1
|
Campbell AJ, Claydon VE, Liva S, Cote AT. Changes in Canadian contraceptive choices: results of a national survey on hormonal contraceptive use. BMC Womens Health 2025; 25:147. [PMID: 40155885 PMCID: PMC11954235 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-025-03597-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2025] [Indexed: 04/01/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the introduction of the birth control pill in 1960, Canadians have been offered a number of different options for hormonal contraceptives, yet oral contraceptives remain the most popular methods. Research from other countries indicates this may be shifting, but the last comprehensive survey of Canadian hormonal contraceptive usage was published in 2009. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine current hormonal contraceptive usage among pre-menopausal Canadians. METHODS An online survey was distributed to pre-menopausal females aged 19-49 years via a third-party survey company. The survey included questions on respondents' demographics and current and past hormonal contraceptive use. Prevalence of current hormonal contraceptive use was calculated by age. Chi-squared tests were conducted to determine whether there was an association between contraceptive choice and various demographic categories. RESULTS Responses of 2306 female Canadians (age 33.4 ± 8.1 years) were analyzed and 29% of these respondents were currently using hormonal contraceptives. The most common choices were oral contraceptives (56.4%) and intrauterine device (IUD) (28.4%). Over 30% of hormonal contraceptive users were currently using a long-acting reversible contraceptive method. CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrate a change in hormonal contraception use, notably an increase in the use of hormonal IUDs from 4 to 28% among Canadian hormonal contraceptive users over the last 15 years. This study also shows a high prevalence of alternative contraceptive options that may influence hormone levels differently than oral forms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison J Campbell
- Integrative Cardiovascular Physiology Laboratory, School of Human Kinetics, Trinity Western University, Langley, Canada
- Cardiovascular Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
| | - Victoria E Claydon
- Cardiovascular Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
| | - Sarah Liva
- School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, Canada
| | - Anita T Cote
- Integrative Cardiovascular Physiology Laboratory, School of Human Kinetics, Trinity Western University, Langley, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rezaiefar P, Archibald D, Kabir M, Humphrey-Murto S. Challenges in Providing Gynecological Procedures in Primary Care: A Survey of Canadian Academic Family Physicians. WOMEN'S HEALTH REPORTS (NEW ROCHELLE, N.Y.) 2025; 6:102-112. [PMID: 39989871 PMCID: PMC11839541 DOI: 10.1089/whr.2024.0098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2025]
Abstract
Purpose Globally, there is a lack of access to health care providers who offer gynecological procedures. Understanding the practice patterns of academic family physicians (AFPs) and whether additional training impacts the provision of care is critical. This study surveys the practice patterns of AFPs regarding gynecological procedures offered, identifies barriers, and explores the impact of additional training. Methods We circulated an anonymous, cross-sectional survey to all 17 family medicine programs across Canada, receiving responses from 71 AFPs. We computed descriptive statistics and bivariate associations. Results A total of 71 respondents from five universities participated. Most participants (97.2%) performed Papanicolaou (Pap) smears; 67.6% provided intrauterine device (IUD) insertion, and only 54.9% offered endometrial biopsy. Numbers decreased significantly for routine pessary care (29.5%), punch biopsy of the vulva (15.5%), and pessary fitting (5.6%). Eighteen participants (26.9%) had received enhanced skills training with a certificate of added competence (CAC), of which 55.6% were in women's health. CAC holders in women's health provided IUD insertions (100% vs. 67.3%; p = 0.049, V = 0.28) and endometrial biopsies (90.0% vs. 53.1%; p = 0.036, V = 0.28) at higher rates than general AFPs. Frequently cited barriers to offering gynecological procedures included lack of knowledge, procedural skills, and insufficient patient volumes to maintain competence. During the COVID-19 pandemic, 44% of respondents reported reducing or ceasing to provide Pap smears. Conclusions Many AFPs in Canada do not provide essential gynecological procedures. This impacts patient access and the training of the next generation of family physicians and thus requires innovative strategies to address the persistent procedural skills educational gap for trainees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parisa Rezaiefar
- Reproductive and Sexual Health, Origyns Medical Clinic, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Douglas Archibald
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monisha Kabir
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Humphrey-Murto
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Research Support Unit, Department of Innovation in Medical Education, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dur G, Mert A, Dur R, Pektas MK. How does the knowledge level of physicians and nurses working at primary health centers affect their preference for oral contraceptives in an inland Turkish province? BMC PRIMARY CARE 2025; 26:6. [PMID: 39780043 PMCID: PMC11708062 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02700-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2024] [Accepted: 12/27/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standardizing the knowledge of health care givers and eliminating their misconceptions would help to achieve optimal service for contraception. This study aims to evaluate the knowledge levels of physicians and nurses working at primary health care centers about the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use. METHODS This is a cross-sectional review of 306 professional care givers (117 physicians and 189 nurses) who are working at primary health care centers. RESULTS Only 17.3% of health care givers recommend OCP as their first professional choice of contraception for their patients. Approximately 50.3% of these care givers do not feel qualified about the OCPs and 81.7% of them wish to have regular training about OCPs. There is a significantly higher number of male health care givers who claim that OCPs cause acne, sexual dysfunction, ectopic pregnancy, deep vein thrombosis, and liver cancer (respectively p = 0.040, p = 0.028, p = 0.001, p = 0.001, and p = 0.020). When compared to nurses, there is a significantly higher number of physicians who state that OCPs cause acne, depression, sexual dysfunction, ectopic pregnancy, deep vein thrombosis, breast cancer and liver cancer. CONCLUSION Physicians and nurses working at primary health centers in an inland Turkish province have relatively lower rates of recommendation for OCP use. These lower recommendation rates become significantly more obvious in male physicians with ≥ 14 years' experience. The concern about probable adverse effects, the lack of standardization in formal education, the absence of post-graduate training and the shortage of time and resources for counseling might have led to the limitation in OCP use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gamze Dur
- School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - Ayşen Mert
- School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - Rıza Dur
- School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Zafer Sağlık Külliyesi Dörtyol Mahallesi 2078 Sokak No: 3, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.
| | - Mine Kanat Pektas
- School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Zafer Sağlık Külliyesi Dörtyol Mahallesi 2078 Sokak No: 3, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hillert J, Bove R, Haddad LB, Hellwig K, Houtchens M, Magyari M, Merki-Feld GS, Montgomery S, Nappi RE, Stenager E, Thompson H, Tulek Z, Verdun Di Cantogno E, Simoni M. Expert opinion on the use of contraception in people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2024; 30:1093-1106. [PMID: 38456514 PMCID: PMC11363471 DOI: 10.1177/13524585241228103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current guidance on the selection of appropriate contraception for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) is lacking. OBJECTIVE To address this gap, an expert-led consensus program developed recommendations to support clinicians in discussing family planning and contraception with women and men with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS A multidisciplinary steering committee (SC) of 13 international clinical experts led the program, supported by an extended faculty of 32 experts representing 18 countries. A modified Delphi methodology was used for decision-making and consensus-building. The SC drafted 15 clinical questions focused on patient-centered care, selection of contraception, and timing of stopping/starting contraception and disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Statements addressing each question were drafted based on evaluation of published evidence and the experts' clinical experience. Consensus was reached if ⩾75% of respondents agreed (scoring 7-9 on a 9-point scale) with each recommendation. RESULTS Consensus was reached on 24 of 25 proposed recommendations, including how and when to discuss contraception, types and safety of contraceptives, and how to evaluate the most appropriate contraceptive options for specific patient groups, including those with significant disability or being treated with DMTs. CONCLUSION These expert recommendations provide the first practical, relevant, and comprehensive guidance for clinicians on the selection of contraception in PwMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Hillert
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Riley Bove
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lisa B Haddad
- Center for Biomedical Research, Population Council, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kerstin Hellwig
- Katholisches Klinikum Bochum GmbH, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Bochum, Germany
| | - Maria Houtchens
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA/ Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melinda Magyari
- Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, University Hospital Boston, MA, USA/ Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gabriele S Merki-Feld
- Clinic of Reproductive Endocrinology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Scott Montgomery
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Rossella E Nappi
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Research Center of Reproductive Medicine, IRCCS San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Egon Stenager
- Department of Regional Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- MS-Clinic of Southern Jutland (Aabenraa, Esbjerg, Kolding), Sønderborg, Denmark
| | - Heidi Thompson
- Southern Health & Social Care Trust, Portadown, Northern Ireland
| | - Zeliha Tulek
- Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Manuela Simoni
- Unit of Endocrinology, Department of Medical Specialties, University Hospital and Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Atkinson A, Tulloch K, Boucoiran I, Money D. Guideline No. 450: Care of Pregnant Women Living with HIV and Interventions to Reduce Perinatal Transmission. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2024; 46:102551. [PMID: 38734074 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This guideline provides an update on the care of pregnant women living with HIV and the prevention of perinatal HIV transmission. This guideline is a revision of the previous guideline, No. 310 Guidelines for the Care of Pregnant Women Living With HIV and Interventions to Reduce Perinatal Transmission, and includes an updated review of the literature with contemporary recommendations. TARGET POPULATION Pregnant women newly diagnosed with HIV during antenatal screening and women living with HIV who become pregnant. This guideline does not include specific guidance for girls/women of reproductive age living with HIV who are not pregnant. OUTCOMES Prevention of perinatal HIV transmission is a key indicator of the success of a health care system and requires multidisciplinary care of pregnant women living with HIV. Intended outcomes include guidance on best practice in perinatal management for Canadian health care providers for pregnant women living with HIV; reduction of perinatal transmission of HIV toward a target of eradication of perinatal transmission; provision of optimal antenatal care for pregnant women to ensure the best maternal health outcomes and HIV suppression; and evidence-based support and recommendations for pregnant women living with HIV, maintaining awareness and consideration of the complex psychosocial impacts of living with HIV. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS The perinatal transmission of HIV has significant morbidity and mortality implications for the child, with associated lifelong health care costs. Pregnancy presents an emotionally and physically vulnerable time for pregnant women as well as an opportunity to engage them in health promotion. This guidance does not include recommendations with additional costs to health care facilities compared with the previous guideline. Application of the recommendations is aimed at health benefits to both mother and child by optimizing maternal health and preventing perinatal HIV transmission. EVIDENCE Published and unpublished literature was reviewed with a focus on publications post-2013. OVID-Medline, Embase, PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant publications available in English or French for each section of this guideline. Results included systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies published from 2012 to 2022. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline until May 2023. Unpublished literature, protocols, and international guidelines were identified by accessing the websites of health-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALIDATION METHODS The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE The intended users of this guideline include obstetric care providers and infectious disease clinicians who provide care for pregnant women living with HIV. SOCIAL MEDIA SUMMARY Updated Canadian HIV in pregnancy guideline informed by global research and tailored to Canadian healthcare needs and goals for pregnant women living with HIV and their families. SUMMARY STATEMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS.
