This study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes based on the ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in patients with rectal cancer.

This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database that included all patients who underwent elective low anterior resection for rectal cancer between January 2013 and December 2019. The clinical outcomes included oncological outcomes, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes. The oncological outcomes included overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). The functional outcomes, including defecatory and urogenital functions, were analyzed using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, International Prostate Symptom Score, and International Index of Erectile Function questionnaires.

In total, 545 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 244 patients underwent high ligation (HL), whereas 301 underwent low ligation (LL). The tumor size was larger in the HL group than in the LL group. The number of harvested lymph nodes (LNs) was higher in the HL group than in the LL group. There were no significant differences in complication rates and recurrence patterns between the groups. There were no significant differences in 5-year RFS and OS between the groups. Cox regression analysis revealed that the ligation level (HL vs. LL) was not a significant risk factor for oncological outcomes. Regarding functional outcomes, the LL group showed a significant recovery in defecatory function 1 year postoperatively compared with the HL group.

LL with LNs dissection around the root of the IMA might not affect the oncologic outcomes comparing to HL; however, it has minimal benefit for defecatory function.

Purpose: It is unclear whether the principles of open complete mesocolic excision (CME) can be safely applied to laparoscopic surgery. Furthermore, definitions vary over how radical optimal CME surgery should be. We report morbidity and oncological outcomes for laparoscopic CME without routine gastro-pancreatico-colic trunk (GPCT) dissection. Materials and Methods: An observational study with consecutive data for patients with Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage I-III colon adenocarcinoma who underwent elective laparoscopic resection between 2006 and 2015. Data were retrieved for demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and histology from prospectively maintained databases. Standardized, routinely video recorded, laparoscopic resections were performed in two United Kingdom centers from The National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) were reported using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression. Results: Laparoscopic CME was performed in 567 patients, 52.7% (288/546) women, median (interquartile range [IQR]) age 73 (65-80) years. Median (IQR) length of stay was 4 (3-5) days with 4.0 (2.2-5.7)-year follow-up. Significant DFS predictors (hazard ratio [HR]) by multivariable Cox regression were age >80 years (1.9), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 3 and 4 (HR = 1.1), right colon cancer (1.7), UICC stage III (3.4), and intramesocolic grade (2.2). Overall 4-year DFS (95% confidence interval) was 81.3% (77-85). Four-year DFS by UICC grades I, II, and III was 94.6% (89-99), 83.4% (77-88), and 72.2% (66-78), respectively (log-rank P = .001). Morbidity by Clavien-Dindo grade was III 18 (3.2%), IV 4 (0.7%) and V 7 (1.2%). Conclusion: This large series suggests standardized laparoscopic CME without routine GPCT dissection has a low morbidity and achieves equivalent outcomes to the most radical open CME techniques.

Since the 19th century, appropriate lymphadenectomy has been considered a cornerstone of oncologic surgery and one of the most important prognostic factors. This approach can be applied to any surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. During surgery for colon and rectal cancer, an adequate portion of the mesentery is removed together with the segment of bowel affected by the disease. The adequate number of lymph nodes to be removed is standardized and reported by several guidelines. It is mandatory to determine the appropriate extent of lymphadenectomy and to balance its oncological benefits with the increased morbidity associated with its execution in cancer patients. Our review focuses on the concept of "complete mesenteric excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL)," a radical lymphadenectomy for colorectal cancer that has gained increasing interest in recent years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evolution of this approach over the years, its potential oncologic benefits and potential risks, and the improvements offered by laparoscopic techniques. Theoretical advantages of CME are improved local-relapse rates due to complete removal of the intact mesocolic fascia and improved distance recurrence rates due to ligation of vessels at their origin (CVL) which guarantees removal of a larger number of lymph nodes. The development and worldwide diffusion of laparoscopic techniques minimized postoperative trauma in oncologic surgery, providing the same oncologic results as open surgery. This has been widely applied to colorectal cancer surgery; however, CME entails a technical complexity that can limit its wide minimally-invasive application. This review analyzes results of these procedures in terms of oncological outcomes, technical feasibility and complexity, especially within the context of minimally invasive surgery.

In the nineteenth century the idea of a correct surgical approach in oncologic surgery moved towards a good lymphadenectomy. In colon cancer the segment is removed with adjacent mesentery, in gastric cancer or pancreatic cancer a good oncologic resection is obtained with adequate lymphadenectomy. Many guidelines propose a minimal lymph node count that the surgeon must obtain. Therefore, it is essential to understand the adequate extent of lymphadenectomy to be performed in cancer surgery. In this review of the current literature, the focus is on "central vascular ligation", understood as radical lymphadenectomy in upper and lower gastrointestinal cancer, the evolution of this approach during the years and the improvement of laparoscopic techniques. For what concerns laparoscopic surgery, the main goal is to minimize post-operative trauma introducing the "less is more" concept whilst preserving attention for oncological outcomes. This review will demonstrate the importance of a scientifically based standardization of oncologic gastrointestinal surgery, especially in relation to the expansion of minimally invasive surgery and underlines the importance to further investigate through new randomized trials the role of extended lymphadenectomy in the new era of a multimodal approach, and most importantly, an era where minimally invasive techniques and the idea of "less is more" are becoming the standard thought for the surgical approach.

Evidence supporting the importance of apical lymph nodes (LNs) and the potential long-term impact of LN metastases at the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) lymphectomy remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of LNs at the IMA (IMA-LN) in sigmoid and rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

We retrospectively evaluated 265 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic sigmoid or rectal cancer surgery between August 2016 and May 2020. They were divided into two groups according to the pathological results of the IMA LNs: IMA-LN negative (n = 248) and IMA-LN positive (n = 17).

