Portable and flexible administration of manual dexterity assessments is necessary to monitor recovery from brain injury and the effects of interventions across clinic and home settings, especially when in-person testing is not possible or convenient. This paper aims to assess the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of a new suite of touchscreen-based manual dexterity tests (called EDNA™MoTap) that are designed for portable and efficient administration. A minimum sample of 49 healthy young adults will be conveniently recruited. The EDNA™MoTap tasks will be assessed for concurrent validity against standardized tools (the Box and Block Test [BBT] and the Purdue Pegboard Test) and for test-retest reliability over a 1- to 2-week interval. Correlation coefficients of r > .6 will indicate acceptable validity, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values > .75 will indicate acceptable reliability for healthy adults. The sample were primarily right-handed (91%) adults aged 19 and 34 years (M = 24.93, SD = 4.21, 50% female). The MoTap tasks did not demonstrate acceptable validity, with tasks showing weak-to-moderate associations with the criterion assessments. Some outcomes demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability; however, this was not consistent. Touchscreen-based assessments of dexterity remain relevant; however, there is a need for further development of the EDNA™MoTap task administration.

Stroke remains a significant global concern, particularly as populations age and the incidence of stroke rises. Approximately one third of stroke survivors experience loss of autonomy, often leading to a decreased participation in rehabilitation due to economic, emotional, and social barriers. In response to these challenges, this study introduces PACTUS, an innovative gamified device designed for the rehabilitation of cognitive and motor functions in the upper limbs of patients with post-stroke. PACTUS aims to improve patient motivation and enable precise monitoring of rehabilitation progress by both therapists and patients.

Developed in collaboration with the Institute of Neurosciences at the Red Cross Hospital in Cordoba, the device underwent a pilot pre-test phase with two neurological patients. An observational study was also conducted involving 30 volunteers, including healthy individuals and patients with various neurological disorders, to evaluate the safety, feasibility, acceptability, and potential utility of PACTUS in a broader clinical context.

Preliminary findings suggest that PACTUS is a promising tool for stroke rehabilitation, offering a safe and cost-effective method to ensure accurate upper limb movement.

Feedback from both patients and therapists highlighted areas of improvement and underscored the device's capacity to adapt to different rehabilitation stages, affirming its broad application potential across diverse neurological conditions.

Virtual reality (VR) technology has emerged as a ground-breaking tool in neuroscience, revolutionizing our understanding of neuroplasticity and its implications for neurological rehabilitation. By immersing individuals in simulated environments, VR induces profound neurobiological transformations, affecting neuronal connectivity, sensory feedback mechanisms, motor learning processes, and cognitive functions. These changes highlight the dynamic interplay between molecular events, synaptic adaptations, and neural reorganization, emphasizing the potential of VR as a therapeutic intervention in various neurological disorders. This comprehensive review delves into the therapeutic applications of VR, focusing on its role in addressing multiple conditions such as stroke, traumatic brain injuries, phobias, and post-traumatic stress disorder. It highlights how VR can enhance motor recovery, cognitive rehabilitation, and emotional resilience, showcasing its potential as an innovative and effective tool in neurological rehabilitation. Integrating molecular neuroscience with VR technology allows for a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying neuroplasticity, opening doors to personalized interventions and precise treatment strategies for individuals with neurological impairments. Moreover, the review emphasizes the ethical considerations and challenges that come with implementing VR-based interventions in clinical practice, stressing the importance of data privacy, informed consent, and collaborative interdisciplinary efforts. By leveraging advanced molecular imaging techniques, VR-based research methodologies, and computational modelling, the review envisions a future where VR technology plays a central role in revolutionizing neuroscience research and clinical neurorehabilitation, ultimately providing tailored and impactful solutions for individuals facing neurological challenges.

One of the possible treatment options for patient with cognitive dysfunction is cognitive telerehabilitation. Previous systematic reviews on cognitive telerehabilitation have focused on specific disease groups and the analysis of intervention methods did not differentiate between traditional face-to-face cognition treatment and usual care. In this systematic review, we aim to analyze randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare telerehabilitation with face-to-face treatment or usual care for improving cognitive function in elderly individuals with cognitive dysfunction or patients with acquired brain injury.

We conducted this systematic review following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). In this systematic review, we searched 7 electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, EMbase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, KMbase) to identify relevant studies published through December 10, 2024. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the quality of the studies and synthesize the evidence. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method.

