1
|
Lorenzo-Hernández E, Rivas-Ruiz F, Del Arco-Jiménez A. Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Incidence, Management and Outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteraemia: Experience in a Spanish Hospital. Pathogens 2024; 13:847. [PMID: 39452719 PMCID: PMC11510453 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13100847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2024] [Revised: 09/23/2024] [Accepted: 09/26/2024] [Indexed: 10/26/2024] Open
Abstract
This work aims to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mortality and incidence of complications in patients with bacteraemia due to Staphylococcus aureus (BSA). All episodes of BSA at the Costa del Sol University Hospital (Marbella, Spain) were recorded during the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020-March 2022) and compared with those in a previous period (February 2018-February 2020). Demographic, clinical and prognostic variables were recorded. The outcomes were measured as 14- and 30-day mortality and the incidence of complications/death. Mortality during the pandemic was 28.7% at 14 days and 35% at 30 days, while in the pre-pandemic group, it was 18.9% and 23.3%, respectively. For overall complications/deaths, the incidence rate was higher in the pandemic group, with 42.7%. No significant differences were observed between groups. Seventeen patients with COVID-19 were identified, with mortality rates of 64.7% and 70.6% at 14 and 30 days. Multivariate analysis established the presence of sepsis at diagnosis as a predictor of mortality, but not BSA, during the pandemic phase. In conclusion, BSA is a disease with high mortality, which was slightly higher during the pandemic phase. No differences were found in adherence to the bundle in our centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Francisco Rivas-Ruiz
- Research Unit, Costa del Sol University Hospital, A-7, Km 187, 29603 Marbella, Malaga, Spain;
| | - Alfonso Del Arco-Jiménez
- Internal Medicine Department, Costa del Sol University Hospital, A-7, Km 187, 29603 Marbella, Malaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tunçay E, Moçin Ö, Ediboğdu Ö, Adıgüzel N, Güngör S, İşcanlı İ, Er B, Mendil NA, Usalan A, Yılmaz D, Keskin H, Dönmez GE, Yılmaz B, Kargın F, Saraçoğlu KT, Temel Ş, Dal HC, Turan S, Talan L, Hoşgün D, Aydemir S, Sungurtekin H. Evaluation of Long-Coronavirus Disease 2019 Cases Readmitted to Intensive Care Units Due to Acute Respiratory Failure: Point Prevalence Study. THORACIC RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2024; 25:162-167. [PMID: 39128056 PMCID: PMC11363373 DOI: 10.5152/thoracrespract.2024.23117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused morbidity and mortality worldwide. Besides the acute effects, subacute and long-term effects are defined as long-COVID causing morbidity. The intensive care unit (ICU) data of long-COVID-19 cases were evaluated with the participation of 11 centers. MATERIAL AND METHODS Study was designed by Turkish Thoracic Society Respiratory Failure and Intensive Care Working Group to evaluate long COVID-19 patients. All patients followed up in the ICU with long-COVID diagnosis were included in point prevelance study. RESULTS A total of 41 long COVID-19 patients from 11 centers were included in the study. Half of the patients were male, mean age was 66 ± 14, body mass index was 27 ± 5. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, lung cancer, malignancy, and heart failure rates were 27%, 51%, 34%, 34%, and 27%, respectively. Eighty percent had received COVID vaccine. Patients had moderate hypoxemic respiratory failure. APACHE II, SOFA score was 18 (14-26), 6 (3-8), respectively. Forty-six percent received invasive mechanical ventilator support, 42% were sepsis, 17% were septic shock. Bilateral (67%), interstitial involvement (37%) were most common in chest x-ray. Fibrosis (27%) was detected in thorax tomography. Seventy-one percent of patients received antibiotherapy (42% carbapenem, 22% linezolid). Sixty-one percent of the patients received corticosteroid treatment. CONCLUSION More than half of the patients had pneumonia and the majority of them used broad-spectrum antibiotics. Presence of comorbidities and malignancies, intensive care severity scores, intubation, and sepsis rates were high. Receiving corticosteroid treatment and extensive bilateral radiologic involvement due to COVID-19 might be the reasons for the high re-admission rate for the ICUs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eylem Tunçay
- Department of Intensive Care, University of Medical Sciences Şehit Prof. Dr. İlhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Özlem Moçin
- Department of Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Süreyyapaşa Pulmonary Disease and Pulmonary Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Özlem Ediboğdu
- Department of Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Dr. Suat Seren Pulmonary Disease and Pulmonary Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Nalan Adıgüzel
- Department of Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Süreyyapaşa Pulmonary Disease and Pulmonary Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Sinem Güngör
- Department of Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Süreyyapaşa Pulmonary Disease and Pulmonary Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - İnşa İşcanlı
- Department of Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Sultan Abdülhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Berrin Er
- Department of Intensive Care, TC Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Adnan Usalan
- Department of Intensive Care, Tarsus Medikalpark Hospital, Mersin, Turkey
| | - Didem Yılmaz
- Department of Intensive Care, Tarsus Medikalpark Hospital, Mersin, Turkey
| | - Hülya Keskin
- Department of Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Gül Erdal Dönmez
- Department of Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Süreyyapaşa Pulmonary Disease and Pulmonary Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Barış Yılmaz