The IMA-LN negative group had significantly better overall survival (OS) (p = .020) and disease-free survival (DFS) (p = .000) than did the IMA-LN positive group. IMA-LN metastasis was associated with worse OS and DFS regardless of the pN stage. Patients with IMA-LN metastasis had a higher risk of postoperative recurrence, especially liver (p = .000) and lung (p = .025) metastasis, than did those without metastasis. However, there was no significant difference in the local recurrence rate between the two groups.

IMA-LN metastasis is an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in sigmoid and rectal cancer. Dissecting and evaluating IMA-LN separately is a more accurate and practical method for predicting prognosis.

The aim of this study is to compare clinical and oncologic outcomes of the high and low ligation techniques of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in rectal cancer patients treated with robotic surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

In this retrospective study, 77 patients with T3/T4-node negative rectal cancer with tumor penetration through the muscle wall (Stage 2) or node positive disease without distant metastases (Stage 3) who were treated electively with robotic surgical resection following nCRT at a single institution between January 2014 and January 2018 were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups (38 patients were included in the low ligation group and 39 patients in the high ligation group).

There was no statistical difference between the high ligation group and low ligation group in univariate analysis for 2-year overall survival and disease-free survival (OR = 1.146; 95% CI = 0.274 to 4.797; P = 0.950, and OR = 1.141; 95% CI = 0.564 to 2.308; P = 0.713, respectively). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the mean number of harvested lymph nodes and mean number of metastatic lymph nodes (P = 0.980 and P = 0.124, respectively). Anastomosis stricture was observed significantly less frequently in the low ligation group versus the high ligation group (2.6% and 28.2%, respectively) (P = 0.002). Also, the difference for the median length of hospital stay for the high and low ligation groups was statistically significant in favor of the low ligation group (P = 0.011).

In robotic rectal surgery, the low ligation technique of the IMA can reduce the rate of anastomosis stricture and provide similar oncological results as the high ligation technique.

To determine the disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence in patients who underwent laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) with either high or low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA).

The level of IMA ligation during anterior rectal resection with TME is still a matter of debate, especially in terms of oncological adequacy.

Between June 2014 and December 2016, patients scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR) and TME in 6 Italian nonacademic hospitals were randomized into 2 groups in the HIGHLOW Trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02153801) according to the level of IMA ligation: high ligation (HL) versus low ligation (LL). DFS, DSS, and recurrence were inquired. Recurrence was determined at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and every 6 months thereafter. Patients and tumor characteristics as well as surgical outcomes were analyzed to identify risk factors for recurrence.

One hundred ninety-six patients from the HIGHLOW trial were analyzed. Median follow-up for DFS was 40.6 (interquartile range [IQR], 6-64.7) and 40 (IQR, 7.6-67.8), while median follow-up for DSS was 41.2 (IQR, 10.7-64.7) and 42.7 (IQR, 6-67.6) in the HL and LL groups, respectively. The 3-year DFS rate of HL and LL patients was 82.2% and 82.1% (P = 0.874), respectively. The 3-year DSS for HL and LL patients was 92.1% and 93.4% (P = 0.897), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the local recurrence rate (2% HL vs 2.1% LL), in the regional recurrence rate (3% HL vs 2.1% LL), and in the distant recurrence rate (12.9% HL vs 13.7% LL). Multivariate analysis found conversion to open surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 3.68; P = 0.001) and higher stage of disease (HR, 7.73; P < 0.001) to be significant determinant for DFS.

The level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation during LAR and TME for rectal cancer does not affect DFS, DSS, and recurrence.

The optimal extent of mesenteric resection in colon cancer surgery remains elusive. The aim was to assess the impact on perioperative morbidity and oncological outcome depending on the height of central vessel ligation in sigmoid resection for adenocarcinomas.

All cases of stage I-III sigmoid cancers, operated on with locally radical resections (2007-2009), were identified in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and categorized according to the position of the vascular ligature, that is, ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery, ligation of the superior rectal artery, or ligation of the sigmoid branches.

In total, 999 cases were identified and possible to categorize. Although higher ligation level yielded a higher number of lymph nodes, 3- or 5-year overall survival, 5-year disease-free survival, or recurrence rate did not differ between the groups (p = 0.79, p = 0.41, p = 0.67, p = 0.51). No differences in survival were detected after multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex, T-stage, N-stage, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and adjuvant therapy.

This large population-based study showed increased lymph node yield but no survival benefit or any decreased recurrence rate by high tie in resection of sigmoid cancer.

The standard procedure of lymph node (LN) dissection for rectal or sigmoid colon cancer remains controversial. Many laparoscopic surgeons cut the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) at the root; however, this may cause bowel ischemia around the site of anastomosis. We performed D3 or D2 LN dissection with the preservation of the IMA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of IMA-preserving LN dissection.

We retrospectively analyzed 142 consecutive patients with upper-rectal or sigmoid colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic LN dissection with the preservation of the IMA. The number of LNs dissected and the overall and disease-free survival rates were retrospectively evaluated.

Laparoscopic D3 (n = 92) or D2 (n = 50) LN dissection were performed with the preservation of the IMA. The left colic artery was preserved in all cases, the superior rectal artery was also preserved in 30 cases. The mean number of LNs dissected was 19.6 in the D3 group and 12.9 in the D2 group. The median operative time was 230 minutes, and the median volume of blood loss was 17 mL. There was no treatment-related mortality. The estimated 5-year disease-free survival rates of the stage I, II, and III patients were 93%, 83%, and 74%, respectively. No patients developed LN recurrence.

Laparoscopic surgery with IMA-preserving LN dissection is an oncologically acceptable treatment strategy in patients with upper-rectal or sigmoid colon cancer.