Finally, 16 studies were included in the analysis. For comparing telerehabilitation with face-to-face cognition treatment, the meta-analysis included 2 RCTs for global cognition (immediate outcome), 2 RCTs for attention (immediate outcome), 2 RCTs for visuospatial function (immediate outcome). For comparing telerehabilitation with usual care, the meta-analysis included 7 RCTs for global cognition (immediate outcome), 3 RCTs for global cognition (persistence outcome), 4 RCTs for attention (immediate outcome), 3 RCTs for executive function (immediate outcome), 3 RCTs for working memory (immediate outcome), 3 RCTs for visuospatial function (immediate outcome).

Telerehabilitation has been shown to be more effective than usual care in improving global cognitive function, and its effectiveness is not inferior to that of traditional face-to-face cognitive treatment. By overcoming the limitations of traditional cognition rehabilitation and providing continuous treatment, telerehabilitation can offer effective treatment in specific situations.

We investigated the effect of exercise combined with cognitive dual-task training on the improvement of cognitive function in stroke patients by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of current relevant studies.

Four electronic databases, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase, were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of exercise combined with cognitive dual-task training on cognitive function in patients with stroke that were publicly available from the starting year of the databases to 10 July 2024.

A total of 14 RCTs were included. Statistical results showed that exercise combined with cognitive dual-task training had a small effect size improvement in cognitive function for stroke patients (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI: [0.26, 0.57], p = 0.00). Moreover, persistent effects on cognitive functioning were observed after the end of the intervention (SMD = 0.24, 95% CI: [0.05, 0.43], p = 0.01). Subgroup analyses revealed that working memory, cognitive flexibility, total execution function, and total cognitive function had significant improvements in the cognitive function dimension group. Subgroup analyses of different exercise modalities, intervention periods, and different forms of control revealed significant differences within each subgroup.

Exercise combined with cognitive dual-task training significantly improves cognitive function in stroke patients with favorable sustained effects.

This scoping review aimed to map existing research on adverse events encountered during telerehabilitation delivery, across rehabilitation populations. This includes identifying characteristics of adverse events (frequency/physical/non-physical, relatedness, severity) and examining adverse events by different modes of telerehabilitation delivery and disease states.

Telerehabilitation, a subset of telemedicine, has gained traction during the COVID-19 pandemic for remote service delivery. However, no prior scoping review, systematic review, or meta-analysis has identified and summarized the current primary research on adverse events in telerehabilitation. Understanding adverse events, such as falls during physiotherapy or aspiration pneumonia during speech therapy, is crucial for identifying limitations and optimizing delivery through risk mitigation and quality indicators. This understanding could also help to improve the uptake of telerehabilitation among clinicians and patients. This review addresses this gap by summarizing published literature on adverse events during telerehabilitation.

The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute framework and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. The review protocol was registered and published on Open Science Framework. A comprehensive search across multiple databases (MEDLINE ALL/EMBASE/APA PsycINFO/CENTRAL/CINAHL) was conducted. Screening, extraction, and synthesis were performed in duplicate and independently. Data extraction followed the Template for Intervention Description and Replication framework and also involved extraction on authors, publication year (pre- or post-COVID), population, sample size, and modes of telerehabilitation delivery (asynchronous, synchronous, hybrid). For synthesis, data were summarized quantitatively using numerical counts and qualitatively via content analysis. The data were grouped by intervention type and by type of adverse event.

This scoping review included qualitative and quantitative studies published between 2013-2023, written in English, and conducted in any geographic area. All modes of telerehabilitation delivery were included. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, commentaries, protocols, opinion pieces, conference abstracts, and case series with fewer than five participants were excluded.

The search identified 11,863 references, and 81 studies were included in this review with a total of 3,057 participants (mean age:59.3 years; females:44.6%). Modes of telerehabilitation delivery (whether asynchronous, synchronous or hybrid) used in the studies included videoconferencing (52), phone calls (25), text messaging (4), email (6), mobile apps (10), and internet-based virtual reality systems (3). A total of 295 adverse events occurred during 84,534 sessions (0.3%), with the majority being physical (e.g., falls or musculoskeletal pain), non-serious/non-severe/mild, and unrelated to (i.e., not caused by) to the telerehabilitation provided.