Collapse
|
6
|
Atkinson A, Tulloch K, Boucoiran I, Money D. Directive clinique n o 450 : Prise en charge des femmes enceintes vivant avec le VIH et interventions pour réduire le risque de transmission périnatale. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2024; 46:102552. [PMID: 38729607 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
|
7
|
Gladstone RA, Brent SE, Dzneladze I, Selk A, Al Harbi H, Karol D, Hojabri S, Shirreff L. Letter: Impact of a Novel, Postpartum Contraception Decision Aid Distributed Antenatally at a Canadian Urban, Tertiary Care Centre: A Prospective, Pre- and Post-Intervention Study. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2023; 45:102149. [PMID: 37236605 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2023.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Gladstone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
| | - Shannon E Brent
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | | | - Amanda Selk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON
| | - Hamad Al Harbi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Dalia Karol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Sara Hojabri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Lindsay Shirreff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aziz MM, El-Gazzar AF. Provider bias and family planning in Upper Egypt: a simulated client approach. J Egypt Public Health Assoc 2023; 98:19. [PMID: 37777657 PMCID: PMC10542042 DOI: 10.1186/s42506-023-00144-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Provider bias is a main barrier that extensively violates the right of free family planning method choice. Egypt is one of the countries that shows skewness in its method mix. Provider bias and insufficiency of alternative methods are identified as potential factors underlying this phenomenon which contributes to high unmet needs and discontinuation rates. Provider bias may be influenced by cultural beliefs and societal trends and is usually overlooked as a possible cause of this skewed method mix. This study aims to explore the presence of provider bias in rural Upper Egypt and its potential causes, a community with conservative cultural beliefs and least contraceptive prevalence rates. METHODS This is a qualitative study using the "simulated client's approach." The study was conducted in 16 villages in Assiut and Sohag governorates in Egypt. The simulated clients visited 30 clinics, 15 in each governorate, including primary healthcare units and private clinics. Three scenarios were used to explore the physicians-imposed restrictions for contraceptive use with different clients' eligibility criteria. Data was analyzed using the grounded theory methodology. RESULTS Recommending a contraceptive method for the mystery clients was not based on informed choice. Most providers had method or client bias. Copper IUD was the most favorable contraceptive method recommended by providers, with negative attitude towards using hormonal contraception. Nulliparous and young clients were discouraged to use contraception before proving fertility or offered temporary methods as emergency contraception or condoms. Providers have shown misconceptions related to infertility-associated complications of contraceptive use, especially for the young and nulliparous women. CONCLUSION In this study, providers had a clear bias towards recommending IUD rather than all other contraceptive methods, which was hindered in some cases by the lack of insertion skills. Interventions to reduce provider bias should go beyond technical training. Moreover, training on reproductive rights should be a main component of routine training. Providers should regularly receive research results and be oriented toward recent medical eligibility criteria of contraceptive methods use. Moreover, the sociocultural beliefs of providers that may affect their practice should be explored and addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirette M Aziz
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Amira F El-Gazzar
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Badr University in Cairo, Badr City, Egypt.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Deffieux X, Rousset-Jablonski C, Gantois A, Brillac T, Maruani J, Maitrot-Mantelet L, Mignot S, Gaucher L, Athiel Y, Baffet H, Bailleul A, Bernard V, Bourdon M, Cardaillac C, Carneiro Y, Chariot P, Corroenne R, Dabi Y, Dahlem L, Frank S, Freyens A, Grouthier V, Hernandez I, Iraola E, Lambert M, Lauchet N, Legendre G, Le Lous M, Louis-Vahdat C, Martinat Sainte-Beuve A, Masson M, Matteo C, Pinton A, Sabbagh E, Sallee C, Thubert T, Heron I, Pizzoferrato AC, Artzner F, Tavenet A, Le Ray C, Fauconnier A. [Pelvic exam in gynecology and obstetrics: Guidelines for clinical practice]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2023; 51:297-330. [PMID: 37258002 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide guidelines for the pelvic clinical exam in gynecology and obstetrics. MATERIAL AND METHODS A multidisciplinary experts consensus committee of 45 experts was formed, including representatives of patients' associations and users of the health system. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any funding. The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized. METHODS The committee studied 40 questions within 4 fields for symptomatic or asymptomatic women (emergency conditions, gynecological consultation, gynecological diseases, obstetrics, and pregnancy). Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology. RESULTS The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 27 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 17 present a strong agreement, 7 a weak agreement and 3 an expert consensus agreement. Thirteen questions resulted in an absence of recommendation due to lack of evidence in the literature. CONCLUSIONS The need to perform clinical examination in gynecological and obstetrics patients was specified in 27 pre-defined situations based on scientific evidence. More research is required to investigate the benefit in other cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Deffieux
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Antoine-Béclère, université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, 92140 Clamart, France.
| | - Christine Rousset-Jablonski
- Département de chirurgie, Centre Léon Bérard, 28, rue Laënnec, 69008 Lyon, France; Inserm U1290, Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France; Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Adrien Gantois
- Collège national des sages-femmes de France hébergé au Réseau de santé périnatal parisien (RSPP), 75010 Paris, France
| | | | - Julia Maruani
- Cabinet médical, 6, rue Docteur-Albert-Schweitzer, 13006 Marseille, France
| | - Lorraine Maitrot-Mantelet
- Unité de gynécologie médicale, hôpital Port-Royal, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), hôpital universitaire Paris centre (HUPC), 75014 Paris, France
| | | | - Laurent Gaucher
- Collège national des sages-femmes de France, CNSF, 75010 Paris, France; Public Health Unit, hospices civils de Lyon, 69500 Bron, France; Inserm U1290, Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France; Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, 1206 Genève, Suisse
| | - Yoann Athiel
- Maternité Port-Royal, groupe hospitalier Paris Centre, AP-HP, université Paris cité, FHU Prema, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Hortense Baffet
- Service de gynécologie médicale, orthogénie et sexologie, CHU de Lille, université de Lille, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Alexandre Bailleul
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier de Poissy Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 78300 Poissy, France; Équipe RISCQ « Risques cliniques et sécurité en santé des femmes et en santé périnatale », université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Valérie Bernard
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, gynécologie médicale et médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, centre hospitalo-universitaire Pellegrin, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Unité Inserm 1312, université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux Institute of Oncology, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Mathilde Bourdon
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique II et médecine de la reproduction, université Paris cité, AP-HP, centre hospitalier universitaire (CHU) Cochin Port-Royal, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Claire Cardaillac
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France
| | | | - Patrick Chariot
- Département de médecine légale et sociale, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 93140 Bondy, France; Institut de recherche interdisciplinaire sur les enjeux sociaux, UMR 8156-997, UFR SMBH, université Sorbonne Paris Nord, 93000 Bobigny, France
| | - Romain Corroenne
- Service de gynécologue-obstétrique, CHU d'Angers, 49000 Angers, France
| | - Yohann Dabi
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, Sorbonne université-AP-HP-hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Laurence Dahlem
- Département universitaire de médecine générale, faculté de médecine, université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo-Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Sophie Frank
- Service d'oncogénétique, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Anne Freyens
- Département universitaire de médecine générale (DUMG), université Paul-Sabatier, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - Virginie Grouthier
- Service d'endocrinologie, diabétologie, nutrition et d'endocrinologie des gonades, Hôpital Haut Lévêque, Centre Hospitalo-universitaire régional de Bordeaux, 31000 Bordeaux, France; Université de Bordeaux, Inserm U1034, Biology of Cardiovascular Diseases, Pessac, France
| | - Isabelle Hernandez
- Collège national des sages-femmes de France hébergé au Réseau de santé périnatal parisien (RSPP), 75010 Paris, France
| | - Elisabeth Iraola
- Institut de recherche interdisciplinaire sur les enjeux sociaux (IRIS), UMR 8156-997, CNRS U997 Inserm EHESS UP13 UFR SMBH, université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Paris, France; Direction de la protection maternelle et infantile et promotion de la santé, conseil départemental du Val-de-Marne, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Marie Lambert
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, gynécologie médicale et médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, centre hospitalo-universitaire Pellegrin, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Nadege Lauchet
- Groupe médical François-Perrin, 9, rue François-Perrin, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - Guillaume Legendre
- Service de gynécologue-obstétrique, CHU Angers, 49000 Angers, France; UMR_S1085, université d'Angers, CHU d'Angers, université de Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail), Angers, France
| | - Maela Le Lous
- Université de Rennes 1, Inserm, LTSI - UMR 1099, 35000 Rennes, France; Département de gynécologie et obstétrique, CHU de Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Christine Louis-Vahdat
- Cabinet de gynécologie et obstétrique, 126, boulevard Saint-Germain, 75006 Paris, France
| | | | - Marine Masson
- Département de médecine générale, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - Caroline Matteo
- Ecole de maïeutique, Aix Marseille Université, 13015 Marseille, France
| | - Anne Pinton
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Trousseau, AP-HP, 26, avenue du Dr-Arnold-Netter, 75012 Paris, France; Sorbonne université, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Emmanuelle Sabbagh
- Unité de gynécologie médicale, hôpital Port-Royal, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), hôpital universitaire Paris centre (HUPC), 75014 Paris, France
| | - Camille Sallee
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Mère-Enfant, CHU de Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - Thibault Thubert
- Service de gynecologie-obstétrique, CHU de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France; EA 4334, laboratoire mouvement, interactions, performance (MIP), Nantes université, 44322 Nantes, France
| | - Isabelle Heron
- Service d'endocrinologie, université de Rouen, hôpital Charles-Nicolle, 76000 Rouen, France; Cabinet médical, Clinique Mathilde, 76100 Rouen, France
| | - Anne-Cécile Pizzoferrato
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital universitaire de La Miletrie, 86000 Poitiers, France; Inserm CIC 1402, université de Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - France Artzner
- Ciane, Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance, c/o Anne Evrard, 101, rue Pierre-Corneille, 69003 Lyon, France
| | - Arounie Tavenet
- Endofrance, Association de lutte contre l'endométriose, 3, rue de la Gare, 70190 Tresilley, France
| | - Camille Le Ray
- Maternité Port-Royal, groupe hospitalier Paris Centre, AP-HP, université Paris cité, FHU Prema, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Arnaud Fauconnier
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier de Poissy Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 78300 Poissy, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Munro S, Di Meglio G, Williams A, Barbic SP, Begun S, Black A, Carson A, Fortin M, Jacob K, Khan Z, Martin-Misener R, Meherali S, Paller V, Seiyad H, Vallée CA, Wahl K, Norman WV. Can youth-engaged research facilitate equitable access to contraception in Canada? The qualitative study protocol for the Ask Us project. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070904. [PMID: 36863736 PMCID: PMC9990688 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is little to no evidence in Canada on the barriers that youth face when accessing contraception. We seek to identify the contraception access, experiences, beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and needs of youth in Canada, from the perspectives of youth and youth service providers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This prospective, mixed-methods, integrated knowledge mobilisation study, the Ask Us project, will involve a national sample of youth, healthcare and social service providers, and policy makers recruited via a novel relational mapping and outreach approach led by youth. Phase I will centre the voices of youth and their service providers through in-depth one-on-one interviews. We will explore the factors influencing youth access to contraception, theoretically guided by Levesque's Access to Care framework. Phase II will focus on the cocreation and evaluation of knowledge translation products (youth stories) with youth, service providers, and policy makers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was received from the University of British Columbia's Research Ethics Board (H21-01091). Full open-access publication of the work will be sought in an international peer-reviewed journal. Findings will be disseminated to youth and service providers through social media, newsletters, and communities of practice, and to policy makers through invited evidence briefs and face-to-face presentations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Munro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Giuseppina Di Meglio
- Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Aleyah Williams
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Skye Pamela Barbic
- Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stephanie Begun
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amanda Black
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Carson
- Research, Innovation, and Discovery, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Michelle Fortin
- Options for Sexual Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kaiya Jacob
- Youth Partner, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Zeba Khan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Salima Meherali
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Victoria Paller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Carol-Anne Vallée
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kate Wahl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Wendy V Norman
- Department of Family Practice, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tomalty D, Giovannetti O, Sa V, Adams MA. Female Sexual Dysfunction: An Appraisal of Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines Using the AGREE II Instrument. THE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN SEXUALITY 2023. [DOI: 10.3138/cjhs.2022-0033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) is a prevalent concern among Canadian women. While clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are commonly relied upon to guide evidence-based decision making, the availability and quality of published Canadian CPGs for FSD is unknown. More broadly, there is also a paucity of literature, which has evaluated documents guiding Canadian CPG development. A search was conducted to identify Canadian documents describing CPG development processes. Eligible documents underwent full-text review to extract content pertaining to scope and target audience. A separate search was conducted to identify Canadian CPGs specific to FSD. Eligible documents underwent quality appraisal using the validated Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Four documents outlining CPG development processes were identified. While there were similarities in the steps for CPG development, discrepancies in scope, target user, and affiliated development group across the Canadian methodologies were noted. One Canadian CPG specific to FSD was identified. Th is CPG scored highly in the domains of Scope and Purpose (79%), and Clarity of Presentation (86%), although it did not reach the same quality threshold for the remaining domains. Our results suggest the need for consistent guidelines that are implementable by Canadian CPG developers across the diverse clinical landscape, including women’s sexual health. Th is is the first study to evaluate the quality of CPGs for FSD using the AGREE II instrument. Our appraisal identifies areas of weakness that should be considered when updating this CPG in the future and in the development of new CPGs in this field.