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been proposed for colon cancer to improve oncological outcomes. The risks and benefits of laparoscopic CME have not been examined fully. We compared short- and long-term outcomes of CME with a conventional mesocolic excision (non-CME) in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (RHC) for right-sided colon cancer.

In total, 115 patients who underwent laparoscopic RHC with stage I-III right-sided colon cancer at Busan Paik Hospital from August 2007 to October 2011 were enrolled in this case-control study. Three trained colorectal surgeons reviewed videos of the surgeries; patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent a CME (CME group, n = 34) and those who underwent a conventional mesocolic excision (non-CME group, n = 81).

There was no significant difference between the CME and non-CME groups in operative time, post-operative complications, or hospital stay. However, the CME group had more lymph nodes harvested (P < 0.001) and lower blood loss (P = 0.016) versus the non-CME group. There was no difference in 5-year disease-free survival rate between the groups, but 5-year overall survival rate was 100% in the CME group and 89.49% in the non-CME group (P < 0.05).

Laparoscopic RHC with CME is safe and associated with better 5-year overall survival rate than non-CME for patients with stage I-III right-sided colon cancer. Implementation of CME surgery might improve oncological outcomes for patients with right-sided colon cancer.

There is no standard consensus for the ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery during radical resection of sigmoid colon cancer. Especially, there is little research about low ligation combined with D3 dissection. The study was performed to compare feasibility and oncologic safety between low ligation with D3 dissection to high ligation in intermediately advanced sigmoid colon cancer.

From January 2008 to December 2013, 134 patients who underwent radical surgery for cT3N0M0 sigmoid colon cancer were evaluated retrospectively. Clinicopathologic factors and oncologic outcomes of high ligation (HL, n = 51) and low ligation (LL, n = 83) groups were compared.

The mean operative time was significantly shorter in LL, and there was no difference in complications, distal margin or number of retrieved lymph node. The tumor size was significantly larger in HL, but there was no difference in number of metastatic lymph node, pT or pN stage. There was no difference in overall survival, disease-free survival, or local and systemic recurrence.

In cT3N0M0 sigmoid colon cancers, we suggest that low ligation with D3 dissection can be performed with feasibility and oncological safety.

Extra-anastomotic intraluminal recurrence of the colon cancer after curative surgery was rarely reported but intraluminal ileal relapse has not been described to date.We report a case of intraluminal ileal tumor arising after curative right hemicolectomy that could be ascribed to an implantation of exfoliated cancer cells.

A 71-years old man was admitted with no metastatic stenotic adenocarcinoma of the hepatic flexure and submitted, without preoperative bowel preparation, to right hemicolectomy using a "no-touch" technique. Histology showed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma without lymph nodes involvement (pT3N0). No adjuvant therapy was prescribed. First colonoscopy three months after surgery was negative but a second endoscopic examination nine months later revealed an ileal neoplasia, presenting like an ulcer 10 cm proximally to ileocolic anastomosis. A new ileo-colic resection including past anastomosis was performed with curative intent. Pathological examination showed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma extended to peri-visceral fat tissue with 10 tumor-free lymph nodes. (pT3N0). Six courses of Capecitabine adjuvant chemotherapy was prescribed and 32 months after second surgery, the patient is alive without disease.

In the present case, the relatively short time from the primary surgery and the fact that recurrence occurred outside the anastomosis suggest that implantation of exfoliated malignant cells seems to be the main pathogenetic mechanism. We suppose that the high grade of primary cancer and the occlusive condition could have promoted the cancer cells reflux through the ileocecal orifice and in the transverse colon.

This case seems to confirm the intraluminal implanting capacity of exfoliated carcinoma cells.

The decision of ligation at the origin of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) or below the origin of the left colic artery (LCA) has remained a dilemma for surgeons in colorectal cancer surgery. The available studies are controversial. The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare the predictive significance of high versus low ligation in colorectal cancer surgery.

A literature search done using Medline, EMBASE, GoogleScholar, and references. A meta-analysis was performed to analyze the 5-year overall survival (OS) of the high and low ligation using hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We further analyzed 2 subgroups considering the level of lymph nodes (LNs) extension. That is IMA positive (+ve) and negative (-ve) LNs. Survival differences were analyzed.

A total of 3119 patients in 5 cohorts were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled HR results showed significant OS benefit of high ligation than low ligation (HR; 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66-0.89) in the "IMA +ve" group with 33% decreased risk, while there is no statistical significance in the "IMA -ve" (HR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.30-1.46) and the "all cases" group (HR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.41-1.15).

The pooled data showed high ligation of IMA has a better survival benefit for the patients with IMA positive LNs. It signifies high ligation should be recommended for the advanced cases or with the suspected high risk of IMA lymphatic metastasis. The limited number of articles demands future high-powered, well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the further reliable conclusion.

Level of proximal lymphovascular ligation remains controversial in carcinoma rectum. High-tie inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) claims better lymph node clearance; low-tie IMA minimizes autonomic nerve injury (ANI) and ensures vascularity to anastomosis. Objective of this study is to compare postsurgical complications and oncological clearance in laparoscopic rectal resection (LRR) and open rectal resection (ORR) for carcinoma rectum, with low-tie IMA and selective D3 lymphadenectomy.

Retrospective analysis was done comparing LRR and ORR done with low-tie IMA for carcinoma rectum/rectosigmoid for significant differences (P<0.05) regarding postsurgical complications and histopathology parameters.

A total of 118 patients; 48 in LRR group and 70 in ORR group were studied. They were comparable in age, site of lesion and clinical TNM (cTNM) stage. Comorbidities and symptoms requiring upfront surgery were more among ORR. 75% LRR and 55.3% ORR had neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT). Duration of surgery was longer in LRR. Clavien-Dindo grade >3 was similar in two groups. Histopathology characteristics were also comparable; including specimen length, lymph node yield, length of distal margin and pathologic TNM (pTNM) stage. Selective D3 lymphadenectomy was done in 37.5% LRR and 37.14% ORR. And 4.16% in LRR and 4.28% in ORR were had positive IMA root lymph nodes.

