The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. However, the conventional procedure's anterior sheath division, from perforating vessels to the pedicle origin, risks weakening the abdominal wall's primary strength layer. Employing the da Vinci Xi Surgical System with indocyanine green dye and near-infrared fluorescence imaging, we refined a robotic technique for bilateral DIEP flap harvest. This approach enhances safety during vessel dissection, utilizing smaller fascial incisions. This study will present this technique in detail to microsurgeons interested in robotic DIEP flaps.

 In a retrospective cohort study spanning July 2021 to September 2022, female patients undergoing robotic bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction were analyzed. Following suprafascial flap dissection, the surgical robot was docked to target the pelvis, identifying and exposing deep inferior epigastric vessels intracorporeally. Mobilization and division occurred at their bases, with retrieval through a minimal anterior fascial incision, minimizing disruption to the abdominal wall and its motor innervation.

 The study comprised 23 patients (46 flaps), with a mean fascial length of 4.1 cm and mean pedicle length of 12.82 cm. Mesh usage was absent. Robotic time averaged 139 minutes, overall case length was 739 minutes, and the average length of stay was 3.9 days. Notably, no pedicle or intra-abdominal injuries were reported.

 This technique ensures safe and efficient pedicle dissection in robotic DIEP flap harvests. Given the limited number of plastic surgeons adept in minimally invasive abdominal surgeries, we recommend collaborative efforts, with general surgeons initially assisting microsurgeons in adopting the robotic approach. This strategy facilitates a smooth transition until plastic surgeons attain confidence and competence in independent robotic dissection.

 Traditional deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap harvest splits the anterior sheath, weakening the abdominal wall and predisposing patients to bulge or hernia. Abdominal wall morbidity may be decreased using minimally invasive techniques. We refined a transabdominal approach to the robotic harvest of bilateral DIEP flaps.

 A retrospective medical record study involving all patients who underwent bilateral or bipedicled robotic DIEP (rDIEP) or standard DIEP (sDIEP) flap harvest between July 2021 and September 2022. Outcomes included abdominal wall morbidity, total operative time, length of stay (LOS), and complications.

 Forty-seven patients were included (48 sDIEP flaps, 46 rDIEP flaps) with no significant difference in patient characteristics. Fascial incision length in the rDIEP group was shorter (4.1 vs. 11.7 cm, p < 0.001). Mesh reinforcement of the abdominal wall was used in 13/24 sDIEP and none in rDIEP patients (p < 0.001). Operative time was longer in the rDIEP cohort (739 vs. 630 minutes, p = 0.013), although subanalysis showed no difference in the second half of the cohort. The average robotic dissection time was 135 minutes, which decreased significantly with the surgeon's experience. There were no intraoperative complications from using the robot. LOS was shorter with rDIEP but not statistically significant (3.9 vs. 4.3 days, p = 0.157).

 This study represents the most extensive cohort analysis of bilateral rDIEP flap harvest, offering a comprehensive comparison to traditional sDIEP. The initial results underscore the viability of robotic techniques for flap harvesting, highlighting potential advantages including reduced fascial incision length and decreased abdominal disruption. Furthermore, using robotics may obviate the necessity for fascial reinforcement with mesh.

The integration of frailty assessments into preoperative evaluation protocols is essential for enhancing surgical procedure safety. As autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) increases in popularity, it is critical to stratify risk in patients with significant comorbidities with an ABR-specific frailty model. The aim of this study was to identify comorbidities associated with patients for unilateral or bilateral ABR flap failure, to develop a frailty index with a multi-institutional database.

The TriNetX database was queried for patients who underwent free flap breast reconstruction (CPT code 19364) between 2016 and 2024 across 89 healthcare institutions. Patients who experienced unilateral or bilateral flap failure (ICD-10 T86.821) were identified; preoperative comorbidities that occurred at a significantly different frequency were detected. Subsequently, univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors of free flap failure. Odds ratios were converted into relative risk ratios and probabilities using the baseline frequency of flap failure without any comorbidity.

A total of 10,291 patients who underwent either unilateral or bilateral primary free flap ABR were identified. A total of 120 (1.17%) patients experienced partial or total flap failure. Comorbidities of interest were seen among infectious, oncologic, hematologic, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and dermatologic systems. Significant risk factors on multivariable logistic regression included history of anemia (OR, 2.87), breast abscess (OR, 2.98), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 3.08), hypertension (OR, 1.69), and body mass index ≥30 (OR, 2.37) (P < 0.05 for all). The baseline frequency of flap failure without any comorbidity was 0.73%. The presence of one or more risk factors increased the probability of 1-week flap failure anywhere from 1.23% (hypertension alone) to 43.69% (all five comorbidities).

Select preoperative comorbidities were identified as patient-specific risk factors for postoperative flap failure. A future direction may also include identifying complications specific to certain flap techniques and within partial and total flap failures, as well as prospectively tracking data per flap, rather than per patient through the TriNetX database.

Muscle sparing-transverse rectus abdominis flap has been widely used for breast reconstruction and the abdominal hernia or bulging at the donor site is relatively common complication. Previous studies have emphasized the fascial defects and the defect of muscle has been neglected. This study aims to investigate the relationship between the size of the rectus abdominis muscle defect and its impact on hernia or bulge formation after muscle sparing-transverse rectus abdominis flap.

A retrospective study of patients undergoing unilateral or bilateral breast reconstruction with muscle sparing-transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap was performed. We compared the patient group with postoperative abdominal hernia or bulging requiring surgery with the patient group without hernia. The surgical specific data of the size of rectus abdominis muscle defect, muscle sparing type and flap weight are analyzed.  Results: We conducted a survey on a total of 160 patients, of which six patients experienced abdominal hernia or bulging requiring surgery. Comparing patient group requiring surgical treatment for hernia or bulging with patient group without hernia, there was a significant difference of the width of rectus abdominis muscle defect. The cut-off value of the width was 4.5 cm.  Conclusion: When performing MS-TRAM, minimizing the resection of rectus abdominis muscle remains crucial, especially the horizontal width.

Donor site morbidity has become a major focus in free tissue transfer as flap success rates have approached 98%. Emphasis is placed on minimizing the morbidity and optimizing cosmetic and functional outcomes at the donor site. This article reviews techniques to mitigate the donor site morbidity of commonly used free flaps in head and neck reconstruction.

Step-off deformity is a suboptimal aesthetic outcome at the donor site following abdominal flap harvesting for breast reconstruction. This study assessed the prevalence of step-off deformities after autologous breast reconstruction and explored the associated risk factors.

This retrospective study evaluated step-off deformities among consecutive patients who had undergone autologous abdominal flap-based breast reconstruction between January of 2019 and December of 2022. The postoperative evaluation used medical records and photographs, defining step-off deformity as a thickness discrepancy in the upper and lower abdominal tissue with reference to the scar line and angles less than 165 degrees. Moreover, the study explored potential risk factors, including abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness based on computed tomography.