- Department of Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Süreyyapaşa Pulmonary Disease and Pulmonary Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Feyza Kargın
- Department of Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Kemal Tolga Saraçoğlu
- Department of Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Şahin Temel
- Department of Intensive Care, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Hayriye Cankar Dal
- Department of Intensive Care, TC Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sema Turan
- Department of Intensive Care, TC Ministry of Health, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Leyla Talan
- Department of Intensive Care, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Derya Hoşgün
- Department of Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Ankara Atatürk Pulmonary Disease and Pulmonary Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Semih Aydemir
- Department of Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Ankara Atatürk Pulmonary Disease and Pulmonary Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hülya Sungurtekin
- Department of Intensive Care, Pamukkale University Faculty of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ruiz-Bastián M, Díaz-Pollán B, Falces-Romero I, Toro-Rueda C, García-Rodríguez J. Impact on tuberculosis diagnostic during COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary care hospital. ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA (ENGLISH ED.) 2024; 42:135-139. [PMID: 36737366 PMCID: PMC9890387 DOI: 10.1016/j.eimce.2022.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study is to review how did the first three COVID-19 waves affected the diagnostic of tuberculosis and to describe the extra-pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (TB) diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective observational study was done during the first three waves of pandemic to ascertain the impact on TB samples and to recover the extra-pulmonary TB cases we included the first two years of COVID-19. All relevant data was recovered from hospital and Clinical Microbiology records. RESULTS Prepandemic period showed an average of 44 samples per week for TB study; during the first three waves this number dropped to 23.1 per week. A reduction of 67.7% of pulmonary TB diagnosis was observed and an increase of 33.3% diagnosis of extra-pulmonary TB was noted when comparing pre-pandemic and pandemic period. DISCUSSION The number of declared cases and samples for TB diagnosis dropped during the first three COVID-19 waves due to the overstretched Public Health System which could lead to a delay in diagnosis, treatment and to the spread of TB disease in the general population. Surveillance programs should be reinforced to avoid this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Ruiz-Bastián
- Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Beatriz Díaz-Pollán
- Infectious Disease Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; IdiPAZ (La Paz Institute for Health Research), La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; CIBERINFEC (Centre for Biomedical Research Network on Infectious Diseases), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Iker Falces-Romero
- Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; CIBERINFEC (Centre for Biomedical Research Network on Infectious Diseases), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Toro-Rueda
- Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Julio García-Rodríguez
- Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; CIBERINFEC (Centre for Biomedical Research Network on Infectious Diseases), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhou S, Liu MH, Deng XP. Critical respiratory failure due to pregnancy complicated by COVID-19 and bacterial coinfection: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:5559-5566. [PMID: 37637702 PMCID: PMC10450368 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i23.5559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the past 3 years, the global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has posed a great threat to human life and safety. Among the causes of death in COVID-19 patients, combined or secondary bacterial infection is an important factor. As a special group, pregnant women experience varying degrees of change in their immune status, cardiopulmonary function, and anatomical structure during pregnancy, which puts them at higher risk of contracting COVID-19. COVID-19 infection during pregnancy is associated with increased adverse events such as hospitalisation, admission to the intensive care unit, and mechanical ventilation. Therefore, pregnancy combined with coinfection of COVID-19 and bacteria often leads to critical respiratory failure, posing severe challenges in the diagnosis and treatment process. CASE SUMMARY We report a case of COVID-19 complicated with Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) coinfection in a pregnant woman at 34 wk of gestation. Her rapid progression of pulmonary lesions caused severe respiratory failure, and she received non-invasive ventilator-assisted respiratory treatment. Subsequently, we delivered a foetus via emergency caesarean section after accelerating the maturity of the foetal pulmonary system, and the respiratory condition of the puerperant woman significantly improved after the delivery of the foetus. Lavage fluid was taken under tracheoscopy to quickly search for pathogens by the metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), and both COVID-19 and S. aureus were detected. After targeted anti-infective treatment, the maternal condition gradually improved, and the patient was discharged from the hospital. CONCLUSION The coinfection of pregnancy with COVID-19 and bacteria often leads to critical respiratory failure, which is a great challenge in the process of diagnosis and treatment. It is crucial to choose the right time to deliver the foetus and to quickly find pathogens by mNGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang Zhou