The post-surgical complications and oncological clearance of LRR done with low-tie IMA and selective D3 lymphadenectomy were found equivalent to ORR. Low-tie IMA without routine splenic flexure mobilisation had no technical issues regarding the anastomosis.

To assess the clinical significance of preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in comparison with IMA ligation in surgery for sigmoid colon or rectal (colorectal) cancer.

Consecutive patients (n=862) with colorectal cancer who underwent intended surgical resection of the main tumor between 1986 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: IMA preserved (n=745) and IMA ligated (n=117).

No significant difference was observed in incidence of advanced stage III or IV disease between the 2 groups (P=0.56 and 0.51, respectively), whereas a longer operation time (287 [95 to 700] vs. 215 [60 to 900] min, respectively; P<0.001) and greater amount of intraoperative bleeding (595 [15 to 4530] vs. 235 [1 to 11565] mL, respectively; P<0.001) were observed in the IMA-ligated group. The overall incidence of surgery-related complications was higher in the IMA-ligated group than in the IMA-preserved group (53.0% vs. 38.5%, respectively; P=0.003). Urinary dysfunction and abdominal abscess were significantly more frequent in the IMA-ligated group (11.1% vs. 4.0%, P=0.001; and 6.8% vs. 2.6%, P=0.01, respectively), and postoperative hospitalization was longer (11 to 140, median 28 vs. 5 to 153, median 19 d, respectively; P<0.001). No significant difference was found in overall survival rate between the 2 groups.

For colorectal cancer resection, IMA preservation may be no change to IMA ligation as to patient' survival, with small risk of operative morbidity.

To compares the effectiveness and impact of high inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) versus low IMA ligation on 5-year survival, lymph node yield rates, and peri-operative morbidity and mortality. 

The databases of Educational Resources Information Centre (ERIC), the Web of Science, EBSCO and MEDLINE were searched using MeSH terms 'colorectal cancer', 'inferior mesenteric artery', 'high ligation', 'low ligation', 'mesenteric lymph nodes', 'prognosis', and 'survival'. Only clinical studies were selected and review articles and meta-analysis were excluded. In cases of duplicate cohorts, only the latest article was included. Irrelevant articles and the articles on both right and left sided CRC were excluded. The finally selected studies were analysed for the defined end-point outcomes. 

The published data has shown that high IMA ligation improves the yield of harvested lymph node that allows accurate tumor staging and a more reliable estimation of prognosis. High ligation was not found to be positively correlated with increased anastomotic leakage or impaired genito-urinary function. However, high ligation demands advanced surgical expertise and longer operating time. There was no significant difference in 5-year survival rates for both techniques. Some studies have reported fatal complications of high ligation such as proximal bowel necrosis.  

Although there is no consensus, this research signals the routine use of high ligation for left-sided CRC. However, the published fatal complications following high ligation and no significant difference in 5-year survival rates demand more studies to establishing a unified protocol.

We aimed to present the factors associated with lymph node harvest (LNH) and seek whether surgical quality control measures can improve LNH.

From a prospectively collected data at a single institution, 874 CRC patients who underwent curative surgery between 2004 and 2013 were included. Factor and survival analyses were performed regarding LNH. Subgroup analysis was performed according to LNH group (LNH ≥ 12 vs LNH < 12) and year of surgery (2004-2008, 2009-2011, and 2012-2013 group).

In the multivariate analysis, tumor location (OR 0.6, p < 0.001), stage (OR 1.95, p < 0.001), and year of surgery (OR 3.86, p < 0.001) showed an association with adequate LNH. In the subgroup analysis categorized by the year of surgery, surgical quality control measures by standardized laparoscopic surgery (OR 52.91, p < 0.001) showed notable association with adequate LNH. Comparing the 2009-2011 and 2012-2013 group, the national quality assessment program additionally improved adequate LNH percentage (83.9 vs 94.3%). In the survival analysis, disease-free survival (DFS) differed according to year of surgery, standardized laparoscopic surgery with high vascular ligation, and adequate LNH by stage. In the overall survival (OS) analysis, the LNH-related factors did not show significant difference.

Through standardized laparoscopic surgery with high vascular ligation and national quality assessment program, surgical quality control had a positive impact on the increase of adequate LNH. Improving the modifiable LNH factors resulted in the enhancement of adequate LNH and related DFS.

This study aimed to investigate in a multicenter cohort study the radicality of colorectal cancer resections, to assess the oncosurgical quality of colorectal specimens, and to compare the performance between centers.

One German and nine Swiss hospitals agreed to prospectively register all patients with primary colorectal cancer resected between September 2001 and June 2005. The median number of eligible patients with one primary tumor included per center was 95 (range 12-204).

The following variations of median values or percentages between centers were found: length of bowel specimen 20-39 cm (25.8 cm), maximum height of mesocolon 6.5-12.5 cm (9.0 cm), number of examined lymph nodes 9-24 (16), distance to nearer bowel resection margin in colon cancer 4.8-12 cm (7 cm), and in rectal cancer 2-3 cm (2.5 cm), central ligation of major artery 40-97 % (71 %), blood loss 200-500 ml (300 ml), need for perioperative blood transfusion 5-40 % (19 %), tumor opened during mobilization 0-11 % (5 %), T4-tumors not en-bloc resected 0-33 % (4 %), inadvertent perforation of mesocolon/mesorectum 0-8 % (4 %), no-touch isolation technique 36-86 % (67 %), abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer 0-30 % (17 %), rectal cancer specimen with circumferential margin ≤1 mm 0-19 % (10 %), in-hospital mortality 0-6 % (2 %), anastomotic leak or intra-abdominal abscess 0-17 % (7 %), re-operation 0-17 % (8 %).