In total, 187 patients underwent abdominal flap-based breast reconstruction; 38 exhibited step-off deformity. The case group exhibited significantly higher body mass index (BMI) and greater subcutaneous layer thickness in both the upper and lower abdomen compared with those of the control group. The groups did not differ significantly in postoperative complications, including abdominal bulging or hernia. Multivariable analysis revealed notable risk factors for step-off deformity development: BMI ( P = 0.026), presence of preoperative abdominal fold ( P = 0.028), and thickness differences between the upper and lower abdomen ( P = 0.011). The cut-off values were 26.1 kg/m 2 for BMI and 9.5 mm for thickness differences.

Higher BMI, presence of abdominal fold, and significant upper-lower abdomen tissue thickness differences may be associated with an increased risk of donor step-off deformity after abdominal flap harvest. These findings may inform patient counseling and warrant attention when closing donor wounds in high-risk individuals.

Risk, III.

Previous studies have shown a higher complication rate in bilateral (BL) compared to unilateral (UL) deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to offer an update by including recent studies to thoroughly assess the complication rates in UL versus BL DIEP flap reconstructions and provide clear guidance for clinicians and their patients.

A systematic review of the literature and comparative meta-analysis were performed to assess the differences in complication rates between UL and BL procedures. Only comparative studies that reported on postoperative complications after UL and BL DIEP flap breast reconstructions were included. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model.

Five studies representing 5120 patients who underwent either UL or BL DIEP flap breast reconstructions were included. BL DIEP flap reconstructions were associated with a higher risk of total flap loss, with an OR of 1.48 (95% CI, 1.02-2.14) and a P value of 0.04. Conversely, the risk of reexploration surgery was reduced, with an OR of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.55- 0.84) and a P value of 0.0002.

BL DIEP flap breast reconstruction carries a higher risk of complete flap loss compared with UL reconstructions, with a moderate risk increase. Despite this increased risk, the significant benefits of BL reconstruction make it a viable and recommended option for women requiring this type of surgery.

Introduction: Autologous breast reconstruction remains a popular surgical option following mastectomy; however, it is not without complications. Preoperative CT angiograms (CTAs) are often obtained for surgical planning, and morphometric data such as fat and muscle distribution can be measured. This study aimed to assess if CTA morphometric data predicts abdominal donor site complications in patients undergoing abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients who underwent abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction from 2013 to 2018. Along with population and operative characteristics, preoperative morphometric variables were assessed for the following: subcutaneous adipose tissue, visceral adipose tissue, skeletal muscle area and index, rectus and psoas cross-sectional area, and bone density. Statistical comparison to abdominal donor site complications was performed using logistic regression analysis for every 100-unit change. Results: A total of 174 patients were included in this study. Visceral adipose tissue was significantly associated with the development of infection (P = .005), epidermolysis (P = .031), and seroma (P = .04). Subcutaneous adipose tissue, skeletal muscle index, cross-sectional muscle area, and bone density were not associated with abdominal donor site complications. Obesity (P = .024), history of smoking (P = .049), and the number of perforators harvested (P = .035) significantly increased the likelihood of delayed abdominal healing. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that increased visceral adipose tissue, as measured by CTA, is significantly associated with an increased risk of abdominal donor site complications. CTA morphometric data and identifying high-risk patient characteristics can help guide preoperative counseling and better inform surgical risks.

Hybrid breast reconstruction combines free tissue transfer with implant placement. Various mesh products have been successfully used to secure the implant position in these reconstructions. In this study, the authors investigate the impact of mesh type on long-term outcomes following hybrid breast reconstruction.

A retrospective analysis of all patients with at least 24 months of follow-up after immediate bilateral prepectoral hybrid breast reconstruction was performed. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were used to evaluate long-term outcomes and compare breasts reconstructed with polyglactin mesh versus acellular dermal matrix (ADM).

Thirty-nine patients (78 breasts) who underwent hybrid breast reconstruction with an average follow-up period of 50.4 months (range, 27 to 73 months) were included in the study. Postoperative complications included hematoma ( n = 2 [2.6%]), mastectomy skin necrosis ( n = 12 [15.4%]), and fat necrosis ( n = 6 [7.7%]). There were no instances of implant infection, implant exposure, or flap failure. Polyglactin mesh and ADM were used in 24 breasts and 54 breasts, respectively. Implant malposition and capsular contracture occurred more frequently in the polyglactin cohort leading to 10 (41.7%) instances of reoperation for implant replacement compared with only 1 (1.9%) in the ADM cohort ( P < 0.001). On multivariable regression analysis, polyglactin mesh was associated with a 36-fold greater probability of requiring implant replacement compared with ADM ( P = 0.006).

ADM (versus polyglactin mesh) is associated with lower rates of capsular contracture and implant malposition in the context of hybrid breast reconstruction.

Therapeutic, III.

The gold standard of microsurgical breast reconstruction is the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap. As techniques have evolved, DIEP flaps have significantly reduced the morbidity previously caused by transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps. However, abdominal wall complications continue to persist after DIEP flap surgery, with bulge rates reported as high as 33%.

The first 25 patients undergoing DIEP flap surgery with the use of Duramesh (MSI, Chicago, Ill.) by the senior author were identified. A retrospective chart review of patient and surgical details was performed. Charts were reviewed for outcomes, including surgical site infections, surgical site events, incisional hernia formation, and/or bulge. Standard descriptive summary statistics were used for patient characteristics, surgical details, and primary and secondary outcomes.

Twenty-five patients were reviewed. Average follow-up duration was 216 ± 39 days. One patient (4%) developed a surgical site infection, and four patients (16%) developed a surgical site event. One patient developed a bulge, but no patients developed an incisional hernia.

Duramesh mesh suture provides a promising opportunity for DIEP surgeons to minimize both abdominal wall morbidity and mesh-related complications. Mesh suture can be used in a similar fashion as other sutures to perform primary closure of the anterior rectus sheath while also providing force-distribution benefits typically unique to planar mesh. This pilot study suggests that Duramesh is a safe, simple alternative to existing techniques in DIEP flap surgery and can be considered by microsurgeons to reduce fascial dehiscence, bulge, and/or hernia formation.

 Abdominal wall morbidity occurs with increased frequency following flap harvest in the obese abdomen. Its impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in breast reconstruction has been poorly characterized.

 A retrospective review of obese patients undergoing abdominal-based free autologous breast reconstruction was conducted over 15 years. Patient operative characteristics were recorded and outcomes were analyzed. PROs were assessed using the BREAST-Q abdominal survey.

 In total, 75 women (108 flaps) with the mean body mass index (BMI) of 33.2 were included. Flaps included deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (24%), muscle-sparing (43%), and free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps (f-TRAM; 33%). World Health Organization (WHO) obesity class, BMI, and flap type did not affect flap failure (1%) or complication rates. Hernia developed in 7%; all necessitated repair. Eight percent developed abdominal bulge; one was repaired. Hernia formation was associated with increased patient age (p < 0.05). Bulge formation occurred more often in f-TRAM donor sites (p = 0.005). BMI, WHO class, flap type, and mesh use were not related to hernia or bulge occurrence in either univariate or multivariate analysis. The survey response rate was 63%. Abdominal Physical Well-Being (proxy for abdominal wall function) and Satisfaction with Abdomen (patient-perceived cosmesis) were similar across flap types, age, and WHO classification groups. Patients with postoperative bulge reported higher abdominal physical well-being scores, regardless of flap type (p < 0.01). Bulge was correlated with lower satisfaction (p < 0.05).

