Bile duct lesion, including benign (eg. occlusion, cholelithiasis, dilatation, malformation) and malignant (cholangiocarcinoma) diseases, is a frequently encountered challenge in hepatobiliary diseases, which can be repaired by interventional or surgical procedures. A viable cure for bile duct lesions is implantation with biliary stents. Despite the placement achieved by current clinical biliary stents, the creation of functional and readily transplantable biliary stents remains a formidable obstacle. Excellent biocompatibility, stable mechanics, and absorbability are just a few benefits of using bioengineered biliary stents, which can also support and repair damaged bile ducts that drain bile. Additionally, cell sources & organoids derived from the biliary system that are loaded onto scaffolds can encourage bile duct regeneration. Therefore, the implantation of bioengineered biliary stent is considered as an ideal treatment for bile duct lesion, holding a broad potential for clinical applications in future. In this review, we look back on the development of conventional biliary stents, biodegradable biliary stents, and bioengineered biliary stents, highlighting the crucial elements of bioengineered biliary stents in promoting bile duct regeneration. After providing an overview of the various types of cell sources & organoids and fabrication methods utilized for the bioengineering process, we present the in vitro and in vivo applications of bioengineered biliary ducts, along with the latest advances in this exciting field. Finally, we also emphasize the ongoing challenges and future development of bioengineered biliary stents.

Demand for biliary stents has expanded with the increasing incidence of biliary disease. The implantation of plastic or self-expandable metal stents can be an effective treatment for biliary strictures. However, these stents are nondegradable and prone to restenosis. Surgical removal or replacement of the nondegradable stents is necessary in cases of disease resolution or restenosis. To overcome these shortcomings, improvements were made to the materials and surfaces used for the stents. First, this paper reviews the advantages and limitations of nondegradable stents. Second, emphasis is placed on biodegradable polymer and biodegradable metal stents, along with functional coatings. This also encompasses tissue engineering & 3D-printed stents were highlighted. Finally, the future perspectives of biliary stents, including pro-epithelialization coatings, multifunctional coated stents, biodegradable shape memory stents, and 4D bioprinting, were discussed.

Biliary stricture can be induced by intrinsic narrowing and extrinsic compression, with the majority of cases being malignant. Clinically, distinguishing between benign and malignant biliary strictures remains a considerable challenge, and the ongoing disagreement over the optimal choice of biliary stents significantly influences treatment strategies and impacts patients' survival and prognosis. The utilization and advancement of endoscopic techniques have heightened the diagnostic sensitivity for biliary strictures. Concurrently, innovative technologies such as endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic compression anastomosis emerge as viable alternatives when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is not an option, providing fresh insights for the clinical management of these patients. Traditional plastic and metal stents, characterized by their complex application and limited scope, have been unable to fully satisfy clinical needs. The introduction of novel stent varieties has notably improved this scenario, marking a considerable progression towards precision medicine. However, the clinical validation of the diverse stent materials available is incomplete. Hence, a thorough discussion on the present state and evolving trends of biliary stents is warranted.

Development of pancreatic necroses or pseudocysts are typical complications of pancreatitis and may require endoscopic drainage therapy using metal or plastic stents. Microbial infection of these lesions poses a major challenge. So far, the composition and significance of the microbial colonization on drainage stents are largely unknown although it may impact outcomes during endoscopic drainage therapy.

A total of 26 stents used for drainage of pancreatic lesions were retrieved and the stent microbiome was determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Additional analysis included comparison of the stent microbiome to the intracavitary necrosis microbiome as well as scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and micro-computed tomography (μCT) imaging of selected metal or plastic stents.

The stent microbiome comprises a large proportion of opportunistic enteric pathogens such as Enterococcus (14.4%) or Escherichia (6.1%) as well as oral bacteria like Streptococcus (13.1%). Increased levels of opportunistic enteric pathogens were associated with a prolonged hospital stay (r = 0.77, p = 3e-06) and the occurrence of adverse events during drainage therapy (p = 0.011). Higher levels of oral bacteria were associated (r = -0.62, p = 8e-04) with shorter durations of inpatient treatment. SEM and μCT investigations revealed complex biofilm networks on the stent surface.

The composition of the stent microbiome is associated with prolonged hospital stays and adverse events during endoscopic drainage therapy, highlighting the need for effective infection control to improve patient outcomes. In addition to systemic antibiotic therapy, antimicrobial stent coatings could be a conceivable option to influence the stent microbiome and possibly enhance control of the necrotic microflora.

Microbial colonization in veterinary stents poses a significant and concerning issue in veterinary medicine. Over time, these pathogens, particularly bacteria, can colonize the stent surfaces, leading to various complications. Two weeks following the stent insertion procedure, the colonization becomes observable, with the aggressiveness of bacterial growth directly correlating with the duration of stent placement. Such microbial colonization can result in infections and inflammations, compromising the stent's efficacy and, subsequently, the animal patient's overall well-being. Managing and mitigating the impact of these pathogens on veterinary stents is a crucial challenge that veterinarians and researchers are actively addressing to ensure the successful treatment and recovery of their animal patients. In addition, irritation of the tissue in the form of an inserted stent can lead to overgrowth of granulation tissue, leading to the closure of the stent lumen, as is most often the case in the trachea. Such serious complications after stent placement require improvements in the procedures used to date. In this review, antibacterial or antibiofilm strategies for several stents used in veterinary medicine have been discussed based on the current literature and the perspectives have been drawn. Various coating strategies such as coating with hydrogel, antibiotic, or other antimicrobial agents have been reviewed.