In colorectal cancer, surgery considerable variations between different centers were found with regard to radicality and oncosurgical quality, suggesting a potential for targeted improvement of surgical technique.

To assess the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) on inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) nodal metastasis and identify predictors for IMA nodal metastasis in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after nCRT.

Propensity score matching of 1167 patients with LARC was performed. Clinicopathological predictors and survival rates were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Compared to surgery alone, nCRT reduced the incidence of IMA nodal metastasis (before matching, 4.8% vs 9.1%, p = 0.004; after matching, 4.3% vs 10.1%, p = 0.002). Logistic regression analysis revealed that poorly differentiated (OR = 5.955, p < 0.001), tumors located above the peritoneal reflection (OR = 3.513, p = 0.005), and preoperative CEA levels ≧10 ng/ml (OR = 4.774, p = 0.005) were associated with IMA nodal metastasis. Time intervals to surgery ≧6 weeks were associated with fewer IMA nodal metastasis (OR = 0.274, p = 0.009).Over a median 40-month follow-up, the 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 63.0% and 43.1% in IMA-positive patients, respectively, which were significantly lower than the corresponding 89.0% and 82.4% rates in IMA-negative patients. Cox regression analysis revealed that IMA nodal metastasis was independently associated with unfavorable 3-year DFS.

nCRT reduced the incidence of IMA node metastasis. Tumors located above the peritoneal reflection, poorly differentiated, and higher preoperative CEA levels were associated with IMA nodal metastasis after nCRT. IMA lymph node dissection is beneficial to certain patients with IMA nodal metastases, and the oncologic benefit may be improved if IMA nodal metastasis can be predicted.

In an effort to optimize further the surgical management of colon cancer, many groups have advocated extended lymphadenectomy as a strategy to improve completeness of resection and lymph node harvest. This review evaluates lymphadenectomy according to the definitions for extent of lymph node dissection based on the guidelines provided by the Japanese Society of Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and the contemporary concepts of complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation. The proposed benefits of a D3 or central nodal dissection along root vessels in colon cancer is improving accuracy of lymph node evaluation and ensuring complete removal of lymph nodes that may harbor undetected tumor cells or other undefined immunologic processes important for metastases. Metastasis to central lymph nodes occurs in 1 to 8% of patients with colon cancer and is most commonly seen in T3 and T4 tumors. Although central lymph node metastasis is associated with decreased survival after resection, resection of the nodes, when present, may confer a survival benefit analogous to resection of metastasis at distant sites. Current data support a standardized anatomic approach to colonic resection with complete resection of the mesocolic envelope and ligation at least to the D2 level.

Colon cancers in male and female patients are suggested to be oncologically different. The aim of this study is to elucidate the prognostic impact of lymph node dissection (LND) in male and female colon cancer patients.

A total of 5941 stage I-III colon cancer patients who were curatively operated on during the period from 1997 to 2007 were retrospectively studied. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was individually compared between for male and female patients treated with D3, D2, and D1 LND. Background differences of the patients were matched using propensity scores.

D3, D2, and D1 LND were performed in 3756 (63 %), 1707 (29 %), and 478 (8 %), respectively, and more extensive LND was indicated for younger patients and more advanced disease. D2 LND was significantly associated with decreased cancer-specific mortality compared to D1 LND in male patients (HR 0.54, 95 % CI 0.32-0.89, p = 0.04), but not in female patients. D3 LND did not correlate to an improved prognosis compared to D2 LND both in male and female patients.

D2 LND was associated with an improved CSS in male, but not female colon cancer patients, compared to D1 LND. This suggested that colon cancer in male and female patients might be oncologically different, and that the prognostic impact of the extent of surgical intervention for colon cancer might therefore be different between sexes.

Low-tie ligation in colorectal cancer surgery is associated with technical difficulties in left colic artery preservation. We aimed to evaluate and classify the anatomical and technical difficulties of left colic artery (LCA) preservation at its origin and along its route at the inferior border of the pancreas.

A vascular reconstruction computed tomography prospective series of 113 patients was analyzed. The inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) branching pattern according to Latarjet's classification (Type I, separate LCA origin, Type II, fan-shaped branching pattern) and the distances between the IMA and the LCA origins and between the LCA and the Inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) at the inferior border of the pancreas were measured.

The IMA branching pattern was Type I in 80 (71 %) patients and Type II in 33 (29 %) patients. The IMA-LCA distance was 39.8 ± 12.2 mm. The LCA-IMV distance at the inferior border of the pancreas was 20.5 ± 21.7 mm. When classified based on this distance, 75 (66 %) patients were classified into the Near subgroup (<20 mm) (7.7 ± 4.1 mm) and 38 (34 %) into the Far subgroup (≥20 mm) (45.6 ± 20.4 mm, p < 0.001). A Type I subgroup F accounted for 27 % of the patients.

Left colic artery preservation is highly feasible at its origin in more than two-thirds of cases due to the separate origin. The addition of a high IMV ligation increases the risk of damage to the LCA at the inferior border of the pancreas because the distance to the IMV is less than 20 mm in two-thirds of cases.

The optimal extent of lymph node dissection for early-stage colon cancer (CC) remains undefined. This study assessed the influence of the extent of lymph node dissection on overall survival (OS) in patients with pT2 CC.

We retrospectively examined data from the multi-institutional registry system of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum and used a propensity score matching method to balance potential confounders of lymph node dissection. We extracted 463 matched pairs from 1433 patients who underwent major resections for pT2 CC between 1995 and 2004.