 The incidence of abdominal wall morbidity following abdominal free-tissue transfer for breast reconstruction was acceptably low in our population of obese patients. Hernia was a clinically significant complication, warranting surgical repair. Bulge was primarily a cosmetic concern and did not detract from patient-reported abdominal wall function. Age may represent an independent risk factor for hernia formation in this population.

Background: The deep inferior epigastric perforator artery (DIEP) free flap is the most commonly performed autologous breast reconstruction. Despite the relative reduction in donor site complications compared to nonmuscle-sparing options, there is still high morbidity associated with this surgery. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes and complications at our institution and to discuss potential quality improvement initiatives. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed looking at patients who underwent delayed or immediate autologous breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap over a 6-year period (2015-2021) at our institution. Complication rates for abdominal infection, seroma, hematoma, wound dehiscence, delayed wound healing, umbilical necrosis, subjective abdominal weakness, abdominal bulge, and hernia were calculated. Additionally, a prospective cohort study was conducted using a portable ultrasound device to detect postoperative changes in the abdominal donor site, including fluid collections and postoperative edema. Results: One hundred seventeen patients underwent autologous breast reconstruction with a DIEP-free flap. Forty-one percent of patients experienced 1 or more donor site complications. Complication rates were 16.2%, 12.8%, 1.7%, 15.4%, 8.5%, 4.3%, 0%, 10.3%, and 2.6%, respectively, for the list above. There was a higher proportion of complications in patients who smoked within the past 3 months and those who had a body mass index (BMI) between 35 and 39.9, although this was not statistically significant. Bilateral reconstructions had higher rates of umbilical necrosis (24.5% vs 7.8%) and wound dehiscence (9.4% vs 0%) compared to unilateral. Twenty-one patients were included in the prospective analysis. No significant changes in abdominal wall edema were found. Twenty-four percent of the patients had detectible collections on ultrasound, and these were associated with wound dehiscence and the need for debridement. Discussion: Our institutional abdominal donor site complication rates in DIEP reconstruction patients are higher than those published in the literature. Similar complication rates were identified regardless of smoking status, BMI, and unilateral/bilateral surgery. Quality improvement initiatives could be considered and implemented to reduce future complications.

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the potential benefit that may be achieved through the introduction of technical innovations and the incorporation of mesh for fascial donor site closure in uni- and bilateral autologous breast reconstruction with abdominal tissue. Methods: A retrospective single-center review of all breast reconstructions with a DIEP or MS-TRAM flap between January 2004 and December 2019 was performed. Donor and recipient site complications and operation times were evaluated before and after the implementation of coupler anastomoses, preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA), indocyanine green (ICG) angiography, and the inclusion of mesh in donor site repair. Results: A total of 396 patients were included, accounting for 447 flaps. Operation time was significantly shorter in unilateral reconstructions after the implementation of CTA (p < 0.0001). ICG angiography significantly reduced the rates of partial flap loss (p = 0.02) and wound healing disorders (p = 0.02). For unilateral reconstructions, abdominal bulging or hernia was observed more often in MS1-TRAM flaps without synthetic mesh repair (p = 0.001), whereas conservatively treated seroma developed more frequently after mesh implantation (p = 0.03). Conclusions: Recent technological advancements developed over the past few decades have made a substantial impact on decreasing surgical duration and enhancing procedure safety.

Abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction (ABABR) is common after mastectomy, but carries a risk of complex abdominal wall hernias. We report experience with posterior component separation (PCS) and transversus abdominis release (TAR) with permanent synthetic mesh repair of ABABR-related hernias.

Patients at Cleveland Clinic Foundation and Penn State Health were identified retrospectively. Outcomes included postoperative complications, hernia recurrence, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs): Hernia Recurrence Inventory, HerQLes Summary Score, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity 3a Survey, and the Decision Regret Scale (DRS).

Forty patients underwent PCS/TAR repair of hernias resulting from pedicled (35%), free (5%), muscle-sparing TRAMs (15%), and DIEPs (28%) from August 2014 to March 2021. Following PCS, 30-day complications included superficial surgical site infection (13%), seroma (8%), and superficial wound breakdown (5%). Five patients (20%) developed clinical hernia recurrence. At a minimum of 1 year, 17 (63%) reported a bulge, 12 (44%) reported pain, median HerQLes Quality Of Life Scores improved from 33 to 63/100 (p value < 0.01), PROMIS 3a Pain Intensity Scores improved from 52 to 38 (p value < 0.05), and DRS scores were consistent with low regret (20/100).

ABABR-related hernias are complex and technically challenging due to missing abdominal wall components and denervation injury. After repair with PCS/TAR, patients had high rates of recurrence and bulge, but reported improved quality of life and pain and low regret. Surgeons should set realistic expectations regarding postoperative bulge and risk of hernia recurrence.

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is a predominant technique for autologous breast reconstruction. However, the best method of abdominal fascial closure in this technique is not well defined. This study details our initial experience with unidirectional barbed suture-only repair of abdominal donor site fascia.

Patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction and abdominal fascial closure with Stratafix Symmetric Polydioxanone PDS Plus were retrospectively reviewed. Information regarding pertinent patient history, medical comorbidities, risk factors, and surgical technique was extracted, along with the incidence of eight separate postoperative abdominal surgical site occurrences.

Retrospective review identified 43 patients who underwent 19 unilateral and 24 bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction procedures (n = 67). Average patient follow-up was 791 days (range 153-1769). Six patients (14%) had a complication of the donor site. Seroma was most frequent (n = 3, 7%), followed by surgical site infection (n = 2, 5%). One patient had incisional dehiscence (2%) and another patient developed bulging (2%). No patients had chronic pain, weakness, hematoma, or hernia postoperatively. Patients with donor site complications had a history of abdominal/pelvic surgery significantly more often than the patients without donor site complications (100% versus 49%; P = 0.032).

Abdominal fascial repair with Stratafix Symmetric suture alone led to low rates of abdominal donor site morbidity, including no hernia and rare bulging, following DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Additional advantages of this technique may be reduced operative times and lower operative costs compared with alternative methods of fascial repair, although prospective and randomized studies are warranted.

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap is the gold standard procedure for autologous breast reconstruction. Although breast-related complications have been well described, donor-site complications and contributing patient risk factors are poorly understood.

We examined a multi-institutional, prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing DIEP free flap breast reconstruction between 2015 and 2020. We evaluated patient demographics, operative details, and abdominal donor-site complications. Logistic regression modeling was used to predict donor-site outcomes based on patient characteristics.

A total of 661 patients were identified who underwent DIEP free flap breast reconstruction across multiple institutions. Using logistic regression modeling, we found that body mass index (BMI) was an independent risk factor for umbilical complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.18, p = 0.001), seroma (OR 1.07, CI 1.01-1.13, p = 0.003), wound dehiscence (OR 1.10, CI 1.06-1.15, p = 0.001), and surgical site infection (OR 1.10, CI 1.05-1.15, p = 0.001) following DIEP free flap breast reconstruction. Further, immediate reconstruction decreases the risk of abdominal bulge formation (OR 0.22, CI 0.108-0.429, p = 0.001). Perforator selection was not associated with abdominal morbidity in our study population.