From the 81 included studies, telerehabilitation was delivered with related adverse events being rare, and mostly characterized as mild/non-severe. A comparable occurrence of adverse events (~30%) was found between asynchronous and synchronous telerehabilitation studies. When categorized by disease type, cardiac telerehabilitation studies had the most frequent adverse events. Detailed reporting of telerehabilitation interventions and adverse event characteristics is recommended for future studies (i.e., use of TIDieR reporting guidelines). Telerehabilitation has the potential to make rehabilitation services more accessible to patients; however, more evidence on the safety of telerehabilitation is needed.

Robotic devices are commonly used to quantify sensorimotor function of the upper limb after stroke; however, the availability and cost of such devices make it difficult to facilitate implementation in clinical environments. Tablets (e.g. iPad) can be used as devices to facilitate rehabilitation but are rarely used as assessment tools for the upper limb. The current study aimed to implement a tablet-based Maze Navigation Task to examine complex upper-limb movement in individuals with chronic stroke. We define complex upper-limb movement as reaching movements that require multi-joint coordination in a dynamic environment. We predicted that individuals with stroke would have more significant spatial errors, longer movement times, and slower speeds compared to controls with increasing task complexity. Twenty individuals with chronic stroke who had a variety of arm and hand function (Upper extremity Fugl-Myer 52.8 ± 18.3) and twenty controls navigated eight pseudorandomized mazes on an iPad using a digitizing stylus. The task was designed to elicit reaching movements engaging both the shoulder and elbow joints. Each maze became increasingly complex by increasing the number of 90° turns. We instructed participants to navigate each maze as quickly and accurately as possible while avoiding the maze's boundaries. Sensorimotor behavior was quantified using the following metrics: Error Time (time spent hitting or outside boundaries), Peak Speed, Average Speed, and Movement Time, Number of Speed Peaks. We found that individuals with stroke had significantly greater Error Time for all maze levels (all, p < 0.01), while both speed metrics, Movement Time and Number of Speed Peaks were significantly lower for several levels (all, p < 0.05). As maze complexity increased, the performance of individuals with stroke worsened only for Error Time while control performance remained consistent (p < 0.001). Our results indicate that a complex movement task on a tablet can capture temporal and spatial impairments in individuals with stroke, as well as how task complexity impacts movement quality. This work demonstrates that a tablet is a suitable tool for the assessment of complex movement after stroke and can serve to inform rehabilitation after stroke.

Rehabilitation after stroke is essential to minimize permanent disability. Gamification, the integration of game elements into non-game environments, has emerged as a promising strategy for increasing motivation and rehabilitation effectiveness. This article systematically reviews the gamified devices used in stroke rehabilitation and evaluates their impact on emotional, social, and personal effects on patients, providing a comprehensive view of gamified rehabilitation.

A comprehensive search using the PRISMA 2020 guidelines was conducted using the IEEE Xplore, PubMed, Springer Link, APA PsycInfo, and ScienceDirect databases. Empirical studies published between January 2019 and December 2023 that quantified the effects of gamification in terms of usability, motivation, engagement, and other qualitative patient responses were selected.

In total, 169 studies involving 6404 patients were included. Gamified devices are categorized into four types: robotic/motorized, non-motorized, virtual reality, and neuromuscular electrical stimulation. The results showed that gamified devices not only improved motor and cognitive function but also had a significant positive impact on patients' emotional, social and personal levels. Most studies have reported high levels of patient satisfaction and motivation, highlighting the effectiveness of gamification in stroke rehabilitation.

Gamification in stroke rehabilitation offers significant benefits beyond motor and cognitive recovery by improving patients' emotional and social well-being. This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the most effective gamified technologies and highlights the need for future multidisciplinary research to optimize the design and implementation of gamified solutions in stroke rehabilitation.

Less than 50% of stroke survivors regain their pre-stroke level of upper limb function, compounded with a lack of long-term rehabilitation options available. The Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Programme (GRASP) is an evidence-based upper limb programme delivered as a standalone programme to stroke survivors. To improve access to such a programme, there is the potential to combine it with a high-utility community-based exercise programme, such as the post-rehabilitation enablement programme (PREP). We aimed to establish if this was feasible to deliver alongside the experience of stroke survivors and therapists, identify any refinements the intervention and the acceptability of the intervention and trial procedures.