Lymph node metastasis was found in 301 (21.0%) of 1433 patients with pT2 CC. In this cohort, significant independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis were lymphatic invasion and venous invasion. Patients who underwent D3 or D2 lymph node dissection did not significantly differ in OS, either among the propensity score-matched cohort (estimated hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.536-1.346, P = 0.484) or in the cohort as a whole (HR 0.720, 95% CI 0.492-1.052, P = 0.089).

For patients with pT2 CC, D3 lymph node dissection did not add to OS. D2 lymph node dissection may be adequate for pT2 CC.

High morbidity rates related to anastomotic leakage and other factors restrict the application of laparoscopic rectal excision. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of left colonic artery (LCA) preservation on postoperative complications after laparoscopic rectal excision.

Data from 888 patients from 28 leading hospitals in Japan who underwent laparoscopic-assisted sphincter-preserving resection of middle and low rectal cancers between 1994 and 2006 were analyzed. The effects of LCA preservation were analyzed among all anterior resection (AR) cases (n = 888) and among AR cases with radical lymph node excision (n = 411).

Among all AR cases, the tumor size, number of lymph nodes collected with evidence of metastasis, TNM factor, and TNM staging were smaller in the LCA preservation group. Regarding complications, the rate of anastomotic leak was significantly higher in the LCA non-preservation group among all AR cases, as well as among AR cases with radical lymph node excision. Nevertheless, there was no difference in survival rate between LCA preservation group and non-preservation group, as measured by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Our data suggest that the preservation of the LCA in laparoscopic AR for middle and low rectal cancer is associated with lower anastomotic leak rates.

Several studies have suggested an increased lymph node yield, reduced locoregional recurrence and increased disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision (CME) for colorectal cancer. This review was undertaken to assess the use of CME for colon cancer by evaluating the technique and its clinical outcome.

A literature search of publications was performed using PubMed and Medline. Only studies published in English were included. Studies assessed for quality and data were extracted by two independent reviewers. End-points included number of lymph nodes per patient, quality of the plane of mesocolic excision, postoperative mortality and morbidity, 5-year locoregional recurrence and 5-year cancer-specific survival.

There were 34 articles comprising 12 retrospective studies, nine prospective studies and 13 original articles including case series, observational studies and editorials. Of the prospective studies, four reported an increased lymph node harvest and a survival benefit. The others reported an improvement in the quality of the specimen as assessed by histopathological examination. Laparoscopic CME has the same oncological outcome as open surgery but completeness of excision during laparoscopy may be compromised for tumours in the transverse colon.

Studies demonstrate that CME removes significantly more tissue around the tumour including maximal lymph node clearance. There is little information on serious adverse events after CME and a long-term survival benefit has not been proved.

During surgery for colorectal cancer, the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) may be ligated either directly at the origin of the IMA from the aorta (high ligation) or at a point just below the origin of the left colic artery (low ligation). Sixty patients of left colonic and rectal cancer undergoing elective curative surgery in 2007 and 2008 were selected for this observational study. The resected lymph nodes were grouped into three levels: along the bowel wall (D1), along IMA below left colic (D2), and along the IMA and its root (D3). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 20.0. D2 level was involved pathologically in 20 (33.3 %) and D3 in six out of 44 (13.6 %) patients. The median nodal yield with high and low ligation were 33 and 25, respectively (p = 0.048). Median overall survival for high ligation was 62 months versus 42 months for low ligation (p = 0.190). High ligation of the IMA for rectal and left colonic cancers can improve lymph node yield, thus facilitating accurate tumor staging and thus better disease prognostication, but the survival benefit is not significant.

Over recent years there has been a new focus on the quality of colon cancer surgery following the description and introduction of complete mesocolic excision (CME). In the same period, laparoscopic surgery has been widely applied to the treatment of colon cancer. We aimed to evaluate the introduction of both CME and laparoscopic-assisted surgery at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark between 2008 and 2011. Secondly we aimed to evaluate the impact on the quality of surgery of post-operative team meetings where pathologists demonstrated the plane of surgery on the specimens.

A series of 209 consecutive and prospectively collected colon cancer specimens were evaluated by assessing the plane of surgery and measuring the amount of tissue resected. Multivariate analyses were used to control for influencing factors.

The proportion of specimens resected in the mesocolic plane was high and increased significantly following the introduction of post-operative team meetings (52%-76%, p = 0.02). Laparoscopic surgery enhanced the distance between the tumour and the arterial tie by a mean of 27 mm (p < 0.0001) and the distance between the nearest bowel wall and the arterial tie by 26 mm (p < 0.0001) when compared to an open approach. Factors such as body mass index and age influenced the outcome for surgical quality.

Implementation of CME and laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colon cancer is a challenge and requires continuous training and feedback. Post-operative multidisciplinary team meetings may be a key element in this process.

Retrospective studies have shown that primary tumor resection improves the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer with unresectable metastasis (mCRC). Prognostic significance of lymph node dissection (LND) in mCRC has not been examined previously. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of primary tumor resection and LND in mCRC.

A total of 1,982 patients with mCRC from January 1997 to December 2007 were retrospectively studied. The impact of primary tumor resection and LND on overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards model and propensity score analysis to mitigate the selection bias. Covariates in the models for propensity scores included treatment period, institution, age, sex, carcinoembryonic antigen, tumor location, histology, depth, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, and number of metastatic organs.

In a multivariate analysis, primary tumor resection and treatment in the latter period were associated with an improved OS, and age over 70 years, female sex, lymph node metastasis, and multiple organ metastasis were associated with a decreased OS. In the propensity-matched cohort, patients treated with primary tumor resection showed a significantly better OS than those without tumor resection (median OS 13.8 vs. 6.3 months; p = 0.0001). Furthermore, among patients treated with primary tumor resection, patients treated with D3 LND showed a significantly better OS than those with less extensive LND (median OS 17.2 vs. 13.7 months; p < 0.0001).