Higher BMI is associated with increased abdominal donor-site complications following DIEP free flap breast reconstruction. Efforts to lower preoperative BMI may help decrease donor-site complications.

When abdomen-based free flap reconstruction is contraindicated, the muscle-sparing thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap may be considered for total autologous breast reconstruction. The TDAP flap is often limited by volume and is prone to distal flap necrosis. We aim to demonstrate our experience combining the delay phenomenon with TDAP flaps for total autologous breast reconstruction.

Patients presenting for autologous breast reconstruction between April 2021 and August 2023 were recruited for surgically delayed TDAP flap reconstruction when abdominally based free flap reconstruction was contraindicated because of previous abdominal surgery or poor perforator anatomy. We dissected the TDAP flap except for a distal skin bridge and then reconstructed the breast 1 to 7 days later. Data included flap dimensions (in centimeters × centimeters), delay time (in days), predelay and postdelay perforator caliber (in millimeters) and flow (in centimeters per second), operative time (in minutes), hospital length of stay (in days), complications/revisions, and follow-up time (in days).

Fourteen patients and 16 flaps were included in this study. Mean age and body mass index of patients were 55.9 ± 9.6 years and 30.1 ± 4.3 kg/m2, respectively. Average flap skin island length and width were 32.1 ± 3.3 cm (n = 8 flaps) and 8.8 ± 0.7 cm (n = 5 flaps), respectively. Beveled flap width reached 16.0 ± 2.2 cm (n = 3 flaps). Average time between surgical delay and reconstruction was 2.9 days, ranging from 1 to 7 days (n = 18 flaps). Mean predelay and postdelay TDAP vessel caliber and flow measured by Doppler ultrasound increased from 1.4 ± 0.3 to 1.8 ± 0.3 mm (P = 0.03) and 13.3 ± 5.2 to 43.4 ± 18.8 cm/s (P = 0.03), respectively (n = 4 flaps). Complications included 1 donor site seroma and 1 mastectomy skin flap necrosis. Follow-up ranged from 4 to 476 days (n = 17 operations).

We demonstrate surgically delayed TDAP flaps as a viable option for total autologous breast reconstruction. Our series of flaps demonstrated increased perforator caliber and flow and enlarged volume capabilities and had no incidences of flap necrosis.

 Literature addressing the risks associated with increasing body mass index (BMI) for patients undergoing free flap breast reconstruction is limited. Often, an arbitrary BMI cutoff (i.e., BMI of 30 kg/m2) is used to determine candidacy for a free flap without substantial backing evidence. This study utilized a national multi-institutional database to analyze outcomes of free flap breast reconstruction and stratified complications by BMI class.

 Using the 2010 to 2020 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, patients who underwent free flap breast reconstruction were identified. Patients were divided into six cohorts based on the World Health Organization BMI classes. Cohorts were compared by basic demographics and complications. A multivariate regression model was created to control for age, diabetes, bilateral reconstruction, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and operative time.

 Surgical complications increased with each BMI class, with the highest rates occurring in class I, II, and III obesity, respectively. In a multivariable regression model, the risk for any complication was significant for class II and III obesity (odds ratio [OR]: 1.23, p < 0.004; OR: 1.45, p < 0.001, respectively). Diabetes, bilateral reconstruction, and operative time were independently associated with an increased risk of any complication (OR: 1.44, 1.14, 1.14, respectively, p < 0.001).

 This study suggests that the risks of postoperative complications following free flap breast reconstruction are highest for patients with a BMI greater than or equal to 35 kg/m2, having nearly 1.5 times higher likelihood of postoperative complications. Stratifying these risks by weight class can help guide preoperative counseling with patients and help physicians determine candidacy for free flap breast reconstruction.

 The additional donor site incisions in autologous breast reconstruction can predispose to abdominal complications. The purpose of this study is to delineate predictors of donor site morbidity following deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvest and use those predictors to develop a machine learning model that can identify high-risk patients.

 This is a retrospective study of women who underwent DIEP flap reconstruction from 2011 to 2020. Donor site complications included abdominal wound dehiscence, necrosis, infection, seroma, hematoma, and hernia within 90 days postoperatively. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify predictors for donor site complications. Variables found significant were used to construct machine learning models to predict donor site complications.

 Of 258 patients, 39 patients (15%) developed abdominal donor site complications, which included 19 cases of dehiscence, 12 cases of partial necrosis, 27 cases of infection, and 6 cases of seroma. On univariate regression analysis, age (p = 0.026), body mass index (p = 0.003), mean flap weight (p = 0.006), and surgery time (p = 0.035) were predictors of donor site complications. On multivariate regression analysis, age (p = 0.025), body mass index (p = 0.010), and surgery duration (p = 0.048) remained significant. Radiographic features of obesity, such as abdominal wall thickness and total fascial diastasis, were not significant predictors of complications (p > 0.05). In our machine learning algorithm, the logistic regression model was the most accurate at predicting donor site complications with the accuracy of 82%, specificity of 0.93, and negative predictive value of 0.87.

 This study demonstrates that body mass index is superior to radiographic features of obesity in predicting donor site complications following DIEP flap harvest. Other predictors include older age and longer surgery duration. Our logistic regression machine learning model has the potential to quantify the risk of donor site complications.

Breast reconstruction is an integral part of breast cancer care. There are 2 main types of breast reconstruction: alloplastic (using implants) and autologous (using the patient's own tissue). The latter creates a more natural breast mound and avoids the long-term need for surgical revision-more often associated with implant-based surgery. The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold standard approach in autologous breast reconstruction. However, complications do occur with DIEP flap surgery and can stem from poor flap tissue perfusion/oxygenation. Hence, the development of strategies to enhance flap perfusion (eg, goal-directed perioperative fluid therapy) is essential. Current perioperative fluid therapy is traditionally guided by subjective criteria, which leads to wide variations in clinical practice.

The main objective of this trial is to determine whether the use of minimally invasive cardiac output (CO) monitoring for guiding intravenous fluid administration, combined with low-dose dobutamine infusion (via a treatment algorithm), will increase tissue oxygenation in patients undergoing DIEP flap surgery.

With appropriate institutional ethics board and Health Canada approval, patients undergoing DIEP flap surgery are randomly assigned to receive CO monitoring for the guidance of intraoperative fluid therapy in addition to a low-dose dobutamine infusion (which potentially improves flap oxygenation) versus the current standard of care. The primary outcome is tissue oxygenation measured via near-infrared spectroscopy at the perfusion zone furthest from the perforator vessels 45 minutes after vascular reanastomosis of the DIEP flap. Low dose (2.5 μg/kg/hr) dobutamine infusion continues for up to 4 hours postoperatively, provided there are no associated complications (ie, persistent tachycardia). Flap oxygenation, hemodynamic parameters, and any medication-associated side effects/complications are monitored for up to 48 hours postoperatively. Complications, rehospitalizations, and patient satisfaction are also collected until 30 days postoperatively.