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Mei-Hong Liu
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Xiao-Peng Deng
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Dalian Women and Children’s Medical Group, Dalian 116011, Liaoning Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Falces-Romero I, Bloise I, García-Rodríguez J, Cendejas-Bueno E. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. MEDICINA CLINICA (ENGLISH ED.) 2023; 160:495-498. [PMID: 37311167 PMCID: PMC10250598 DOI: 10.1016/j.medcle.2023.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Objectives The aim was to compare the incidence of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 adult patients during the pandemic period versus the previous two years. Also, we described the characteristics of both cohorts of patients in pandemic period to find differences. Material and methods Retrospective study in our tertiary-care centre reviewing S. aureus bacteremia episodes in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients through clinical records and the Microbiology Department database. Results In 2018 and 2019, the incidence of S. aureus bacteremia episodes was 1.95 and 1.63 per 1000 admissions respectively. In the pandemic period, global incidence was 1.96 episodes per 1000 non-COVID-19 admissions and 10.59 episodes per 1000 COVID-19 admissions. A total of 241 bacteremia was registered during this pandemic period in 74 COVID-19 patients and in 167 non-COVID-19 patients. Methicillin resistance was detected in 32.4% and 13.8% of isolates from COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients respectively. In COVID-19 patients, mortality rates were significantly higher. Conclusions We showed a significantly high rates of S. aureus bacteremia incidence in COVID-19 patients and higher methicillin resistance and 15-day mortality rates than in non-COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iker Falces-Romero
- Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain
- CIBERINFEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Iván Bloise
- Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Julio García-Rodríguez
- Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain
- CIBERINFEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Emilio Cendejas-Bueno
- Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain
- CIBERINFEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Langford BJ, So M, Simeonova M, Leung V, Lo J, Kan T, Raybardhan S, Sapin ME, Mponponsuo K, Farrell A, Leung E, Soucy JPR, Cassini A, MacFadden D, Daneman N, Bertagnolio S. Antimicrobial resistance in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. THE LANCET. MICROBE 2023; 4:e179-e191. [PMID: 36736332 PMCID: PMC9889096 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-5247(22)00355-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frequent use of antibiotics in patients with COVID-19 threatens to exacerbate antimicrobial resistance. We aimed to establish the prevalence and predictors of bacterial infections and antimicrobial resistance in patients with COVID-19. METHODS We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of bacterial co-infections (identified within ≤48 h of presentation) and secondary infections (>48 h after presentation) in outpatients or hospitalised patients with COVID-19. We searched the WHO COVID-19 Research Database to identify cohort studies, case series, case-control trials, and randomised controlled trials with populations of at least 50 patients published in any language between Jan 1, 2019, and Dec 1, 2021. Reviews, editorials, letters, pre-prints, and conference proceedings were excluded, as were studies in which bacterial infection was not microbiologically confirmed (or confirmed via nasopharyngeal swab only). We screened titles and abstracts of papers identified by our search, and then assessed the full text of potentially relevant articles. We reported the pooled prevalence of bacterial infections and antimicrobial resistance by doing a random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression. Our primary outcomes were the prevalence of bacterial co-infection and secondary infection, and the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens among patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and bacterial infections. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021297344). FINDINGS We included 148 studies of 362 976 patients, which were done between December, 2019, and May, 2021. The prevalence of bacterial co-infection was 5·3% (95% CI 3·8-7·4), whereas the prevalence of secondary bacterial infection was 18·4% (14·0-23·7). 42 (28%) studies included comprehensive data for the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among bacterial infections. Among people with bacterial infections, the proportion of infections that were resistant to antimicrobials was 60·8% (95% CI 38·6-79·3), and the proportion of isolates that were resistant was 37·5% (26·9-49·5). Heterogeneity in the reported prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in organisms was substantial (I2=95%). INTERPRETATION Although infrequently assessed, antimicrobial resistance is highly prevalent in patients with COVID-19 and bacterial infections. Future research and surveillance assessing the effect of COVID-19 on antimicrobial resistance at the patient and population level are urgently needed. FUNDING WHO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley J Langford
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Miranda So
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Valerie Leung
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto East Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer Lo
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tiffany Kan
- North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Mia E Sapin
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kwadwo Mponponsuo
- University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Elizabeth Leung
