Toli A, Perente A, Labiris G. Evaluation of the red reflex: An overview for the pediatrician.
World J Methodol 2021;
11:263-277. [PMID:
34631483 PMCID:
PMC8472546 DOI:
10.5662/wjm.v11.i5.263]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Red reflex test (RRT) is a simple, non-invasive method that can be performed easily by pediatricians during the clinical examination in neonatal period, infancy and childhood. Abnormal reflexes can lead to prompt diagnosis of several ocular disorders, with potentially severe consequences on patient's vision, cognitive function and even life.
AIM
To underline the contribution of pediatricians to early detection of vision and life threatening diseases by using RRT effectively.
METHODS
For the present systematic review, PubMed searches were performed using the key words "red reflex and newborn"; "red reflex and neonate"; "red reflex and complications"; "red reflex and necessity"; "red reflex and retinoblastoma"; "red reflex and congenital cataract"; "red reflex and glaucoma"; "red reflex and prematurity"; "red reflex and leukocoria"; "red reflex and blindness"; "red reflex sensitivity and specificity"; "red reflex and differential diagnosis"; "red reflex and guidelines". The relevant articles were selected without language restrictions. When a full-text publication was not available, their English abstracts were used. In some cases, studies from the reference lists of the selected articles provided useful information. The research took place in September 2020, in the Ophthalmology Department of University Hospital of Alexandroupolis.
RESULTS
A total of 45 articles were selected according to the used key words. After reviewing data from these articles, it is supported that red reflex remains an effective tool of undeniable importance for early detection of severe eye conditions, such as cataract, retinoblastoma, retinopathy of prematurity and glaucoma. Although literature reports some limitations of RRT, including a notable percentage of false positive tests, the inability to detect small, peripheral retinoblastomas and the lower sensitivity for posterior segment pathology, it is widely accepted that the benefits from the regular evaluation of the test on public health are significant. Therefore, RRT has been established by international guidelines and should be an essential component of pediatricians clinical practice. Red reflex implementation should be incorporated in pediatricians educational programs, so that they would be able to provide quality services and safe diagnoses.
CONCLUSION
The implementation of RRT should be encouraged in all neonatal/pediatric departments. Prompt education of pediatricians should be empowered in order to achieve careful vision screening, according to current guidelines.
Collapse