Funding and regulatory approvals were obtained in 2019, but the study recruitment was interrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. As of October 4, 2023, 34 participants have been recruited. Because of the significant delays associated with the pandemic, the expected completion date was extended. We expect the study to be completed and ready for potential news release (as appropriate) and publication by July 2024. No patients have suffered any adverse effects/complications from participating in this study, and none have been lost to follow-up.

CO-directed fluid therapy in combination with a low-dose dobutamine infusion via a treatment algorithm has the potential to improve DIEP flap tissue oxygenation and reduce complications following DIEP flap breast reconstruction surgery. However, given that the investigators remain blinded to group randomization, no comment can be made regarding the efficacy of this intervention for improving tissue oxygenation at this time. Nevertheless, no patients have been withdrawn for safety concerns thus far, and compliance remains high.

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04020172; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04020172.

Obesity is a risk factor for complications following autologous breast reconstruction. Little is known regarding outcomes based on the degree of obesity. This study compares breast reconstruction outcomes and complication rates for the three classes defined by the body mass index (BMI)-based WHO classification.

The authors conducted a retrospective chart review identifying obese patients who underwent abdominally based breast reconstruction between January 2011 and January 2021. Patients were stratified by BMI class [class 1 (C1) = 30-34.99 kg/m2, class 2 (C2) = 35-39.99 kg/m2, and class 3 (C3) = 40 kg/m2 + ]. Outcomes were compared.

A total of 232 patients (395 flaps) were included with 138 patients were classified as C1, 68 patients as C2, and 26 patients as C3. Rates of any complication (80%) and at least one major complication (31%) did not vary significantly (P = 0.057, 0.185). Individual rates of 30-day readmission (18%) or reoperation (26%) did not vary significantly (P = 0.588 and 0.059). Rates of seroma (C1 = 15%, C2 = 16%, and C3 = 35%), hernia (C1 = 0%, C2 = 4%, and C3 = 8%), and incisional dehiscence (C1 = 30%, C2 = 44%, and C3 = 62%) were associated with significantly increased risk with higher classes of obesity (P < 0.05). The rate of flap failure did not vary significantly (P = 0.573).

The risk of major complications and total flap loss associated with abdominally based breast reconstruction does not differ between the classes of obesity. Although complication rates are high overall in the obese population, detrimental complications do not vary between the classes. Patients should be counseled regarding their individual risk without the need for arbitrary BMI cutoffs.

To minimize donor-site damage, robot-assisted (RA) deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvest has been suggested. Current robotic approaches favor port placement, which either does not allow a bilateral DIEP flap harvest through the same ports or necessitates additional scars. In this article, the authors propose a modification of port configuration. In a retrospective controlled cohort study, RA-DIEP and conventional DIEP surgery were compared. The perforator and pedicle were visualized conventionally until the level behind the rectus abdominis muscle. Next, the robotic system was installed to dissect the retromuscular pedicle. The authors assessed patient age; body mass index; history of smoking, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension; and additional surgical time. The length of the anterior rectus sheath (ARS) incision was measured. Pain was quantified using the visual analogue scale. Donor-site complications were assessed. Thirteen RA-DIEP flaps (11 unilateral and two bilateral) and 87 conventional DIEP flaps were harvested without flap loss. The bilateral DIEP flaps were raised without readjustments of the ports. The mean time for pedicle dissection was 53.2 ± 13.4 minutes. The length of the ARS incision was significantly shorter in the RA-DIEP group (2.67 ± 1.13 cm versus 8.14 ± 1.69 cm; 304.87% difference; P < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference in postoperative pain (day 1: 1.9 ± 0.9 versus 2.9 ± 1.6, P = 0.094; day 2: 1.8 ± 1.2 versus 2.3 ± 1.5, P = 0.319; day 3: 1.6 ± 0.9 versus 2.0 ± 1.3, P = 0.444). Preliminary results show that the authors' RA-DIEP approach is safe and allows dissection of bilateral RA-DIEP flaps with short ARS incision lengths.

Therapeutic, III.

Closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has shown promise in reducing surgical wound complications. Among its numerous benefits, it allows for exudate management and tension offloading from wound edges. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of prophylactic ciNPWT versus conventional dressings on abdominal donor site complications in microsurgical breast reconstruction (MR).

A systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in January 2023. PubMed and Embase were searched to identify all relevant studies. Data collected included rates of total wound complications, wound dehiscence, infection, seroma, and length of hospital stay.

A total of 202 articles were screened, and eight studies (1009 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Use of ciNPWT was associated with a significantly lower rate of wound dehiscence (OR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.85; P = 0.0085, I2 = 0%). There was no significant difference in the rate of total wound complications [odds ratio (OR), 0.63; 95% CI, 0.35-1.14; P = 0.12, I2 = 69%], donor site infection (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.42-1.50; P = 0.47, I2 = 13%), seroma (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.22-2.49; P = 0.63, I2 = 57%), or length of hospital stay (SMD, 0.089; 95% CI, -0.13-0.35; P = 0.37, I2 = 29%).

Although exudate management by ciNPWT fails to reduce surgical site infection, seroma formation, and overall length of stay, ciNPWT tension offloading properties seem to be associated with lower rates of wound dehiscence when compared with conventional dressings in abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction.

Breast reconstructions using autologous abdominal tissue result in breasts with a natural shape and consistency. One of the major complications is abdominal bulging. Because of the increased abdominal wall tension, high visceral volume (not visceral fat alone) may increase the occurrence rate of abdominal bulging. A simple procedure involving CT imaging was used to assess this relationship in patients undergoing an abdominal free flap for unilateral breast reconstruction.

A total of 278 patients were enrolled in this study. The patients' demographics, the thicknesses of visceral volume were compared (Bulging (+) vs. Bulging (-)). Visceral volume was investigated based on the horizontal thickness, which was measured at the thickest part at the level of the umbilical fossa between both sides under the transverse abdominis muscles.

Bulging (+) consisted of 39 patients (14.0%), whereas Bulging (-) included 239 patients. Patients with Bulging (+) were significantly older, had higher gestational history rate, and had thin rectus abdominis muscle. In terms of visceral volume, the Bulging (+) group had significantly higher horizontal thicknesses (median 233 mm vs. 219 mm, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed with respect to other factors (age, BMI, history of laparotomy, and operative details). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the thickness of the rectus abdominis muscle, horizontal visceral volume, and gestational history were independently significant predictors.

Not only the patients with thin rectus abdominis muscle but also patients with a thick horizontal visceral volume may have a higher risk of abdominal bulging.

Autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction continues to evolve as new technology and mastectomy techniques become available. Robotic-assisted breast reconstruction represents a growing field within plastic surgery, with the potential to improve aesthetic and functional outcomes, as well as patient satisfaction. This article provides a review of indications, techniques, and outcome data supporting the use of robotic assistance in both implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction from surgeons around the world.

Breast reconstruction remains a major component of the plastic surgeon's repertoire, especially free-flap breast reconstruction (FFBR), though this is a high-risk surgery in which patient selection is paramount. Preoperative predictors of complication remain mixed in their utility. We sought to determine whether the sarcopenia score, a validated measure of physiologic health, outperforms the body mass index (BMI) and modified frailty index (mFI) in terms of predicting outcomes.