Collapse
|
12
|
Margaritis K, Margioula-Siarkou G, Margioula-Siarkou C, Petousis S, Galli-Tsinopoulou A. Contraceptive methods in adolescence: a narrative review of guidelines. EUR J CONTRACEP REPR 2023; 28:51-57. [PMID: 36637987 DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2022.2162336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adolescent pregnancy, while recently in decline, remains a matter in need of addressing. Education and counselling are deemed crucial and this review aims at comparing published contraceptive guidelines, thus resolving any surrounding misconceptions. MATERIALS AND METHODS Recently published contraception guidelines regarding adolescent pregnancy were retrieved. In particular, guidelines and recommendations from ACOG, RCOG, SOCG, AAP, CPS, NICE, CDC, and WHO were compared and reviewed based on each guideline's method of reporting. RESULTS Three categories of contraceptive methods are available for adolescents and recommendations on their initiation should be made based on their efficacy, according to all guidelines. Therefore, long acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) should be highly recommended as the most effective method (typical use failure rate: 0.05%), followed by short-acting hormonal contraceptives (typical use failure rate: 3-9%). The third contraceptive option includes contraceptives used in the moment of intercourse and displays the lowest effectiveness (typical use failure rate: 12-25%), mostly due to its dependence on personal consistency, however offers protection against STI transmission. CONCLUSION Adolescents should be encouraged to initiate contraception, with LARCs being the primary choice followed by short-acting hormonal contraception. However, regardless of the chosen effective contraceptive method, the use of condom is necessary for STI prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosmas Margaritis
- 2nd Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgia Margioula-Siarkou
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hippokration General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Chrysoula Margioula-Siarkou
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hippokration General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Stamatios Petousis
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hippokration General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Assimina Galli-Tsinopoulou
- 2nd Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mazza D, James S, Black K, Taft A, Bateson D, McGeechan K, Norman WV. Increasing the availability of long-acting reversible contraception and medical abortion in primary care: the Australian Contraception and Abortion Primary Care Practitioner Support Network (AusCAPPS) cohort study protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e065583. [PMID: 36521891 PMCID: PMC9756212 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although primary care practitioners are the main providers of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and early medical abortion (EMA) in Australia, few provide these services. A professional community of practice (CoP) has the potential to improve LARC and EMA provision through evidence-based guidance, expert support and peer-to-peer engagement.The primary objective is to establish, implement and evaluate an innovative, multidisciplinary online CoP (AusCAPPS Network) to increase LARC and EMA services in Australian primary care. Secondary objectives are to (1) increase the number of general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacists certified to provide or dispense EMA, respectively, (2) increase LARC and EMA prescription rates and, (3) improve primary care practitioners' knowledge, attitudes and provision of LARC and EMA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A stakeholder knowledge exchange workshop (KEW) will be conducted to inform the AusCAPPS Network design. Once live, we aim to reach 3000 GPs, practice nurses and community pharmacists members. Changes in the number of GPs and pharmacists certified to provide or dispense EMA, respectively, and changes in the number of LARCs and EMAs prescribed will be gleaned through health service data. Changes in the knowledge attitudes and practices will be gleaned through an online survey with 500 individuals from each professional group at baseline and 12 months after members have joined AusCAPPs; and experiences of the AusCAPPS Network will be evaluated using interviews with the project team plus a convenience sample of 20 intervention participants from each professional group. The project is underpinned by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework, and a realist framework will inform analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was received from the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (No. 28002). Dissemination will occur through KEWs, presentations, publications and domestic and international networks. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12622000655741.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Mazza
- SPHERE, NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sharon James
- SPHERE, NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kirsten Black
- Specialty of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Angela Taft
- Judith Lumley Centre, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Deborah Bateson
- Gynaecology and Neonatology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kevin McGeechan
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wendy V Norman
- Department of Family Practice, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lee SC, Norman WV. Emergency contraception subsidy in Canada: a comparative policy analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1110. [PMID: 36050668 PMCID: PMC9438154 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08416-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Canada, cost prohibits access to emergency contraception (EC) which may assist to prevent unintended pregnancy. The drug, ulipristal acetate (UPA-EC), is more clinically effective and cost-effective than the prior standard levonorgestrel (LNG-EC). We analyzed provincial EC subsidization policies and examined underlying decision-making processes. METHODS We undertook documentary analysis of provincial EC subsidization policies in publicly available drug formularies. We conducted semi-structured interviews with key informants to explore the processes underlying current policies. RESULTS Quebec is the only province to subsidize UPA-EC, whilst all ten provinces subsidize LNG-EC. As such, provincial EC subsidization policies do not align with the latest UPA-EC evidence. Interviews revealed that evidence was valued in the policymaking process and formulary decisions were made through interdisciplinary consensus. CONCLUSIONS We identify a gap between EC subsidization policies and the latest evidence. Institutional structures affect policies reflecting evolving evidence. Increasing interdisciplinary mechanisms may encourage evidence-based policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina C Lee
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Manitoba, WN5002-665 William Ave, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 0L8, Canada
| | - Wendy V Norman
- Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical, London, UK.
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, 320-5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Directive clinique n o 425a : Le cannabis aux différentes périodes de la vie des femmes - Partie 1 : Fertilité, contraception, ménopause et douleur pelvienne. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2022; 44:420-435.e4. [PMID: 35400520 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIF Fournir aux fournisseurs de soins de santé les meilleures données probantes sur l'utilisation de cannabis et la santé des femmes. Les domaines d'intérêt sont : les profils généraux d'utilisation du cannabis ainsi que la sécurité de la consommation; les soins aux femmes qui utilisent le cannabis; la stigmatisation; le dépistage, l'intervention brève et l'orientation vers le traitement; les effets sur la régulation hormonale; la santé reproductive, y compris la contraception et la fertilité; la fonction sexuelle; les effets sur les symptômes périménopausiques et postménopausiques; et l'utilisation dans le traitement des syndromes de douleur pelvienne chronique. POPULATION CIBLE La population cible comprend toutes les femmes qui consomment ou utilisent du cannabis ou qui envisagent de le faire. RéSULTATS: Un dialogue ouvert et fondé sur des données probantes relativement à l'utilisation et la consommation de cannabis, dialogue qui mènera à l'amélioration des soins aux patientes. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: L'exploration de l'utilisation et de la consommation de cannabis par une approche basée sur la connaissance des traumatismes donne l'occasion au fournisseur de soins et à la patiente de créer une solide alliance thérapeutique collaborative. Cette alliance permet aux femmes de faire des choix éclairés sur leurs propres soins. Elle facilite également le diagnostic et le traitement possible des troubles de l'usage du cannabis. Il ne faut pas stigmatiser la consommation, car la stigmatisation nuit à l'alliance thérapeutique (c'est-à-dire le partenariat entre la patiente et le fournisseur de soins). Plusieurs effets indésirables de la consommation de cannabis peuvent être confondus avec d'autres problèmes de santé. À l'heure actuelle, l'utilisation du cannabis pour traiter les problèmes de santé féminine n'est pas financée par le secteur public; par conséquent, les utilisatrices doivent assumer les coûts directs. Les coûts indirects de l'utilisation de cannabis sont inconnus. Ainsi, les fournisseurs de soins et les patientes doivent comprendre le rôle du cannabis dans les problèmes de santé féminine de sorte que les femmes puissent prendre des décisions éclairées. DONNéES PROBANTES: Des recherches ont été effectuées dans PubMed, Embase et la littérature grise pour recenser des études publiées entre le 1er janvier 2018 et le 18 février 2021 concernant l'utilisation du cannabis et ses effets sur l'infertilité, la contraception, les symptômes périménopausiques et postménopausiques et la douleur pelvienne. Toutes les publications des types suivants ont été incluses : essais cliniques, études observationnelles, revues (y compris les revues systématiques et les méta-analyses), directives cliniques et déclarations de conférences de consensus. Un survol des publications a été effectué pour en confirmer la pertinence. Les termes de recherche ont été définis à l'aide des termes MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) et mots clés (et variantes) suivants : cannabis, cannabinoids, marijuana, dexanabinol, dronabinol et tetrahydrocannabinol. À ces termes ont été combinés les termes suivants afin de cerner la santé des femmes : estrogen, estradiol, medroxyprogesterone acetate, vaginal contraception, oral contraceptives, fertilization, amenorrhea, oligomenorrhea, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, endometriosis, interstitial cystitis, vulvodynia et menopause. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant l'approche d'évaluation, de développement et d'évaluation (GRADE). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et faibles). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Tous les fournisseurs de soins de santé qui prodiguent des soins aux femmes. DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.