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, UK
| | - Jean-Paul R Soucy
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Derek MacFadden
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Nick Daneman
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sleiman A, Abdelkhalek P, Doumat G, Atallah F, Hamadeh L, Moussa P, Bou Akl I, Dbaibo G, Araj GF, Kanj SS, Mahfouz R, Matar GM, Kanafani ZA, Abou Fayad AG. The under investigated facet of the COVID-19 pandemic: Molecular analysis of secondary bacterial infections at a COVID dedicated intensive care unit within a tertiary care center in Lebanon. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1001476. [PMID: 36817795 PMCID: PMC9928946 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1001476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread worldwide. Secondary bacterial infections are associated with unfavorable outcomes in respiratory viral infections. This study aimed at determining the prevalence of secondary bacterial infections in COVID-19 patients admitted at a tertiary medical center in Lebanon. Methodology From May till November, 2020, a total of 26 Gram-negative isolates were recovered from 16 patients during the course of their COVID-19 infection with Escherichia coli being the most prevalent. The isolates were assessed for their antimicrobial susceptibility by broth microdilution against 19 antimicrobial agents from different classes. Whole genome sequencing of 13 isolates allowed the mining of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) determinants as well as mobile genetic elements and sequence types (ST). Finally, broth microdilution with three different efflux pump inhibitors [theobromine, conessine and PheArg-β-naphthylamide (PAβN)] was done. Results Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that out of the 26 Gram-negative isolates, 1 (4%) was extensively drug resistant and 14 (54%) were multi-drug resistant (MDR). Whole genome sequencing results revealed a plethora of AMR determinants among the 13 sequenced isolates. Moreover, the 9 Enterobacterales and 4 Pseudomonas aeruginosa sequenced isolates belonged to 9 and 2 different ST, respectively. Using a variety of efflux pump inhibitors we demonstrated that only PAβN had a significant effect when combined with levofloxacin, and the latter regained its activity against two P. aeruginosa isolates. Conclusion The identification of carbapenem and colistin resistant Gram-negative bacilli causing secondary bacterial infections in critical patients diagnosed with COVID-19 should be of high concern. Additionally, it is crucial to monitor and track AMR, post-COVID pandemic, in order to better understand the effect of this disease on AMR exacerbation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Sleiman
- Department of Experimental Pathology, Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon,Center for Infectious Diseases Research, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon,World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Bacterial Pathogens, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Pascal Abdelkhalek
- Department of Experimental Pathology, Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon,Center for Infectious Diseases Research, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon,World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Bacterial Pathogens, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - George Doumat
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Frida Atallah
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Lama Hamadeh
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon,Pillar Genomics Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Pamela Moussa
- Department of Experimental Pathology, Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon,Center for Infectious Diseases Research, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon,World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Bacterial Pathogens, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Imad Bou Akl
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Ghassan Dbaibo
- Center for Infectious Diseases Research, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - George F. Araj
- Center for Infectious Diseases Research, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Souha S. Kanj
- Center for Infectious Diseases Research, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon,Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Rami Mahfouz
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon,Pillar Genomics Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Ghassan M. Matar
- Department of Experimental Pathology, Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon,Center for Infectious Diseases Research, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon,World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Bacterial Pathogens, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Zeina A. Kanafani
- Center for Infectious Diseases Research, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon,Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon,Zeina A. Kanafani,
| | - Antoine G. Abou Fayad