Endoscopic biliary stent placement is a minimally invasive intervention for patients with biliary strictures. Stent patency and function time are crucial factors. Suprapapillary versus transpapillary stent positioning may contribute to stent function time, so a meta-analysis was performed in this comparison.

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the CENTRAL, Embase, and MEDLINE databases to find data on suprapapillary stent placement compared to the transpapillary method via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in cases of biliary stenosis of any etiology and any stent type until December 2020. We carried out a meta-analysis focusing on the following outcomes: stent patency, stent migration, rate of cholangitis and pancreatitis, and other reported complications.

Three prospective and ten retrospective studies involving 1028 patients were included. Suprapapillary stent placement appeared to be superior to transpapillary stent positioning in patency (weighted mean difference = 50.23 days, 95% CI: 8.56, 91.98; p = 0.0.018). In a subgroup analysis of malignant indications, suprapapillary positioning showed a lower rate of cholangitis (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.93; p = 0.036). Another subgroup analysis investigating metal stents in a suprapapillary position resulted in a lower rate of pancreatitis (OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.95; p = 0.043) compared to transpapillary stent placement. There was no difference in stent migration rates between the two groups (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.17, 2.72; p = 0.577).

Based on our results, suprapapillary biliary stenting has longer stent patency. Moreover, the stent migration rate did not differ between the suprapapillary and transpapillary groups.

Cholestasis of the indwelling biliary stents usually leads to stone recurrence after endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatoraphy (ERCP). Biliary stents, including metallic and none-degradable plastic stents are widely used in clinical settings due to their many excellent properties. However, conventional biliary stents still suffer from poor antibacterial activity and anti-bile-adhesion, which lead to injured, local fibroblasts proliferating. Currently, various coatings for biliary stents have been prepared to meet the clinical demands. In this review, we start by summarizing and discussing classifications of biliary stents and antibacterial/antibiofilm mechanism. Then, the latest advances about developing antibacterial and antibiofilm coatings for improving the properties of biliary stents are reviewed and discussed in detail. Lastly, we list several possible directions for future development of biliary stents coatings and biliary stent, such as anti-bile-adhesion coating, multifunctional coating, drug-eluting biodegradable biliary stents and 3D printed biliary stents.

Pancreatic necroses are a major challenge in the treatment of patients with pancreatitis, causing high morbidity. When indicated, these lesions are usually drained endoscopically using plastic or metal stents. However, data on factors associated with the occurrence of failure or adverse events during stent therapy are scarce. We retrospectively analyzed all adverse events and their associated features which occurred in patients who underwent a first-time endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis from 2009 to 2019. During the observation period, a total of 89 eligible cases were identified. Adverse events occurred in 58.4% of the cases, of which 76.9% were minor (e.g., stent dislocation, residual lesions, or stent obstruction). However, these events triggered repeated interventions (63.5% vs. 0%, p < 0.001) and prolonged hospital stays (21.0 [11.8−63.0] vs. 14.0 [7.0−31.0], p = 0.003) compared to controls without any adverse event. Important factors associated with the occurrence of adverse events during endoscopic drainage therapy were positive necrosis cultures (6.1 [2.3−16.1], OR [95% CI], p < 0.001) and a larger diameter of the treated lesion (1.3 [1.1−1.5], p < 0.001). Superinfection of pancreatic necrosis is the most significant factor increasing the likelihood of adverse events during endoscopic drainage. Therefore, control of infection is crucial for successful drainage therapy, and future studies need to consider superinfection of pancreatic necrosis as a possible confounding factor when comparing different therapeutic modalities.

Endoscopic biliary decompression is a minimally invasive procedure for cholestasis since the first endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary stenting performed by Soehendra and Reynders-Frederix. Among the endoscopic biliary decompression, endoscopic transpapillary biliary stenting (EBS), is a mainstream choice and presently has two methods of placement: stenting above the sphincter of Oddi (SO) (suprapapillary) and stenting across the SO (transpapillary). Stent patency is the most important concern for patients, endoscopists and physicians because it can affect both the life prognosis and treatment schedule of patients. Biliary stent occlusion can occur because of several factors. Among them, direct food impaction, biofilm formation, and sludge formation play important roles and are presumed to be theoretically overcome by EBS above the SO. Thus, EBS above the SO is expected to result in a longer patency than EBS across the SO. In the literature, there have been six comparative studies on EBS for distal biliary obstruction in which the stent was placed above or across the SO, including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with negative results of stenting above the SO. With respect to EBS for hilar biliary obstruction, there have been no RCTs, whereas four retrospective comparative studies with negative results and four retrospective comparative studies showing positive results of stenting above the SO have been reported. In this review, we focused on EBS above and across the SO, and summarized the positive and negative results of the two types of stenting to promote effective clinical practice and to provide a basis for future studies.