Collapse
|
16
|
Robert M, Graves LE, Allen VM, Dama S, Gabrys RL, Tanguay RL, Turner SD, Green CR, Cook JL. Guideline No. 425a: Cannabis Use Throughout Women's Lifespans - Part 1: Fertility, Contraception, Menopause, and Pelvic Pain. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2022; 44:407-419.e4. [PMID: 35400519 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide health care providers with the best evidence on cannabis use with respect to women's health. Areas of focus include general patterns of cannabis use as well as safety of use; care for women who use cannabis; stigma; screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment; impact on hormonal regulation; reproductive health, including contraception and fertility; sexual function; effects on perimenopausal and menopausal symptoms; and use in chronic pelvic pain syndromes. TARGET POPULATION The target population includes all women currently using or contemplating using cannabis. OUTCOMES Open, evidence-informed dialogue about cannabis use, which will lead to improvement in patient care. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS Exploring cannabis use through a trauma-informed approach provides the health care provider and patient with an opportunity to build a strong, collaborative, therapeutic alliance. This alliance empowers women to make informed choices about their own care. It also allows for the diagnosis and possible treatment of cannabis use disorders. Use should not be stigmatized, as stigma leads to poor "partnered care" (i.e., the partnership between the patient and care provider). Multiple side effects of cannabis use may be mistaken for other disorders. Currently, use of cannabis to treat women's health issues is not covered by public funding; as a result, individual users must pay the direct cost. The indirect costs of cannabis use are unknown. Thus, health care providers and patients must understand the role of cannabis in women's health issues, so that women can make knowledgeable decisions. EVIDENCE PubMed, EMBASE, and grey literature were searched to identify studies of "cannabis use and effect on infertility, contraception, perimenopause and menopausal symptoms, and pelvic pain" published between January 1, 2018 and February 18, 2021. All clinical trials, observational studies, reviews (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses), guidelines, and conference consensus statements were included. Publications were screened for relevance. The search terms were developed using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords (and variants), including cannabis, cannabinoids, marijuana, dexanabinol, dronabinol, tetrahydrocannabinol; the specific terms to capture women's health were estrogen, estradiol, medroxyprogesterone acetate, vaginal contraception, oral contraceptives, fertilization, amenorrhea, oligomenorrhea, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, endometriosis, interstitial cystitis, vulvodynia, and menopause. VALIDATION METHODS The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE All heath care providers who care for women. SUMMARY STATEMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS.
Collapse
|
17
|
Jin XX, Sun L, Lai XL, Li J, Liang ML, Ma X. Effect of Mirena placement on reproductive hormone levels at different time intervals after artificial abortion. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10:511-517. [PMID: 35097076 PMCID: PMC8771403 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i2.511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improper methods of contraception greatly increase the risk of abortion, cervical or endometrial lesions, and the number of recurrent artificial abortions. These complications result in the deterioration of a patient’s outcome. Further, the proportion of artificial abortions is highest among unmarried females. Placement of an intrauterine device, such as the Mirena, after an artificial abortion may decrease the likelihood of an endometrial injury caused by recurrent abortions while significantly improving its contraceptive effects.
AIM To discuss the effect of Mirena placement on reproductive hormone levels at different time points after an artificial abortion.
METHODS Women (n = 119) undergoing an artificial abortion operation were divided into the study (n = 56) and control (n = 63) groups. In the study group, the Mirena was inserted immediately after the artificial abortion, whereas in the control group, it was inserted 4–7 d after the onset of the first menstrual cycle after abortion. All participants were followed-up for 6 mo to observe the continuation and expulsion rates and adverse reactions and to measure the levels of serum estradiol (E2), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and luteinizing hormone (LH).
RESULTS The continuation rates were 94.64% and 93.65% in the study group and the control group, respectively. The expulsion rates were 1.79% and 3.17% in the study group and the control group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). There were also no statistically significant differences in the proportion of patients with bacterial vaginitis, trichomonas vaginitis, or cervicitis between the groups (P > 0.05). Six months after Mirena placement, E2 Levels were 45.50 ± 7.13 pg/mL and 42.91 ± 8.10 pg/mL, FSH 13.60 ± 3.24 mIU/mL and 14.54 ± 3.11 mIU/mL, and LH 15.11 ± 2.08 mIU/mL and 14.60 ± 3.55 mIU/mL in the study and control groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in hormone levels between the two groups (P > 0.05). There were also no statistically significant differences in the proportions of abnormal menstruation, prolonged menstruation, or pain during intercourse between the study and control groups after Mirena placement (P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in uterine volume, sexual desire, sexual activity, or the sexual satisfaction score between the study and control groups before and after Mirena placement (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION Placement of a Mirena intrauterine device immediately after an artificial abortion does not increase the risk of adverse reactions and can help prevent endometrial injury caused by recurrent abortions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Xiao Jin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhejiang Taizhou Hospital, Taizhou 317000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Ling Sun
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhejiang Taizhou Hospital, Taizhou 317000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xiao-Li Lai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhejiang Taizhou Hospital, Taizhou 317000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhejiang Taizhou Hospital, Taizhou 317000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Mei-Li Liang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhejiang Taizhou Hospital, Taizhou 317000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xia Ma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhejiang Taizhou Hospital, Taizhou 317000, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Matsushita T, Hasegawa T, Noma H, Ota E, Chou VB, Okada Y. Interventions to increase access to long-acting reversible contraceptives. Hippokratia 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tomomi Matsushita
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Showa University School of Medicine; Tokyo Japan
| | - Takeshi Hasegawa
- Showa University Research Administration Center (SURAC); Showa University; Tokyo Japan
| | - Hisashi Noma
- Department of Data Science; The Institute of Statistical Mathematics; Tokyo Japan
| | - Erika Ota
- Global Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Science; St. Luke's International University; Chuo-ku Japan
| | - Victoria B Chou
- Department of International Health; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - Yoshiyuki Okada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital; Kanagawa Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Stern J, Molin MS, Fernaeus M, Georgsson S, Carlsson T. Contraceptive counseling about adverse reactions of intrauterine contraception: Exploration of narratives found in web-based discussion boards. Midwifery 2021; 104:103166. [PMID: 34717242 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE the possibility of experiencing adverse reactions is an important aspect of contraceptive decision-making and information about this topic is highlighted as an essential aspect of contraceptive counseling. The aim of this study was to explore experiences of contraceptive counseling about potential adverse reactions of intrauterine contraception. DESIGN exploratory qualitative study of messages in discussion boards, analyzed with inductive qualitative content analysis. SETTING two large public Swedish web-based discussion boards about sexual and reproductive health. PARTICIPANTS threads related to the aim were identified through searches in the discussion boards during 2019 and 2020, resulting in in 43 included posters who had written 140 messages in total. FINDINGS the themes 'difficulties making an informed decision due to insufficient and untrustworthy information about adverse reactions' and 'feeling dismissed when communicating about experienced adverse reactions' illustrate the results. Posters emphasized the importance of sufficient information about adverse reactions. However, professionals were perceived as overly optimistic regarding intrauterine contraception and focusing on mild or common reactions. The importance of feeling that their adverse reactions were acknowledged was articulated, but posters felt that some professionals dismissed the reactions when being told about it, resulting in frustration and dissatisfaction with care. The discussion boards contained narratives describing a resistance among professionals to send in a formal report about the adverse reaction. KEY CONCLUSIONS according to statements made by posters who have experience of adverse reactions of intrauterine contraception, contraceptive counseling have room for improvement in regard to inclusion of comprehensive information about adverse reactions. The findings illustrate the importance that clients who experience adverse reactions of intrauterine contraception feel they are acknowledged and offered adequate support. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE echoing guidelines for high-quality contraceptive counseling, the narratives provide further weight that professionals need to have adequate training and resources to offer comprehensive information about adverse reactions of intrauterine contraception. The findings call attention to the importance of follow-up services for clients who experience adverse reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Stern
- Sophiahemmet University, Box 5605, SE-114 86, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Women's and Children's Health, MTC-huset, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 14B, SE-75237, Uppsala university, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Maja Fernaeus
- Sophiahemmet University, Box 5605, SE-114 86, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Susanne Georgsson
- The Swedish Red Cross University College, Box 1059, SE 141 21 Huddinge, Sweden; Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical science, Intervention and technology, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tommy Carlsson
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, MTC-huset, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 14B, SE-75237, Uppsala university, Uppsala, Sweden; The Swedish Red Cross University College, Box 1059, SE 141 21 Huddinge, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
BakenRa A, Gero A, Sanders J, Simmons R, Fay K, Turok DK. Pregnancy Risk by Frequency and Timing of Unprotected Intercourse Before Intrauterine Device Placement for Emergency Contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 138:79-84. [PMID: 34259467 PMCID: PMC8216596 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess pregnancy risk after intrauterine device (IUD) placement by the number and timing of unprotected intercourse episodes in the prior 14 days. METHODS This was a secondary analysis of a randomized trial that compared the copper T380A IUD and levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine system for emergency contraception. At enrollment, participants had a negative urine pregnancy test result and reported the frequency and timing of any unprotected intercourse in the preceding 14 days. We assessed pregnancies 1 month after IUD placement and compared pregnancy risk by single or multiple unprotected intercourse episodes and by timing (5 or fewer days before IUD placement or 6 or more days before). RESULTS Among the 655 participants, one pregnancy occurred in a patient who reported intercourse once 48 hours before IUD placement. Multiple unprotected intercourse episodes were reported by 286 participants (43.7%), and 95 participants (14.4%) reported at least one unprotected intercourse episode 6 or more days before IUD placement. No pregnancies occurred among those with multiple unprotected intercourse episodes (0%, 97.5% CI 0-1.3%) or with any unprotected intercourse episode 6-14 days before IUD placement (0.0%, 97.5% CI 0.0-3.8%). Pregnancy risk difference did not significantly differ by single compared with multiple unprotected intercourse episodes (0.3%, 95% CI -0.3% to 0.8%), nor by unprotected intercourse 5 or fewer days before IUD placement or 6 or more days before (0.2%, 95% CI -0.2% to 0.5%). CONCLUSION With a negative urine pregnancy test result at IUD placement, 1-month pregnancy risk remains low, regardless of frequency or timing of unprotected intercourse in the prior 14 days. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02175030.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abena BakenRa
- University of California Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley, California; and the University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rocca ML, Palumbo AR, Visconti F, Di Carlo C. Safety and Benefits of Contraceptives Implants: A Systematic Review. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:548. [PMID: 34201123 PMCID: PMC8229462 DOI: 10.3390/ph14060548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Progestin-only contraceptive implants provide long-acting, highly effective reversible contraception. We searched the medical publications in PubMed, CENTRAL, and EMBASE for relevant articles on hormonal implants published in English between 1990 and 2021. Levonorgestrel (LNG) 6-capsule subdermal implants represented the first effective system approved for reversible contraception. The etonogestrel (ENG) single rod dispositive has been widely employed in clinical practice, since it is a highly effective and safe contraceptive method. Abnormal menstrual bleeding is a common ENG side effect, representing the main reason for its premature discontinuation. Emerging evidence demonstrated that it is possible to extend the use of the ENG implant beyond the three-year period for which it is approved. The ENG implant could be an effective and discrete alternative to the IUD in young girls, such as post-partum/post-abortion. Implants should be inserted by trained skilled clinicians who previously provide adequate counselling about their contraceptive effect, benefits, and any possible adverse events. More studies are needed to validate the extended use of the ENG implant for up to 5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morena Luigia Rocca
- Operative Unit of Obstetric and Gynaecology, Pugliese-Ciaccio Hospital, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Anna Rita Palumbo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, “Magna Graecia” University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (A.R.P.); (F.V.); (C.D.C.)
| | - Federica Visconti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, “Magna Graecia” University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (A.R.P.); (F.V.); (C.D.C.)