- Department of Experimental Pathology, Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon,Center for Infectious Diseases Research, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon,World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Bacterial Pathogens, Beirut, Lebanon,*Correspondence: Antoine G. Abou Fayad,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Falces-Romero I, Bloise I, García-Rodríguez J, Cendejas-Bueno E. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Med Clin (Barc) 2023:S0025-7753(23)00029-5. [PMID: 36841646 PMCID: PMC9884619 DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2023.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim was to compare the incidence of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 adult patients during the pandemic period versus the previous two years. Also, we described the characteristics of both cohorts of patients in pandemic period to find differences. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective study in our tertiary-care centre reviewing S. aureus bacteremia episodes in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients through clinical records and the Microbiology Department database. RESULTS In 2018 and 2019, the incidence of S. aureus bacteremia episodes was 1.95 and 1.63 per 1000 admissions respectively. In the pandemic period, global incidence was 1.96 episodes per 1000 non-COVID-19 admissions and 10.59 episodes per 1000 COVID-19 admissions. A total of 241 bacteremia was registered during this pandemic period in 74 COVID-19 patients and in 167 non-COVID-19 patients. Methicillin resistance was detected in 32.4% and 13.8% of isolates from COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients respectively. In COVID-19 patients, mortality rates were significantly higher. CONCLUSIONS We showed a significantly high rates of S. aureus bacteremia incidence in COVID-19 patients and higher methicillin resistance and 15-day mortality rates than in non-COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iker Falces-Romero
- Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain; CIBERINFEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Iván Bloise
- Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Julio García-Rodríguez
- Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain,CIBERINFEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Emilio Cendejas-Bueno
- Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain,CIBERINFEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ruiz-Bastián M, Díaz-Pollán B, Falces-Romero I, Toro-Rueda C, García-Rodríguez J. [IMPACT ON TUBERCULOSIS DIAGNOSTIC DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL]. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2022; 42:S0213-005X(22)00280-4. [PMID: 36506458 PMCID: PMC9722676 DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study is to review how did the first three COVID-19 waves affected the diagnostic of tuberculosis and to describe the extra-pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (TB) diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective observational study was done during the first three waves of pandemic to ascertain the impact on TB samples and to recover the extra-pulmonary TB cases we included the first two years of COVID-19. All relevant data was recovered from hospital and Clinical Microbiology records. RESULTS Prepandemic period showed an average of 44 samples per week for TB study; during the first three waves this number dropped to 23.1 per week. A reduction of 67.7% of pulmonary TB diagnosis was observed and an increase of 33.3% diagnosis of extra-pulmonary TB was noted when comparing pre-pandemic and pandemic period. DISCUSSION The number of declared cases and samples for TB diagnosis dropped during the first three COVID-19 waves due to the overstretched Public Health System which could lead to a delay in diagnosis, treatment and to the spread of TB disease in the general population. Surveillance programs should be reinforced to avoid this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Ruiz-Bastián
- Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology Department. Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Díaz-Pollán
- Infectious Disease Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
- IdiPAZ (La Paz Institute for Health Research). La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- CIBERINFEC (Centre for Biomedical Research Network on Infectious Diseases). Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Iker Falces-Romero
- Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology Department. Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
- CIBERINFEC (Centre for Biomedical Research Network on Infectious Diseases). Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Toro-Rueda
- Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology Department. Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Julio García-Rodríguez
- Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology Department. Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Antibiotics Use in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Literature Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11237207. [PMID: 36498781 PMCID: PMC9739751 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11237207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The issue of bacterial infections in COVID-19 patients has received increasing attention among scientists. Antibiotics were widely prescribed during the early phase of the pandemic. We performed a literature review to assess the reasons, evidence and practices on the use of antibiotics in COVID-19 in- and outpatients. Published articles providing data on antibiotics use in COVID-19 patients were identified through computerized literature searches on the MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases. Searching the MEDLINE database, the following search terms were adopted: ((antibiotic) AND (COVID-19)). Searching the SCOPUS database, the following search terms were used: ((antibiotic treatment) AND (COVID-19)). The risk of bias in the included studies was not assessed. Both quantitative and qualitative information were summarized by means of textual descriptions. Five-hundred-ninety-three studies were identified, published from January 2020 to 30 October 2022. Thirty-six studies were included in this systematic review. Of the 36 included studies, 32 studies were on the use of antibiotics in COVID-19 inpatients and 4 on antibiotic use in COVID-19 outpatients. Apart from the studies identified and included in the review, the main recommendations on antibiotic treatment from 5 guidelines for the clinical management of COVID-19 were also summarized in a separate paragraph. Antibiotics should not be prescribed during COVID-19 unless there is a strong clinical suspicion of bacterial coinfection or superinfection.