All patients with at least 6-months follow-up and imaging of the abdomen who underwent FFBR from 2013 to 2022 were included in this study. Appropriate preoperative and postoperative data were included, and sarcopenia scores were extracted from imaging. Complications were defined as any unexpected outcome that required a return to the operating room or readmission. Statistical analysis and regression were performed.

In total, 299 patients were included. Patients were split into groups, based on sarcopenia scores. Patients with lower sarcopenia had significantly more complications than those with higher scores. BMI and mFI both did not correlate with complication rates. Sarcopenia was the only independent predictor of complication severity when other factors were controlled for in a multivariate regression model.

Sarcopenia correlates with the presence of severe complications in patients who undergo FFBR in a stronger fashion to BMI and the mFI. Thus, sarcopenia should be considered in the preoperative evaluation in patients undergoing FFBR.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between flap harvest technique and occurrence of abdominal bulging.

A retrospective analysis of 159 patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction between 2014 and 2021 in the University Medical Center Utrecht was conducted. Outcomes measured were preoperative rectus diastasis, flap weight, laterality of flap harvest (unilateral or bilateral), timing of the harvest (immediate or delayed), number of perforators harvested (single or multiple), and location of the harvested perforator (medial, lateral, or both).

In 159 patients, 244 DIEP flaps were performed, 16 of these donor-sites (6.6%) developed a clinically evident abdominal bulge. When preoperative rectus abdominis diastasis was found (n = 97), postoperative bulging occurred significantly more often (P < 0.01). Patients in whom the medial perforator artery was harvested for reconstruction (n = 114) showed less abdominal bulging than patients in whom the lateral (n = 92) was harvested (P = 0.02). Using single versus multiple perforators for the DIEP flap, bilateral versus unilateral reconstruction or timing of the operation showed no significant difference in outcome of bulging (P = 1.00, P = 0.78, P = 0.59, respectively).

The incidence of bulging in our study cohort is comparable to the literature. Harvesting the medial perforator artery for the DIEP flap showed less abdominal bulging than using the lateral perforator artery in a DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Also, preoperative rectus diastasis was found to be an important risk factor for the occurrence of bulging.

The rectus abdominis myocutaneous free flap has been widely used as a reconstructive option in head and neck reconstruction with great success. Challenging the popular assumption, this study sought to examine the effects of smoking on donor site complications in this population.

Multi-institution retrospective study of 103 patients (50 active smokers, 28 former and 25 never smoked).

Overall complication rate was 14.5 %. Hernia rate 4.8 %, evisceration 0 %, dehiscence 2.9 %, infection 6.7 %. Smoking history did not significantlly influence complication rates (chi square test, p = 0.33). Abdominal wall closure technique also did not influence the complication rate (chi square test, p = 0.58).

The rectus abdomonis myocutaneous free flap has an acceptable complication rate that does not appear to be influenced by smoking history. While patients should be counseled regarding smoking cessation, smoking habits should not delay treatment nor obviate consideration of rectus flap utilization.

Class 3 (severe) obesity is defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m² . Obesity is common and an independent risk factor for breast cancer. The plastic surgeon will be tasked with providing reconstruction for obese patients after mastectomy. This presents a surgical dilemma because patients with elevated BMI are known to have greater rates of morbidity when undergoing free flap reconstruction, however free flap reconstruction is associated with greater functional and aesthetic outcomes. This study quantifies complication rates in a cohort of patients with class 3 obesity that underwent abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction. This study may be able answer whether this surgery is feasible or safe.

Patients with a class 3 obesity who underwent abdominally-based free flap breast reconstruction between January 1, 2011 and February 28, 2020 at the authors' institution were identified. A retrospective chart review was performed to record patient demographics and peri-operative data.

Twenty-six patients met inclusion criteria. Eighty percent of patients had at least one minor complication including infection (42%), fat necrosis (31%), seroma (15%), abdominal bulge (8%), and hernia (8%). Thirty-eight percent of patients had at least one major complication (requiring readmission (23%) and/or a return to the operating room (38%)). No flaps failed.

Abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction in patients with class 3 obesity is associated with great morbidity, however, no patients experienced flap loss or failure which may imply that this population can safely undergo surgery so long as the surgeon is prepared for complications and takes steps to mitigate risk.

 Understanding of donor-site morbidity and satisfaction after breast reconstruction is limited. There are few previous studies comparing satisfaction with different donor sites in breast reconstruction. This study aimed to examine the long-term patient-reported satisfaction with the donor site of latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps in comparison to the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps. Further, a systematic review of previously published studies was conducted.

 In this retrospective cross-sectional study, all women who underwent breast reconstructions with either LD or DIEP flap following mastectomy and radiotherapy between 2007 and 2017 were included; patient-reported satisfaction was assessed using the BREAST-Q reconstruction module. For the systematic review, studies examining patient-reported abdominal satisfaction and well-being, and meeting the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome) criteria were included.

 Eligible and responding participants were divided into the LD (n = 135 patients) and DIEP (n = 118 patients) flap groups. Impairment due to muscular weakness of the donor site was more common in the LD group than that of the DIEP group. Bulging was common in the DIEP group and increased over time. Regarding the esthetic appearance of the donor site, the patients in the DIEP group were less satisfied than the LD group. The systematic review showed that most of the patients were dissatisfied with their abdomen after the operation.

 Patients who have undergone DIEP flap for breast reconstruction are less satisfied with the donor-site esthetics than those who have undergone LD flap. Patient-reported abdominal bulging was common in the DIEP group and the number seemed to increase over time. Most patients were not satisfied with their abdominal scarring postoperatively, as per the systematic review. These results may indicate a need for more nuanced preoperative patient information, as well as improvements in the surgical management of the donor site, for DIEP flap reconstructions.

In breast reconstruction surgeries, surgical wound dehiscence is a serious complication which generates a significant burden on patients and healthcare systems. There are indications that postoperative treatment with closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been associated with reduced wound dehiscence rates. This randomized clinical trial examines the effect of ciNPT application on abdominal donor site surgical wound dehiscence in low- and high-risk patients undergoing a breast reconstruction with a deep internal epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap.

Eighty eligible women, stratified as low- or high-risk patients, were included and were randomized for treatment with either ciNPT or adhesive strips (AS) by drawing sealed, opaque envelopes. All surgeons were kept blind for allocation. Primary outcomes were surgical wound dehiscence and surgical site infection at the abdominal donor site upon follow-up after 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were seroma and hematoma formation. Five patients were excluded from the study due to non-sufficient exposure to the study treatment (n=4) or major protocol deviation (n=1).

A total of 75 women, low-risk (n=38) and high-risk (n=37), received either ciNPT (n=36) or AS (n=39). Patients' demographics did not differ significantly. Donor-site surgical wound dehiscence occurred in 23 patients; the Absolute Risk Reduction was statistically significant (21.6%, 95% Confidence Interval [1.5-41.7]). No statistically significant differences were found in surgical site infection or secondary outcomes.