| | - Costantino Di Carlo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, “Magna Graecia” University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (A.R.P.); (F.V.); (C.D.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Boyce TM, Neiterman E. Women in larger bodies' experiences with contraception: a scoping review. Reprod Health 2021; 18:89. [PMID: 33926501 PMCID: PMC8082612 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01139-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the prevalence of obesity increases and the age of onset decreases, more women of reproductive age will be living in larger bodies. Research on weight-related efficacy and safety has informed clinical guidelines for routine and emergency contraceptive use by women with a higher body mass index; however, patient perspectives are needed to understand women in larger bodies' experiences with contraception and contraceptive care. This scoping review summarizes the literature on women in larger bodies' experiences with contraception with the goal of gaining a better understanding of the nature of these experiences and identifying gaps in the existing research. METHODS Following Arksey and O'Malley's framework, a scoping review of the literature was conducted. Four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and CINAHL) were searched for peer-reviewed, empirical articles published in English between 2010 and 2020, with a focus on North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. Data were summarized by identifying key themes in the reviewed literature. RESULTS Twenty-nine articles meeting the eligibility criteria were reviewed. The literature was predominantly quantitative (n = 27), with only one qualitative study and one systematic review, respectively. Five themes were identified, including (1) use of contraception among women in larger bodies; (2) knowledge, attitudes towards and beliefs about contraception; (3) contraceptive (dis)satisfaction among women in larger bodies; (4) contraceptive counseling; and (5) barriers to contraception. The findings revealed that women in larger bodies may have unmet contraceptive care needs. Despite many articles addressing the need to improve contraceptive counseling for women in larger bodies (n = 26), few explored how women felt about their care (n = 2). Finally, only two articles focused on emergency contraception, indicating a need for further research. CONCLUSION This scoping review emphasizes the pressing need for qualitative research to explore women in larger bodies' experiences with routine and emergency contraception, as well as receiving contraceptive counseling and care. Future research exploring the lived experiences of women in larger bodies is necessary to better characterize their contraceptive needs and identify avenues to improve patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tierney M. Boyce
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada
| | - Elena Neiterman
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
ÖZCAN H, YİĞİTBAŞ Ç, KARACA MT. Men's Choice of Contraception Method. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES 2021; 11:53-58. [DOI: 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.767229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the contraception choices of men, aged between 18-60 and living in the center of a province in the Gümüşhane.
Methods: The study is of a descriptive type. As a data collection form, an Individual Information Form consisting of a total of 32 questions was used. This form questions the demographic-physical-biological-social-health histories of the participants and their knowledge, attitudes, behaviors about contraception methods. Averages were given together with standard deviations.
Results: 20.8 % of the participants are aged between 26-33. It was seen that 25.3% of the participants had knowledge about contraception methods and 64.7% did not use any methods. When the variables of the age and the marital status are approached in terms of having sufficient knowledge about contraception and still using contraception methods, there is a statistical significance between the variable of 'is the use of contraception methods harmful to health?' with the status of still using contraception methods. A statistical significance is also found between the variable of being sexually active with the status of having sufficient knowledge about contraception and still using contraception methods (p>0.05).
Conclusion: In this study, It has been determined that men who had sufficient information about contraceptions had higher age and higher education levels, were sexually active and married. It has been seen that the age, the marital status, the perception of contraception as harmful to health, the status of being sexually active did not affect receiving any training about contraception.
Collapse
|
24
|
Trawick E, Pecoriello J, Quinn G, Goldman KN. Guidelines informing counseling on female age-related fertility decline: a systematic review. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:41-53. [PMID: 33188440 PMCID: PMC7822973 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01967-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify, appraise, and assess clinical practice guidelines informing patient counseling on female age-related fertility decline. METHODS Searched electronic database records from January 1, 2006, to September 10, 2018, and professional society websites. The search terms included iterations of "guideline," "counseling," "preconception," "age-related fertility decline," and "reproductive life planning." English-language professional organization guidelines addressing patient counseling on age-specific reproductive health topics were included. Assessed the methodological quality of included guidelines using the AGREE II instrument. Guidelines were categorized as high quality or low quality based on AGREE II scores. Extracted age-specific reproductive health recommendations of high-quality guidelines. RESULTS The search identified 2918 records. Nineteen records addressed counseling on age-related fertility decline; only 6 focused only on reproductive aging, with the remaining 13 covering related topics. Eleven met criteria for high quality. All high-quality guidelines had high "rigor of development" scores on AGREE II. Ten high-quality guidelines stated an age at which female fertility declines, ranging from 30 to "late 30s." One recommended a specific age at which patients should be counseled. Five of eleven high-quality guidelines did not discuss the obstetric and perinatal risks of advanced maternal age. CONCLUSIONS Few high-quality guidelines address counseling on female age-related fertility decline, and existing guidance on reproductive aging counseling is inconsistent and incomplete. Greater rigor of development and incorporation of age-specific counseling recommendations into clinical practice guidelines could lead to improved patient anticipatory guidance and more informed reproductive choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Trawick
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU School of Medicine, 462 First Avenue, NBV 9N1-C, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 676 North Saint Clair Street, Suite 2300, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Jillian Pecoriello
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU School of Medicine, 462 First Avenue, NBV 9N1-C, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Gwendolyn Quinn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU School of Medicine, 462 First Avenue, NBV 9N1-C, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Kara N Goldman
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 676 North Saint Clair Street, Suite 2300, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Soper K, Di Meglio G. Accessibility of emergency contraception for adolescents in Quebec community pharmacies. Paediatr Child Health 2020; 25:385-388. [PMID: 32963652 DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxz109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Access to effective contraceptives, including emergency contraception (EC), is critical to reducing unintended adolescent pregnancy. This study evaluates the accessibility of Ln-EC (levonorgestrel EC) for adolescents in Quebec community pharmacies. Methods We conducted an anonymous self-administered electronic survey of Quebec community pharmacists between June 1, 2016 and October 31, 2016. Pharmacists were asked about the availability of Ln-EC in their pharmacy, whether they prescribed Ln-EC, and their experience with adolescents who requested Ln-EC. Results Five hundred and ninety-one pharmacists responded, with representation from across the province. Ninety-five per cent had Ln-EC in stock. Most pharmacists (90%) reported being comfortable prescribing Ln-EC, though they were less comfortable prescribing to adolescents than to adults (*P<0.001). Pharmacists also reported that cost and confidentiality are barriers to accessing Ln-EC for some adolescents. Conclusions This study indicates that availability and pharmacist comfort are not likely to be barriers to Ln-EC use for adolescents. On the other hand, cost and/or confidentiality do represent a barrier for some adolescents. This study lays the groundwork for a national study examining the accessibility of EC for adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Soper
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Giuseppina Di Meglio
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Munro S, Guilbert E, Wagner MS, Wilcox ES, Devane C, Dunn S, Brooks M, Soon JA, Mills M, Leduc-Robert G, Wahl K, Zannier E, Norman WV. Perspectives Among Canadian Physicians on Factors Influencing Implementation of Mifepristone Medical Abortion: A National Qualitative Study. Ann Fam Med 2020; 18:413-421. [PMID: 32928757 PMCID: PMC7489974 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Revised: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Access to family planning health services in Canada has been historically inadequate and inequitable. A potential solution appeared when Health Canada approved mifepristone, the gold standard for medical abortion, in July 2015. We sought to investigate the factors that influence successful initiation and ongoing provision of medical abortion services among Canadian health professionals and how these factors relate to abortion policies, systems, and service access throughout Canada. METHODS We conducted 1-on-1 semistructured interviews with a national sample of abortion-providing and nonproviding physicians and health system stakeholders in Canadian health care settings. Our data collection, thematic analysis, and interpretation were guided by Diffusion of Innovation theory. RESULTS We conducted interviews with 90 participants including rural practitioners and those with no previous abortion experience. In the course of our study, Health Canada removed mifepristone restrictions. Our results suggest that Health Canada's initial restrictions discouraged physicians from providing mifepristone and were inconsistent with provincial licensing standards, thereby limiting patient access. Once deregulated, remaining factors were primarily related to local and regional implementation processes. Participants held strong perceptions that mifepristone was the new standard of care for medical abortion in Canada and within the scope of primary care practice. CONCLUSION Health Canada's removal of mifepristone restrictions facilitated the implementation of abortion care in the primary care setting. Our results are unique because Canada is the first country to facilitate provision of medical abortion in primary care via evidence-based deregulation of mifepristone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Munro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M., K.W.); Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M, E.S.W.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada (E.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (M.W.); School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (E.S.W.); School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (C.D.); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (M.B.); Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (J.A.S.); Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (M.M., G.L., E.Z); Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (W.V.N.); Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (W.V.N.)
| | - Edith Guilbert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M., K.W.); Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M, E.S.W.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada (E.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (M.W.); School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (E.S.W.); School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (C.D.); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (M.B.); Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (J.A.S.); Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (M.M., G.L., E.Z); Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (W.V.N.); Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (W.V.N.)
| | - Marie-Soleil Wagner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M., K.W.); Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M, E.S.W.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada (E.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (M.W.); School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (E.S.W.); School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (C.D.); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (M.B.); Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (J.A.S.); Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (M.M., G.L., E.Z); Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (W.V.N.); Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (W.V.N.)
| | - Elizabeth S Wilcox
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M., K.W.); Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M, E.S.W.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada (E.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (M.W.); School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (E.S.W.); School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (C.D.); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (M.B.); Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (J.A.S.); Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (M.M., G.L., E.Z); Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (W.V.N.); Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (W.V.N.)
| | - Courtney Devane
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M., K.W.); Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M, E.S.W.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada (E.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (M.W.); School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (E.S.W.); School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (C.D.); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (M.B.); Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (J.A.S.); Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (M.M., G.L., E.Z); Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (W.V.N.); Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (W.V.N.)
| | - Sheila Dunn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M., K.W.); Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M, E.S.W.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada (E.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (M.W.); School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (E.S.W.); School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (C.D.); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (M.B.); Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (J.A.S.); Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (M.M., G.L., E.Z); Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (W.V.N.); Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (W.V.N.)
| | - Melissa Brooks
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M., K.W.); Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M, E.S.W.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada (E.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (M.W.); School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (E.S.W.); School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (C.D.); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (M.B.); Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (J.A.S.); Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (M.M., G.L., E.Z); Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (W.V.N.); Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (W.V.N.)
| | - Judith A Soon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M., K.W.); Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M, E.S.W.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada (E.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (M.W.); School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (E.S.W.); School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (C.D.); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (M.B.); Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (J.A.S.); Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (M.M., G.L., E.Z); Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (W.V.N.); Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (W.V.N.)
| | - Megan Mills
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M., K.W.); Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M, E.S.W.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada (E.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (M.W.); School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (E.S.W.); School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (C.D.); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (M.B.); Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (J.A.S.); Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (M.M., G.L., E.Z); Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (W.V.N.); Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (W.V.N.)
| | - Genevieve Leduc-Robert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M., K.W.); Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M, E.S.W.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada (E.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (M.W.); School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (E.S.W.); School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (C.D.); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (M.B.); Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (J.A.S.); Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (M.M., G.L., E.Z); Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (W.V.N.); Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (W.V.N.)
| | - Kate Wahl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M., K.W.); Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M, E.S.W.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada (E.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (M.W.); School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (E.S.W.); School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (C.D.); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (M.B.); Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (J.A.S.); Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (M.M., G.L., E.Z); Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (W.V.N.); Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (W.V.N.)
| | - Erik Zannier
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M., K.W.); Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M, E.S.W.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada (E.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (M.W.); School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (E.S.W.); School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (C.D.); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (M.B.); Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (J.A.S.); Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (M.M., G.L., E.Z); Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (W.V.N.); Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (W.V.N.)
| | - Wendy V Norman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M., K.W.); Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S.M, E.S.W.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada (E.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (M.W.); School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (E.S.W.); School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (C.D.); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.D.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (M.B.); Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (J.A.S.); Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (M.M., G.L., E.Z); Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (W.V.N.); Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (W.V.N.).