A cluster feasibility-controlled trial was conducted using both quantitative and qualitative outcome measures with stroke survivors who were discharged from NHS care. Participants completed PREP for 6 weeks (control), with the intervention group also completing GRASP. The GRASP intervention was refined in between five iterative testing cycles. Focus groups with participants explored the acceptability and feasibility. Individual interviews with intervention therapists explored how feasible it was to embed the intervention into practice, and determine the feasibility of a future larger, mixed methods, randomised controlled trial. Clinical endpoints for upper limb and overall function were explored through the Rating of Everyday Arm use in the Community and Home, 10-metre walk test (10MWT) and quality of life via the Shortened Edinburgh Warwick questionnaire. No further suggestions for intervention design were noted after cycle 4.

Recruitment (n=72) and retention levels (84.7%) were high with 61 participants (mean age of 66 years and 49 weeks post-stroke) completing the study. Participants and therapists reported positive acceptability of the intervention with goal setting and family support noted as beneficial. The home exercise programme was noted as challenging. Participants within both groups demonstrated improvements in clinical measures, with the intervention group demonstrating a greater improvement within the Rating of Everyday Arm-use in the Community and Home and the 10MWT.

This study successfully recruited and retained stroke survivors into an upper limb community-based programme. It poses a feasible delivery mechanism to combine evidence-based upper limb approaches with established physical activity programmes in a future large scale and fully powered study.

NCT05090163.

To synthetize the evidence on the effects of hand rehabilitation (RHB) interventions on cognition post-stroke and compare their efficacy.

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched from inception to November 2022.

Randomized controlled trials conducted in adults with stroke where the effects of hand motor interventions on any cognitive domains were assessed.

Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers. A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis (NMA) was applied for measures with enough studies and comparisons. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

Fifteen studies were included in qualitative synthesis, and 11 in NMA. Virtual reality (VR) (n=7), robot-assisted (n=5), or handgrip strength (n=3) training were the experimental interventions and conventional RHB (n=14) control intervention. Two separate NMA were performed with MoCA (n=480 participants) and MMSE (n=350 participants) as outcome measures. Both coincided that the most probable best interventions were robot-assisted and strength training, according to SUCRA and rankogram, followed by conventional RHB and VR training. No significant differences between any of the treatments were found in the MoCA network, but in the MMSE, robot-assisted and strength training were significantly better than conventional RHB and VR. No significant differences between robot-assisted and strength training were found nor between conventional RHB and VR.

Motor interventions can improve MoCA/MMSE scores post-stroke. Most probable best interventions were robot-assisted and strength training. Limited literature assessing domain-specific cognitive effects was found.

In stroke rehabilitation, simple robotic devices hold the potential to increase the training dosage in group therapies and to enable continued therapy at home after hospital discharge. However, we identified a lack of portable and cost-effective devices that not only focus on improving motor functions but also address sensory deficits. Thus, we designed a minimally-actuated hand training device that incorporates active grasping movements and passive pronosupination, complemented by a rehabilitative game with meaningful haptic feedback. Following a human-centered design approach, we conducted a usability study with 13 healthy participants, including three therapists. In a simulated unsupervised environment, the naive participants had to set up and use the device based on written instructions. Our mixed-methods approach included quantitative data from performance metrics, standardized questionnaires, and eye tracking, alongside qualitative feedback from semi-structured interviews. The study results highlighted the device's overall ease of setup and use, as well as its realistic haptic feedback. The eye-tracking analysis further suggested that participants felt safe during usage. Moreover, the study provided crucial insights for future improvements such as a more intuitive and comfortable wrist fixation, more natural pronosupination movements, and easier-to-follow instructions. Our research underscores the importance of continuous testing in the development process and offers significant contributions to the design of user-friendly, unsupervised neurorehabilitation technologies to improve sensorimotor stroke rehabilitation.

To examine the effects of virtual reality-based cognitive interventions on cognitive function and activities of daily living among stroke patients, and to identify the optimal design for such intervention.

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINANL, JBI-EBP and Web of Science from inception to October 2023.

Methodological quality was assessed by Risk of Bias Tool. Meta-analyses were assessed by Review Manager 5.4. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the influence of study design. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was adopted to assess the certainty of evidence.

Twenty-five randomized controlled trials (1178 participants) were included. Virtual reality-based cognitive interventions demonstrated moderate-to-large effects in improving global cognitive function (SMD = 0.43; 95% CI [0.01, 0.85]), executive function (SMD = 0.84; 95% CI [0.25, 1.43]) and memory (SMD = 0.65; 95% CI [0.15, 1.16]) compared to control treatments. No significant effects were found on language, visuospatial ability and activities of daily living. Subgroup analyses indicated one-on-one coaching, individualized design and dynamic difficulty adjustment, and interventions lasting ≥ 6 weeks had particularly enhanced effects, especially for executive function.