In this randomized clinical trial, postoperative treatment with ciNPT decreased the incidence of surgical wound dehiscence at the abdominal donor site in low- and high-risk DIEP flap breast reconstruction patients.

Abdominal bulging at the donor site of free abdominal flaps for breast reconstruction is a common postoperative complication. In addition to the thickness of abdominal muscles, the authors identified the rectus abdominis diastasis as an important factor that compromises abdominal wall strength. This study aimed to assess the relationship between preoperative abdominal wall strength and postoperative abdominal bulging.

A total of 224 patients were enrolled in this study. Patient demographics, the rectus and lateral abdominis muscle thicknesses, and the rate of rectus abdominis diastasis were compared (with versus without bulging). Muscle thickness and rectus abdominis diastasis were investigated by preoperative computed tomography.

The group with bulging consisted of 32 patients (14.3 percent), whereas the group without bulging consisted of 192 patients. The group with bulging had a significantly higher gestational history rate. The thickness of the rectus abdominis muscle in the group with bulging was significantly thinner (median, 8.6 mm versus 10.5 mm; p < 0.001) and the rate of rectus abdominis diastasis was significantly higher (78.1 percent versus 32.3 percent; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences with respect to the thickness of the lateral abdominal muscle and the other factors (i.e., age, body mass index, history of laparotomy. and operative details).

Because the diagnosis of abdominal bulging was based on severity, the rate may be high compared to that reported from previous studies. Because the factor of gestational history correlated to thickness of the rectus abdominis muscle and rectus abdominis diastasis, this factor influenced the occurrence of abdominal bulging. Patients with a thin rectus abdominis muscle and rectus abdominis diastasis were at higher risk of abdominal bulging.

Risk, III.

Reducing donor site morbidity after deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap harvest relies mainly upon maintaining integrity of the anterior rectus sheath fascia. The purpose of this study is to describe our minimally-invasive technique for robotic DIEP flap harvest.

A retrospective review of four patients undergoing seven robotic-assisted DIEP flaps from 2019 to 2020 was conducted. Average patient age and BMI were 52 years (range: 45-60 years) and 26.7 kg/m² (range: 20.6-32.4 kg/m² ), respectively. Average follow-up was 6.31 months (range: 5.73-7.27 months). Robotic flap harvest was performed with intramuscular perforator dissection in standard fashion, followed by the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach to DIEP pedicle harvest using the da Vinci Xi robot. Data was collected on demographic information, perioperative characteristics. Primary outcomes included successful flap harvest as well as donor site morbidity (e.g., abdominal bulge, hernia, bowel obstruction, etc.).

All four patients underwent bilateral abdominally-based free flap reconstruction. Three patients received bilateral robotic DIEP flaps, and one patient underwent unilateral robotic DIEP flap reconstruction. The da Vinci Xi robot was used in all cases. Average flap weight and pedicle length were 522 g (range: 110-809 g) and 11.2 cm (range: 10-12 cm), respectively. There were no flap failures, and no patient experienced abdominal wall donor site morbidity on physical exam.

While further studies are needed to validate its use, this report represents the largest series of robotic DIEP flap harvests to date and is a valuable addition to the literature.

Abdominal flap-based breast reconstruction is challenging in the overweight and obese population not only because of increased donor-site complications, but also because excessive flap thickness makes inset cumbersome, requiring thinning and remodeling that frequently result in aesthetically poor outcomes.

The authors started by studying 10 deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps with angiographic computed tomography. Then, they prospectively performed 21 breast reconstructions using a superficial thinning technique reliant on a constant suprafascial vessel as the pedicle for the remaining deep fat and compared the rate of complications with their previous experience using traditional flap thinning techniques.

All samples studied showed a suprafascial division of the main perforator. Two constant branches were identified, one coursing over the Scarpa fascia and displaying a robust network of linking vessels with the subcutaneous and subdermal plexuses. That anatomical insight was used to develop a flap-thinning technique tested on 21 consecutive high-body mass index patients. A 7-year retrospective analysis (n = 164) showed no significant correlation between body mass index and incidence of complications except for a long-term upper pole step deformity that was associated with increasing body mass index (p = 0.001). No statistically significant difference in complications was found comparing high-body mass index patients from the retrospective group (n = 72) with the superficial thinning group, but a highly suggestive difference (p = 0.061) was found regarding the avoidance of the step deformity using the superficial thinning technique.

The presence of a constant suprafascial perforator branch makes superficial DIEP thinning a safe technique that facilitates inset and improves the reconstructed breast contour of obese patients.

Therapeutic, IV.

Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction is the gold standard reconstructive technique for women undergoing breast cancer surgery. A preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA)-dedicated protocol and 3D reconstructions are mandatory for correct surgical planning.

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a new preoperative CTA protocol and a new reconstruction method in the assessment of DIEP technique.

A total of 263 women (median age 49 years, age range 26-73 years) underwent preoperative CTA examination before DIEP flap breast reconstruction. A CTA-dedicated protocol followed by 3D-reconstructions were performed. Identification, branching pattern, and caliber at origin were assessed for each perforator. Intraoperative findings were the standard of reference. The sensitivity, positive predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of the preoperative CTA protocol were calculated.

In 255/263 (97%) patients, the dominant perforators assessed by CTA resulted adequate for surgical reconstruction. In 260/263 (99%) cases, the imaging localization of the dominant perforators corresponded with those seen intraoperatively (mean errors ≤1 cm). The preoperative CTA imaging sensitivity, positive predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy in determining the localization of perforators were 99% (95% CI 98-100), 100% and 99% (95% CI 98-100), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the CTA findings and the surgical findings for the assessment of branching pattern and caliber of the dominant perforators (P < 0.001).

The present protocol has demonstrated high accuracy in the CTA imaging assessment of the perforators before DIEP flap reconstruction with high reproducibility between CT and surgical findings.

The better survival rates after breast cancer allow for setting of long-term goals, such as Quality of Life (QoL) and aesthetic outcomes following breast reconstruction. Studies find a higher breast-related QoL and greater satisfaction with breasts following autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) compared to implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR). However, aesthetic results from donor sites can influence body image. This concern is little addressed in the literature. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the long-term breast-related and body-related QoL of women who underwent ABR to women who underwent IBR.

A multicenter, cross-sectional survey was conducted between November and December 2020 among women who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction between January 2015 and December 2018. A general questionnaire, the BREAST-Q, and the BODY-Q were used to collect data. Multivariable linear regression was performed to adjust differences in Q-scores for potential confounders.

In total, 336 patients were included (112 IBR, 224 ABR). Autologous reconstruction resulted in significantly higher mean scores in all subdomains of the BREAST-Q. On the BODY-Q, IBR scored significantly higher on scars, while ABR scored moderately to significantly higher on all other scales. Despite a lower mean score on Hips & outer thighs in women with Lateral Thigh Perforator (LTP) flap reconstruction, no negative influence on body image was found in these women.

Long-term breast-related and body-related outcomes of ABR are superior to IBR. Donor site aesthetic does not adversely affect body image in women who underwent free flap breast reconstruction.

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of semi-absorbable mesh on donor-site morbidity and patient-reported outcomes in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction.

