Zhao LY, Liu XT, Zhao ZL, Gu R, Ni XM, Deng R, Li XY, Gao MJ, Zhu WN. Effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery in the perioperative management of patients with bone surgery in China.
World J Clin Cases 2021;
9:10151-10160. [PMID:
34904085 PMCID:
PMC8638060 DOI:
10.12998/wjcc.v9.i33.10151]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) was introduced in China in 2007. Over time, the scope of ERAS has expanded from abdominal surgery to orthopedics, urology and other fields. Continuous development and research has contributed to progress of ERAS in China. In 2019, to promote the application of ERAS in bone tumor surgery, we formed the “Consensus of Experts on Perioperative Management of Accelerated Rehabilitation in Major Surgery of Bone Tumors in China”.
AIM
To evaluate the effect of enhanced recovery after bone tumor surgery in perioperative management in China.
METHODS
One hundred and seven patients who underwent bone tumor surgery at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University between May 2019 and April 2021 were randomized into a study group (53 cases) and a control group (54 cases). The study group adopted the ERAS protocol and the control group adopted conventional care. Main outcome measures included postoperative length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, mortality, and 30-d readmission rates. Secondary outcomes included postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score of pain, number of blood transfusions, drainage volume in 24 h after operation, patient satisfaction 30 d after discharge, VAS score at 30 d after discharge, and daily standing walking time.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences in the baseline data, clinical features and surgical site between the two groups. The LOS in the study group with the ERAS protocol was 7.72 ± 3.34 d compared with 10.28 ± 4.27 d in the control group who followed conventional care. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in the study group was 19% and 37% in the control group. The VAS scores of pain on postoperative day 1 (POD1) and POD3 in the study group were 4.79 ± 2.34 and 2.79 ± 1.53 compared with 5.28 ± 3.27 and 3.98 ± 2.27 in the control group. The drainage volume in 24 h after the operation was 124.36 ± 23.43 mL in the study group and 167.43 ± 30.87 mL in the control group. The number of blood transfusions in the study group was also lower. The patient satisfaction rate was higher in the study group than in the control group.
CONCLUSION
The ERAS protocol in the perioperative period of bone tumor surgery can decrease LOS, PONV, and postoperative pain, blood transfusion and 24-h drainage, improve patient satisfaction and accelerate recovery.
Collapse