Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Methodol. Dec 26, 2017; 7(4): 139-147
Published online Dec 26, 2017. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v7.i4.139
Published online Dec 26, 2017. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v7.i4.139
Figure 2 A phantom was used to evaluate the accuracy of the methods used to quantify the surgical pyramid.
Three funnels were positioned inside a radiotherapy mesh plastic mask to simulate a total of five different surgical approaches: Small funnel, simulating a narrow and short approach; medium funnel (asterisk), simulating two different approaches, with the same superficial area and different deep areas, at distinctive distances from the surface; large funnel, simulating two approaches, with the same superficial area and different deep areas, at the same distance. Round, one-millimeter metallic markers were positioned over the mask as reference points for neuronavigation registration (black arrow). A reference frame (white arrow) was attached to allow the use of navigation systems (see text for further details).
- Citation: Doglietto F, Qiu J, Ravichandiran M, Radovanovic I, Belotti F, Agur A, Zadeh G, Fontanella MM, Kucharczyk W, Gentili F. Quantitative comparison of cranial approaches in the anatomy laboratory: A neuronavigation based research method. World J Methodol 2017; 7(4): 139-147
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v7/i4/139.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v7.i4.139