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zgliczynska M, Kocaj K, Szymusik I, Dutsch-Wicherek MM, Ciebiera M, Kosinska-Kaczynska K. Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System as a Contraceptive Method in Nulliparous Women: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9072101. [PMID: 32635369 PMCID: PMC7408997 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this review was to summarize the available evidence about the use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) as a contraceptive method in nulliparous women. For this purpose, studies evaluating the efficacy, safety, bleeding pattern, satisfaction and discontinuation of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in nulliparous women were analyzed. Only original research articles published in English between 1990–27th March 2020 were considered eligible. Reviews, book chapters, case studies, conference papers, opinions, editorials and letters were excluded. The systematic literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane Library databases identified 816 articles, 23 of which were analyzed. The available evidence indicates that LNG-IUS is an effective and safe contraceptive method for nulliparous women that achieves high levels of satisfaction among patients. Moreover, nulliparous women seem to experience fewer expulsions than parous ones. Bleeding pattern is acceptable for the majority of patients, and bleeding disorders mainly occur in the first months after the insertion. More in-depth, long-term prospective studies are needed in this patient group to determine risk factors for the occurrence of side effects and associated discontinuations, which should not, however, delay the wider use of the method in this group, given the number of advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Zgliczynska
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-809 Warsaw, Poland; (M.Z.); (K.K.-K.)
| | - Karol Kocaj
- Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland;
| | - Iwona Szymusik
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-015 Warsaw, Poland;
| | | | - Michal Ciebiera
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-809 Warsaw, Poland; (M.Z.); (K.K.-K.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: + 48-22-5690274
| | - Katarzyna Kosinska-Kaczynska
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-809 Warsaw, Poland; (M.Z.); (K.K.-K.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Interpreting a Rapid Plasma Reagin of 1:4 in a Female Patient. J Nurse Pract 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2019.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
29
|
Abstract
Although pregnancy and abortion rates have declined in adolescents, unintended pregnancies remain unacceptably high in this age group. The use of highly effective methods of contraception is one of the pillars of unintended pregnancy prevention and requires a shared decision making process within a rights based framework. Adolescents are eligible to use any method of contraception and long-acting reversible contraceptives, which are “forgettable” and highly effective, may be particularly suited for many adolescents. Contraceptive methods may have additional non-contraceptive benefits that address other needs or concerns of the adolescent. Dual method use should be encouraged among adolescents for the prevention of both unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections. Health care providers have an important role to play in ensuring that adolescents have access to high quality and non-judgmental reproductive health care services and contraceptive methods in adolescent-friendly settings that recognize the unique biopsychosocial needs of the adolescent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Todd
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Amanda Black
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa; and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Eriksson C, Skinstad M, Georgsson S, Carlsson T. Quality of websites about long-acting reversible contraception: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Reprod Health 2019; 16:172. [PMID: 31775765 PMCID: PMC6882246 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-019-0835-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Today, there are various short- and long-acting contraceptive alternatives available for those who wish to prevent unintended pregnancy. Long-acting reversible contraception are considered effective methods with a high user satisfaction. High-quality information about contraception is essential in order to empower individuals to reach informed decisions based on sufficient knowledge. Use of the Web for information about contraception is widespread, and there is a risk that those who use it for this purpose could come in contact with sources of low quality. Objective The overarching aim was to investigate the quality of websites about long-acting reversible contraception. Methods Swedish client-oriented websites were identified through searches in Google (n = 46 included websites). Reliability and information about long-acting reversible contraceptive choices were assessed by two assessors with the DISCERN instrument, transparency was analyzed with the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmarks, completeness was assessed with inductive content analysis and readability was analyzed with Readability Index. Results The mean DISCERN was 44.1/80 (SD 7.7) for total score, 19.7/40 (SD 3.7) for reliability, 22.1/35 (SD 4.1) for information about long-acting reversible contraceptive choices, and 2.3/5 (SD 1.1) for overall quality. A majority of the included websites had low quality with regard to what sources were used to compile the information (n = 41/46, 89%), when the information was produced (n = 40/46, 87%), and if it provided additional sources of support and information (n = 30/46, 65%). Less than half of the websites adhered to any of the JAMA benchmarks. We identified 23 categories of comprehensiveness. The most frequent was contraceptive mechanism (n = 39/46, 85%) and the least frequent was when contraception may be initiated following an abortion (n = 3/46, 7%). The mean Readability Index was 42.5 (SD 6.3, Range 29–55) indicating moderate to difficult readability levels, corresponding to a grade level of 9. Conclusions The quality of client-oriented websites about long-acting reversible contraception is poor. There is an undeniable need to support and guide laypersons that intend to use web-based sources about contraceptive alternatives, so that they may reach informed decisions based on sufficient knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Susanne Georgsson
- The Swedish Red Cross University College, Huddinge, Sweden.,Department of Clinical science, Intervention and technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tommy Carlsson
- Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden. .,The Swedish Red Cross University College, Huddinge, Sweden. .,Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala university, MTC-huset, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 14B, 1 tr, SE-75237, Uppsala, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Nethery E, Schummers L, Maginley KS, Dunn S, Norman WV. Household income and contraceptive methods among female youth: a cross-sectional study using the Canadian Community Health Survey (2009-2010 and 2013-2014). CMAJ Open 2019; 7:E646-E653. [PMID: 31690652 PMCID: PMC6944121 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low socioeconomic status is one of many barriers that may limit access to family planning services. We aimed to examine the relation between household income and contraceptive methods among female youth in Canada. METHODS Our study population included sexually active females aged 15-24 who were trying to avoid pregnancy. We used cross-sectional data from the 2009-2010 and 2013-2014 cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey to compare household income and other sociodemographic covariates for those using oral contraceptives, injectable contraceptives, condoms or a dual method (condoms plus oral or injectable contraceptives). RESULTS Of female youth at risk for unintended pregnancy, 59.2% reported using oral contraceptives, 29.0% used dual methods, 16.8% used condoms only, 2.5% used injectable contraceptives and 13.6% did not use contraception. In multiple regression models, lower annual household income (< $80 000) was associated with decreased use of oral contraceptives (relative risk [RR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.91) and dual methods (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.91), increased use of condoms (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.11-1.67) and injectable contraceptives (RR 1.69, 95% CI 0.98-2.92), and a greater risk of contraceptive nonuse (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.94-1.50). INTERPRETATION We found that lower household income was associated with decreased use of oral contraceptives and increased reliance on injectable contraceptives and condoms only. Young, low-income females may face barriers to accessing the full range of contraceptive methods available in Canada. Easier access to affordable contraception may decrease the number of female youth at risk for unintended pregnancy due to financial barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Nethery
- School of Population and Public Health (Nethery, Maginley, Norman) and Department of Family Practice (Schummers, Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto; Women's College Research Institute (Dunn), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Public Health & Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Laura Schummers
- School of Population and Public Health (Nethery, Maginley, Norman) and Department of Family Practice (Schummers, Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto; Women's College Research Institute (Dunn), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Public Health & Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - K Suzanne Maginley
- School of Population and Public Health (Nethery, Maginley, Norman) and Department of Family Practice (Schummers, Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto; Women's College Research Institute (Dunn), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Public Health & Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Sheila Dunn
- School of Population and Public Health (Nethery, Maginley, Norman) and Department of Family Practice (Schummers, Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto; Women's College Research Institute (Dunn), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Public Health & Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Wendy V Norman
- School of Population and Public Health (Nethery, Maginley, Norman) and Department of Family Practice (Schummers, Norman), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Dunn), University of Toronto; Women's College Research Institute (Dunn), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Public Health & Policy (Norman), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Faustmann T, Crocker J, Moeller C, Engler Y, Caetano C, Buhling KJ. How do women and health care professionals view hormonal long-acting reversible contraception? Results from an international survey. EUR J CONTRACEP REPR 2019; 24:422-429. [PMID: 31559869 DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1666362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Evidence from real-world settings is important to provide an accurate picture of health care delivery. We investigated use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) in women aged 15-49 years.Materials and methods: Two surveys, one of women and one of health care professionals (HCPs), were conducted in parallel across seven countries. Participating women completed an online survey to assess contraceptive awareness, current method of contraception, age, and experience with current contraceptive method. HCPs participated in an online survey to provide practice-level information and three anonymous charts of hormonal LARC users.Results: Of 6903 women who completed the survey, 3225 provided information about their current primary contraception method. Overall, 16% used LARC methods, while 52% used oral contraceptives (OCs). Of hormonal intrauterine system users, 72% described their experience as 'very favourable', compared with only 53% of women using OCs. Anonymous patient records (n = 1605) were provided by 550 HCPs who completed the online survey. Most women (64%) had used short-acting reversible contraception before switching to LARC. Physicians perceived 56-84% of LARC users to be highly satisfied with their current form of contraception.Conclusions: Although usage of LARC was low, most women using LARC were highly satisfied with their method of contraception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Kai J Buhling
- Department of Gynecological Endocrinology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Iftikhar PM, Shaheen N, Arora E. Efficacy and Satisfaction Rate in Postpartum Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertion: A Prospective Study. Cureus 2019; 11:e5646. [PMID: 31700748 PMCID: PMC6822878 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) reduces the rate of abortions and it is a cost-effective, reversible, and convenient choice of contraception. The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and satisfaction rate in women with postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device insertion. Methods This prospective study of immediate PPIUCD insertion was conducted at our institute from March 2016 to February 2019. Approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) was taken before starting the study. A total of 372 women were enrolled in the study after taking informed consent. All the women were counseled regarding different methods of contraception and birth control during antenatal checkups, early labor and immediately postpartum (within 48 hours). All the enrolled women in the study were followed for three years to determine the satisfaction and success rate of PPIUCD continuation. We also kept the record of women who discontinued PPIUCD. Results After the exclusion criteria, 372 women were recruited in the study. The mean gestation age at the time of delivery was 38.5 weeks with a standard deviation (SD) of 1.45. All the women were followed for short-term and long-term complications and satisfaction rates. Out of 372, 51.07% of women (n = 190) had a spontaneous vaginal delivery, and 48.9% of women (n = 182) had a cesarean section but there was no significant long-term satisfaction outcome difference in both the groups. The highest success rate of the postpartum long-acting intrauterine contraceptive device was noted in patients who were counseled thoroughly in the antenatal and intrapartum period 61.5% as compared to those patients who were counseled either antenatally 42.2 %, intrapartum 35.4%, or immediate postpartum 22.4% alone. Conclusion PPIUCD insertion is an opportunity not to be missed. It allows women to obtain safe, long-acting, highly effective contraception while already within the medical system. More research data are needed in the literature with regard to counseling timings for PPIUCD insertion during the antenatal and postnatal period as it can affect the decision of women to prevent unplanned pregnancy. PPIUCD has one of the highest patient satisfaction rates among all the contraceptives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nighat Shaheen
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cantonment General Hospital, Rawalpindi, PAK
| | - Ena Arora
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Family planning represents a key component of reproductive health care. Accordingly, the provision of contraception must span the reproductive age spectrum, including perimenopause. The risk of pregnancy is decreased, but not trivial, among women over 40 years of age. Evidence-based guidelines for contraceptive use can assist clinicians in counseling their patients in this population. Intrauterine contraception is one of the most effective methods and is safe to use in midlife women with few exceptions. Progestin-only contraception is another safe option for most midlife women because it is not associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular complications. Combined (estrogen-containing) contraception can be safely used by midlife women who do not have cardiovascular risk factors. Unique noncontraceptive benefits for this population include: improvement in abnormal uterine bleeding, decreased hot flashes, and decreased cancer risk. Finally, guidelines state that contraception can be used by midlife women without medical contraindications until the age of menopause, at which time they may consider transition to systemic hormone therapy.