Collapse
|
11
|
Wei W, Qi J, Yin Y, Gong J, Yao X. Characteristics of inhalable bioaerosols on foggy and hazy days and their deposition in the human respiratory tract. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION (BARKING, ESSEX : 1987) 2022; 307:119593. [PMID: 35680068 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Atmospheric bioaerosols contain live and dead biological components that can enter the human respiratory tract (HRT) and affect human health. Here, the total microorganisms in a coastal megacity, Qingdao, were characterized on the basis of long-term observations from October 2013 to January 2021. Particular attention was given to the size dependence of inhalable bioaerosols in concentration and respiratory deposition in different populations on foggy and hazy days. Bioaerosol samples stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) were selected to measure the total airborne microbe (TAM) concentrations with an epifluorescence microscope, while a multiple-path particle dosimetry model was employed to calculate respiratory deposition. The mean TAM concentrations in the particle size range of 0.65-1.1 μm (TAM0.65-1.1) were 1.23, 2.02, 1.60 and 2.33 times those on sunny reference days relative to the corresponding values on days with slight, mild, moderate and severe levels of haze, respectively. The mean concentration of TAMs in the particle size range of 0.65-2.1 μm (TAM0.65-2.1) on severely hazy days was (2.02 ± 3.28) × 105 cells/m3, with a reduction of 4.16% relative to that on the reference days. The mean TAM0.65-2.1 concentration changed from (1.50 ± 1.37) × 105 cells/m3 to (1.76 ± 1.36) × 105 cells/m3, with TAM0.65-1.1 increasing from (7.91 ± 7.97) × 104 cells/m3 to (1.76 ± 1.33) × 105 cells/m3 on days with light fog days and medium fog, respectively. The modeling results showed that the majority of TAM0.65-2.1 deposition occurred in the extrathoracic (ET) region, followed by the alveolar (AL) region. When different populations were examined separately, the deposition doses (DDs) in adult females and in children ranked at the minimum value (6.19 × 103 cells/h) and maximum value (1.08 × 104 cells/h), respectively. However, the inhalation risks on polluted days, such as hazy, foggy and mixed hazy-foggy (HF) days, were still below the threshold for adverse impacts on human health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenshu Wei
- Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and Ecology, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, China; Laboratory for Marine Ecology and Environmental Science, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266100, China
| | - Jianhua Qi
- Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and Ecology, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, China; Laboratory for Marine Ecology and Environmental Science, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266100, China.