It was suggested that primary tumor resection with D3 LND improves the survival of patients with mCRC.

In rectal cancer surgery, it is unclear whether the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) should be ligated as high as possible, at its origin, or low, below the origin of the left colic artery. We reviewed all relevant articles identified from MEDLINE databases and found that despite a trend of improved survival among patients who underwent high ligation, there is no conclusive evidence to support this. High ligation of the IMA is beneficial in that it allows for en bloc dissection of the node metastases at and around the origin of the IMA, while enabling anastomosis to be performed in the pelvis, without tension, at the time of low anterior resection. High ligation of the IMA does not represent a source of increased anastomotic leak in rectal cancer surgery and postoperative quality of life is improved by preserving the hypogastric nerve without compromising the radicality of the operation. More importantly, high ligation of the IMA improves node harvest, enabling accurate tumor staging. Although the prognosis of patients with node metastases at and around the origin of the IMA is poor, the survival rate of patients with rectal cancer may be improved by performing high ligation of the IMA combined with neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy.

Nowadays left colon and rectal cancer treatment has been well standardized in both open and laparoscopy. Nevertheless, the level of the ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), at the origin from the aorta (high tie) or below the origin of the left colic artery (low tie), is still debated. The objective of the systematic review is to evaluate the current scientific evidence of high versus low tie of the IMA in colorectal cancer surgery. The outcomes considered were overall 30-days postoperative morbidity, overall 30-days postoperative mortality, anastomotic leakage, 5-years survival rate, and overall recurrence rate. A total of 8.666 patients were included in our analysis, 4.281 forming the group undergoing high tie versus 4.385 patients undergoing low tie. Neither the high tie nor the low tie strategy showed an evidence based success, as no statistically significant differences were identified for all outcomes measured. Future high powered and well designed randomized clinical trials are needed to draw definitive conclusion on this dilemma.

Over recent years, patient outcomes after colon cancer resection have not improved to the same degree as for rectal cancer. Japanese D3 resection and European complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) are both based on sound oncologic principles. Expert surgeons using both techniques report impressive outcomes as compared with standard surgery. We aimed to independently compare the physical appearances and quality of specimens resected using both techniques in major institutions in Japan and Germany.

A series of resections for primary colon cancer from one European and two Japanese centers were independently assessed in terms of the plane of surgery, physical characteristics, and lymph node yields.

Mesocolic plane resection rates from both series were high; however, Japanese D3 specimens were significantly shorter (162 v 324 mm, P < .001), resulting in a smaller amount of mesentery (8,309 v 17,957 mm(2), P < .001) and nodal yield (median, 18 v 32, P < .001). The distance from the high vascular tie to the bowel wall (100 v 99 mm, P = .605) was equivalent.

Both techniques showed high mesocolic plane resection rates and long distances between the high tie and the bowel wall. The extended longitudinal resection after CME with CVL increased the nodal yield but did not increase the number of tumor involved nodes. Both series were oncologically superior to recently reported series from other countries and confirm the wide variation in colonic cancer surgery and the need for further standardization and optimization following the approach undertaken in improving rectal cancer outcomes.

This study evaluated the prognostic significance of the distribution of lymph node metastases (LND) in patients with colorectal cancer.

The impact of the LND on survival in colorectal cancer is unknown.

A total of 1205 consecutive patients who underwent potentially curative surgery for sigmoid colon or rectal cancer with high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) from January 1997 to February 2008 were assigned to 4 groups based on LND: LND0, no lymph node metastases-615 patients (51.0%); LND1, metastases in the pericolic nodes-324 patients (26.9%); LND2, metastases in the intermediate nodes-172 patients (14.3%); and LND3, node metastases at the origin of the IMA-94 patients (7.8%).

The 5-year overall survival rates of patients with LND0, LND1, LND2, and LND3 were 83%, 63%, 52%, and 28%, respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival rates of patients with LND0, LND1, LND2, and LND3 were 83%, 54%, 43%, and 21%, respectively (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, LND was an independent prognostic factor for both overall survival and disease-free survival. However, the 5-year local recurrence-free survival rate was not inversely related to the LND. On a subset analysis that compared stage III disease with stage IV disease, the 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 45% and 31% for the patients with stage IV disease compared with 40% and 32% for the patients with stage III, LND3 disease, respectively (P = 0.761 and 0.704). For the patients with pN1 tumors, the overall survival and disease-free survival did not differ significantly according to the LND (P = 0.471 and 0.347, respectively). However, for patients with pN2 tumors, the overall survival and disease-free survival curves among the LND groups significantly differed (P < 0.001 and <0.001, respectively).

LND is an independent predictor of survival for colorectal cancer patients, but it does not predict local recurrence. The N categorization including LND may enhance the prognostic value of the TNM staging system for patients with node-positive sigmoid colon or rectal cancer.

The prognostic significance of apical-node metastasis around the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) remains unclear. We investigated the oncological relevance of apical-node metastasis detected after high ligation of the IMA in stage III sigmoid colon or rectal cancer.

Between May 2003 and December 2007, 229 consecutive patients with stage III sigmoid colon or rectal cancer, who had undergone curative resection with high ligation, were analyzed. Cox proportional regression model was used to identify the prognostic factors for disease-free survival.

Thirty-one patients (13.5%) had apical-node metastases: 0% with T0-1, 3.8% with T2, 11.5% with T3, and 29.3% with T4 disease (p = 0.017). Additionally, the factors related to apical-node metastasis were tumor size, number of metastatic lymph nodes, lymph-node ratio, and N-stage. Multivariate analysis showed that the lymph-node ratio (odds ratio (OR) = 40.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 8.41-195.22, p < 0.001) was an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival but that apical-node metastasis was not a factor that predicted a poor outcome (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.81-2.91, p = 0.192). Apical-node metastasis was not a prognostic factor for disease-free survival on multivariate analysis of the subgroups based on tumor location (sigmoid colon cancer: OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 0.42-1.82, p = 0.577; rectal cancer: OR = 1.82, 95% CI = 0.82-4.06, p = 0.141).