Collapse
|
35
|
Di Meglio G, Yorke E. Universal access to no-cost contraception for youth in Canada. Paediatr Child Health 2019; 24:160-169. [PMID: 31110456 PMCID: PMC6519616 DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxz033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2018] [Accepted: 11/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Timely access to effective contraception reduces the incidence of unintended pregnancy. Cost is a significant barrier to using contraception for youth in Canada. Many must pay out-of-pocket because they have no pharmaceutical insurance, their insurance does not cover the contraceptives they desire, or they wish to obtain contraceptives without their parents' knowledge. To address these barriers and reduce rates of unintended pregnancy, this statement recommends that all youth should have confidential access to contraception, at no cost, until the age of 25. The statement also recommends measures to help achieve this goal across Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elisabeth Yorke
- Canadian Paediatric Society, Adolescent Health Committee, Ottawa, Ontario
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Choosing Pre-conception Planning for Women/Families: Counselling and Informed Consent (Part 2) – Pre-conception Reproductive Planning, Lifestyle, Immunization, and Psychosocial Issues. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2019; 41:666-678. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.08.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2017] [Revised: 08/25/2017] [Accepted: 08/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
37
|
Marcinkow A, Parkhomchik P, Schmode A, Yuksel N. The Quality of Information on Combined Oral Contraceptives Available on the Internet. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2019; 41:1599-1607. [PMID: 31003948 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Revised: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Combined oral contraceptives (COC) are a popular choice among women. The Internet is an accessible and popular source of information on contraception. The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of online information on COC. METHODS A quantitative content analysis was completed on websites containing patient health information on COCs. The search was completed in October 2016 using Google; search terms included "birth control pill," "oral contraception," "oral birth control", "birth control," and "pregnancy prevention." The first three pages of search results were screened according to inclusion criteria. The DISCERN instrument and JAMA Benchmarks were used to assess quality. Websites were analyzed independently by two coders; discrepancies were resolved by third coder (Canadian Task Force Classification III). RESULTS Of the 155 websites identified, 32 were eligible for review. Most websites mentioned contraceptive benefit (81.3%), and half reported the typical effectiveness of COCs (53.1%). Commonly included non-contraceptive benefits were alleviation of dysmenorrhea (87.5%) and reduced blood loss (84.4%). Risk of venous thromboembolism was listed in 81.3% of websites, including stroke (56.3%) and myocardial infarction (46.9%); however, sites failed to include details with these risks. Only 46.9% provided information on starting COC; the first-day start method was the most common (40.6%). Nearly half lacked details on managing missed pills (46.9%). The mean Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level was 9 ± 2.0. The mean DISCERN score was 46.3 ± 9.37, indicating "fair" quality. CONCLUSION Online information on COCs was variable in quality, often missing key information for making informed decisions. Health care providers should be aware of information gaps when advising women to seek information online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreana Marcinkow
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
| | - Polina Parkhomchik
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
| | - Alyssa Schmode
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
| | - Nese Yuksel
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Miller MK, Mollen C, Behr K, Dowd MD, Miller E, Satterwhite CL, Stancil S, Allen N, Michael J, Inboriboon PC, Park A, Goggin K. Development of a Novel Computerized Clinical Decision Support System to Improve Adolescent Sexual Health Care Provision. Acad Emerg Med 2019; 26:420-433. [PMID: 30240032 PMCID: PMC6625349 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2018] [Revised: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 07/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective was to develop an acceptable clinical decision support (CDS) system to facilitate evidence-based sexual health care for adolescents in the emergency department (ED). METHODS In this multiphased iterative process, we engaged an expert group to synthesize evidence on a wide range of sexual health services (e.g., contraception, condoms, identification and treatment of previously diagnosed sexually transmitted infection). We created a computerized questionnaire and embedded our decision tree, utilizing patient-entered responses to create tailored, evidence-based recommendations, and embedded links to study-related resources such as the emergency contraception (EC) quick guide. We utilized mixed methodology to explore perspectives of adolescents aged 14 to 19 years and clinicians at two general and two pediatric EDs after they interacted with the system. Clinicians reported usefulness (Likert scale 1 = not at all, 4 = very); adolescents reported acceptability. We used the chi-square test to compare responses between subgroups. We collected adolescents' verbatim responses to open-ended questions; clinicians self-entered responses. Four authors independently generated themes from qualitative responses before compiling key findings and achieving consensus on final themes. RESULTS Among 57 clinicians (23 physicians, 23 nurses, 11 nurse practitioners; 54% female; 65% aged < 40 years), the mean system usefulness rating was 3.4 ± 0.7. Sex, age, clinician role, or ED type were not associated with rating the system "somewhat/very" useful. Clinicians identified barriers (e.g., time constraints) that could be overcome by implementation considerations (e.g., training) as well as benefits including improved care. For future assessments, providers preferred computer (65%) over face-to-face interview (26%). Among 57 adolescents (mean age = 16.2 years; 75% female; 56% sexually experienced), nearly all (95%) reported that it was "very/somewhat easy" to complete the computerized questionnaire and to understand the questions. Most adolescents understood the EC quick guide and correctly identified that ulipristal, compared to levonorgestrel, required a prescription and was more effective. For future assessments, adolescents preferred computer (69%) over face-to-face interviews (9%). CONCLUSIONS We developed a sexual health CDS system that is easy to use and can facilitate evidence-based care to reduce health outcome gaps. Evaluation of system impact on service delivery and, ultimately, health outcomes is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa K. Miller
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medical Services, Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, MO
| | - Cynthia Mollen
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medical Services, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kelli Behr
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medical Services, Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, MO
| | - M. Denise Dowd
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medical Services, Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, MO
| | - Elizabeth Miller
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Stephani Stancil
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, MO
| | - Nancy Allen
- Department of Pediatrics, Office of Evidence-Based Practice, Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, MO
| | - Jeffery Michael
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medical Services, Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, MO
- Department of Pediatrics, Office of Evidence-Based Practice, Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, MO
| | | | - Andrew Park
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, KS
| | - Kathy Goggin
- Center for Health Services Research, Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, MO
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Intrauterine Contraception: Knowledge and Prescribing Practices of Canadian Health Care Providers. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2019; 41:1084-1092. [PMID: 30898549 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Revised: 11/23/2018] [Accepted: 11/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Contraception is an important issue in the lives of women, their partners, and society. Canadians and their health care providers play a critical role in contraceptive decision making that influences individuals and Canadian society. The purpose of this study was to gather data on contraception-related knowledge, counselling, and prescribing practices of Canadian health care providers. METHODS This project reported on the outcomes of an educational initiative, designed as a quality improvement initiative (time series level II-3), focused on Canadian health care providers' contraception-related knowledge, counselling, and prescribing practices. Outcomes were intended to inform the development of tools, resources, and educational programming. Part 1 was an online program to identify educational and knowledge gaps for health care providers. Part 2 was a practice assessment exploring and measuring health care providers' contraceptive counselling and prescribing practices. RESULTS A total of 4300 health care providers completed the program between July 6, 2015 and August 30, 2016. Knowledge significantly increased; post-test scores were higher than pretest scores. After completion, all participants felt more comfortable, knowledgeable, and inclined to change their practice around prescribing intrauterine contraception (IUC). The 4300 providers reported on their contraception counselling experiences with 10 patients following participation in Part 1. Forty percent of patients were using oral contraceptives, and 53% were dissatisfied with their current type of contraception. After counselling, patients reported being most comfortable with IUC (55%). Both short- and long-acting types of contraception were most often discussed or offered (74% of the time), followed by long-acting reversible contraception only (21%) and short-acting methods only (5%). CONCLUSION This training program filled an education need for patients and gave providers tools to change their behaviour and practice around IUC prescribing. On the basis of these data, a practice assessment model was deemed a successful way to change behaviour.
