissue more easily; (3) articulation of an endocutter is clinically important in laparoscopic surgeries; (4) improved access to hard-to-reach targets and in limited space would improve safety; and (5) an endocutter with improved access through greater articulation would become common use. Discussion: By understanding user-specific challenges and needs from both specialty- and region-wide perspectives, endoscopic stapling devices can continue to be refined. In this study, improved articulation and greater jaw aperture were the key design features examined. Improved articulation and greater jaw aperture were key stapler design features identified in this study that may mitigate the risk of instrument clashes and intraoperative complications such as anastomotic leaks. Conclusions: This study gained insights into surgeons' perspective across a variety of specialties and from 3 distinct geographies. Participating surgeons reached consensus that an endocutter with greater jaw aperture and articulation may improve surgical access and has potential to improve surgical outcomes.