| | - Yidan Yin
- Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and Ecology, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, China; Laboratory for Marine Ecology and Environmental Science, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266100, China
| | - Jing Gong
- Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and Ecology, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, China; Laboratory for Marine Ecology and Environmental Science, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266100, China
| | - Xiaohong Yao
- Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and Ecology, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, China; Laboratory for Marine Ecology and Environmental Science, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266100, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rangroo R, Young M, Davis A, Pack S, Thakore S, Schepcoff A, Oyesanmi O. The Severity of the Co-infection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in COVID-19 Patients. Cureus 2022; 14:e24563. [PMID: 35664402 PMCID: PMC9148197 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objective The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel coronavirus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, with symptoms ranging from mild upper respiratory illness to multisystem organ failure, and even death. Since its discovery in December 2019, the SARS-CoV-2 virus has led to a global pandemic, rapidly spreading to countries around the world, with millions of reported deaths to date. As researchers around the world continue to analyze and interpret the data gathered regarding the novel virus, it is evident that its co-infection with various bacterial pathogens is associated with a worse overall prognosis. One such bacterial pathogen, Mycoplasma pneumoniae (M. pneumoniae), has been associated with an increase in inpatient mortality, length of hospital stay, and need for mechanical ventilation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of patients co-infected with SARS-CoV-2 and M. pneumoniae. We sought to determine if this co-infection led to increased incidence of ventilatory support, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and mortality. Materials and Methods A multi-center retrospective study was conducted involving patients aged 18 years and older. We compared the incidence of in-hospital mortality, ICU stay, and mechanical ventilation support between COVID-19-positive patients with and without M. pneumoniae co-infection. Based on the collected data, a binary logistic regression model was implemented to assess the correlation between mortality and ventilatory support, while linear regression was used to study the length of stay (LOS) independent variable. Results A total of 1,208 patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test were identified. Among them, 604 (50%) had an M. pneumoniae co-infection. LOS (95% CI for the coefficient estimate [0.86, 1.05], p<0.001), need for mechanical ventilation (95% CI for the odds ratio [2.60, 6.02], p<0.001), and inpatient mortality (95% CI for the odds ratio [1.43, 2.97], p<0.001) among those co-infected were significantly higher compared to COVID-19 patients without concomitant M. pneumoniae infection. Conclusion COVID-19 with a concomitant M. pneumoniae infection was found to have worse outcomes and overall prognosis when compared to individuals with independent disease states. Based on retrospective data gathered from a large multicenter database, the rates of mortality, ventilatory support, and length of hospital stay were significantly worse in patients with a co-infection of SARS-CoV-2 and M. pneumoniae.
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Some patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may develop pulmonary bacterial coinfection or superinfection, that could unfavorably impact their prognosis. RECENT FINDINGS The exact burden of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) lung infection in peculiar populations such as patients with COVID-19 remains somewhat elusive, possibly because of wide heterogeneity in methods and endpoints across studies. SUMMARY There was important heterogeneity in the retrieved literature on the epidemiology of MRSA lung infection in patients with COVID-19, both when considering all other bacteria as the denominator (relative prevalence ranging from 2% to 29%) and when considering only S. aureus as the denominator (relative prevalence ranging from 11% to 65%). Overall, MRSA is among the most frequent causative agents of pulmonary infection in patients with COVID-19. Improving our ability to rapidly reach etiological diagnosis of bacterial lung infection in COVID-19 patients remains fundamental if we are to improve the rates of appropriate antibiotic therapy in patients with COVID-19 and concomitant/superimposed MRSA infection, at the same time avoiding antibiotic overuse in line with antimicrobial stewardship principles.
Collapse
|
14
|
Díaz Pollán B, Guedez López GV, García Clemente PM, Jiménez González M, García Bujalance S, Gómez-Gil Mirá MR. Urinary Tract Infections in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients, What's Up, Doc? J Clin Med 2022; 11:1815. [PMID: 35407423 PMCID: PMC8999936 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11071815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic might have increased the risks of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs); however, several studies of HAI such as urinary tract infections (UTIs) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) have shown contradictory results. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical features of UTIs and bacterial isolates from urine samples of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We conducted a retrospective observational study including 87 COVID-19 patients with UTIs admitted to our centre. Bacterial UTIs presented were 87: 9 (10.3%) community-acquired UTIs (coinfection group) and 78 (89.6%) hospital-acquired UTIs (superinfection group). In the coinfection group, the most frequent type was non-CAUTI with 5 (55.5%) patients; however, the most frequent UTI in the superinfection group was CAUTI, with 53 (67.9%) patients. The median number of days of hospitalization in coinfected patients was lower than superinfection patients: 13 (IQR 11, 23) vs. 34 days (IQR 23, 47) p < 0.006. All UTI patients admitted to ICU, 38 (43.7%), belonged to the superinfection group. The mortality rate was 26.4% (23/87), 22/23 in the superinfection group. The most common microorganisms were E. coli 27 (28.4%), E. faecalis 25 (26.3%) and E. faecium 20 (21.1%). There was an increased incidence of E. faecalis and E. faecium in UTIs as well as hospital-acquired UTIs. This can be related to urethral catheterization during hospitalization, UCI admissions and the number of days of hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatriz Díaz Pollán
- Infectious Disease Unit, Internal Medicine Service, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Gladys Virginia Guedez López
- Clinical Microbiological Service, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (G.V.G.L.); (P.M.G.C.); (S.G.B.); (M.R.G.-G.M.)