This study suggests that apical-node metastasis is not a poor prognostic factor for stage III sigmoid colon or rectal cancer after high ligation.

The present study aims to define the prognostic impact of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with stage III distal rectal cancer.

We analyzed data from 501 patients who underwent curative resection (total mesorectal excision, TME) for stage III distal rectal cancer at 12 institutions between 1991 and 1998. Patients were divided into four groups according to quartiles based on LNR.

Among the 501 patients, 381 underwent TME with pelvic sidewall dissection (PSD). The median numbers of lymph nodes retrieved with and without PSD were 45 and 17, respectively (P < 0.0001). Forty-nine patients with lymph node retrieved less than 12 were excluded from further analyses. Among various clinicopathological parameters, univariate analysis identified age (P = 0.0059), histological grade (P < 0.0001), depth of tumor invasion (P = 0.0003), and number of positive nodes (P < 0.0001) and LNR (P < 0.0001) as prognostic factors. The Cox proportional hazards model revealed that age (P = 0.014), histological grade (P < 0.0001), depth of tumor invasion (P = 0.0002), and LNR (group 3, P = 0.0012; group 4, P < 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors. When the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) seventh staging system was added as a covariate, both AJCC stage (P < 0.0001) and LNR (P < 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors.

Adding the LNR concept to the AJCC cancer staging system will improve accuracy in evaluating the nodal status of distal rectal cancer.

Recent evidence has demonstrated the importance of dissection in the correct tissue plane for the resection of colon cancer. We have previously shown that meticulous mesocolic plane surgery yields better outcomes and that the addition of central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard techniques. We aimed to assess the effect of surgical education on the oncological quality of the resection specimen produced.

We received clinicopathological data and specimen photographs from 263 resections for primary colon cancer from 6 hospitals in the Capital and Zealand regions of Denmark before a national training program. Ninety-three cases were from Hillerød Hospital, where surgeons had previously implemented a surgical educational training program in complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation and adopted the procedure as standard practice. The specimen photographs were assessed for the plane of surgery and tissue morphometry was performed.

Hillerød specimens had a higher rate of mesocolic plane surgery (75% vs 48%; P < .0001) compared with the other hospitals. The surgeons at Hillerød Hospital also removed a greater length of colon in both fresh (median, 315 vs 247 mm; P < .0001) and fixed (269 vs 207 mm; P < .0001) specimens with a greater distance between the tumor and the closest vascular tie in both fresh (105 vs 84 mm; P = .006) and fixed (82 vs 67 mm; P = .002) specimens. This resulted in the removal of more mesentery in both fresh (14,466 vs 8706 mm; P < .0001) and fixed (9418 vs 6789 mm; P < .0001) specimens and a greater median lymph node yield (28 vs 18; P < .0001).

We have shown that adoption of complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation results in a change to the production of an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard techniques. This should improve outcomes toward those reported by centers that have long practiced meticulous colon cancer surgery.

What level of arterial ligation is best in left-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer remains controversial. This study aims to assess the necessity and risk of high ligation from an oncological and technical perspective.

The lymph nodes at the origin of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) were separated as apical nodes in all patients operated for distal colorectal cancer in our department. The number and status of the nodes were prospectively assessed, and demographic and tumor-related variables were evaluated as risk factors for apical tumor invasion. Anastomotic leaks were also evaluated.

A hundred and three patients (52 [50.5%] males, 60.3+/-12.9 years old) were included. The number of non-apical lymph nodes harvested was 14.5+/-7.1 with an additional 4.4+/-3.2 apical nodes at the high ligation site. Tumor invasion of apical nodes was observed in 6 (5.8%) patients. Two of these (1.9%) had no other positive nodes (skip metastases). Although none of the variables evaluated was found significant for predicting apical node positivity, tumor invasion was detected in 8.5 and 22.2% of patients with pT3 and pN2 cancers, respectively. Among patients, who had an anastomosis (n = 84, 81.6%), anastomotic leak was observed in 7(8.3%) and 1 (1.2%) of these patients required emergency relaparotomy. There was no mortality related to high ligation.

High ligation of IMA may be routinely performed in patients with distal colorectal cancer, since tumor invasion of apical lymph nodes is neither rare (>5%) nor predictable, and skip metastases may also occur. This is especially true in case of an advanced disease for which apical node positivity peaks. The anastomotic leak rate is less than 10%, and mortality is low after high ligation of IMA.

The aim of this study is to compare pathological findings in rectal cancer specimens obtained by laparoscopy or laparotomy.

Bowel length, distal and circumferential margins, and number of total and positive nodes harvested were prospectively recorded in specimens obtained from 100 consecutive patients who had a laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for cancer. These data were compared with those extracted from a well-matched group of 100 patients who had an open procedure.

The mean length of the specimens was 31.04 cm in the case group and 29.45 cm in the control group (not significant (NS)). All distal margins in both groups were negative. The circumferential margin was positive in four cases in the case group and nine cases in the control group (NS). The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 13.76 nodes/patient in the case group and 12.74 nodes/patient in the control group (NS). The mean number of involved lymph nodes was 1.18 node/case in the case group and 1.96 node/case in group 2 (NS).

There is no difference between laparoscopic or open approaches concerning specimen's length, distal margin, circumferential margin, and total and positive lymph nodes. Laparoscopic rectal resection is not only technically feasible but it seems also oncologically safe.