Virtual reality-based cognitive interventions improve global cognitive function, executive function and memory among stroke patients.

This review underscores the broad cognitive advantages offered by virtual technology, suggesting its potential integration into standard stroke rehabilitation protocols for enhanced cognitive recovery.

The study identifies key factors in virtual technology interventions that effectively improve cognitive function among stroke patients, offering healthcare providers a framework for leveraging such technology to optimize cognitive outcomes in stroke rehabilitation.

PRISMA 2020 statement.

CRD42022342668.

To identify, map and synthesize the extent and nature of existing studies on the use of home-based digital technology to support post-stroke upper limb rehabilitation.

A comprehensive literature search was completed between 30 May 2022 and 05 April 2023, from seven online databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed, ScienceDirect, IEEExplore, Web of Science and PEDro), Google Scholar and the reference lists of already identified articles.

A scoping review was conducted according to Arksey and O'Malley (2005), and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. All English-language studies reporting on the use of home-based digital technology to support upper limb post-stroke rehabilitation were eligible for inclusion.

The search generated a total of 1895 records, of which 76 articles met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 52 were experimental studies and the rest, qualitative, case series and case studies. Of the overall 2149 participants, 2028 were stroke survivors with upper limb impairment. The majority of studies were aimed at developing, designing and/or assessing the feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of a digital system for poststroke upper limb rehabilitation in home settings. The thematic analysis found six major categories: Tele-rehabilitation (n = 29), games (n = 45), virtual reality (n = 26), sensor (n = 22), mobile technology (n = 22), and robotics (n = 8).

The digital technologies used in post-stroke upper limb rehabilitation were multimodal, and system-based comprising telerehabilitation, gamification, virtual reality, mobile technology, sensors and robotics. Furthermore, future research should focus to determine the effectiveness of these modalities.

There is mounting evidence that regular physical activity is an important prerequisite for healthy cognitive aging. Consequently, the finding that almost one-third of the adult population does not reach the recommended level of regular physical activity calls for further public health actions. In this context, digital and home-based physical training interventions might be a promising alternative to center-based intervention programs. Thus, this systematic review aimed to summarize the current state of the literature on the effects of digital and home-based physical training interventions on adult cognitive performance.

In this pre-registered systematic review (PROSPERO; ID: CRD42022320031), 5 electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, PsycInfo, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library) were searched by 2 independent researchers (FH and PT) to identify eligible studies investigating the effects of digital and home-based physical training interventions on cognitive performance in adults. The systematic literature search yielded 8258 records (extra 17 records from other sources), of which 27 controlled trials were considered relevant. Two reviewers (FH and PT) independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using a modified version of the Tool for the assEssment of Study qualiTy and reporting in EXercise (TESTEX scale).

Of the 27 reviewed studies, 15 reported positive effects on cognitive and motor-cognitive outcomes (i.e., performance improvements in measures of executive functions, working memory, and choice stepping reaction test), and a considerable heterogeneity concerning study-related, population-related, and intervention-related characteristics was noticed. A more detailed analysis suggests that, in particular, interventions using online classes and technology-based exercise devices (i.e., step-based exergames) can improve cognitive performance in healthy older adults. Approximately one-half of the reviewed studies were rated as having a high risk of bias with respect to completion adherence (≤85%) and monitoring of the level of regular physical activity in the control group.

The current state of evidence concerning the effectiveness of digital and home-based physical training interventions is mixed overall, though there is limited evidence that specific types of digital and home-based physical training interventions (e.g., online classes and step-based exergames) can be an effective strategy for improving cognitive performance in older adults. However, due to the limited number of available studies, future high-quality studies are needed to buttress this assumption empirically and to allow for more solid and nuanced conclusions.

To evaluate whether cognitive and motor therapy (CMT) is more effective than no therapy, motor therapy, or cognitive therapy on motor and/or cognitive outcomes after stroke. Additionally, this study evaluates whether effects are lasting and which CMT approach is most effective.

AMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, and PsycINFO databases were searched in October 2022.