| | - Paloma María García Clemente
- Clinical Microbiological Service, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (G.V.G.L.); (P.M.G.C.); (S.G.B.); (M.R.G.-G.M.)
| | - María Jiménez González
- UCICEC AIDS/Infectious Diseases, IdiPAZ, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Silvia García Bujalance
- Clinical Microbiological Service, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (G.V.G.L.); (P.M.G.C.); (S.G.B.); (M.R.G.-G.M.)
| | - María Rosa Gómez-Gil Mirá
- Clinical Microbiological Service, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (G.V.G.L.); (P.M.G.C.); (S.G.B.); (M.R.G.-G.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tanaka S, Yamamoto K, Hagiya H, Hasegawa K, Otsuka F. Threat of Staphylococcus aureus Pneumonia in Severe COVID-19 Patients. Cureus 2022; 14:e22486. [PMID: 35345748 PMCID: PMC8942142 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been spreading worldwide with unprecedented rapidity. Staphylococcus aureus is reported to frequently cause bacterial complications in patients with COVID-19. We herein present two additional cases of S. aureus pneumonia involving such patients. The first case was an obese 48-year-old man without any particular underlying diseases. The second case was another patient, a 72-year-old man, with hypertension, dyslipidemia, and steatohepatitis. Both patients developed methicillin-susceptible S. aureus pneumonia in the clinical course of COVID-19, to which antibiotic therapy with cefazolin was effectively administered. Through these cases, we emphasize that S. aureus secondary infections should be well cared with a high degree of caution in a case of critically ill COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
|
16
|
Bassetti M, Labate L, Melchio M, Robba C, Battaglini D, Ball L, Pelosi P, Giacobbe DR. Current pharmacotherapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2021; 23:361-375. [PMID: 34882041 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2021.2010706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Currently, several antibiotics are active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and can be used for the treatment of pneumonia. They show great variability in terms of antibiotic class, indication, pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties, type of available formulations, spectrum of activity against bacteria other than MRSA, and toxicity profile. AREAS COVERED In this narrative review, the authors discuss the characteristics of currently available agents for the treatment of MRSA pneumonia. EXPERT OPINION The availability of different agents with anti-MRSA activity, and approved for the treatment of pneumonia can allow a personalized approach for any given patient based on the severity of the disease, the setting of occurrence, the patient's baseline risk of toxicity and drug interactions, and the possibility of oral therapy whenever early discharge or outpatient treatment are possible. Although some gray areas still remain, like the lack of high certainty evidence on the efficacy of some old agents and on the precise role of companion agents with toxin inhibitory activity in the case of necrotizing pneumonia, the frequent availability of different treatment choices, each with peculiar characteristics, is already allowing an important step toward a precision medicine approach for the treatment of MRSA pneumonia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Bassetti
- Infectious Diseases Unit, San Martino Policlinico Hospital - IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Laura Labate
- Infectious Diseases Unit, San Martino Policlinico Hospital - IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Monica Melchio
- Infectious Diseases Unit, San Martino Policlinico Hospital - IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Chiara Robba
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Denise Battaglini
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lorenzo Ball
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paolo Pelosi
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Daniele Roberto Giacobbe
- Infectious Diseases Unit, San Martino Policlinico Hospital - IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|