Collapse
|
40
|
Howatt K, Binette A, Pudwell J, Waddington A. Improving Physician Knowledge: A Necessary but Not Sufficient Requirement of Improving Intrauterine Contraception Access in Canada. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2019; 41:1115-1124. [PMID: 30803875 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2018] [Revised: 10/20/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study sought to identify knowledge gaps and attitudinal barriers to prescribing intrauterine contraception (IUC). METHODS A national, Web-based survey of Canadian gynaecology (GYN) and family medicine (FM) physicians was conducted. The survey was distributed through several channels, including physicians' databases, invitations through a commercial email aggregating service, and contacting residency programs. For knowledge-based questions, correct answers were those consistent with Canadian practice guidelines. Ethics approval was granted through Queen's Health Sciences Research Ethics Board. Project funding was through a research grant from Bayer, Inc. (Canadian Task Force Classification III). RESULTS A total of 600 responses were received. GYN physicians' knowledge about IUC (number correct / 40) was better than that of the FM and FM with additional women's health training (FMWH) groups (median [interquartile range] 39 [37-40], 36 [32-38], and 37 [35-39]; P < 0.0001). Factors associated with lower scores included rural practice location, lack of affiliation with medical trainees, extremes of practice duration, and self-perceived lack of knowledge about IUC. Most respondents prescribed IUC (93.7%). Among prescribers, 97.0% inserted IUC. The most common reasons for not prescribing or inserting IUC included lack of training, lack of comfort, and referral to other physicians to provide this service. Respondents indicated that they would be more likely to prescribe and/or insert IUC if cost barriers were removed, patient interest was increased, or if there was improved access to patient-centred educational materials and hands-on training modules. CONCLUSION This study suggests that although many GYN and FM physicians are offering IUC, misconceptions regarding contraindications still exist, and several barriers are related to deficiencies in providers' knowledge. Therefore, educational efforts should be prioritized to increase the usage of IUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerry Howatt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON
| | - Audrey Binette
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC
| | - Jessica Pudwell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON
| | - Ashley Waddington
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
The perimenopause is accompanied by important biological and psychosocial changes. The choice of contraceptive methods for women in the perimenopause, none of which is limited by age alone, will depend on the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and potential benefit of each method in relation to the biopsychosocial profile of the individual woman. Copper intrauterine devices are highly effective in the typical user and are a very safe method with, in general, good tolerability but are of limited use in women with heavy menstrual bleeding and subserous myomata. An additional benefit of copper intrauterine devices is protection against endometrial cancer. All progestogen-based methods share a favorable cardiovascular profile, making their use safe in most perimenopausal women. Long-acting implants and intrauterine systems are user independent and highly effective. Injectables and pills depend on user compliance. There is no evidence of a significant impact on breast cancer. Their impact on the endometrium can be either a negative side-effect (irregularity) or a benefit regarding reduction of heavy menstrual bleeding. Combined hormonal contraceptives have the highest cardiovascular risk. They can act as a promoting factor for breast cancer and cervical cancer, but they have the strongest potential regarding benefits (protection against endometrial and ovarian cancer, positive effect on bone mineral density, menstrual complaints, hyperandrogenic symptoms, hot flushes, and reduced risk regarding benign ovarian cysts and benign breast tumors).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Bitzer
- a Frauenklinik , Universitätsspital Basel , Basel , Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lambert M, Begon E, Hocké C. [Contraception for women after 40: CNGOF Contraception Guidelines]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2018; 46:865-872. [PMID: 30424983 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Choosing contraception for women over 40 can be sometimes difficult but it is crucial since fertility and pregnancy's risks still exist. It requires a thorough evaluation of the situation, in order to identify any vascular and metabolic risk factors, along with the uterine and mammary benign pathologies already diagnosed. OBJECTIVE The objective of this review was to elaborate some guidelines for clinical practice regarding contraception's prescription for women over 40. METHODS A systematic review of the French and English existing literature was conducted. Pubmed and the Cochrane library were used to identify studies about contraception for perimenopausal women. International guidelines published by scientific societies were also reviewed (RCOG, FSRH, ESHRE, ACOG, WHO, HAS). RESULTS No contraceptive methods are contraindicated on the sole basis of age alone. However, because age is a risk factor for vascular and metabolic diseases, combined hormonal contraception and DMPA should not be prescribed at first intention. Copper IUD and progestin-only contraceptives (pill, implant, intrauterine device) should primarily be considered, since they offer good efficacy with lower risks. CONCLUSIONS Contraception for women over 40 should not be put aside. Long acting reversible contraception and progestin-only pill have to be prescribed as first-ine. Contraception is no longer needed for women over 50 who use non-hormonal contraception, after a 12 month-amenorrhea. Patients treated with combined hormonal contraception must stop using it over 50. Measuring hormonal levels while using hormonal contraception is not recommended. An hormonal-contraception-free interval must be considered, while using barrier contraception method. If an ovarian activity persists, a non-hormonal contraception or progestin-only contraception (except for DMPA) should be (re-)established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lambert
- Service de gynécologie et de médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, CHU de Bordeaux, place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France.
| | - E Begon
- Service de gynécologie et de médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, CHU de Bordeaux, place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France
| | - C Hocké
- Service de gynécologie et de médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, CHU de Bordeaux, place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Skogsdal YRE, Karlsson JÅ, Cao Y, Fadl HE, Tydén TA. Contraceptive use and reproductive intentions among women requesting contraceptive counseling. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018; 97:1349-1357. [PMID: 30007091 PMCID: PMC6175138 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Limited attention has been paid to the use of contraception in relation to women's family planning intentions. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of contraception during the most recent intercourse as well as the reproductive intentions of Swedish‐speaking women requesting contraceptive counseling. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cross‐sectional baseline survey in a randomized controlled trial regarding reproductive life planning (before randomization). Women requesting contraceptive counseling answered questions about contraception and whether they wanted to have children/more children in the future. Results In total, 1946 women participated: 33.7% (n = 656) parous and 65.7% (n = 1279) nulliparous. The majority, 87.1% (n = 1682), had used contraception during their latest intercourse; 64.6% (n = 1239) used short‐acting reversible contraception, 22.8% (n = 443) used long‐acting reversible contraception (LARC), and 12.9% (n = 251) had not used any contraception. A combined oral contraceptive was more common among nulliparous and LARC among parous. Among all women, 64.8% (n = 1253) intended to have children/more children in the future, among parous women 35.7% (n = 220) and among nulliparous 80.0% (n = 1033). Among women who did not intend to have children/more children, 22.6% (n = 60) of parous and 10% (n = 8) of nulliparous had not used contraceptives during their most recent intercourse. Conclusions Women did not always use contraceptives that were suitable for their reproductive intentions. Questioning women who request contraceptive counseling about their pregnancy intention can give healthcare providers better opportunities for individualized counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jan Åke Karlsson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University Health Care Research Center, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Yang Cao
- School of Medical Sciences, Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.,Unit of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Helena Elisabeth Fadl
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Tanja Adele Tydén
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Di Meglio G, Crowther C, Simms J. Contraceptive care for Canadian youth. Paediatr Child Health 2018; 23:271-277. [PMID: 30681670 DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxx192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Sexual and reproductive health is an important component of comprehensive health care for youth. This statement provides guidance for selecting and prescribing contraceptives for youth, including commonly prescribed hormonal contraceptives-the pill, patch, ring and injectable progestin-and long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs). LARCs, including subdermal implants (which are not available in Canada) and intrauterine contraceptives (IUCs), are substantially more effective during typical use than hormonal contraceptives. This statement endorses LARCs as the first-line option for contraception for Canadian youth, while emphasizing that providers must collaborate with youth to select a contraceptive method that is acceptable, safe, effective and practical for them. Strategies that eliminate obstacles to initiating and continuing contraception are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Colleen Crowther
- Canadian Paediatric Society, Adolescent Health Committee, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Joanne Simms
- Canadian Paediatric Society, Adolescent Health Committee, Ottawa, Ontario
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ten Years of Experience in Contraception Options for Teenagers in a Family Planning Center in Thrace and Review of the Literature. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2018; 15:ijerph15020348. [PMID: 29462872 PMCID: PMC5858417 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15020348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2017] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: The goal of our study was to investigate and evaluate the contraceptive behavior in teenagers from our family planning centre that services two different religious and socioeconomic populations living in the Thrace area. Methods: During the last 10 years 115 Christian Orthodox (group A) and 53 Muslim teenagers (group B) were enrolled in our retrospective study. Contraceptive practice attitudes were assessed by a questionnaire. Religion, demographics, socio-economic characteristics were key factors used to discuss contraception and avoid unplanned pregnancy in each group and to compare with the contraceptive method used. Results: The most used contraceptive method—about two times more frequently—among Christian Orthodox participants was the oral contraceptive pill (p = 0.015; OR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.13–2.90), while in the other group the use of condoms and IUDs was seven and three times more frequent, respectively. Our family planning centre was the main source of information for contraception. Conclusions: During adolescence, the existence of a family planning centre and participation in family planning programs plays a crucial role to help the teenagers to improve their knowledge and choose an effective contraception method.
Collapse
|
46
|
Bitzer J, Marin V, Lira J. Contraceptive counselling and care: a personalized interactive approach. EUR J CONTRACEP REPR 2018; 22:418-423. [DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2017.1414793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Bitzer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Josefina Lira
- Department of Adolescent Gynecology, Instituto Nacional de Perinatologia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
O'Rourke T. Oral contraceptives do not appear to present long-term cancer harms and may even provide protection against some cancers. Evid Based Nurs 2018; 21:21. [PMID: 29102962 DOI: 10.1136/eb-2017-102771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/10/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tammy O'Rourke
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Vernooij RWM, Martínez García L, Florez ID, Hidalgo Armas L, Poorthuis MHF, Brouwers M, Alonso-Coello P. Updated clinical guidelines experience major reporting limitations. Implement Sci 2017; 12:120. [PMID: 29025429 PMCID: PMC5639761 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0651-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2017] [Accepted: 10/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Checklist for the Reporting of Updated Guidelines (CheckUp) was recently developed. However, so far, no systematic assessment of the reporting of updated clinical guidelines (CGs) exists. We aimed to examine (1) the completeness of reporting the updating process in CGs and (2) the inter-observer reliability of CheckUp. METHODS We conducted a systematic assessment of the reporting of the updating process in a sample of updated CGs using CheckUp. We performed a systematic search to identify updated CGs published in 2015, developed by a professional society, reporting a systematic review of the evidence, and containing at least one recommendation. Three reviewers independently assessed the CGs with CheckUp (16 items). We calculated the median score per item, per domain, and overall, converting scores to a 10-point scale. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to identify differences according to country, type of organisation, scope, and health topic of updated CGs. We calculated the intraclass coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for domains and overall score. RESULTS We included in total 60 updated CGs. The median domain score on a 10-point scale for presentation was 5.8 (range 1.7 to 10), for editorial independence 8.3 (range 3.3 to 10), and for methodology 5.7 (range 0 to 10). The median overall score on a 10-point scale was 6.3 (range 3.1 to 10). Presentation and justification items at recommendation level (respectively reported by 27 and 38% of the CGs) and the methods used for the external review and implementing changes in practice were particularly poorly reported (both reported by 38% of the CGs). CGs developed by a European or international institution obtained a statistically significant higher overall score compared to North American or Asian institutions (p = 0.014). Finally, the agreement among the reviewers on the overall score was excellent (ICC 0.88, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.95). CONCLUSIONS The reporting of updated CGs varies considerably with significant room for improvement. We recommend using CheckUp to assess the updating process in updated CGs and as a blueprint to inform methods and reporting strategies in updating.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin W M Vernooij
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Martínez García
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Ivan Dario Florez
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia
| | - Laura Hidalgo Armas
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Melissa Brouwers
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chaumont A, Foster AM. The not so over-the-counter status of emergency contraception in Ontario: A mixed methods study with pharmacists. Facets (Ott) 2017. [DOI: 10.1139/facets-2017-0024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: In Canada, the progestin-only dedicated pill is the most widely used method of emergency contraception (EC). This method gained over-the-counter status in Ontario in 2008. Our mixed methods study explored the progestin-only EC knowledge, attitudes, and provision practices of Ontario pharmacists. Methods: From June 2015 to October 2015, we collected 198 mailed surveys from Ontarian pharmacy representatives and conducted 17 in-depth interviews with a subset of respondents. We analyzed these data using descriptive statistics and for content and themes. Results: Results from our English/French bilingual survey indicate that respondents’ knowledge is generally accurate, but confusion persists about the mechanism of action and the number of times the drug can be used in one menstrual cycle. Nearly half (49%) of our survey respondents indicated that progestin-only EC pills are only available behind the counter. Interviewees strongly supported the introduction and promotion of more effective methods of EC in Ontario. Conclusion: Continuing education focusing on both the regulatory status of progestin-only EC and information about the medication appears warranted. Health Canada’s recent approval of ulipristal acetate for use as a post-coital contraceptive may provide a window of opportunity for engaging with health service providers, including pharmacists, about all available modalities of EC in Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angel M. Foster
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
- Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Hsiang D, Dunn S. Emergency contraception. CMAJ 2016; 188:E536. [PMID: 27821461 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.160720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Hsiang
- Department of Family and Community Medicine (Hsiang, Dunn), Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto; Women's College Research Institute (Dunn), Toronto, Ont.
| | - Sheila Dunn
- Department of Family and Community Medicine (Hsiang, Dunn), Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto; Women's College Research Institute (Dunn), Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|