Twenty-six studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria: randomized controlled trials published in peer-reviewed journals since 2010 that investigated adults with stroke, delivered CMT, and included at least 1 motor, cognitive, or cognitive-motor outcome. Two CMT approaches exist: CMT dual-task ("classical" dual-task where the secondary cognitive task has a distinct goal) and CMT integrated (where cognitive components of the task are integrated into the motor task).

Data on study design, participant characteristics, interventions, outcome measures (cognitive/motor/cognitive-motor), results and statistical analysis were extracted. Multilevel random effects meta-analysis was conducted.

CMT demonstrated positive effects compared with no therapy on motor outcomes (g=0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10, 0.88) and cognitive-motor outcomes (g=0.29; 95% CI, 0.03, 0.54). CMT showed no significant effects compared with motor therapy on motor, cognitive, and cognitive-motor outcomes. A small positive effect of CMT compared with cognitive therapy on cognitive outcomes (g=0.18; 95% CI, 0.01, 0.36) was found. CMT demonstrated no follow-up effect compared with motor therapy (g=0.07; 95% CI, -0.04, 0.18). Comparison of CMT dual-task and integrated revealed no significant difference for motor (F1,141=0.80; P=.371) or cognitive outcomes (F1,72=0.61, P=.439).

CMT was not superior to monotherapies in improved outcomes after stroke. CMT approaches were equally effective, suggesting that training that enlists a cognitive load per se may benefit outcomes.

To (1) examine the feasibility of combining lower extremity aerobic exercise (AEx) with a virtual reality (VR) upper extremity (UE) rehabilitation intervention and (2) provide an estimate of effect size for the combined intervention on UE function, aerobic capacity, and health-related quality of life.

Single-group feasibility trial.

Research laboratory.

Community-dwelling individuals with mild to moderate impairment of the UE at least 6 months post stroke (N=10; male, n=6; female n=4; mean age, 54 years).

All participants received 18 sessions over a nominal 2-3 sessions per week schedule of a combined AEx and VR-UE rehabilitation intervention. During each session, participants completed 15 minutes of lower extremity AEx followed by playing a VR-UE rehabilitation game for approximately 20 minutes.

Feasibility was evaluated by metrics of adherence, retention, treatment acceptability, data completeness, and adverse events. UE function, aerobic capacity (peak oxygen consumption [Vo2peak]), and quality of life were assessed with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), expired gas exchange analysis, and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS), respectively.

Adherence was 100%, and there were no withdrawals or losses to follow-up to report. Participants completed the intervention in 49±14 days. Cohen's dz effect size calculations indicated the intervention elicited medium effects on FMA-UE (dz =0.50) and SIS memory domain (dz =0.46) and large effects on absolute Vo2peak (dz =1.46), relative Vo2peak (dz =1.21), SIS strength (dz =1.18), and SIS overall recovery domains (dz =0.81).

Combining lower extremity AEx and VR-UE rehabilitation appears feasible in the clinical research setting. Fifteen minutes of lower extremity AEx performed at vigorous intensity appears to elicit clinically meaningful benefits in chronic stroke. Further examination of the combination of lower extremity AEx and VR-UE rehabilitation and its effects on physical function and quality of life is warranted.

Stroke is a highly incapacitating disease that can lead to disabilities due to cognitive impairment, physical, emotional, and social sequelae, and a decrease in the quality of life of those affected. Moreover, it has been suggested that cognitive reserve (patients' higher levels of education or having a skilled occupation), for instance, can promote faster cognitive recovery after a stroke. For this reason, this review aims to identify the cognitive, functional, and behavioral effects of computerized rehabilitation in patients aged 50 years or older who had a stroke, considering cognitive reserve proxies.

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis-PRISMA, and performed the search for peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials without a date restriction on CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were chosen.

We screened 780 papers and found 19 intervention studies, but only 4 met the inclusion criteria and shared data. These studies included computerized tools for motor and cognitive rehabilitation in the experimental groups. In all studies, computerized training was combined with other interventions, such as standard therapy, occupational therapy, and aerobic exercises. There were 104 participants affected by ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, predominantly male (57.69%), and all with cognitive impairment.

Despite a limited number of studies, varied methods and insufficient information available, schooling as a CR proxy combined with high-intensity computerized cognitive training was key to mediating cognitive improvement. The systematic review also identified that the associated ischemic stroke and shorter time of onset for rehabilitation contribute to the cognitive evolution of patients. Findings do not support a greater benefit of computerized cognitive training compared to conventional cognitive therapies.

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=296193], identifier [CRD42022296193].