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients who had DIEP flap breast reconstruction in our department from July 2007 to March 2019. Patients were invited to a comparative follow-up visit and grouped according to donor-site closure: primary fascial closure (the no-mesh group) and fascial reinforcement with semi-absorbable mesh in a subfascial position (the mesh group). The primary outcome of interest was donor-site morbidity, including bulging, hernia formation and rectus abdominis muscle strength. We also surveyed, surgical site complications and patient-reported outcomes using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale v2.0 and BREAST-Q^© version 2.0.

A total of 191 patients had received DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Eighty-five patients (44.5%) with 108 DIEP flaps (53 patients in the mesh group and 32 patients in the no-mesh group) were included in the study. The mean BMI of the patients was significantly higher in the mesh group (mesh group, 26.9 vs. no-mesh group, 25.0, with p = 0.03). The incidence of hernia was significantly reduced in the mesh group (mesh group, 2.8% vs. no-mesh group, 13.5%, with p = 0.03). The incidence of bulging and the extent of rectus abdominis muscle strength were similar for both groups. Operative surgical site complications were reduced in the mesh group (mesh group, 7.5% vs. no-mesh group, 18.8%). There was no difference in patients' physical well-being and satisfaction with the donor site between groups. Patient-reported scar outcome was significantly better in the no-mesh group (p < 0.001).

Our novel method of donor-site closure with semi-absorbable mesh in a subfascial position for reinforcement of the anterior rectus fascia on the DIEP donor site is safe. It has no negative impact on surgical site complications and patient-reported outcomes, while reducing the incidence of hernias on the donor-site in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The obesity epidemic has led to larger numbers of obese patients seeking breast reconstruction. The aim of this study was to compare complication rates and patient satisfaction between obese and nonobese women undergoing autologous breast reconstruction using abdominal free flaps.

The records of all patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction by one surgeon for 15 years were reviewed. Patients were divided into obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m and nonobese groups. Demographic data, medical and smoking history, cancer type and treatments, surgical details, and complications were recorded. Breast-Q surveys were mailed to all patients, and satisfaction ratings were compared between obese and nonobese patients.

There were 109 patients and 149 breast reconstructions, with a mean age of 49 years. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 112 months (median = 19 months). There were 59 patients in the obese group and 52 in the nonobese group. The 2 groups did not differ significantly in median age, follow-up, pathology type, presence of chemotherapy or radiation, or smoking history. Obese group had a higher incidence of mastectomy flap necrosis (19.3% vs 7.7%, P < 0.01) and a higher rate of unplanned reoperations (38.6% vs 21.1%, P < 0.01). Obesity was not associated with a higher risk of microsurgical complications or flap loss (7.0% vs 3.8%, P = 0.21). Overall wound complications did not differ between the groups, but the obese group had a higher rate of severe wound complications requiring operative intervention (15.8% vs 3.8%, P < 0.01). The obese group had a higher incidence of hernia or bulge (10.5% vs 0%, P = 0.03). Thirty-three patients returned completed surveys (response rate of 30%). There was no statistically significant difference in any Breast-Q category associated with BMI.

Obesity was associated with higher rates of wound complications, reoperation, and abdominal bulge after microsurgical breast reconstruction. However, patient satisfaction remained high. Patients should be counseled regarding their relative risks, but high BMI should not be considered an absolute contraindication for microsurgical breast reconstruction.

 From both a medical and surgical perspective, obese breast cancer patients are considered to possess higher risk when undergoing autologous breast reconstruction relative to nonobese patients. However, few studies have evaluated the continuum of risk across the full range of obesity. This study sought to compare surgical risk between the three World Health Organization (WHO) classes of obesity in patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction.

 A retrospective review of 219 obese patients receiving 306 individual DIEP flaps was performed. Subjects were stratified into WHO obesity classes I (body mass index [BMI]: 30-34), II (BMI: 35-39), and III (BMI: ≥ 40) and assessed for risk factors and postoperative donor and recipient site complications.

 When examined together, the rate of any complication between the three groups only trended toward significance (p = 0.07), and there were no significant differences among rates of specific individual complications. However, logistic regression analysis showed that class III obesity was an independent risk factor for both flap (odds ratio [OR]: 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-3.20, p = 0.03) and donor site (OR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.09-5.05, p = 0.03) complications.

 DIEP breast reconstruction in the obese patient is more complex for both the patient and the surgeon. Although not a contraindication to undergoing surgery, obese patients should be diligently counseled regarding potential complications and undergo preoperative optimization of health parameters. Morbidly obese (class III) patients should be approached with additional caution, and perhaps even delay major reconstruction until specific BMI goals are met.

 Breast mound and nipple creation are the goals of the reconstructive process. Unlike in normal body mass index (BMI) women, breast reconstruction in the obese is associated with increased risk of perioperative complications. Our aim was to determine if reconstruction technique and the incidence of perioperative complications affect the achievement of reconstruction completion in the obese female.

 Consecutive obese women (BMI ≥30) who underwent mastectomy and implant or autologous reconstruction were evaluated for the completion of breast reconstruction.

 Two hundred twenty-five women with 352 reconstructions were included. Seventy-four women underwent 111 autologous reconstructions and 151 women underwent 241 implant-based reconstructions. Chemotherapy, radiation, and delayed reconstruction timing was more common in the autologous patients. Major perioperative complications (requiring hospital readmission or unplanned surgery) occurred more frequently in the implant group (p ≤ 0.0001). Breast mounds were completed in >98% of autologous cases compared with 76% of implant cases (p ≤ 0.001). Nipple areolar complex (NAC) creation was completed in 57% of autologous patients and 33% of implant patients (p = 0.0009). The rate of successfully completing the breast mound and the NAC was higher in the autologous patient group (Mound odds ratio or OR 3.32, 95% confidence interval or CI 1.36-5.28 and NAC OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.50-4.69).

 Occurrence of a major complication in the implant group decreased the rate of reconstruction completion. Obese women who undergo autologous breast reconstruction are more likely to achieve breast reconstruction completion when compared with obese women who undergo implant-based breast reconstruction.

Perforator mapping may be performed prior to deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction to guide perforator selection. However, the accuracy of different imaging modalities remains unknown. This review aimed to evaluate the accuracy of different modalities for locating perforators for unipedicled DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from inception to 24th September 2019 for studies concerning adult women undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction with preoperative perforator mapping. The index test was pre-operative imaging and the reference standard was intraoperative identification.

21 articles with 1146 women were included. Six methods were described; handheld doppler, colour doppler (duplex) ultrasonography, computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), direct infrared thermography with and without doppler. Meta-analysis revealed 94% (95% CI 88-99%) of DIEPs identified as the 'dominant perforator' on imaging were chosen as dominant perforators intraoperatively. Colour doppler (Duplex) ultrasonography had the lowest agreement (mean 74% [95% CI 67-81%]) whilst MRA had the highest agreement (mean 97% [95% CI 86-100%]). There was no statistically significant difference in the performance of different tests. All studies were subject to bias as the operators had knowledge of the index test prior to conducting the reference standard.

Based upon limited evidence, cross sectional (CT/MR) imaging modalities for preoperative DIEP mapping appear to have similar accuracy and perform better than ultrasound.